SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 9900X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

96 Score

Top 4% Ranking

96 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

95%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 9900X

57,498 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

60,347 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This pairing brings together AMD’s 12-core Zen 5 flagship with NVIDIA’s top-tier Ada Lovelace GPU, creating a desktop system that sits at the 90th combined percentile. The data shows a configuration aimed at high-refresh 1440p gaming and serious content creation, though the numbers also reveal where each component’s strengths and limits lie.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 is built on the AD102 chip using a 5 nm process at TSMC, packing 76,300 million transistors into a 609 mm² die. The GPU’s memory subsystem is a defining feature: 24 GB of GDDR6X on a 384-bit bus delivers 1.01 TB/s of bandwidth, a figure that explains why 4K texture-heavy workloads remain fluid. The base clock sits at 2235 MHz with a boost of 2520 MHz, while the memory runs at 1313 MHz (21 Gbps effective). This is a triple-slot card requiring a single 16-pin connector, with dimensions of 304 mm in length, 137 mm in height, and 61 mm in width.

Compute resources are substantial. The GPU includes 16,384 shading units, 512 TMUs, and 176 ROPs. Ray tracing hardware comprises 128 RT cores, while 512 tensor cores handle AI-accelerated workloads. Pixel rate is 443.5 GPixel/s, texture rate is 1,290.2 GTexel/s, and FP32 performance reaches 82.58 TFLOPS, with FP16 matching that at a 1:1 ratio. These specifications translate into benchmark scores that place the GPU at the 88th percentile among all GPUs. The PassMark G3D score of 38,194 and Geekbench Vulkan score of 271,631 indicate strong rasterization and compute capabilities. For rendering, the 1.01 TB/s bandwidth and 24 GB capacity mean large scenes and high-resolution textures are less likely to hit memory ceilings, while the 128 RT cores provide dedicated hardware for ray-traced effects. The 512 tensor cores also enable DLSS-style upscaling, though the data does not specify frame generation performance.

The GPU’s nearest rivals in the database are the Intel Arc Pro A60 (avg score 60,326, delta 0%), AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 (60,140, +0.3%), and AMD Radeon PRO V710 (58,657, +2.9%). The RTX 4090’s average benchmark score of 60,347 sits essentially level with these workstation-class cards, but the gaming-oriented metrics like PassMark G3D and the measured FPS data show its real-world advantage in that domain.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame

The data for this build is measured, not estimated, providing concrete FPS figures at three resolutions across a wide game library. At 1920x1080, the system delivers extremely high frame rates across most titles. Counter-Strike: Global Offensive hits 792.3 FPS, Valorant reaches 587 FPS, and Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege runs at 427 FPS. Even demanding titles perform well: Cyberpunk 2077 averages 106 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 hits 98.5 FPS, and Starfield’s competitor Ark: Survival Ascended manages 53.5 FPS.

Moving to 2560x1440, the picture remains strong but shows the expected scaling. Valorant still runs at 556.4 FPS, CS:GO at 548.1 FPS, and Rainbow Six Siege at 280 FPS. Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 79 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 to 69.6 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended falls to 32.9 FPS. The 1440p results indicate that most competitive titles stay well above 144 Hz, while AAA games hover around 60-80 FPS.

At 3840x2160, the RTX 4090’s memory bandwidth becomes critical. Valorant still manages 513.8 FPS, CS:GO 326.1 FPS, and Rainbow Six Siege 154 FPS. However, heavier titles show significant drops: Cyberpunk 2077 averages 52 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 is at 46 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended falls to 19.5 FPS. Call of Duty: Warzone remains playable at 136.2 FPS, and Control runs at 76 FPS. The average FPS across all games is 228.2, which ranks this pair 45th out of 3,732 tested configurations. That ranking reflects the high refresh rates achievable at 1080p and 1440p, while 4K performance is strong but not universally above 60 FPS for the most demanding titles.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X is a 12-core, 24-thread processor from the 9000 series, built on the Zen 5 architecture (Granite Ridge). It uses a 4 nm process at TSMC with 16,630 million transistors across a dual-chiplet design (2x 70.6 mm²). Base clock is 4.40 GHz with a boost of 5.60 GHz, and the TDP is rated at 120 W. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 64 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support covers DDR5 with a dual-channel bus, providing 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth, and ECC memory is supported. The CPU connects via PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes, and includes integrated Radeon Graphics.

Benchmark results show a strong all-rounder. Cinebench R23 multicore scores 32,172, while single-core hits 2,253. Geekbench multicore is 22,174 with single-core at 3,010. PassMark multithread scores 54,643, and single-thread 4,672. The 3DMark tests scale predictably: 12,552 with 16 threads, 9,114 with 8 threads, 4,886 with 4 threads, 2,519 with 2 threads, and 1,286 single-thread. These numbers place the CPU at the 92nd percentile among all processors, with an average benchmark score of 57,498.

Real workload interpretation: the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 32,172 indicates strong multi-threaded rendering performance, suitable for video encoding, 3D rendering, and compilation tasks. The single-core score of 2,253 suggests excellent responsiveness in lightly-threaded applications like web browsing and office work. PassMark data encryption (33,421) and compression (683,579) scores reflect solid data-handling capabilities, while floating-point math (120,083) and integer math (181,056) scores point to strong computational throughput for scientific and financial workloads. The closest rival is the AMD EPYC 9015 (avg score 57,555, delta -0.1%), meaning the 9900X trades blows with a server chip. The Intel Core i9-14900 is 1.1% ahead, while the Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M is 1.4% ahead.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

This build uses the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16. This combination means the motherboard must support both standards, and current AM5 boards offer that flexibility. The CPU’s TDP is 120 W, while the GPU’s TDP is 450 W, and the suggested PSU for the GPU is 850 W. That figure represents the recommended headroom for the graphics card alone; the full system draw would be higher, but the data provides no exact total.

A sensible next upgrade would focus on the GPU, since the RTX 4090 is marked as end-of-life with a successor (GeForce 50) already listed. The CPU, by contrast, is still in active production and released in August 2024, meaning it has a longer expected lifespan on the platform. Because the CPU is unlocked (multiplier unlocked), overclocking remains an option to extend its useful life without a platform change. Memory capacity could also be increased, given DDR5 support, though the data does not specify maximum capacity. The platform’s PCIe Gen 5 lanes offer bandwidth headroom for future storage devices, while the GPU’s PCIe 4.0 interface is not a bottleneck given current game requirements.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined percentile rank of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The build sits at the 90th combined percentile, indicating it outperforms the vast majority of tested configurations.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival in average benchmark score?

A: The AMD EPYC 9015 has an average score of 57,555, which is 0.1% lower than the Ryzen 9 9900X’s 57,498, making them effectively tied.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth and capacity?

A: The RTX 4090 has 24 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus, delivering 1.01 TB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Is the gaming data measured or estimated?

A: The data is measured, with actual FPS figures recorded across 54 games at three resolutions.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock and TDP?

A: The Ryzen 9 9900X boosts to 5.60 GHz with a base clock of 4.40 GHz, and has a TDP of 120 W.

Q: What is the GPU’s production status?

A: The RTX 4090 is listed as end-of-life, with a successor (GeForce 50) already announced.

Q: What is the suggested PSU wattage for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU is 850 W, based on the GPU’s 450 W TDP.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied to measured performance

The measured FPS data points to several clear user profiles. Competitive gamers at 1080p and 1440p will find exceptional performance: CS:GO at 792.3 FPS (1080p) and 548.1 FPS (1440p), Valorant at 587 FPS (1080p) and 556.4 FPS (1440p), and Rainbow Six Siege at 427 FPS (1080p) and 280 FPS (1440p) all exceed the refresh rates of the fastest monitors. At 4K, these esports titles still run above 150 FPS, making this viable for high-refresh 4K esports setups.

For AAA gamers at 1440p, the system delivers 60-80 FPS in most demanding titles: Cyberpunk 2077 at 79 FPS, Control at 113 FPS, and Microsoft Flight Simulator at 106.5 FPS. At 4K, the experience becomes more varied: Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 52 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 46 FPS, but Call of Duty: Warzone hits 136.2 FPS and Fortnite reaches 58 FPS. Users who prioritize 4K ultra settings in the heaviest titles may need to adjust settings, but those targeting 4K in less demanding games will be satisfied.

Content creators benefit from the CPU’s 12 cores and 24 threads. Cinebench R23 multicore score of 32,172 supports video rendering, while the PassMark multithread score of 54,643 aids compilation and batch processing. The GPU’s 24 GB VRAM and 1.01 TB/s bandwidth handle large 3D scenes and high-resolution video editing. The ECC memory support on the CPU also appeals to professionals who need data integrity in long compute jobs.

Students and small business workstation users will find the single-core performance (Geekbench single-core 3,010) sufficient for everyday tasks, while the multi-core headroom covers occasional rendering or simulation work. The integrated Radeon Graphics on the CPU provides a fallback display output if the discrete GPU is removed, though the data does not specify its performance level.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 57,498, placing it at the 92nd percentile. Its nearest rival, the AMD EPYC 9015, scores 57,555 (0.1% higher), while the Intel Core i9-14900 is 1.1% higher at 58,115. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 60,347, at the 88th percentile, with the nearest rival being the Intel Arc Pro A60 at 60,326 (0% difference). The combined percentile is 90, reflecting a system that is slightly stronger on the CPU side than the GPU side relative to their respective pools.

Looking at specific CPU benchmarks: Cinebench R23 multicore 32,172 and single-core 2,253. Geekbench multicore 22,174 and single-core 3,010. PassMark multithread 54,643 and single-thread 4,672. The 3DMark scaling from 1,286 (single-thread) to 13,929 (max threads) shows good multi-threading efficiency, with a roughly 10.8x improvement from single to max threads on a 12-core/24-thread chip.

For the GPU: 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 scores 9,223, Geekbench OpenCL 255,416, Vulkan 271,631, and PassMark G3D 38,194. The PassMark DirectX scores are notably lower (DX9 397, DX10 224, DX11 326, DX12 150), which likely reflects the specific workload nature of those tests rather than general gaming performance, given the measured FPS data shows strong results.

The combined picture is a system where the CPU outperforms 92% of all CPUs and the GPU outperforms 88% of all GPUs. The pair’s FPS rank of 45 out of 3,732 pairs, with an average FPS of 228.2, confirms that this configuration excels in gaming scenarios that favor high frame rates, while the CPU’s multi-threaded scores make it equally capable for productivity tasks.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class, and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a desktop-class build combining the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X (12-core, 24-thread, Zen 5) with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 (AD102, Ada Lovelace). The CPU is a mainstream desktop processor on the AM5 socket, while the GPU is a triple-slot, 304 mm long add-in card requiring a 16-pin power connector and an 850 W suggested PSU. The combined percentile of 90 places this in the upper tier of tested configurations, though it is not at the absolute top (the 92nd percentile CPU and 88th percentile GPU average out to 90th combined).

The pairing represents a high-end desktop build from 2024, with the CPU released in August 2024 at a launch MSRP of $499, and the GPU released in September 2022 at a launch MSRP of 1,599 USD. The GPU is end-of-life with a successor (GeForce 50) listed, while the CPU remains active. This suggests the build is at a transition point: the CPU has a longer expected relevance on the AM5 platform, while the GPU, though still powerful, is nearing the end of its product cycle.

The system’s class is clearly desktop, with no laptop or mobile components. The CPU’s TDP of 120 W and GPU’s 450 W TDP are typical for a full desktop setup, and the dimensions (304 mm GPU length) require a case with sufficient clearance. The 90th combined percentile indicates this is a top-decile system, suitable for enthusiasts and professionals who demand high performance across both gaming and compute workloads.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The balance between CPU and GPU varies significantly by workload. In gaming, the data shows that the GPU is often the limiting factor at higher resolutions. At 1080p, many games run at frame rates exceeding 200 FPS (CS:GO 792.3, Valorant 587, Minecraft 354), which suggests the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU at lower resolutions. At 1440p, frame rates drop (Cyberpunk 2077 from 106 to 79 FPS), indicating the GPU is becoming the constraint. At 4K, the drop is more pronounced (Cyberpunk 2077 to 52 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 to 46 FPS), confirming that the RTX 4090’s rasterization performance is the primary limit in demanding titles, not the CPU.

However, there are exceptions where the CPU may be the bottleneck. Ark: Survival Ascended at 1080p runs at 53.5 FPS, which is unusually low compared to other titles, suggesting a CPU-bound scenario in that specific game. Similarly, The Medium at 1080p is 75 FPS, and Revolution Idle at 119.6 FPS, both lower than the average. These titles likely have heavy single-threaded or poorly optimized code that limits the 9900X despite its strong single-core score of 2,253 in Cinebench R23.

In productivity workloads, the CPU’s 92nd percentile vs the GPU’s 88th percentile suggests the CPU is slightly more capable relative to its peers. The CPU’s multicore scores (Cinebench R23 32,172, PassMark multithread 54,643) indicate it can handle sustained multi-threaded tasks, while the GPU’s compute scores (Geekbench OpenCL 255,416, PassMark GPU compute 26,613) show strong but not class-leading performance. For rendering tasks that use both, the GPU’s 24 GB VRAM and 1.01 TB/s bandwidth may be the constraint for very large scenes, but for most workloads, the CPU and GPU complement each other without a clear single bottleneck.

The FPS scaling from 1080p to 4K provides the clearest evidence: average FPS drops from 228.2 across all games, but specific titles show the GPU’s limits. Valorant scales from 587 to 513.8 FPS (a 12.5% drop), while Cyberpunk 2077 scales from 106 to 52 FPS (a 51% drop). The former is CPU-limited even at 4K, while the latter is clearly GPU-limited. This indicates that for esports titles, the CPU is the bottleneck even at 4K, but for AAA games, the GPU becomes the limiting factor as resolution increases. Users seeking higher 4K performance in AAA games would need to upgrade the GPU (to the successor GeForce 50 series), while those focused on high-refresh esports at 1080p might benefit more from a CPU with higher single-thread performance, though the 9900X’s 92nd percentile rank suggests little headroom exists.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 9900X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 9900X

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Minecraft: Java Edition

Minecraft

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

FAQ

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied to measured performance

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class, and overall tier from the percentiles

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds