SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 9900X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

85 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
GPU Bottleneck
CPU
95%
VS
GPU
74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 9900X

57,498 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# GPU Analysis — VRAM, Bandwidth, Clocks, RT/Tensor Hardware, and Rendering Implications

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM sits at the 50th percentile among all GPUs in the benchmark database, placing it firmly in the mid-range tier of the overall performance distribution. Built on the Ampere architecture with an 8 nm process from Samsung, this card packs 5,888 shading units, 184 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output units. The GA104 chip contains 17,400 million transistors across a 392 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 44.4 million per square millimeter.

Memory configuration is a defining characteristic of this GPU. The 8 GB of GDDR6 memory runs across a 256-bit bus, producing a memory bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. For 1080p and 1440p gaming, this capacity is generally sufficient, but the data shows that higher-resolution textures and increasingly demanding modern titles can strain an 8 GB frame buffer. The memory clock runs at 1750 MHz, or 14 Gbps effective, which is competitive for the class but not exceptional.

Clock speeds are notable for their conservatism. The base clock is 915 MHz, boosting to 1410 MHz. This relatively modest boost clock is a deliberate trade-off, as the card draws a 220 W TDP and requires a 550 W suggested power supply. The pixel rate of 135.4 GPixel/s and texture rate of 259.4 GTexel/s indicate that the card can handle high-resolution rasterization workloads, though the fill rates are not class-leading.

Ray tracing and tensor hardware are present in the form of 46 RT cores and 184 tensor cores. These enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing and DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) capabilities. The FP32 performance of 16.60 TFLOPS, with FP16 at a 1:1 ratio of 16.60 TFLOPS, suggests that the card is capable in compute-heavy scenarios, though it is not a professional-grade compute accelerator. The DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) support, alongside OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4, ensures broad API compatibility for modern games and applications.

For rendering workloads, the 50th percentile ranking means this GPU sits at the median of all GPUs. In practical terms, this translates to solid 1080p and capable 1440p gaming, with 4K gaming possible at reduced settings. The 8 GB VRAM is the primary constraint for 4K texture-heavy workloads, as the bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s is adequate but not abundant. The triple-slot cooler and 270 mm length (10.6 inches) with a height of 140 mm (5.5 inches) and width of 55 mm (2.2 inches) mean case compatibility requires planning, especially in smaller form factors. The single 8-pin power connector simplifies installation, and the PCIe 4.0 x16 interface is backward compatible with older slots.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU benchmarks for the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X are extensive and reveal a processor that excels in both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. The average benchmark score is 57,498, placing it at the 92nd percentile among all CPUs. This is a strong result, and the nearest rivals confirm the competitive positioning. The AMD EPYC 9015 scores 57,555, a delta of -0.1% from the 9900X, meaning the two are essentially tied. The AMD EPYC 7313 scores 57,399, a delta of +0.2%, again within a rounding error. The Intel Core i9-14900 scores 58,115, a delta of -1.1%, meaning the 9900X trails by just over one percent. The Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M scores 58,323, a delta of -1.4%, a slightly larger but still small gap.

Single-threaded performance is where the 9900X shines. The 3DMark single-thread score of 1,286 is strong, and the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,253 confirms this. The Geekbench single-core score of 3,010 is equally impressive. These numbers indicate that the 9900X handles lightly threaded workloads such as web browsing, office applications, and legacy games with ease. The PassMark single-thread score of 4,672 reinforces this picture.

Multi-threaded performance is the headline feature. The 3DMark max-threads score of 13,929 and the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32,172 are substantial figures. The Geekbench multi-core score of 22,174 is also strong. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 12,552 shows that scaling is nearly linear up to 16 threads, and the 8-thread score of 9,114 indicates that even mid-thread-count workloads benefit. The 4-thread score of 4,886 and 2-thread score of 2,519 round out the scaling picture. PassMark multi-thread score of 54,643, PassMark integer math of 181,056, floating-point math of 120,083, and extended instructions of 55,243 all point to a processor that handles compute-heavy tasks with authority.

The GPU, by contrast, has no benchmark scores in the data. Its 50th percentile ranking is the only quantitative performance indicator available. This means the RTX 3070 TiM sits exactly at the median of all GPUs, which is a moderate position. When paired with the 92nd-percentile CPU, the combined percentile is 71, indicating that the overall system is above average but not top-tier.

The combined picture is one of imbalance. The CPU is a high-end part that can drive any workload, while the GPU is a mid-range component. In CPU-bound scenarios, the system will excel. In GPU-bound scenarios, the CPU will be underutilized. The data suggests that this pairing is best suited for users who prioritize CPU-heavy tasks like video encoding, software compilation, and 3D rendering, with gaming as a secondary consideration.

# FAQ

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 71, meaning the system performs better than 71% of all recorded desktop configurations.

Q: How does the Ryzen 9 9900X compare to the Intel Core i9-14900 in average benchmark score?

A: The 9900X has an average score of 57,498, while the i9-14900 scores 58,115. The delta is -1.1%, meaning the 9900X trails by just over one percent.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the RTX 3070 TiM?

A: The memory bandwidth is 448.0 GB/s, delivered via 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus.

Q: Does the RTX 3070 TiM have ray tracing and tensor cores?

A: Yes, it has 46 RT cores and 184 tensor cores, which enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing and DLSS.

Q: What is the TDP of the Ryzen 9 9900X and what socket does it use?

A: The TDP is 120 W, and it uses the AMD Socket AM5 with DDR5 memory support and dual-channel memory bus.

Q: What is the CPU's 3DMark single-thread score?

A: The 3DMark single-thread score is 1,286, with a 2-thread score of 2,519, a 4-thread score of 4,886, an 8-thread score of 9,114, a 16-thread score of 12,552, and a max-threads score of 13,929.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking among all GPUs?

A: The RTX 3070 TiM is at the 50th percentile, meaning it performs better than half of all GPUs in the database.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data for the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM. Therefore, all FPS figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and percentile rankings, not measured results. The GPU's 50th percentile ranking and the CPU's 92nd percentile ranking provide the basis for these projections.

In 1080p gaming, the RTX 3070 TiM is expected to deliver high frame rates in most titles. The 448.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 16.60 TFLOPS of FP32 compute are sufficient for 1080p ultra settings in the majority of games. The CPU's strong single-thread score of 1,286 in 3DMark and 2,253 in Cinebench R23 single-core ensures that even CPU-bound titles will not bottleneck. Expect frame rates well above 60 FPS in most esports and AAA titles at 1080p ultra, with the potential for 144 Hz displays being realized in less demanding games.

At 1440p, the GPU becomes the limiting factor. The 8 GB VRAM may struggle with maximum texture settings in some modern titles, and the 50th percentile ranking suggests that 1440p ultra settings will produce playable but not exceptional frame rates. Estimates place average FPS in the 60-90 range for AAA titles at 1440p high, with drops below 60 FPS possible in the most demanding scenes or with ray tracing enabled. The 46 RT cores can handle ray tracing, but the performance cost is significant.

At 4K, the RTX 3070 TiM is likely to require reduced settings. The 8 GB VRAM is a hard limit for high-resolution textures, and the bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s will struggle with 4K frame buffers. Estimated FPS at 4K ultra are likely in the 30-45 range for AAA titles, with 60 FPS achievable only by lowering settings to medium or high. The CPU's abundant multi-threaded performance, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32,172, will not be a limiting factor at any resolution.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The combination of the 92nd-percentile CPU and 50th-percentile GPU is well-suited for 1080p high-refresh gaming. The CPU's single-thread score of 1,286 in 3DMark ensures minimal frame time spikes, and the GPU's 16.60 TFLOPS can push high frame rates at 1080p. At 1440p, 144 Hz displays are achievable in less demanding titles, but 4K high-refresh is out of reach.

Streaming: The 12 cores and 24 threads of the 9900X provide ample headroom for software encoding while gaming. The PassMark multi-thread score of 54,643 indicates that simultaneous encoding and gaming workloads are manageable. The GPU's NVENC capabilities, while not detailed in the data, are standard for the Ampere architecture and would offload encoding tasks.

Video editing: The CPU's multi-threaded performance is a strong asset for video editing. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32,172 and Geekbench multi-core score of 22,174 indicate fast rendering of video timelines and effects. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p and 1440p editing timelines, but 4K projects with heavy effects may exceed capacity.

3D rendering: The CPU excels in rendering workloads. The PassMark floating-point math score of 120,083 and integer math score of 181,056 are substantial, and the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32,172 supports fast CPU-based rendering. The GPU's 16.60 TFLOPS and 8 GB VRAM make it suitable for GPU-accelerated rendering at moderate resolutions.

Software development: The CPU's compile times benefit from the 12 cores and 24 threads. The PassMark data compression score of 683,579 and random string sorting score of 72,013 indicate strong performance in data-intensive tasks. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 12,552 shows that parallel compilation scales well. The GPU is irrelevant for most development workloads.

Student and office work: This system is overkill for basic office tasks. The CPU's single-thread performance, with a PassMark single-thread score of 4,672, ensures snappy responsiveness, but the full multi-threaded power will go unused. For students in engineering or computer science, however, the CPU's performance is a benefit for simulations and compilation.

# Who Should Build It

The target user for this pairing is someone who needs substantial CPU compute power but is more modest on the GPU side. Gamers at 1080p or 1440p will find this system well-matched, with the CPU ensuring no bottlenecks and the GPU providing smooth frame rates at those resolutions. Gamers at 4K should look elsewhere, as the 8 GB VRAM and 50th-percentile GPU will require significant setting reductions.

Content creators who work with video editing, 3D rendering, or software development will benefit most from the 9900X's 92nd-percentile performance. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32,172 and Geekbench multi-core score of 22,174 translate to faster render and compile times. The RTX 3070 TiM provides hardware acceleration for effects and previews, though professionals working with 4K timelines may need more VRAM.

Developers writing multi-threaded code will appreciate the 12 cores and 24 threads, with the 3DMark 16-thread score of 12,552 indicating strong parallel scaling. The PassMark extended instructions score of 55,243 suggests good SIMD performance for scientific computing. Students in STEM fields will find the CPU capable of handling simulations and data analysis, while the GPU handles visualizations.

Small business workstations that run CPU-intensive applications like accounting software, databases, or engineering tools will see tangible benefits from the 9900X. The PassMark data encryption score of 33,421 and data compression score of 683,579 indicate strong performance in data management tasks. The GPU is adequate for office displays and light graphics work.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a clear imbalance in this pairing. The CPU sits at the 92nd percentile, while the GPU sits at the 50th percentile. In CPU-bound workloads, such as software compilation, 3D rendering, and data processing, the system performs at a level consistent with the CPU's high percentile. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32,172 and PassMark multi-thread score of 54,643 are strong indicators of CPU-bound performance.

In GPU-bound workloads, which includes most modern gaming at higher resolutions, the RTX 3070 TiM is the limiting factor. The 50th percentile ranking means that the GPU will hold back the system in scenarios where frame rates are determined by graphics processing. At 1080p, the CPU may still be able to push the GPU to its limits, but at 1440p and above, the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and moderate compute power will be the constraint.

The FPS scaling evidence, while estimated, supports this analysis. At 1080p, the CPU's strong single-thread performance can feed the GPU adequately. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU's workload increases faster than the CPU's, and the GPU becomes the bottleneck. The combined percentile of 71 reflects this imbalance, as it is a weighted average that falls between the CPU's 92nd and the GPU's 50th percentile.

For users who want to address this bottleneck, the data suggests that the CPU has headroom. The nearest rival data shows the 9900X is competitive with the Intel Core i9-14900, trailing by only 1.1%. This means that upgrading the GPU would yield significant performance gains in gaming, as the CPU would not be a limiting factor. Conversely, upgrading the CPU would provide minimal benefit for gaming, as the GPU is already the constraint.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM. The CPU is from the 9000 series, based on the Zen 5 architecture with the Granite Ridge codename, manufactured on a 4 nm process by TSMC with 16,630 million transistors across a 2x 70.6 mm² die. It features 12 cores and 24 threads, with a base clock of 4.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, drawing a 120 W TDP. It supports DDR5 memory on the dual-channel bus with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, and includes ECC memory support. The CPU has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 64 MB of L3 cache. It uses the AMD Socket AM5 and has PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes. Integrated Radeon Graphics are present, and the multiplier is unlocked for overclocking. The launch MSRP is $499, and the release date is August 14, 2024.

The GPU is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM, part of the GeForce 30-series with the GA104 chip on the Ampere architecture. It uses an 8 nm process from Samsung with 17,400 million transistors on a 392 mm² die. The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 448.0 GB/s bandwidth. It features 5,888 shading units, 184 TMUs, 96 ROPs, 46 RT cores, and 184 tensor cores. The base clock is 915 MHz with a boost clock of 1410 MHz. The TDP is 220 W, with a triple-slot cooler and a single 8-pin power connector. The card is 270 mm long (10.6 inches), 140 mm tall (5.5 inches), and 55 mm wide (2.2 inches), with 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs.

The overall tier, based on the combined percentile of 71, places this system in the upper-mid range of desktop configurations. It is not a top-tier enthusiast system, but it is well above average. The CPU is the standout component, offering near-top-tier performance, while the GPU is a solid mid-range part.

# CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X is a 12-core, 24-thread processor from the 9000 series, built on the Zen 5 architecture with the Granite Ridge codename. It is manufactured on a 4 nm process by TSMC, with 16,630 million transistors across a dual-die design of 2x 70.6 mm². The base clock is 4.40 GHz, boosting to 5.60 GHz, with a TDP of 120 W. It uses the AMD Socket AM5 and supports DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, including ECC support. The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 64 MB of shared L3 cache. The PCIe implementation is Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the CPU. Integrated Radeon Graphics are included, and the multiplier is unlocked.

The benchmark scores paint a picture of a processor that is strong across the board. The 3DMark scores show excellent thread scaling: 1,286 single-thread, 2,519 for 2 threads, 4,886 for 4 threads, 9,114 for 8 threads, 12,552 for 16 threads, and 13,929 for max threads. This near-linear scaling up to 12 cores indicates efficient use of the Zen 5 architecture. Cinebench scores are equally impressive, with a single-core R23 score of 2,253 and a multi-core score of 32,172. Geekbench scores of 3,010 single-core and 22,174 multi-core confirm this strength.

PassMark results add depth to the analysis. The multi-thread score of 54,643 is substantial, and the integer math score of 181,056 indicates strong general-purpose compute. Floating-point math scores of 120,083 are also high, suggesting good performance in scientific and engineering workloads. Data compression at 683,579 and random string sorting at 72,013 are strong for database and file management tasks. Data encryption at 33,421 and extended instructions at 55,243 round out the compute picture. The find prime numbers score of 436 is lower, but this is a niche workload.

The 92nd percentile ranking among all CPUs is well-deserved. The nearest rival data shows that the 9900X is within 1.4% of the Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M and within 1.1% of the Intel Core i9-14900, both of which are high-end parts. The AMD EPYC 9015 and EPYC 7313 are essentially tied with the 9900X, with deltas of -0.1% and +0.2% respectively. This places the 9900X in the upper echelon of available processors, suitable for demanding workloads. For real-world tasks, this means fast compile times, quick rendering, and responsive multi-tasking, with the single-thread performance to handle legacy and lightly threaded applications without issue.