SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX + Intel Arc A350M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

95 Score

Top 5% Ranking

95 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

97%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX

76,212 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350M

24,647 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX paired with the Intel Arc A350M is a laptop configuration with a stark performance divide. The CPU is a top-tier mobile powerhouse, operating in the 95th percentile of all processors, while the GPU is a modest entry-level solution sitting in the 70th percentile of all graphics cards. This creates a system where the processor's immense capabilities are largely held in check by the graphics adapter, making it a platform suited for productivity and compute tasks rather than high-end gaming. The combined system percentile of 83 reflects this imbalance, placing it above average overall but driven almost entirely by the CPU's strength.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The Intel Arc A350M is an entry-level mobile GPU based on the Xe-HPG architecture, built on TSMC's 6 nm process. It features 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 24 raster operation pipelines. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1150 MHz with a boost clock of 2200 MHz. Memory is a significant constraint: the card has 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s. This is a modest memory subsystem that will limit texture-heavy workloads and high-resolution rendering.

In terms of specialized hardware, the Arc A350M includes 6 ray tracing cores, positioning it as capable of hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though the overall compute power is limited. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring broad API compatibility for modern games and applications. Its compute throughput is rated at 3.379 TFLOPS for FP32 and 6.758 TFLOPS for FP16 (2:1), which are low figures compared to dedicated desktop graphics cards.

Benchmark data shows the Arc A350M scoring 24546 in Geekbench OpenCL and 24747 in Geekbench Vulkan, with an average benchmark score of 24647. This places it in the 70th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals, based on average score, are the AMD Radeon RX 590 (scoring 24744, a delta of -0.4%), the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile (scoring 24763, a delta of -0.5%), and the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT (scoring 24442, a delta of 0.8%). The data indicates the Arc A350M performs essentially on par with a last-generation desktop mid-range card like the RX 590, and is only 0.8% behind the much more powerful RX 6600 XT in this specific aggregate metric. For rendering, the 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth are the primary bottlenecks; the GPU can handle light 3D modeling and video encoding tasks, but complex scenes with high-resolution textures will quickly exhaust its memory. The ray tracing cores exist, but their throughput is insufficient for demanding ray-traced workloads.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The balance of this system is heavily skewed toward the CPU. The Ryzen 9 8945HX sits in the 95th percentile of all CPUs, while the Arc A350M sits in the 70th percentile of all GPUs. This 25-point gap means the GPU is the definitive bottleneck in any graphics-intensive workload. In gaming, the CPU will have no trouble feeding frames to the GPU; the Arc A350M will be the limiting factor, capping frame rates well below what the processor could theoretically handle.

There is no measured FPS data for this exact combination, so frame scaling cannot be quantified empirically. However, the percentile data strongly suggests that in CPU-bound scenarios, such as physics calculations or AI-driven tasks, the Ryzen 9 will excel, while in GPU-bound scenarios, such as rasterization at high resolutions, the A350M will cap performance. The PassMark physics score for the CPU is 2168, indicating strong computational throughput for simulation, while the GPU's FP32 throughput of 3.379 TFLOPS is a modest figure for rendering.

The bottleneck shifts depending on the workload. For general productivity, multitasking, and code compilation, the CPU dominates and the GPU is largely irrelevant. For gaming, the GPU is the sole limiting factor; the CPU's performance headroom will go unused. For light content creation involving GPU acceleration, the 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus will throttle performance, making the CPU's speed irrelevant. The takeaway is that this is not a balanced pairing; it is a workstation-class CPU saddled with an entry-level GPU, making the GPU the perpetual limiter in any graphics-related task.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU delivers exceptional benchmark results. In Cinebench R23, it scores 42713 in multi-core and 6030 in single-core. Cinebench R20 scores are 17939 multi-core and 2532 single-core, while Cinebench R15 scores are 4305 multi-core and 607 single-core. PassMark results include a multi-thread score of 51405, a single-thread score of 3907, and an average benchmark score of 76212. This places the Ryzen 9 8945HX in the 95th percentile of all CPUs.

Its nearest CPU rivals are remarkably close. The Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX scores 76155, a delta of 0.1% behind. The AMD EPYC Embedded 8224P scores 76492, putting the Ryzen 9 8945HX 0.4% behind. The AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX scores 76513, also 0.4% ahead. The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D scores 75779, which is 0.6% behind the 8945HX. These deltas show the 8945HX is statistically tied with the best mobile and desktop processors available, making it a top-tier performer.

The GPU scores are far more modest. Its average benchmark score is 24647, placing it in the 70th percentile of all GPUs. It is 0.4% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 590, 0.5% ahead of the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile, and 1.5% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630. It is 0.8% behind the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT. The combined picture is a system with elite-level CPU performance and mid-range GPU performance. The combined percentile of 83 reflects this, but it masks the severe imbalance where the CPU's 95th percentile is dragged down by the GPU's 70th percentile. This is a system built for compute, not graphics.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX is a 16-core, 32-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Dragon Range. It is manufactured on TSMC's 5 nm process with a transistor count of 13,140 million across a die size of 2x 71 mm². The base clock is 2.50 GHz, boosting up to 5.40 GHz. It has a TDP of 55 W and is designed for the AMD Socket FL1. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a substantial 64 MB of L3 cache.

Memory support is DDR5, with a dual-channel bus providing a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. It supports PCIe Gen 5 with 28 lanes from the CPU. The integrated graphics are the Radeon 610M, though the presence of a discrete GPU makes this largely redundant. The multiplier is unlocked, allowing for overclocking in supported systems. It was released on 2025-04-22 and is classified as an Active production status mobile part.

The benchmark scores translate directly to real-world performance. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42713 indicates exceptional throughput for multi-threaded workloads like video rendering, 3D animation, and software compilation. The single-core score of 6030 ensures snappy responsiveness in everyday tasks and strong performance in lightly-threaded applications. The PassMark data compression score of 677755 and data encryption score of 40836 show high efficiency in archival and security tasks. The floating-point math score of 117453 and integer math score of 195180 confirm its prowess in scientific computing and financial modeling. The extended instructions score of 49823 indicates strong SIMD performance for modern workloads. This CPU is a mobile workstation powerhouse, capable of handling the most demanding CPU-intensive tasks with ease.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFpsUltraByGame entries, and the dataIsMeasured flag is false. Therefore, all frame rate expectations discussed here are estimates based on the individual benchmark scores of the CPU and GPU, not empirical testing.

The Arc A350M's 70th percentile ranking and its average benchmark score of 24647, which is on par with the AMD Radeon RX 590, suggest it can handle esports titles and older games at 1080p with medium to high settings. Games like Counter-Strike or League of Legends should achieve playable frame rates, likely in the 60-100 FPS range at 1080p, but this is an estimate. The 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus will cause stuttering in modern AAA titles with high-resolution textures, and the GPU likely cannot sustain 60 FPS at 1080p on ultra settings for demanding games.

The CPU, with its 95th percentile ranking, will never be the bottleneck in gaming. Its 32 threads and 5.40 GHz boost clock are overkill for gaming, meaning the Arc A350M will always be the limiting factor. For a gaming-focused user, this pairing is suboptimal. The estimated frame rates are far below what the CPU could support with a more powerful GPU. Expect this system to deliver playable performance only in less demanding titles; for modern AAA games, expect significant compromises in resolution and graphical fidelity to achieve acceptable frame rates.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The platform is built around the AMD Socket FL1, which is specific to the Dragon Range mobile processors. This limits CPU upgrades to other FL1 socket parts, which are likely to offer similar performance characteristics. The memory support is DDR5, dual-channel, with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. Upgrading memory capacity is possible, but the speed is fixed by the memory controller. The CPU provides 28 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which offers high bandwidth for future storage devices, though the GPU is limited to PCIe 4.0 x8.

The GPU, Intel Arc A350M, has a TDP of 25 W and is an integrated form factor (IGP), meaning it is soldered to the motherboard. This makes GPU upgrades impractical in most laptop chassis. The suggested PSU field is null, and the GPU's low TDP means power supply headroom is not a concern for the GPU itself; the CPU's 55 W TDP is the primary power draw. The CPU's power requirements are modest for a 16-core part, which is beneficial for thermal management in a laptop.

A sensible next upgrade path is constrained. Since the GPU is likely soldered, the only meaningful upgrade is system memory. Increasing DDR5 capacity could help with multitasking and memory-intensive applications. The PCIe Gen 5 support means a fast NVMe SSD could be added for storage, though this does not improve compute performance. The platform is what it is; without the ability to swap the GPU, the system's gaming and rendering capabilities are fixed at the level of the Arc A350M.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking among all processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX is in the 95th percentile of all CPUs, indicating top-tier performance.

Q: What is the GPU's average benchmark score and how does it compare to the AMD Radeon RX 590?

A: The Intel Arc A350M has an average benchmark score of 24647, which is 0.4% higher than the AMD Radeon RX 590's score of 24744.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the CPU and the GPU?

A: The CPU has a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s via dual-channel DDR5, while the GPU has a bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s via a 64-bit GDDR6 bus.

Q: How many cores and threads does the Ryzen 9 8945HX have?

A: It has 16 cores and 32 threads, based on the Zen 4 architecture.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU+GPU system?

A: The combined system percentile is 83, reflecting the CPU's high performance and the GPU's more modest capabilities.

Q: Does the Arc A350M support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, it has 6 ray tracing cores, and it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2).

Q: What is the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score?

A: The Ryzen 9 8945HX scores 42713 in Cinebench R23 multi-core.

Build Overview

This is a laptop build with a clear dual personality. The AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX is a 16-core, 32-thread mobile processor based on Zen 4, scoring in the 95th percentile of all CPUs. It is paired with the Intel Arc A350M, a 4 GB GDDR6 mobile GPU with 768 shading units, scoring in the 70th percentile of all GPUs. The combined percentile is 83.

The system is a desktop-class compute engine in a laptop form factor, but the GPU is an entry-level component. The data shows a massive performance gap between the two. The CPU is competitive with the Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX, being just 0.1% ahead, and the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D, being 0.6% ahead. The GPU is on par with the AMD Radeon RX 590, which is a last-generation desktop card. This pairing is not balanced; it is a workstation CPU with a casual gaming GPU. The overall tier is high due to the CPU, but the system's graphics capabilities drag it down to a mid-range tier for gaming and rendering tasks.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who prioritize CPU compute performance above all else and have minimal GPU demands. The Ryzen 9 8945HX's 95th percentile ranking makes it ideal for developers compiling large codebases, researchers running complex simulations, and data analysts processing large datasets. The PassMark multi-thread score of 51405 and integer math score of 195180 indicate exceptional performance for these tasks.

Content creators working on CPU-bound workflows, such as video encoding with software codecs or 3D scene rendering on the CPU, will see excellent performance. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42713 reflects this capability. However, creators who depend on GPU acceleration will be disappointed by the Arc A350M.

Students and small business workstations that need fast multitasking and productivity application performance will find the CPU more than sufficient. The single-core score of 6030 ensures smooth operation in office suites and web browsing. The GPU can handle basic display output and light 2D acceleration, but it is not suitable for gaming beyond esports titles at 1080p with reduced settings. This build is for those who need a mobile supercomputer for the CPU and are willing to ignore the GPU's limitations. It is not for gamers or GPU-accelerated rendering professionals.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX + Intel Arc A350M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX

Intel Arc A350M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

FAQ

Build Overview

Who Should Build It

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds