SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D + Intel Arc A310

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

95%

GPU

85%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D

54,762 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A310

7,550 Benchmark Score

Top 15% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D paired with the Intel Arc A310 is a study in extremes: a top-tier 12-core desktop processor built for heavy multitasking and high-end productivity, paired with an entry-level, low-power graphics card designed primarily for basic display output and light acceleration. Benchmark data confirms this pairing is entirely CPU-bound in any 3D workload, making it a specialized configuration for users who prioritize processor performance above all else and do not require modern gaming capability. The data shows this is a desktop build with a combined percentile of 66, indicating it sits above the median system, though the GPU drags the overall experience down significantly from what the CPU alone could achieve.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D is a 12-core, 24-thread processor from the 9000 series, built on the Zen 5 architecture with the Granite Ridge codename. It is manufactured on a 4 nm process by TSMC, featuring 16,630 million transistors across a dual-chiplet design with a combined die size of 2x 70.6 mm². Operating at a base clock of 4.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, this chip has a 120 W TDP and supports DDR5 memory via a dual-channel bus, delivering 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth. It also supports ECC memory and connects to the system via PCIe Gen 5 with 24 CPU lanes.

The benchmark scores reveal a processor that excels in both single-threaded and heavily threaded tasks. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 47,737 in multi-core and 6,739 in single-core, placing it in the 91st percentile among all CPUs. The Geekbench results echo this: 22,884 multi-core and 3,041 single-core. The 3DMark thread tests show strong scaling, with scores rising from 2,512 at 2 threads to 13,795 at max threads, indicating that the 12-core design effectively utilizes additional threads without significant scaling penalties. PassMark results are equally robust, with a multi-thread score of 56,154 and a single-thread score of 4,646.

The nearest rivals in the benchmark database are the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF (avg score 55,093, delta -0.6%), the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K (avg score 54,053, delta 1.3%), the Intel Xeon 6505P (avg score 53,701, delta 2%), and the Intel Core i7-14700F (avg score 53,620, delta 2.1%). The Ryzen 9 9900X3D has an average benchmark score of 54,762, putting it essentially on par with the Core Ultra 5 245KF — just 0.6% behind — while leading the i7-14700F by 2.1%. This indicates the 9900X3D is competitive with mid-range Intel offerings in aggregate performance, despite having a higher core count. The data suggests that for real-world workloads like video encoding, compiling code, or 3D rendering, the 9900X3D will deliver performance comparable to those Intel chips, with the 128 MB L3 cache providing a potential edge in cache-sensitive applications.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 54,762, placing it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs. This is a strong result, confirming it as a high-end desktop processor. In contrast, the Intel Arc A310 GPU has an average benchmark score of 7,550, placing it in the 40th percentile of all GPUs. This is a low-tier result, typical of an entry-level card. The combined percentile for this pairing is 66, which reflects the CPU’s high performance dominating the overall system percentile, while the GPU pulls it down from what a top-tier CPU alone would suggest.

Looking at specific GPU benchmarks, the Arc A310 scores 30,607 in Geekbench OpenCL and 28,964 in Geekbench Vulkan, which are modest figures. In PassMark, the GPU scores 5,433 in G3D and 2,157 in compute, with DirectX 12 performance at 29 and DirectX 11 at 33. The nearest GPU rivals include the AMD Radeon R7 250 (avg 7,557, delta -0.1%), the AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 (avg 7,580, delta -0.4%), the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (avg 7,472, delta 1%), and the AMD Radeon HD 8850M (avg 7,447, delta 1.4%). The Arc A310 is essentially tied with these older or lower-end cards, performing within 1% of the GTX 1650. The combined picture is clear: the CPU is a top-10% performer, while the GPU is a bottom-half performer, creating a massive imbalance in compute capability.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The data shows this is not a viable configuration for high-refresh gaming. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 5,433 and its 40th percentile ranking place it far below the level needed to drive modern titles at high frame rates. The CPU’s strong single-thread score of 6,739 in Cinebench R23 is irrelevant when the GPU cannot render frames fast enough. High-refresh gaming is unsupported by the data.

Streaming: The CPU can handle the encoding workload for streaming, given its multi-thread score of 47,737 in Cinebench R23. However, the GPU lacks the performance to run games at playable settings while streaming simultaneously. The 3DMark max-thread score of 13,795 suggests the CPU has headroom, but the GPU’s DirectX 12 score of 29 indicates it will bottleneck any gaming scenario. Streaming is possible for CPU-intensive tasks, but not for gaming.

Video Editing: The CPU is well-suited for video editing, with a PassMark multi-thread score of 56,154 and a data compression score of 685,074. These scores indicate strong performance in encoding and processing video files. The GPU’s low compute score of 2,157 means it will not accelerate rendering or effects significantly. Video editing will rely almost entirely on the CPU, which is capable, but the GPU offers little assistance.

3D Rendering: The CPU excels here, with a Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 20,049 and a PassMark floating-point math score of 119,622. These scores indicate that CPU-based rendering will be fast. The GPU’s FP32 performance of 2.688 TFLOPS is far too low for GPU-accelerated rendering, so any renderer that cannot use the CPU fully will be severely limited. The data suggests that CPU rendering is the only viable path.

Software Development: The CPU’s 12 cores and 24 threads, combined with a PassMark integer math score of 179,727, make it excellent for compiling code and running virtual machines. The 128 MB L3 cache and 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth support large codebases. The GPU is irrelevant for most development tasks, so this pairing is workable for programmers.

Student and Office Work: For basic productivity, this pairing is overkill on the CPU side and adequate on the GPU side. The CPU’s single-thread score of 4,646 in PassMark ensures snappy responsiveness in office applications. The GPU’s G2D score of 625 is sufficient for 2D desktop workloads and video playback. Students and office workers will experience no performance issues, but the cost of the CPU is disproportionate to the tasks.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a severe bottleneck, with the GPU being the limiting factor in any graphics-related workload. The CPU’s 91st percentile ranking versus the GPU’s 40th percentile ranking means the CPU is vastly more powerful. In gaming, the GPU will be at 100% utilization while the CPU idles, as evidenced by the GPU’s low DirectX scores (29-33) and the CPU’s high 3DMark scores. The CPU’s max-thread score of 13,795 suggests it can handle far more graphics work than the GPU can deliver.

In CPU-bound tasks like rendering or compiling, the bottleneck flips: the CPU is the workhorse, and the GPU has no impact. The combined percentile of 66 reflects this imbalance — the system performs well in CPU tasks but poorly in GPU tasks. The FPS scaling for this pairing is non-existent in the data, as no measured FPS rows exist. The only way to balance this system would be to pair the CPU with a significantly more powerful GPU, but that is not the configuration under analysis. The data indicates that for any workload involving 3D graphics, the Arc A310 is the sole and absolute bottleneck.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the FACT PACK. The dataIsMeasured field is false, so all frame rate figures are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 5,433 and its 40th percentile ranking suggest that gaming performance will be very low, comparable to the AMD Radeon R7 250 or the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650, which are near its rival scores. At 1080p with ultra settings, the Arc A310’s 4 GB VRAM and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth will be insufficient for modern titles, and the DirectX 12 score of 29 indicates that even older games will struggle. Estimated frame rates in modern AAA games would likely be below 30 FPS at 1080p low settings. E-sports titles like CS:GO or League of Legends might achieve 60 FPS at 1080p low, given the CPU’s strong single-thread performance, but the GPU will still cap the frame rate. The data supports a conclusion that this is not a gaming GPU, and any FPS expectations should be very conservative.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who need extreme CPU performance for non-graphics tasks and do not require a discrete GPU for 3D work. Software developers will benefit from the 12-core, 24-thread configuration and the PassMark integer math score of 179,727, which accelerates compilation and testing. Students and office workers in technical fields who run simulations or heavy data analysis will find the CPU’s multi-thread score of 56,154 in PassMark sufficient for their workloads. Small business workstations that rely on CPU-bound applications like database management or financial modeling will see strong performance, as indicated by the PassMark data encryption score of 33,282 and the random string sorting score of 71,864. Content creators who work primarily in CPU-based rendering or video encoding, where the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 47,737 is critical, can use this build effectively. However, anyone expecting to play games or use GPU-accelerated applications should not choose this pairing, as the GPU’s 40th percentile ranking will severely limit those tasks.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A310 is an entry-level GPU from the Alchemist generation, based on the Xe-HPG architecture and the DG2-128 chip. It is manufactured on a 6 nm process by TSMC, with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. The GPU has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing 124.0 GB/s of bandwidth. It operates at a base and boost clock of 1750 MHz, with memory clocked at 1937 MHz (15.5 Gbps effective). The GPU features 768 shading units, 32 TMUs, 16 ROPs, and 6 ray tracing cores. Its compute capabilities are modest: 2.688 TFLOPS FP32 and 5.376 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1). The card is single-slot, has a 30 W TDP, and requires no power connectors, with a suggested PSU of 200 W.

The benchmark scores for the Arc A310 place it in the 40th percentile of all GPUs. The PassMark G3D score of 5,433 and the compute score of 2,157 indicate that this is not a card for rendering or compute-heavy tasks. Its nearest rivals are older cards like the Radeon R7 250 and the GTX 1650, both of which are also low-end. For rendering, the GPU’s low FP32 throughput means that any GPU-accelerated renderer will be slow. The ray tracing cores are present (6 cores), but the overall performance is too low for modern RT workloads. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, but its passmark DirectX 12 score of 29 shows it struggles with the API. The data shows this GPU is only suitable for basic display output, video playback, and light 2D acceleration. It is not a gaming or rendering card.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s benchmark percentile?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D is in the 91st percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 54,762.

Q: What is the GPU’s benchmark percentile?

A: The Intel Arc A310 is in the 40th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 7,550.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF?

A: The Ryzen 9 9900X3D has an average score of 54,762, which is 0.6% lower than the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF's average score of 55,093.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650?

A: The Arc A310 has an average score of 7,550, which is 1% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650's average score of 7,472.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the GPU?

A: The Intel Arc A310 has a memory bandwidth of 124.0 GB/s, using 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock speed?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D has a boost clock of 5.50 GHz and a base clock of 4.40 GHz.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this build?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all frame rate discussions are estimates from benchmark scores.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D with the Intel Arc A310. The CPU is a high-end 12-core, 24-thread processor with a 91st percentile ranking, while the GPU is an entry-level, 30 W card with a 40th percentile ranking. The combined percentile for this system is 66, which places it above the median but reflects the vast performance gap between the two components. The CPU is a top-tier performer for productivity and compute tasks, as shown by its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 47,737 and Geekbench multi-core score of 22,884. The GPU, with its PassMark G3D score of 5,433, is only suitable for basic display output and cannot handle modern gaming or GPU-accelerated workloads. This pairing is a workstation-oriented configuration for users who need maximum CPU power and have no need for discrete graphics performance, making it a specialized build for developers, researchers, and CPU-bound content creators.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D + Intel Arc A310

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D

Intel Arc A310

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Usage Scenarios

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

FAQ

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds