SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 9900X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
95%
VS
GPU
90%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 9900X

57,498 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

17,208 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 pairing represents a desktop build that combines a high-end, 12-core Zen 5 processor with a mid-range Ampere graphics card. The CPU is designed for heavy multi-threaded workloads, while the GPU targets 1080p and 1440p gaming. Benchmark data shows this combination achieves a combined percentile rank of 77, placing it above the majority of tested systems. The CPU’s strong multi-core scores and the GPU’s solid rasterization performance create a system that excels in productivity tasks but faces limitations in 4K gaming and ray tracing.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X is a 12-core, 24-thread processor built on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Granite Ridge, and manufactured on TSMC’s 4 nm process. It has a base clock of 4.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, with a TDP of 120 W. The CPU features 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and a total of 64 MB of L3 cache. It supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, offering a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, and includes ECC memory support.

In benchmark results, the CPU demonstrates exceptional multi-threaded performance. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 32172, which is 13 times higher than the single-core score of 2253, reflecting the scaling of its 12 cores. The Geekbench multi-core score of 22174 and single-core score of 3010 further confirm this balance. The PassMark multi-thread score of 54643 and integer math score of 181056 indicate strong performance in tasks that utilize all cores, such as video encoding and 3D rendering. Data compression and encryption scores of 683579 and 33421, respectively, show the CPU is capable of handling data-intensive operations with ease.

The CPU’s percentile rank against all CPUs is 92, meaning it outperforms 92% of processors in the database. Its average benchmark score is 57498, which places it in close competition with server-class chips. The nearest rivals include the AMD EPYC 9015 with an average score of 57555 (0.1% higher), the Intel Core i9-14900 with a score of 58115 (1.1% higher), and the Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M with a score of 58323 (1.4% higher). This indicates the 9900X is competitive with high-end desktop and server processors, though it trails slightly in raw average score.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, the CPU’s single-thread performance is crucial, and the 3DMark single-thread score of 1286 and PassMark single-thread score of 4672 indicate strong performance. In games like Counter-Strike 2, the system achieves 209 FPS at 1080p and 138 FPS at 1440p, easily exceeding 144 Hz refresh rates. Valorant reaches even higher, with 478 FPS at 1080p, showing the CPU is not a bottleneck in competitive titles.

For streaming, the CPU’s multi-threaded capabilities are beneficial. The 3DMark max-threads score of 13929 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32172 allow for simultaneous game encoding and broadcasting without significant frame drops. The PassMark physics score of 3381 further supports this, though the GPU also plays a role in encoding.

Video editing relies heavily on multi-core performance, and the CPU delivers with a Geekbench multi-core score of 22174 and PassMark floating point math score of 120083. This enables smooth timeline scrubbing and faster export times in applications that utilize all 12 cores. The 16-thread 3DMark score of 12552 shows good scaling in professional rendering workloads.

For 3D rendering, the Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 5008 and R23 multi-core score of 32172 demonstrate the CPU’s ability to handle complex scenes. The PassMark extended instructions score of 55243 indicates support for modern instruction sets, which can accelerate rendering in software that uses AVX-512 or similar. This is a strong system for Blender or similar applications.

Software development benefits from the CPU’s parallel processing power. The PassMark integer math score of 181056 and data encryption score of 33421 suggest fast compilation times and secure encryption tasks. The 24 threads allow for efficient multi-tasking, such as running virtual machines or containers simultaneously, making it suitable for developers.

For student and office work, the CPU is overkill but not detrimental. The 3DMark 2-thread score of 2519 and 4-thread score of 4886 show that even light-threaded applications run quickly. The PassMark single-thread score of 4672 ensures snappy responsiveness in everyday tasks like web browsing and document editing, though the power consumption may be higher than necessary for basic use.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data reveals that the CPU is significantly more powerful than the GPU in this pairing. The CPU’s percentile rank of 92 is substantially higher than the GPU’s percentile rank of 61. In gaming scenarios, this imbalance means the GPU is often the limiting factor, particularly at higher resolutions. For example, in Cyberpunk 2077, the system achieves 62 FPS at 1080p but drops to 46 FPS at 1440p and 30 FPS at 4K, indicating the GPU is struggling to keep up with the CPU’s ability to feed frames.

The FPS scaling across resolutions shows this trend clearly. In Call of Duty: Warzone, the system achieves 182 FPS at 1080p, 162 FPS at 1440p, and 137 FPS at 4K. The relatively small drop from 1080p to 1440p suggests the CPU is still capable, but the GPU is the primary bottleneck at 4K. In contrast, CPU-bound tasks like data compression show the CPU’s dominance, with a score of 683579, which is not affected by the GPU.

The pair’s average FPS across all games is 134.9, and it ranks 1548 out of 3732 pairs, placing it in the top 41% of tested combinations. This indicates that while the CPU is high-end, the GPU’s mid-range performance prevents the system from reaching the top tier. The GPU’s nearest rivals, such as the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT with a score of 17083 (0.7% lower), show that the RTX 3070 is well-positioned but not exceptional.

Who Should Build It

This build is suited for gamers who prioritize high refresh rates at 1080p and 1440p. The measured FPS in titles like Counter-Strike 2 (209 FPS at 1080p) and Valorant (478 FPS at 1080p) make it ideal for competitive gaming. At 1440p, games like Call of Duty: Warzone (162 FPS) and Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege (163 FPS) still provide smooth gameplay, making it a strong choice for enthusiasts with 144 Hz monitors.

Content creators who work with video editing and 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU’s multi-core prowess. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32172 and Geekbench multi-core score of 22174 ensure fast export times and smooth previews. The GPU’s 8 GB of VRAM is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p rendering tasks, though 4K assets may require more memory.

Software developers, especially those working on large codebases, will appreciate the 12 cores and 24 threads. The PassMark integer math score of 181056 and data encryption score of 33421 indicate efficient compilation and secure data handling. The CPU’s support for ECC memory adds reliability for long-running builds.

Students and office workers will find this build more powerful than necessary, but the CPU’s single-thread performance ensures fast application loading. The PassMark single-thread score of 4672 means everyday tasks are responsive, though the system’s power draw may be excessive for simple workloads like spreadsheets or web browsing. For small business workstations, the CPU’s multi-threading and ECC support make it suitable for database management or financial modeling.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X has 12 cores and 24 threads.

Q: How does the CPU’s multi-core performance compare to its single-core?

A: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 32172, while the single-core score is 2253, showing a 14.3x scaling, indicating excellent multi-threaded scaling.

Q: What is the GPU’s VRAM capacity and type?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory with a 256-bit bus width and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: How does the system perform in Cyberpunk 2077 at 1440p?

A: The system achieves 46 FPS at 2560x1440 resolution in Cyberpunk 2077, which is playable but not high-refresh.

Q: What is the CPU’s memory support?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, and it supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile rank?

A: The GPU has a percentile rank of 61, meaning it outperforms 61% of GPUs in the database.

Q: Is the system suitable for 4K gaming?

A: The system struggles at 4K, with many games dropping below 60 FPS. For example, Cyberpunk 2077 achieves 30 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 achieves 26 FPS at 3840x2160.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 is built on the Ampere architecture with the GA104 chip, manufactured on Samsung’s 8 nm process. It has 5888 shading units, 184 texture mapping units, and 96 raster operation units. The GPU features 46 ray tracing cores and 184 tensor cores, which support DirectX 12 Ultimate, Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6. The base clock is 1500 MHz with a boost clock of 1725 MHz, and the memory runs at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective).

The GPU’s memory configuration consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. This is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but the limited VRAM capacity can become a bottleneck in 4K textures or ray tracing workloads. The pixel rate is 165.6 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 317.4 GTexel/s, indicating solid rasterization performance. The FP32 performance is 20.31 TFLOPS, which is competitive for its class.

In benchmark results, the GPU achieves a PassMark G3D score of 22214 and a Geekbench OpenCL score of 112821. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 3162, and the Geekbench Vulkan score is 21022. These scores place the GPU at a percentile rank of 61, with an average benchmark score of 17208. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT with a score of 17083 (0.7% lower) and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 with a score of 17037 (1% lower), showing the RTX 3070 is slightly ahead of these cards.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark scores are exceptional, with an average score of 57498 and a percentile rank of 92. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32172 places it in the top tier of desktop processors, while the Geekbench multi-core score of 22174 confirms its multi-threaded strength. The PassMark multithread score of 54643 and floating point math score of 120083 further underscore its capabilities.

The GPU’s scores are more modest, with an average score of 17208 and a percentile rank of 61. The PassMark G3D score of 22214 is solid for 1080p gaming, but the 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3162 suggests it may struggle with next-generation DX12 titles at high settings. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 21022 indicates good compute performance, but the GPU’s overall ranking shows it is a mid-range card.

The combined performance, as measured by the pair’s average FPS across games, is 134.9, with a rank of 1548 out of 3732 pairs. This places the system in the 58th percentile of all tested pairs, indicating that while the CPU is high-end, the GPU holds back the overall performance. The combined percentile rank of 77 reflects this imbalance, with the CPU contributing more to the overall score than the GPU.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which supports DDR5 memory and PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the CPU. It has an unlocked multiplier, allowing for overclocking. The TDP is 120 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 220 W, with a suggested PSU of 550 W. This provides headroom for upgrades, but users should consider the total system power draw.

The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface and requires a single 12-pin power connector. It is a dual-slot card with a length of 242 mm (9.5 inches) and a height of 112 mm (4.4 inches). The GPU is end-of-life, with a successor in the GeForce 40 series, making it a less future-proof option. The CPU, however, is active and part of the 9000 series, suggesting a longer lifespan on the AM5 platform.

A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the GPU with a newer, more powerful model that can better match the CPU’s capabilities. The CPU’s high multi-core performance would benefit from a GPU with more VRAM and higher rasterization power, especially for 4K gaming or ray tracing. The AM5 platform also supports future CPU upgrades, allowing users to keep the motherboard and memory while improving the processor.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that pairs the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X, a 12-core Zen 5 processor, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, a mid-range Ampere GPU. The CPU is designed for high-end productivity and gaming, while the GPU targets 1080p and 1440p gaming. The combined percentile rank of 77 indicates that this system performs better than 77% of tested builds, though the GPU is the weaker component.

The CPU’s percentile rank of 92 places it in the top 8% of processors, while the GPU’s rank of 61 places it in the top 39%. This disparity means the system is well-suited for CPU-intensive tasks like video editing, 3D rendering, and software development, but it may not be the best choice for 4K gaming or ray tracing. The overall tier is solid upper-midrange, with the CPU providing future-proofing for several years.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data shows that the system excels at 1080p and 1440p gaming, with many titles achieving high frame rates. In eSports titles, the performance is exceptional: Valorant reaches 478 FPS at 1080p, 408 FPS at 1440p, and 326 FPS at 4K. Counter-Strike: Global Offensive achieves 464.3 FPS at 1080p, and Counter-Strike 2 hits 209 FPS at 1080p and 138 FPS at 1440p.

For AAA games, the system provides playable frame rates at 1080p. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 62 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 56.2 FPS, and Control at 88.4 FPS. At 1440p, these titles drop to 46, 41.8, and 66.3 FPS respectively, which is still playable but may require settings adjustments. At 4K, the system struggles, with Cyberpunk 2077 at 30 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 26 FPS, indicating the GPU is the limiting factor.

Games with lower graphical demands run exceptionally well. Minecraft achieves 206 FPS at 1080p and 130 FPS at 1440p, while Roblox hits 267.9 FPS at 1080p. Valve’s titles like Dota 2 or CS:GO see high frame rates, and the system also handles simulation games like Microsoft Flight Simulator at 74.5 FPS at 1080p and 60.8 FPS at 1440p. The data is measured, providing accurate expectations for gaming performance across resolutions.