SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 9900X + Intel Arc A310

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

95%

GPU

85%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 9900X

57,498 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A310

7,550 Benchmark Score

Top 15% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 9 9900X + Intel Arc A310

This desktop pairing combines AMD's 12-core Zen 5 flagship with Intel's entry-level Arc 3 graphics, creating a configuration where the CPU's 92nd percentile ranking among all processors contrasts sharply with the GPU's 40th percentile standing. The combined percentile of 66 reflects a system built around compute-heavy CPU workloads rather than graphical performance, and the data shows no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination — all gaming discussion below is estimated from benchmark scores rather than direct testing.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This pairing will not sustain high-refresh gaming at modern resolutions. The Arc A310's PassMark G3D score of 5433 places it near the AMD Radeon R7 250 (deltaPct -0.1) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (deltaPct 1), both of which are entry-level or older GPUs. The GPU's 40th percentile ranking means frame rates will likely fall well short of 144 Hz in demanding titles, even at 1080p with reduced settings.

Streaming: The Ryzen 9 9900X provides substantial headroom for encoding and streaming workloads. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 32172 and Geekbench multicore score of 22174 indicate strong multi-threaded throughput, while the 24 threads can handle simultaneous game capture, encoding, and stream output without overtaxing the system. The Arc A310 does include dedicated media engines common to Intel Arc products, though its raw rendering throughput remains limited.

Video editing: The CPU excels at video encoding and rendering tasks. The PassMark multithread score of 54643 and floating-point math score of 120083 suggest smooth timeline scrubbing and export performance for 1080p and some 4K projects. However, the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus (124.0 GB/s bandwidth) constrain effects processing and GPU-accelerated previews, pushing most heavy lifting onto the CPU.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering will be the strong suit here. The 12-core/24-thread configuration with a 5.60 GHz boost clock delivers Cinebench R23 multicore results of 32172, placing it within 1.1% of the Intel Core i9-14900 and 0.2% ahead of the AMD EPYC 7313. For GPU rendering, the Arc A310's FP32 throughput of 2.688 TFLOPS and 768 shading units will handle modest scenes but struggle with complex geometry or high-resolution textures.

Software development: Compilation and parallel build tasks benefit directly from the CPU's thread count. The PassMark integer math score of 181056 and data compression score of 683579 indicate rapid code compilation and archive operations. The 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth and DDR5 dual-channel support reduce bottlenecks during large project builds, while the GPU's presence is sufficient for basic IDE rendering and UI acceleration.

Student and office work: This configuration is massively over-provisioned for productivity tasks. The single-thread performance (Geekbench single-core 3010, PassMark single-thread 4672) ensures responsive application launches, while the GPU handles 2D workloads with a PassMark G2D score of 625. The 30 W GPU TDP and 120 W CPU TDP keep power draw moderate, though the hardware exceeds typical office requirements by a wide margin.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU benchmarks place the Ryzen 9 9900X in the 92nd percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 57498. This sits between the AMD EPYC 9015 (57555, deltaPct -0.1) and the Intel Core i9-14900 (58115, deltaPct -1.1), showing near-parity with enterprise-class server silicon. Single-thread performance is equally strong: 3DMark single-thread 1286, Cinebench R23 single-core 2253, and Geekbench single-core 3010 all indicate top-tier IPC from the Zen 5 architecture.

The GPU benchmarks tell a different story. The Arc A310's average benchmark score of 7550 places it in the 40th percentile, with PassMark G3D of 5433 and Geekbench OpenCL of 30607. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon R7 250 (7557, deltaPct -0.1) and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (7472, deltaPct 1), confirming entry-level positioning. The PassMark DirectX scores are notably low — DirectX 12 at 29, DirectX 11 at 33, DirectX 10 at 31 — suggesting the GPU's driver and hardware implementation trails even modest expectations for modern APIs.

The combined picture is a system where the CPU operates at near-server-class performance while the GPU functions at basic-accelerator level. The 92nd versus 40th percentile gap (52 points) represents one of the largest CPU/GPU imbalances possible in a desktop build, making this configuration suitable for compute-focused tasks rather than graphics-intensive workloads.

Balance and Bottleneck

The bottleneck analysis is unambiguous: the GPU limits essentially all graphics workloads. The CPU's PassMark multithread score of 54643 versus the GPU's PassMark G3D of 5433 illustrates a tenfold performance gap in their respective domains. In gaming, the Arc A310's 40th percentile ranking means frame rates will be constrained by the GPU long before the CPU's 12 cores are meaningfully engaged.

The CPU's 3DMark 16-thread score of 12552 and max-thread score of 13929 indicate that even heavily threaded game engines will not approach the CPU's ceiling. Conversely, the GPU's PassMark DirectX 12 score of 29 suggests that DirectX 12 titles will be particularly limited, while the DirectX 9 score of 69 indicates older titles fare comparatively better but remain far below playable high-refresh thresholds.

For CPU-bound workloads, the GPU's presence is nearly irrelevant. The system will not bottleneck the CPU during rendering, compilation, or scientific computing — the Arc A310 simply provides display output and basic acceleration while the Ryzen 9 9900X handles compute. The FPS scaling in games will show minimal variation across CPU settings, as the GPU saturates first in virtually every scenario.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Socket AM5 platform provides a clear upgrade trajectory. The Ryzen 9 9900X supports PCIe Gen 5 with 24 CPU lanes, allowing future GPU upgrades to take advantage of Gen 5 bandwidth. The DDR5 dual-channel memory with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth is current-generation, and ECC memory support (true) adds workstation flexibility. The motherboard platform remains active, meaning future Zen 5 and subsequent architectures should fit the same socket.

The GPU's power requirements are minimal — a 30 W TDP with no power connectors and a suggested PSU of 200 W. This leaves enormous headroom for a GPU upgrade; the system's 120 W CPU TDP plus any mainstream graphics card would still require far less than typical 650-850 W power supplies. The Arc A310's PCIe 4.0 x8 interface will not bottleneck a wider-bus GPU replacement, though the 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 outputs limit display connectivity options.

A sensible next upgrade would be replacing the Arc A310 with a mid-range or high-end GPU, given the CPU can feed far more graphics performance than the current card can deliver. The CPU's 92nd percentile ranking means it will not become the limiting factor for several GPU generations. Memory expansion to higher-capacity DDR5 kits would also benefit the 89.6 GB/s bandwidth ceiling in memory-intensive workloads.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all gaming figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The Arc A310's PassMark G3D of 5433 and DirectX 12 score of 29 indicate that modern titles at 1080p ultra settings will likely produce frame rates in the low 20s to 30s, with some lighter titles reaching 40-50 FPS. The GPU's 40th percentile ranking relative to all GPUs confirms sub-mediocre gaming capability.

At 1440p and 4K, the 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus (124.0 GB/s) will cause severe texture thrashing and bandwidth starvation. The GPU's pixel rate of 28.00 GPixel/s and texture rate of 56.00 GTexel/s are insufficient for high-resolution rendering. Games from the DirectX 9 era may achieve playable frame rates (PassMark DirectX 9 score of 69 is the GPU's best API result), but anything requiring DirectX 11 or 12 will struggle.

The CPU's contribution to gaming performance is excellent but largely wasted. The 3DMark 2-thread score of 2519 and 4-thread score of 4886 show strong gaming-relevant thread performance, but the GPU cannot translate this into playable frame rates. Esports titles at low settings and 720p might reach 60+ FPS, but this remains speculative given the GPU's benchmark profile.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A310 uses the DG2-128 chip built on TSMC's 6 nm process with 7,200 million transistors across a 157 mm² die. The Xe-HPG architecture includes 768 shading units, 32 TMUs, and 16 ROPs, with 6 dedicated ray tracing cores. The GPU's FP32 throughput is 2.688 TFLOPS, and FP16 reaches 5.376 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio). Memory consists of 4 GB GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, delivering 124.0 GB/s bandwidth at 15.5 Gbps effective speed.

The ray tracing hardware is present but underpowered — 6 RT cores on a GPU that scores 29 in PassMark DirectX 12 will not deliver playable ray-traced frame rates in any modern title. The GPU's 30 W TDP and single-slot design with no power connectors position it as a low-power accelerator rather than a gaming card. The 2.688 TFLOPS FP32 rating places it below what modern games expect for even medium settings at 1080p.

The PassMark GPU compute score of 2157 indicates limited compute utility for GPGPU workloads, though the Geekbench OpenCL score of 30607 suggests some acceleration potential in OpenCL-compatible applications. The 40th percentile ranking places it among older or entry-level discrete GPUs, comparable to the AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 (deltaPct -0.4) and Radeon HD 8850M (deltaPct 1.4). The GPU's production status is end-of-life with a Battlemage successor announced, confirming this is a transitional product.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X is a 12-core, 24-thread processor built on Zen 5 architecture (Granite Ridge codename) using TSMC's 4 nm process. The chip contains 16,630 million transistors across a 2x 70.6 mm² die design, with 80 KB L1 cache per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 64 MB shared L3 cache. Base clock is 4.40 GHz with a 5.60 GHz boost, running at 120 W TDP on the AMD Socket AM5 platform.

The benchmark results position this CPU at the 92nd percentile, with an average score of 57498 that rivals server processors. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 32172 and Geekbench multicore of 22174 demonstrate exceptional multi-threaded throughput. Single-thread performance is equally notable: the 3DMark single-thread score of 1286 and Cinebench R23 single-core of 2253 reflect the Zen 5 IPC improvements. The PassMark data encryption score of 33421 and extended instructions score of 55243 indicate strong cryptography and SIMD workload performance.

The 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth from dual-channel DDR5 support, combined with 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, makes this CPU suitable for workstation-class tasks. The unlocked multiplier allows overclocking, and the 2024-08-14 release date confirms current-generation status. The nearest rival comparisons — within 1.4% of the Intel Core i9-14900 and AMD EPYC 9015 — demonstrate that this desktop CPU delivers server-comparable performance for compute-heavy applications.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 66, reflecting the CPU's 92nd percentile ranking against all CPUs and the GPU's 40th percentile ranking against all GPUs.

Q: How does the Ryzen 9 9900X compare to the Intel Core i9-14900?

A: The Ryzen 9 9900X has an average benchmark score of 57498, which is 1.1% lower than the Intel Core i9-14900's 58115.

Q: What memory type and bandwidth does this CPU support?

A: The Ryzen 9 9900X supports DDR5 dual-channel memory with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth and also supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the GPU's VRAM capacity and memory bus width?

A: The Intel Arc A310 has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing 124.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Does the Arc A310 support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the GPU includes 6 dedicated ray tracing cores, though its low overall performance (40th percentile) limits practical ray tracing use.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU is 200 W, and the GPU itself has a 30 W TDP with no power connectors required.

Q: What is the release date of the CPU and GPU?

A: The Ryzen 9 9900X was released on 2024-08-14, while the Arc A310 was released on 2022-10-11 and is now end-of-life.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who prioritize CPU compute performance above all else. Software developers compiling large codebases will benefit from the 24 threads and PassMark integer math score of 181056. Researchers running data analysis or scientific simulations can leverage the 12-core/24-thread design with 64 MB L3 cache and 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth. Students in engineering or computer science fields gain a workstation-class CPU for compilation, simulation, and multi-tasking, though gaming capability remains minimal.

Content creators working primarily with CPU-based rendering (Cinebench R23 multicore 32172) will find this pairing useful, provided GPU acceleration is not critical. Small business workstations running database operations, virtualization, or financial modeling can exploit the CPU's 92nd percentile performance while the GPU handles basic display output. The system is not suitable for gamers at 1080p or higher resolutions, nor for GPU-accelerated workloads like machine learning training or video encoding that rely on CUDA or modern graphics drivers.

The 120 W CPU TDP and 30 W GPU TDP make this an efficient compute node for multi-system deployments, though the Arc A310's 4 GB VRAM and end-of-life status limit its utility for modern GPU compute. Users needing graphics performance should upgrade the GPU immediately; those needing only CPU throughput will find an exceptional processor at a competitive launch MSRP of $499.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class pairing of AMD's Ryzen 9 9900X (12 cores, 24 threads, Zen 5 architecture) with Intel's Arc A310 (768 shading units, Xe-HPG architecture, 4 GB GDDR6). The combined percentile of 66 places this system in the upper-middle tier of all configurations, driven almost entirely by the CPU's 92nd percentile ranking. The GPU's 40th percentile ranking anchors the system's overall tier, making this a compute-first build where the graphics card serves as a basic display adapter rather than a performance component.

The Ryzen 9 9900X's average benchmark score of 57498 places it within 1.4% of enterprise EPYC and Xeon processors, while the Arc A310's average score of 7550 aligns with entry-level GPUs from several generations ago. The 52-percentile gap between CPU and GPU represents one of the most imbalanced pairings in the database, yet the system remains coherent for specific use cases: CPU rendering, compilation, and scientific computing benefit from the processor's 32172 Cinebench R23 multicore score, while the GPU's low power draw (30 W TDP) and minimal cooling requirements (single-slot, no power connectors) simplify system design. This is not a balanced gaming machine, but it is a highly capable CPU workstation with basic graphical output, upgradeable to a balanced system with a single GPU swap.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 9900X + Intel Arc A310

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 9900X

Intel Arc A310

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Usage Scenarios

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Upgrade Path and Platform

Gaming Performance

GPU Analysis

CPU Analysis

FAQ

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds