SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 9900X + Intel Arc A380

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

95%

GPU

86%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 9900X

57,498 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A380

8,558 Benchmark Score

Top 14% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X pairs with the Intel Arc A380 in a desktop build that lands at the 68th combined percentile across all tracked CPU and GPU pairings. This is a lopsided configuration: the CPU sits in the 92nd percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU sits in the 44th percentile among all GPUs. The data shows a processor with top-tier multi-threaded and single-threaded muscle paired with an entry-level graphics card that will dictate the entire gaming experience. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the FACT PACK, so all frame-rate discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than direct testing.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X uses the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which is the current mainstream desktop socket for AMD. The CPU supports DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus, with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, and it also supports ECC memory — a feature that matters for workstation-style reliability. The platform provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the CPU, which gives ample bandwidth for the fastest NVMe storage and future expansion cards. The integrated Radeon Graphics inside the CPU means the system can output a display even before the discrete GPU is installed, which simplifies initial setup and troubleshooting.

The CPU has a TDP of 120 watts, while the Intel Arc A380 has a TDP of 75 watts and a suggested PSU of 250 watts. The combined power draw is modest, so a sensible PSU headroom calculation points to a unit well above that 250-watt suggestion for the GPU alone. Since the CPU is unlocked (multiplier unlocked is true), overclocking is possible, but the platform's real headroom comes from the upgrade path. The AM5 socket supports the Ryzen 9000 series and the CPU is marked as Active in production status, meaning a user could later drop in a higher-core-count Ryzen 9 part without changing the motherboard. The GPU, however, is End-of-life with a successor named Battlemage, so the most sensible next upgrade for this build is a stronger discrete GPU — the current Arc A380 will be the bottleneck in gaming long before the CPU is stressed. The PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface on the GPU is sufficient for its bandwidth needs, but a future GPU would still fit the same slot.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X is a 12-core, 24-thread processor built on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Granite Ridge, using a 4 nm process from TSMC. It has a base clock of 4.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, with a TDP of 120 watts. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 64 MB of L3, shared across the chip. The CPU contains 16,630 million transistors across a dual-chiplet design with a die size of 2x 70.6 mm². The launch MSRP was $499, and it was released on 2024-08-14.

Benchmark results place this CPU firmly in the high-end desktop segment. In Cinebench R23, it scores 32,172 multi-core and 2,253 single-core. The multi-core score is 14.3 times the single-core score, which reflects the scaling of 12 cores across 24 threads. In Geekbench, it scores 22,174 multi-core and 3,010 single-core. The PassMark multithread score is 54,643, while the single-thread score is 4,672. The 3DMark thread scaling shows a progression from 1,286 single-thread, to 2,519 at 2 threads, 4,886 at 4 threads, 9,114 at 8 threads, 12,552 at 16 threads, and 13,929 at max threads — the gains from 16 to 24 threads are modest, indicating diminishing returns beyond 16 threads for that workload. The PassMark integer math score of 181,056 and floating-point math score of 120,083 show strong compute throughput, while data compression (683,579) and random string sorting (72,013) indicate strong memory and cache performance. The CPU sits at the 92nd percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 57,498. Among its nearest rivals, it is 0.1% behind the AMD EPYC 9015, 0.2% ahead of the AMD EPYC 7313, 1.1% behind the Intel Core i9-14900, and 1.4% behind the Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M. This means the 9900X trades blows with server-class silicon in multi-threaded work, while its single-thread score of 2,253 in Cinebench R23 is a strong indicator for latency-sensitive applications.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU is more than capable of feeding a high-refresh monitor, with a single-thread PassMark score of 4,672 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,253. However, the Intel Arc A380's 44th GPU percentile means the frame rates will be limited by the GPU, not the CPU. The estimated performance will be modest even at 1080p, so a high-refresh monitor would only be fully utilized in esports titles with low graphics demands.

Streaming: The 12-core, 24-thread CPU can handle encoding and gaming simultaneously, as the PassMark multithread score of 54,643 and the 3DMark max-threads score of 13,929 indicate ample headroom for background tasks. The GPU, however, will be the limiting factor for game rendering, so streamers would need to lower in-game settings to maintain smooth gameplay.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32,172 and Geekbench multi-core score of 22,174 suggest fast export times and smooth timeline scrubbing on the CPU side. The GPU's 6 GB of VRAM and 186.0 GB/s bandwidth will handle lightweight effects, but heavy GPU-accelerated rendering will be slow, as the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 6,252 is entry-level.

3D rendering: The CPU is a rendering powerhouse, with a PassMark floating-point math score of 120,083 and a Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 5,008. The GPU's 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 performance is low for GPU rendering, so CPU-based renderers will vastly outperform GPU-based ones on this build.

Software development: The high single-thread score of 3,010 in Geekbench and the PassMark single-thread score of 4,672 mean fast compilation of single-threaded build steps, while the 24 threads handle parallel builds. The ECC memory support is a plus for long-running build servers, and the 64 MB of L3 cache helps with large codebases.

Student and office work: The CPU is overkill for typical office tasks, but the integrated Radeon Graphics means the system is functional even without the discrete GPU. The 44th percentile GPU is sufficient for web browsing, spreadsheets, and document editing, though the power draw of the 120-watt CPU is more than needed for such workloads.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so the following frame rates are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The Intel Arc A380 sits at the 44th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 8,558. Its nearest rivals include the AMD FirePro W5170M (−0.4% delta), the AMD Radeon HD 8870M (+1.1% delta), the NVIDIA GeForce MX330 (+1.2% delta), and the AMD Radeon 880M (+1.4% delta). These rivals are all entry-level or older mobile parts, which gives a clear picture of the Arc A380's tier. The GPU has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 186.0 GB/s, and a boost clock of 2050 MHz.

For gaming, the CPU's single-thread strength (PassMark single-thread score of 4,672) ensures that the CPU will not bottleneck the GPU in most titles. The estimated frame rates will be typical of the 44th percentile GPU tier: playable at 1080p with medium to low settings in modern AAA titles, and higher frame rates in esports titles. At 1440p or 4K, the GPU's 6 GB VRAM and 96-bit bus will be severely limiting, and the 32 ROPs will cap pixel throughput. The GPU's DirectX 12 Ultimate support and Vulkan 1.4 support mean it can run modern APIs, but the raw compute power (4.198 TFLOPS FP32) is low. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 808 is a low result, confirming the entry-level positioning. For gamers, this build is best treated as an esports machine at 1080p, or as a placeholder GPU until a stronger card is installed.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance in this build is heavily skewed toward the CPU. The CPU's 92nd percentile ranking versus the GPU's 44th percentile ranking creates a situation where the GPU is the clear bottleneck in any graphics-bound workload. The CPU's PassMark multithread score of 54,643 is roughly 8.7 times the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 6,252, illustrating the massive disparity. In gaming, the GPU will be pinned at 100% utilization while the CPU idles well below its capacity. The CPU's 3DMark max-threads score of 13,929 versus the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 808 reinforces that the CPU can handle far more graphics work than the GPU can deliver.

The bottleneck shifts in non-graphics workloads. For 3D rendering, video editing, or software compilation, the CPU is the primary engine, and the GPU contributes little. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32,172 means the CPU will dominate those tasks, and the GPU's low compute scores (PassMark GPU compute of 2,762) mean GPU acceleration will not provide meaningful speedups. The FPS scaling from the CPU's thread tests — from 2,519 at 2 threads to 13,929 at max threads — shows that the CPU scales well up to 16 threads, which benefits multitasking while gaming. The practical upshot is that this build is well-balanced for productivity but poorly balanced for gaming; the GPU limits the experience, and upgrading the GPU alone would transform the system's gaming capability without touching the CPU.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who prioritize CPU-heavy workloads and are willing to accept entry-level gaming performance. Content creators working on video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32,172 and Geekbench multi-core score of 22,174. Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the 24 threads and single-thread speed, with the PassMark single-thread score of 4,672 and multithread score of 54,643. Students and office workers who need a responsive system for general tasks will find the CPU overkill but functional, especially with the integrated Radeon Graphics as a fallback. Gamers at 1080p with modest expectations — esports titles or older AAA games — will get playable performance from the Arc A380, but gamers targeting 1440p or high refresh rates should look elsewhere. Small business workstations that run CPU-bound simulations or data processing (PassMark data compression score of 683,579) will find this pairing adequate, provided graphics demands are minimal.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 57,498, placing it at the 92nd percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rival is the AMD EPYC 9015 with an average score of 57,555, a delta of −0.1%, meaning the 9900X is essentially tied with a server EPYC part. The Intel Core i9-14900 scores 58,115, which is 1.1% higher, and the Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M scores 58,323, which is 1.4% higher. The AMD EPYC 7313 scores 57,399, which is 0.2% lower. In specific tests, the CPU shines in multi-threaded workloads: Cinebench R23 multi-core of 32,172, Geekbench multi-core of 22,174, and PassMark multithread of 54,643. Single-thread performance is also strong: Cinebench R23 single-core of 2,253 and PassMark single-thread of 4,672.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 8,558, placing it at the 44th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the AMD FirePro W5170M with an average score of 8,595, a delta of −0.4%, meaning the Arc A380 is just behind that workstation card. The AMD Radeon HD 8870M scores 8,462 (+1.1%), the NVIDIA GeForce MX330 scores 8,458 (+1.2%), and the AMD Radeon 880M scores 8,436 (+1.4%). The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 808 and PassMark G3D score of 6,252 are entry-level results, while its Geekbench OpenCL score of 38,224 shows moderate compute capability. The combined picture is a CPU that outperforms most desktop and server parts, paired with a GPU that sits just below the median. The combined percentile of 68 reflects this imbalance — the build is better than the average system overall, but the GPU drags the gaming potential down.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X with the Intel Arc A380. The CPU is a 12-core, 24-thread Zen 5 part on the AM5 socket, with a 4.40 GHz base clock and 5.60 GHz boost clock, a 120-watt TDP, and a launch MSRP of $499. The GPU is an Intel Arc A380 on the Xe-HPG architecture (Alchemist generation), with 6 GB of GDDR6 memory, a 96-bit bus, a 75-watt TDP, a suggested PSU of 250 watts, and a launch MSRP of 149 USD. The build's combined percentile is 68, meaning it outperforms the majority of tracked CPU+GPU pairings, but the gap between the CPU's 92nd percentile and the GPU's 44th percentile defines the system's character. This is a productivity-first desktop that can handle light gaming, not a gaming rig. The CPU is a top-tier performer for its generation, while the GPU is an entry-level part that has reached end-of-life status with a successor (Battlemage) already announced.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X has 12 cores and 24 threads.

Q: Does this build support DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, and it also supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The Intel Arc A380 has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 186.0 GB/s.

Q: Is the GPU's performance comparable to other entry-level cards?

A: The GPU's average benchmark score of 8,558 puts it at the 44th percentile, with its nearest rival being the AMD FirePro W5170M at 8,595 (−0.4% delta) and the NVIDIA GeForce MX330 at 8,458 (+1.2% delta).

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile is 68, meaning the pairing outperforms most tracked CPU+GPU combinations, though the CPU is far stronger than the GPU.

Q: Can this system run without the discrete GPU?

A: Yes, the CPU includes integrated Radeon Graphics, so the system can output a display even if the Arc A380 is removed or fails.

Q: What is the PCIe interface of the GPU?

A: The Intel Arc A380 uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface, which is sufficient for its bandwidth needs.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 9900X + Intel Arc A380

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 9900X

Intel Arc A380

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Upgrade Path and Platform

CPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

FAQ

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds