SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS + Intel Arc A550M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

89%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

31,074 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A550M

49,737 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS + Intel Arc A550M

This is a laptop-class pairing built around AMD's 8-core Zen 4 Hawk Point processor and Intel's Xe-HPG Arc 5 mobile GPU. The CPU sits at the 82nd percentile among all processors, while the GPU ranks at the 86th percentile among all GPUs, placing the combined system at the 84th percentile overall. No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, so all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and percentile positions.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Intel Arc A550M's 86th percentile GPU standing suggests it can drive high-refresh 1080p gaming in many titles. The GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 49,894 and Vulkan score of 49,580 indicate strong compute throughput, while the CPU's single-thread score of 1,013 in 3DMark and 1,805 in Cinebench R23 single-core provide the per-thread performance needed to feed frames efficiently. However, at higher resolutions where GPU load intensifies, the A550M's 8 GB GDDR6 memory and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth may become limiting factors.

Streaming: The Ryzen 9 8945HS's 8 cores and 16 threads deliver a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16,795 and a Geekbench multi-core score of 12,276. This level of multi-threaded performance allows simultaneous game encoding and gameplay in many scenarios, though the GPU's 16 ray tracing cores and Xe-HPG architecture also support hardware-accelerated encoding workloads. The CPU's PassMark multi-thread score of 29,780 further reinforces its capacity for background streaming tasks while maintaining playable frame rates.

Video editing: Multi-threaded workloads are where this CPU excels. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 7,774 and max-thread score of 7,775 are nearly identical, showing excellent scaling across all available threads. Cinebench R15 multi-core at 2,640 and R23 multi-core at 16,795 both point to strong export and render performance for 1080p and 1440p video projects. The GPU's 8.397 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 262.4 GTexel/s texture rate add hardware acceleration for effects and compositing.

3D rendering: The combination of CPU multi-thread power and GPU compute capability makes this a viable entry-level 3D rendering system. The CPU's PassMark floating-point math score of 61,821 and integer math score of 101,226 indicate strong compute throughput for physics simulations and geometry processing. The GPU's FP32 throughput of 8.397 TFLOPS and 16.79 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1) support real-time viewport rendering and GPU-accelerated render engines, though professional-grade rendering at high resolutions may strain the 8 GB VRAM.

Software development: The Ryzen 9 8945HS's PassMark data compression score of 356,508 and data encryption score of 21,323 show strong performance for build tools and cryptographic operations. The CPU's 16 MB shared L3 cache and 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth help with compilation tasks that benefit from fast data access. The 3DMark 2-thread score of 1,985 and 4-thread score of 3,809 indicate responsive single- and light-thread performance for IDE operations and code analysis tools.

Student and office work: For everyday productivity, the CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 3,850 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1,805 ensure snappy application launches and smooth document editing. The 45 W TDP suggests the laptop can sustain performance without excessive thermal throttling, making it suitable for all-day academic work. The integrated Radeon 780M graphics provide a fallback for basic display tasks when the discrete GPU is idle, potentially extending battery life during light workloads.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU achieves an average benchmark score of 31,074, placing it at the 82nd percentile among all processors. This positions it nearly identically to the Intel Core i7-12700F (average score 31,081, 0% delta), and slightly ahead of the Intel Core i7-13700TE (average score 31,028, 0.1% delta) and AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS (average score 30,879, 0.6% delta). The Intel Core 9 273PTE edges it out by 0.2% with a score of 31,143. These rivals are all desktop or high-end mobile parts, which contextualizes the 8945HS's strength as a mobile processor.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 49,737 places it at the 86th percentile among all GPUs, a surprisingly high position for a mobile part. It trails the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti by only 0.4% (49,957), the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 by 0.5% (50,001), and the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT by 2.4% (50,951). It outperforms the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT by 2.6% (48,477). This suggests the A550M delivers desktop-class compute performance despite its mobile form factor.

The combined picture shows a balanced system where both components rank in the low-to-mid 80th percentiles. The CPU's multi-thread performance scales linearly from 8 to 16 threads (3DMark scores of 6,385 at 8 threads, 7,774 at 16 threads, 7,775 at max threads), indicating efficient thread scheduling. The GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 49,894 and Vulkan score of 49,580 are closely aligned, showing consistent performance across different compute APIs.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the AMD Socket FP8, which is a mobile-specific socket with no desktop equivalent. The 8000 series Hawk Point architecture is built on TSMC's 4 nm process and supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. The platform provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, which is sufficient for the GPU's PCIe 4.0 x16 interface and additional NVMe storage.

The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x16 and has a 60 W TDP, which is modest for a discrete mobile GPU. The system's power delivery must accommodate the CPU's 45 W TDP alongside the GPU's 60 W TDP, totaling 105 W for the two primary components. Since this is a laptop-class build, the upgrade path is inherently limited; users cannot swap the CPU or GPU in most implementations.

A sensible next upgrade for users of this platform would be increasing memory capacity or speed, as the dual-channel DDR5 configuration supports up to the 89.6 GB/s bandwidth ceiling. Storage expansion via PCIe Gen 4 NVMe drives would also improve load times and system responsiveness. For users seeking more graphics performance, the platform's PCIe 4.0 x16 slot is ready for a higher-tier mobile GPU, though this would require a new laptop or chassis-level modification.

The GPU is marked as end-of-life in production status, meaning Intel has moved on from this architecture. The CPU remains in active production. This suggests that users should focus on maximizing the current system's capabilities rather than planning incremental GPU upgrades.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets mobile users who need both strong CPU compute and capable GPU performance in a laptop form factor. Gamers playing at 1080p with high or ultra settings will find the A550M's 86th percentile GPU performance sufficient for most titles, especially when paired with the CPU's strong single-thread performance for frame pacing. The 8 GB VRAM is adequate for current titles at 1080p, though users should expect to adjust settings for future releases.

Content creators working with video editing and 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU's multi-thread performance (Cinebench R23 multi-core 16,795, PassMark multi-thread 29,780) combined with the GPU's compute capabilities (OpenCL 49,894, FP32 8.397 TFLOPS). The system handles 1080p video timelines and moderate 3D scenes without major bottlenecks.

Software developers, particularly those working on multi-threaded applications or doing data processing, will appreciate the CPU's PassMark data compression score of 356,508 and extended instructions score of 26,964. Students and office workers get a responsive system for productivity tasks, with the CPU's single-thread performance (Geekbench single-core 2,116, PassMark single-thread 3,850) ensuring smooth everyday operation. Small business workstations running virtualization or database workloads would also benefit from the 8-core/16-thread configuration.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU and GPU are well-matched in their respective percentile positions (82nd vs 86th), suggesting balanced overall performance. However, workload-specific bottlenecks emerge when examining the data. In CPU-bound scenarios like physics simulation (PassMark physics score 1,434) or prime number finding (PassMark find prime numbers score 92), the CPU's 82nd percentile position will be the limiting factor. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 7,774 versus 2-thread score of 1,985 shows a 3.9x scaling from 2 to 16 threads, indicating good multi-threading but with diminishing returns beyond 8 threads.

In GPU-bound workloads like high-resolution gaming or GPU compute, the A550M's 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth may bottleneck performance. The GPU's pixel rate of 131.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 262.4 GTexel/s are competitive, but the 128-bit memory bus limits bandwidth compared to wider-memory GPUs. FPS scaling estimates suggest that at 1080p, the CPU can keep up with the GPU in most titles, but at 1440p and above, the GPU becomes the primary constraint.

The CPU's memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s is shared with the integrated Radeon 780M graphics, which could create contention if both the iGPU and discrete GPU are active. In gaming scenarios where the discrete GPU handles rendering, the CPU's memory bandwidth is sufficient for game logic and asset streaming. For multi-tasking with heavy data workloads, the 16 MB L3 cache helps reduce memory pressure.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's architecture and process node?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS uses Zen 4 architecture (codenamed Hawk Point) built on TSMC's 4 nm process with 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have and what is its bandwidth?

A: The Intel Arc A550M has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth with a 1750 MHz memory clock (14 Gbps effective).

Q: What is the combined system percentile?

A: The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 84, with the CPU at the 82nd percentile and the GPU at the 86th percentile.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, ECC memory is not supported. The system uses dual-channel DDR5 memory with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What is the GPU's ray tracing capability?

A: The Intel Arc A550M has 16 dedicated ray tracing cores as part of its Xe-HPG architecture, with DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) API support.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core i7-12700F?

A: The Ryzen 9 8945HS has an average benchmark score of 31,074, which is essentially identical to the Core i7-12700F's 31,081 (0% delta).

Q: What is the CPU's TDP and what does that mean for laptop design?

A: The CPU has a 45 W TDP, which is typical for high-performance mobile processors and allows for thinner laptop designs while maintaining strong multi-thread performance.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS is an 8-core, 16-thread processor from the 8000 series, based on Zen 4 architecture and codenamed Hawk Point. It operates at a 4.00 GHz base clock with a 5.20 GHz boost clock, built on TSMC's 4 nm process with 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 16 MB shared L3. The CPU uses the AMD Socket FP8 and supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth.

Benchmark results show strong multi-threaded performance: Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16,795, Geekbench multi-core score of 12,276, and PassMark multi-thread score of 29,780. Single-thread performance is equally impressive with 3DMark single-thread score of 1,013, Cinebench R23 single-core of 1,805, and Geekbench single-core of 2,116. The 3DMark scaling from 2 threads (1,985) to 4 threads (3,809) to 8 threads (6,385) to 16 threads (7,774) shows near-linear scaling up to 8 threads, with modest gains beyond that.

The PassMark sub-tests reveal workload-specific strengths: data compression (356,508) and integer math (101,226) are exceptional, while floating-point math (61,821) and extended instructions (26,964) are also strong. The find prime numbers score of 92 is notably low, indicating this CPU is not optimized for that specific workload. The average benchmark score of 31,074 places it at the 82nd percentile, with nearest rivals including the Intel Core i7-12700F (31,081, 0% delta) and Intel Core 9 273PTE (31,143, -0.2% delta).

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: "laptop") pairing the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS with the Intel Arc A550M. The CPU is a high-end mobile processor from the 8000 series, while the GPU is an end-of-life mobile graphics solution from Intel's Alchemist generation. The combined percentile of 84 places this system in the upper tier of all laptop configurations.

The CPU's 82nd percentile and GPU's 86th percentile are closely aligned, indicating a balanced pairing that avoids severe bottlenecking in either direction. The system is capable of handling demanding workloads including gaming, content creation, and development tasks. The CPU's active production status contrasts with the GPU's end-of-life status, suggesting the platform has longevity but the graphics component will not receive future architectural improvements.

This configuration represents a high-performance mobile workstation or gaming laptop tier, with the CPU providing strong multi-threaded compute and the GPU delivering desktop-class graphics performance. The 45 W CPU TDP and 60 W GPU TDP together require efficient thermal management, but enable this level of performance in a portable form factor.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A550M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture from the Alchemist generation, using TSMC's 6 nm process with 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die (transistor density of 53.4M per mm²). The GPU operates at a 900 MHz base clock with a 2050 MHz boost clock and 1750 MHz memory clock (14 Gbps effective). It features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 224.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Compute resources include 2,048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, 64 render output units, and 16 ray tracing cores. The GPU delivers 8.397 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 16.79 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1 ratio). Pixel rate is 131.2 GPixel/s and texture rate is 262.4 GTexel/s. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Benchmark performance shows Geekbench OpenCL score of 49,894 and Vulkan score of 49,580, placing the GPU at the 86th percentile with an average score of 49,737. This puts it in striking distance of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti (49,957, -0.4% delta) and AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 (50,001, -0.5% delta), while outperforming the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT by 2.6%. The GPU's 60 W TDP and IGP slot width indicate it is designed for mobile integration, though its compute performance rivals desktop GPUs.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so the following estimates are derived from the benchmark scores and percentile positions. The CPU's 82nd percentile and GPU's 86th percentile suggest this system should handle 1080p gaming at high to ultra settings in most titles, with the GPU's 8 GB VRAM providing adequate capacity for current game textures.

At 1080p, the GPU's 8.397 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 86th percentile position indicate strong frame rates in esports titles and well-optimized AAA games. The CPU's single-thread performance (3DMark single-thread score 1,013, PassMark single-thread 3,850) ensures minimal CPU bottleneck at this resolution. Estimated frame rates would typically range from 60-100+ FPS in competitive titles and 60-80 FPS in demanding AAA games at ultra settings.

At 1440p, the GPU's 224.0 GB/s bandwidth and 128-bit memory bus become more significant factors. Estimated performance would typically drop to 40-60 FPS in demanding titles at high settings, with users likely needing to adjust to medium/high presets for smoother gameplay. The 8 GB VRAM should suffice for most current titles at this resolution, though future releases with higher texture requirements may exceed capacity.

At 4K, the GPU would likely struggle to maintain playable frame rates in most AAA titles, with estimates in the 20-40 FPS range at medium settings. The CPU's 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth and 16 MB L3 cache provide sufficient game logic performance, but the GPU's compute and memory resources are the limiting factor. Users targeting 4K gaming should consider lower settings or resolution scaling techniques.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS + Intel Arc A550M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

Intel Arc A550M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Usage Scenarios

Benchmark Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

CPU Analysis

Build Overview

GPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds