SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 9900X + Intel Arc A310E

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

85 Score

Top 15% Ranking

85 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

GPU Bottleneck

CPU

95%

GPU

74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 9900X

57,498 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A310E

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X paired with the Intel Arc A310E is a fundamentally unbalanced desktop configuration, where a top-tier 12-core processor is coupled with an entry-level graphics card. Benchmark data confirms this pairing sits at the 71st percentile overall, but the CPU's 92nd percentile standing and the GPU's 50th percentile standing reveal a stark performance hierarchy. This build is defined by its processor's immense compute capability, while the graphics card serves as a basic display output and light-rendering solution rather than a gaming powerhouse.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the database. Consequently, all gaming performance figures presented here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of the individual components, not from direct testing of the pairing. The lack of measured frames means these projections should be treated as directional guidance rather than precise expectations.

The Intel Arc A310E’s specifications indicate it is positioned for basic graphical tasks, not high-refresh-rate gaming. With 768 shading units, 32 TMUs, and 16 ROPs, the GPU delivers a pixel rate of 32.00 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 64.00 GTexel/s. Its FP32 compute of 3.072 TFLOPS places it firmly in the entry-level segment. For 1080p gaming at ultra settings, this GPU would likely struggle to maintain playable frame rates in modern titles, particularly those with heavy geometry or shader complexity. Esports titles and older games might run acceptably, but the 4 GB GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus with 124.0 GB/s bandwidth presents a severe limitation for texture-heavy modern games.

The CPU’s performance in threaded workloads does not translate directly to gaming FPS when bottlenecked by the GPU. The Ryzen 9 9900X’s 3DMark 16-thread score of 12552 and single-thread score of 1286 indicate it can feed frames rapidly, but the Arc A310E cannot convert that data into high frame rates. In CPU-bound scenarios at lower resolutions, the processor would sit largely idle waiting for the GPU. At higher resolutions like 1440p or 4K, the GPU bottleneck becomes even more pronounced, making the gaming experience consistently limited by the graphics card. Users should expect this build to handle 2D applications, video playback, and light indie games comfortably, but demanding 3D titles will require significant graphical settings reductions to achieve playable performance.

FAQ

Q: What is the processor's core and thread configuration?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X features 12 cores and 24 threads based on the Zen 5 architecture, code-named Granite Ridge, manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process.

Q: Does this CPU support overclocking?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 9 9900X has an unlocked multiplier, allowing users to adjust clock speeds beyond the factory settings of 4.40 GHz base and 5.60 GHz boost.

Q: What type of memory does this build require?

A: The system uses DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The CPU supports ECC memory and provides a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s.

Q: What is the graphics card's memory capacity and type?

A: The Intel Arc A310E comes with 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 124.0 GB/s.

Q: Is the graphics card still in production?

A: No, the Intel Arc A310E is marked as end-of-life in the database, with its successor being Battlemage. Its predecessor was Xe Graphics.

Q: What PCIe interface does the GPU use?

A: The Intel Arc A310E connects via a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface.

Q: What is the CPU's market segment and release date?

A: The Ryzen 9 9900X is a desktop processor released on August 14, 2024, and remains in active production. Its launch MSRP was $499.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform's foundation is the AMD Socket AM5, which supports the Ryzen 9 9900X and its DDR5 memory. The CPU provides 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, offering substantial bandwidth for future expansion. This socket is current-generation, meaning users have a clear path to other Ryzen 9000 series processors without changing the motherboard, should they desire a different core count. The 120 W TDP of the CPU is modest for a 12-core part, indicating that most AM5 motherboards with adequate VRM cooling can handle it.

The graphics card presents a more immediate upgrade consideration. The Arc A310E is a single-slot, 75 W card that draws power directly from the PCIe slot, requiring no additional power connectors. The suggested PSU for this GPU is 250 W, which is remarkably low. This leaves enormous headroom in any typical desktop power supply, meaning a GPU upgrade to a higher-performance model would be the logical next step. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface is adequate for current mid-range cards, though high-end models might prefer x16.

For a sensible next upgrade, replacing the Arc A310E with a more capable graphics card would transform this system's capabilities. The CPU's 92nd percentile standing ensures it would not bottleneck virtually any consumer GPU on the market. The 4 GB VRAM of the current card is the primary limiting factor for modern gaming and rendering workloads. A future GPU with more VRAM and higher compute throughput would leverage the Ryzen 9 9900X's full potential. The platform's PCIe Gen 5 support on the CPU side also future-proofs against next-generation storage and expansion cards.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data reveals an extreme bottleneck imbalance. The CPU's average benchmark score is 57498, placing it in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU's average benchmark score is 0 with a 50th percentile standing. This means the processor is capable of far more work than the graphics card can process. In gaming, the Arc A310E will be the limiting factor in nearly every scenario, as its 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 124.0 GB/s memory bandwidth cannot keep pace with the CPU's data generation.

In CPU-bound workloads like data compression, encryption, and physics calculations, the Ryzen 9 9900X excels. Its PassMark data compression score of 683579, data encryption score of 33421, and physics score of 3381 demonstrate high throughput. These tasks would run at speeds determined entirely by the CPU, with the GPU playing no role. Conversely, in graphics-intensive tasks like 3D rendering or video encoding with GPU acceleration, the system's performance would collapse to the GPU's level.

The FPS scaling in games would show a clear pattern: at lower settings and resolutions, the CPU might briefly show its strength, but frame rates would plateau quickly as the GPU reaches its maximum output. The 3DMark scores illustrate the CPU's threading advantage, scaling from 2519 at 2 threads to 13929 at max threads, but this scaling has no bearing on GPU-limited gaming. The bottleneck is unambiguously the graphics card, making this pairing suitable primarily for compute-focused tasks where the GPU is not a factor.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X is a 12-core, 24-thread processor built on the Zen 5 architecture, code-named Granite Ridge. It operates at a base clock of 4.40 GHz and boosts up to 5.60 GHz, with a TDP of 120 W. The chip is manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process, containing 16,630 million transistors across a dual-die design with each die measuring 70.6 mm². Cache allocation includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 64 MB of L3 cache.

Benchmark results show exceptional single-threaded and multi-threaded capabilities. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 32172 and single-core score of 2253 place it among the top consumer processors. Geekbench results reinforce this, with a multicore score of 22174 and single-core score of 3010. The PassMark multithread score of 54643 and single-thread score of 4672 indicate balanced performance across various workload types. The 3DMark threaded tests demonstrate excellent scaling, from 4886 at 4 threads to 9114 at 8 threads and 13929 at max threads.

For real-world workloads, these scores translate to rapid compilation times, smooth video editing, and fast scientific computations. The PassMark extended instructions score of 55243 and floating-point math score of 120083 suggest strong performance in AVX-512 and other vectorized workloads. The integer math score of 181056 indicates robust general-purpose processing. The CPU's 92nd percentile ranking means it outperforms the vast majority of installed processors, rivaling server-class chips like the AMD EPYC 9015 and Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M, as shown in the nearest rivals data where it trades within 1.4% of those parts.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users whose primary workloads are CPU-intensive and who require only basic graphics output. Software developers compiling large codebases would benefit immensely from the 12-core, 24-thread processor, as the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 32172 and Geekbench multicore score of 22174 indicate rapid build times. Data analysts running complex calculations would leverage the PassMark integer math score of 181056 and floating-point math score of 120083 for accelerated processing.

Students and researchers working with scientific computing or simulation software would find the CPU's 92nd percentile ranking advantageous, particularly in tasks like Prime number finding, where the PassMark score of 436 reflects strong algorithmic performance. Small business workstations handling databases or virtualization would appreciate the ECC memory support and 64 MB L3 cache, which aids in concurrent workloads. Content creators focused on CPU-based rendering, such as software encoding or 3D modeling, would see substantial throughput from the Cinebench R15 multicore score of 5008.

However, gamers seeking high frame rates should avoid this pairing. The Arc A310E's 4 GB VRAM and 3.072 TFLOPS compute are insufficient for modern gaming at acceptable quality settings. At 1080p ultra, the GPU would bottleneck almost any title, making the CPU's power irrelevant. This build is best suited for professionals and hobbyists who need a powerful compute node with display output for monitoring, not for interactive 3D applications. The 75 W GPU power draw and 250 W suggested PSU keep the system energy-efficient for always-on workstations.

Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark picture shows a system at the 71st percentile, dragged down significantly by the graphics card's mediocre performance. The CPU's average benchmark score of 57498 places it in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs, with nearest rivals including the AMD EPYC 9015 (score 57555, deltaPct -0.1), AMD EPYC 7313 (score 57399, deltaPct 0.2), Intel Core i9-14900 (score 58115, deltaPct -1.1), and Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M (score 58323, deltaPct -1.4). These deltas indicate the Ryzen 9 9900X performs within 1.4% of these enterprise and high-end desktop parts, a remarkable showing for a consumer chip.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 0, while holding a 50th percentile position, means it sits exactly at the median of all GPUs but has no recorded benchmark data in the database. This lack of data makes direct performance comparisons impossible, but its specifications suggest entry-level capability. The combined percentile of 71 reflects the CPU's strength dominating the overall score while the GPU contributes minimally.

The 3DMark CPU tests provide a detailed threading profile: single-thread score of 1286, 2-thread score of 2519, 4-thread score of 4886, 8-thread score of 9114, 16-thread score of 12552, and max-thread score of 13929. This scaling shows near-linear improvement up to 8 threads, with diminishing returns beyond that, indicating efficient core utilization. The Cinebench R15 scores of 353 single-core and 5008 multi-core align with this pattern. For the combined system, the takeaway is clear: the CPU alone provides exceptional compute density, but the GPU's 50th percentile standing means the overall system tier is limited for graphics-dependent tasks.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X processor with the Intel Arc A310E graphics card. The CPU represents the high end of AMD's 9000 series, with 12 cores and 24 threads, while the GPU is an entry-level Alchemist architecture part from Intel's Arc 3 generation. The overall tier, based on the combined percentile of 71, places this system above average, but this metric is heavily skewed by the processor's 92nd percentile ranking.

The fundamental character of this build is that of a compute workstation with basic graphical capabilities. The Ryzen 9 9900X is a flagship-level processor suitable for demanding professional workloads, while the Arc A310E is a low-power, single-slot card designed for multi-display setups or basic acceleration. The 4 GB GDDR6 memory and 64-bit bus of the GPU are appropriate for office productivity, not gaming or rendering. The 120 W CPU TDP combined with the 75 W GPU TDP results in a system that is power-efficient for its compute capacity.

For users seeking a balanced gaming or content-creation machine, this pairing is suboptimal. The CPU's performance would be wasted in gaming scenarios, and the GPU would frustrate users expecting modern graphical fidelity. However, for specific use cases like headless compute nodes, virtualization hosts, or software development workstations where the GPU is merely a display adapter, this build offers exceptional processing power in a power-conscious package. The system's tier is defined by its ability to handle CPU-bound tasks at a near-server level while maintaining a low overall power footprint.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A310E is built on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the DG2-128 chip, manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. It operates at a fixed clock speed of 2000 MHz for both base and boost, with memory running at 1937 MHz (15.5 Gbps effective). The 4 GB GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus provides 124.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is modest by modern standards but adequate for its intended entry-level role.

The GPU contains 768 shading units, 32 TMUs, and 16 ROPs, producing a pixel rate of 32.00 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 64.00 GTexel/s. Its FP32 compute is 3.072 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance of 6.144 TFLOPS via a 2:1 ratio. The 6 ray tracing cores support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, indicating modern API compatibility despite the entry-level positioning. The single-slot design, 168 mm length, and lack of power connectors make it easy to install in any case, with a suggested PSU of only 250 W.

For rendering workloads, the Arc A310E's 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 performance is suitable for lightweight 2D compositing or basic 3D preview, but not for production rendering. The 4 GB VRAM limits texture sizes and scene complexity, while the 124.0 GB/s bandwidth restricts data throughput. The 50th percentile standing confirms it as an average performer, but its end-of-life status and successor Battlemage indicate Intel is moving beyond this architecture. The 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 outputs support multi-monitor setups, which is a strength for productivity environments. However, for any serious graphical computation, this GPU is the clear bottleneck in the system.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 9900X + Intel Arc A310E

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 9900X

Intel Arc A310E

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform

Balance and Bottleneck

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds