SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D + Intel Arc A310E

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

85 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
GPU Bottleneck
CPU
95%
VS
GPU
74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D

54,762 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A310E

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D + Intel Arc A310E

This pairing combines a top-tier 12-core desktop processor with a modest entry-level graphics card, creating a fundamentally unbalanced desktop system. The Ryzen 9 9900X3D ranks in the 91st percentile among all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 54,762, while the Intel Arc A310E sits at the 50th percentile among all GPUs with no benchmark scores provided. The combined system percentile is 71, reflecting the CPU's dominance over the GPU in this configuration. No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, so all gaming performance figures are estimates derived from the individual component benchmark scores.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming is limited by the Arc A310E's entry-level positioning. The CPU can feed frames far faster than the GPU can render them — the 9900X3D's single-thread score of 1,269 in 3DMark and 6,739 in Cinebench R23 single-core indicate exceptional per-core performance, but the GPU's 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 4 GB memory capacity will cap frame rates at lower levels. The data suggests the GPU becomes the bottleneck well before the CPU's potential is reached.

Streaming and content creation benefit strongly from the CPU's 12 cores and 24 threads. The 3DMark max-threads score of 13,795 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 47,737 provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming, though the GPU's lack of dedicated encoder specifications in the data means hardware encoding capability remains unverified. The 128 MB L3 cache helps with repetitive workloads common in streaming pipelines.

Video editing workloads show mixed results. Multi-threaded tasks like rendering and exporting will leverage the 12-core/24-thread configuration effectively — the Geekbench multi-core score of 22,884 and PassMark multi-thread score of 56,154 place the CPU well above average. However, real-time preview and GPU-accelerated effects processing will struggle with the Arc A310E's limited 4 GB VRAM and 124.0 GB/s memory bandwidth. The PassMark data compression score of 685,074 suggests strong performance for codec-heavy workflows.

3D rendering is CPU-bound in this pairing, and the 9900X3D delivers accordingly. Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 20,049 and R15 multi-core score of 4,811 demonstrate strong render performance. The GPU's 768 shading units and 6 RT cores provide some acceleration, but the 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is minimal for GPU rendering tasks. The CPU's 4 nm process node and 16,630 million transistors contribute to efficient sustained multi-core operation.

Software development sees excellent CPU performance for compilation and build tasks. PassMark integer math score of 179,727 and extended instructions score of 55,426 indicate strong computational throughput for code compilation. The CPU's 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth and dual-channel DDR5 support help with large codebases. The 91st percentile CPU ranking means developer workloads will rarely be CPU-limited.

Student and office work is overwhelmingly overserved by this CPU. PassMark single-thread score of 4,646 and 3DMark 2-thread score of 2,512 handle word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing with massive headroom. The GPU's 50th percentile ranking is adequate for basic display output and 2D acceleration. The system's 71st combined percentile suggests it exceeds typical student requirements by a wide margin, though the GPU's 4 GB VRAM limits any graphics-intensive academic work.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A310E uses the DG2-128 chip built on TSMC's 6 nm process with 7,200 million transistors across a 157 mm² die. The Xe-HPG architecture implements 768 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, and 16 ROPs, with 6 dedicated RT cores for ray tracing workloads. The GPU operates at a fixed 2000 MHz base and boost clock, producing 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 and 6.144 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1 ratio). Memory configuration consists of 4 GB GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus running at 1937 MHz (15.5 Gbps effective), yielding 124.0 GB/s bandwidth.

The 64-bit memory bus is the primary architectural limitation. With only 4 GB VRAM and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth, the GPU cannot sustain high-resolution textures or complex scenes. The 32.00 GPixel/s pixel rate and 64.00 GTexel/s texture rate are consistent with entry-level positioning. DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 API support means modern graphics features are available, but the hardware resources to utilize them are constrained. The single-slot design, 75 W TDP, and no power connectors make it a low-power option, with a suggested PSU of 250 W. Display output is limited to 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 connectors. The GPU is end-of-life with a successor named Battlemage, and its 50th percentile ranking places it exactly at the midpoint of all GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

The Ryzen 9 9900X3D's CPU benchmarks show strong scaling from 2 to 24 threads. 3DMark scores progress from 2,512 at 2 threads, 4,885 at 4 threads, 9,002 at 8 threads, 12,490 at 16 threads, to 13,795 at max threads. This scaling pattern indicates effective multi-core utilization, though the gains diminish beyond 16 threads. Single-thread performance of 1,269 in 3DMark and 6,739 in Cinebench R23 single-core demonstrate excellent per-core efficiency. Cinebench R15 scores of 679 single-core and 4,811 multi-core, R20 scores of 2,830 single-core and 20,049 multi-core, and R23 multi-core of 47,737 all confirm strong rendering performance. Geekbench scores of 3,041 single-core and 22,884 multi-core, along with PassMark multi-thread of 56,154 and single-thread of 4,646, round out a comprehensive performance picture.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 54,762 places it 0.6% behind the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF (55,093), 1.3% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K (54,053), 2% ahead of the Intel Xeon 6505P (53,701), and 2.1% ahead of the Intel Core i7-14700F (53,620). These nearest rivals show the 9900X3D sits in a tight competitive cluster, with all four processors within 2.7% of each other. The 91st percentile ranking among all CPUs confirms this is a high-end processor.

The Arc A310E has no benchmark scores in the data, making direct GPU performance comparison impossible. Its 50th percentile ranking and zero average benchmark score mean quantitative GPU analysis relies solely on architectural specifications — 768 shading units, 3.072 TFLOPS, and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth. The combined system percentile of 71 reflects the CPU pulling the overall score upward while the GPU sits at the median.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance asymmetry between CPU and GPU is stark. The 9900X3D ranks in the 91st percentile among CPUs, while the Arc A310E ranks in the 50th percentile among GPUs — a 41-percentage-point gap. In CPU-bound workloads like rendering, compilation, and multi-threaded productivity, the CPU operates near its potential. In GPU-bound scenarios like gaming and graphics acceleration, the GPU becomes the limiting factor well before the CPU's capabilities are exhausted.

The CPU's 12 cores and 24 threads provide far more compute throughput than the GPU can feed. With 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 124.0 GB/s memory bandwidth, the GPU's rendering capacity is roughly an order of magnitude below what the CPU's 47,737 Cinebench R23 multi-core score suggests the system could support. The 128 MB L3 cache on the CPU is designed for gaming workloads, but the GPU cannot take advantage of this cache directly — it must be fed through the PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface.

Frame rate scaling in gaming will show the GPU as the hard ceiling. The CPU can calculate game logic, physics, and AI at high rates, but the GPU's 32 ROPs and 16.00 GPixel/s pixel rate limit final output resolution and quality. The 4 GB VRAM will also cause texture streaming bottlenecks at higher settings. In productivity workloads, the bottleneck shifts to the CPU for single-threaded tasks, though multi-threaded tasks will scale well. The 75 W GPU TDP versus 120 W CPU TDP shows the power distribution is similarly lopsided.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows, so all gaming figures are estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores and architectural specifications. The CPU's 91st percentile ranking and high single-thread scores (1,269 in 3DMark, 6,739 in Cinebench R23) indicate it can handle high-refresh gaming workloads in principle, but the GPU's 50th percentile ranking and entry-level specifications determine actual frame rates.

The Arc A310E's 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 4 GB GDDR6 memory with 124.0 GB/s bandwidth suggest playable frame rates at 1080p with reduced settings in less demanding titles. The 64-bit memory bus will cause significant performance drops in bandwidth-sensitive games. The 6 RT cores provide ray tracing capability, but with only 3.072 TFLOPS of compute, ray-traced scenes will see substantial frame rate reductions. The 32.00 GPixel/s pixel rate limits fill-rate-heavy scenarios.

For competitive esports titles at 1080p with low settings, the GPU may achieve playable frame rates, though the CPU would be underutilized. For modern AAA games at 1080p ultra settings, the 4 GB VRAM and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth will be severe limitations, likely resulting in texture pop-in and reduced quality settings. At 1440p or 4K, the GPU's 16 ROPs and 64-bit bus make smooth performance unlikely. The data supports classifying this as a 1080p entry-level gaming configuration where CPU headroom far exceeds GPU capability.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who need exceptional CPU performance but have minimal GPU requirements. Software developers compiling large codebases will benefit from the 12-core/24-thread configuration and 47,737 Cinebench R23 multi-core score. Students and office workers performing document processing, spreadsheet analysis, and web browsing will find the 4,646 PassMark single-thread score more than sufficient, though the GPU is overkill for these tasks.

Content creators working primarily in CPU-bound workflows like audio processing, data analysis, and server-style workloads will appreciate the 685,074 PassMark data compression score and 179,727 integer math score. The 128 MB L3 cache and 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth support large datasets and complex computations. The 4 nm process node and 120 W TDP make it relatively power-efficient for sustained workloads.

Small business workstations running virtualization, database management, or scientific computing will find the 22,884 Geekbench multi-core score and 56,154 PassMark multi-thread score compelling. The CPU's 24 threads enable concurrent task handling. However, anyone needing gaming performance, GPU-accelerated rendering, or machine learning workloads should look elsewhere — the Arc A310E's 3.072 TFLOPS and 4 GB VRAM are entry-level at best. This pairing is best suited for CPU-centric users who need basic display output and occasional light graphics acceleration.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D is a 12-core, 24-thread desktop processor from the 9000 series, built on Zen 5 architecture with the Granite Ridge codename. It uses TSMC's 4 nm process node with 16,630 million transistors across a dual-die design (2x 70.6 mm²). Base clock is 4.40 GHz with a 5.50 GHz boost clock, and the multiplier is unlocked for overclocking. The 120 W TDP is modest for a 12-core part, indicating efficient power management.

Cache configuration includes 80 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 128 MB L3 total. The large L3 cache is notable for gaming and data-intensive workloads. Memory support includes dual-channel DDR5 with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth and ECC support. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes and includes integrated Radeon Graphics. It uses AMD Socket AM5 and was released on January 5, 2025 with a launch MSRP of $599. Production status is Active, and the part number is 100-000001368.

Benchmark results show strong single-thread and multi-thread performance. The 3DMark single-thread score of 1,269 and Cinebench R23 single-core of 6,739 indicate excellent per-core efficiency. Multi-thread scaling from 3DMark 16-threads (12,490) to max-threads (13,795) shows good but not perfect scaling, suggesting some multi-thread overhead. PassMark tests show specialized strengths: floating-point math at 119,622, integer math at 179,727, extended instructions at 55,426, and data compression at 685,074. The 91st percentile ranking confirms this is a top-tier CPU.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D has 12 cores and 24 threads.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The average benchmark score of 54,762 puts it 0.6% behind the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF (55,093), 1.3% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K (54,053), 2% ahead of the Intel Xeon 6505P (53,701), and 2.1% ahead of the Intel Core i7-14700F (53,620).

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The Intel Arc A310E has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus with 124.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What is the GPU's ray tracing capability?

A: The Arc A310E has 6 RT cores, but with only 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 throughput, ray tracing performance will be limited.

Q: What is the CPU's memory bandwidth?

A: The Ryzen 9 9900X3D supports dual-channel DDR5 with 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth and ECC support.

Q: What is the system's overall performance percentile?

A: The combined system percentile is 71, with the CPU at 91st percentile and GPU at 50th percentile.

Q: What socket does the CPU use?

A: The Ryzen 9 9900X3D uses AMD Socket AM5 and supports PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build pairing the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D processor with the Intel Arc A310E graphics card. The CPU represents the high end of AMD's 9000 series with 12 cores, 24 threads, and a 91st percentile ranking among all CPUs. The GPU represents an entry-level Alchemist-generation Arc 3 part with a 50th percentile ranking. The combined system percentile of 71 reflects the CPU's strong pull on the overall score.

The pairing is fundamentally mismatched for graphics-intensive workloads. The CPU's 47,737 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and 22,884 Geekbench multi-core score indicate high-end processing capability, while the GPU's 3.072 TFLOPS and 4 GB VRAM place it at the entry level. For CPU-bound tasks like compilation, rendering, and data processing, this system performs at a high level. For gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads, the GPU severely limits overall system performance. The 75 W GPU TDP and 120 W CPU TDP show a combined power draw that is modest for a desktop system.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 9 9900X3D uses AMD Socket AM5, which supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth and ECC capability. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes, offering substantial bandwidth for future expansion. The 120 W TDP and unlocked multiplier allow for overclocking headroom within a reasonable power envelope.

The Intel Arc A310E uses PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface and has a 75 W TDP with a suggested PSU of 250 W. The single-slot design and lack of power connectors make it easy to replace. The GPU is end-of-life with a successor named Battlemage, indicating that an upgrade within the Arc family is the natural path. The 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 outputs support multi-monitor configurations.

The most sensible upgrade path is replacing the Arc A310E with a more capable GPU. The CPU's 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes and 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth can support significantly more powerful graphics cards. The 250 W suggested PSU for the current GPU leaves substantial headroom for a higher-TDP replacement. With the CPU at 91st percentile and the GPU at 50th percentile, upgrading the GPU would bring system balance closer to the CPU's performance level. The AM5 platform's DDR5 support and PCIe Gen 5 connectivity ensure the CPU will not be a bottleneck for future GPU upgrades.