SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS + Intel Arc A350M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
89%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

31,074 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350M

24,647 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS + Intel Arc A350M: A Mobile Analysis

This pairing combines a high-end 8-core AMD mobile processor with Intel's entry-level discrete Arc GPU in a laptop configuration. The CPU is a Zen 4 (Hawk Point) part from the 8000 series, built on TSMC's 4 nm process with 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. The GPU is an Intel Alchemist (Arc 3 Mobile) part on TSMC's 6 nm node with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. The combined system sits at the 76th percentile against all CPU+GPU pairings. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data — so all frame rate discussion below is estimated from benchmark scores, not direct game testing.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket FP8, a mobile-only socket. This immediately defines the upgrade path: it is a soldered BGA package in a laptop chassis, so the CPU itself cannot be swapped. Memory support is DDR5 over a dual-channel bus, yielding 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory controller does not support ECC. A laptop buyer should be aware that DDR5 capacity and speed are fixed at purchase time; there is no DIMM slot flexibility typical of desktop platforms.

The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes (CPU only). The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x8, which is half the lane width used by many discrete mobile GPUs. This is not a bottleneck for the A350M given its modest bandwidth needs, but it does cap future expansion within the same chassis. The platform is closed, so the only meaningful "upgrade" is to a different laptop entirely.

Power delivery is constrained by the CPU's 45 W TDP and the GPU's 25 W TDP. The GPU has no suggested PSU field, which is typical for a mobile IGP-class part — it draws power from the laptop's internal supply, not an external PSU. The combined thermal budget is modest, suggesting a thin-and-light chassis rather than a desktop replacement. A sensible next upgrade for users needing more GPU headroom would be a laptop with a higher-TDP discrete GPU, but the CPU's 82nd percentile performance means it is rarely the limiting factor in this pairing.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A350M is a 4 GB GDDR6 part with a 64-bit memory bus, providing 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Its base clock is 1150 MHz with a boost clock of 2200 MHz; memory runs at 1750 MHz, effectively 14 Gbps. The chip, DG2-128, packs 768 shading units, 48 TMUs, and 24 ROPs. It has 6 ray tracing cores, and while tensor cores are not listed, the architecture supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Compute throughput is 3.379 TFLOPS for FP32 and 6.758 TFLOPS for FP16 (2:1 ratio). Pixel rate is 52.80 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 105.6 GTexel/s. These figures place the A350M at the 70th percentile among all GPUs. Its average benchmark score is 24647, which is nearly identical to the AMD Radeon RX 590 (24744, -0.4% delta) and the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile (24763, -0.5% delta). It also edges out the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT (24442, +0.8%) and beats the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 (24277, +1.5%).

For rendering workloads, the 4 GB VRAM is a hard constraint. The 112 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for 1080p textures but will choke on 1440p or 4K assets. The 6 RT cores provide entry-level ray tracing support, but the 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 throughput means ray-traced scenes will require significant compromises. The Vulkan 1.4 support is notable for cross-platform graphics development, and the DirectX 12 Ultimate feature set ensures compatibility with modern game engines.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark scores are strong across the board. In 3DMark, it scores 1013 single-thread, 1985 at 2 threads, 3809 at 4 threads, 6385 at 8 threads, 7774 at 16 threads, and 7775 at max threads. The scaling from 8 to 16 threads is nearly flat (6385 to 7774), indicating that the 8-core/16-thread configuration is well-utilized by the 16-thread test. Cinebench R23 scores are 1805 single-core and 16795 multi-core. Geekbench shows 2116 single-core and 12276 multi-core. PassMark results include 3850 single-thread, 29780 multithread, 101226 integer math, 61821 floating point math, and 356508 data compression.

The CPU sits at the 82nd percentile against all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 31074. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the Intel Core i7-12700F (31081, 0% delta), the Intel Core i7-13700TE (31028, +0.1% delta), the Intel Core 9 273PTE (31143, -0.2% delta), and the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS (30879, +0.6% delta). This means the 8945HS is statistically indistinguishable from a desktop Core i7-12700F in average CPU performance, which is remarkable for a 45 W mobile part.

The GPU's benchmark results are more limited. Geekbench OpenCL scores 24546, and Vulkan scores 24747. The average is 24647. The GPU's nearest rivals are the RX 590 (-0.4%), RTX A5000 Mobile (-0.5%), RX 6600 XT (+0.8%), and GTX 1630 (+1.5%). The combined picture is a CPU that is firmly in the upper tier of mobile processors, paired with a GPU that is mid-pack and roughly equivalent to a desktop RX 590 or GTX 1630.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance here is heavily skewed toward the CPU. The 8945HS at the 82nd CPU percentile is a high-end mobile processor, while the A350M at the 70th GPU percentile is an entry-level discrete part. In CPU-bound workloads like software compilation, data compression, or single-threaded productivity, the CPU will deliver near-desktop-class performance. In GPU-bound workloads like gaming at high settings or 3D rendering, the GPU will be the limiting factor.

The FPS scaling evidence is indirect but informative. The CPU's 3DMark 16-thread score of 7774 suggests it can feed a much more powerful GPU than the A350M. The GPU's 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is roughly one-third of what a modern mid-range desktop GPU offers, so frame rates will be constrained by the GPU in most graphically intensive scenarios. The 4 GB VRAM is a further bottleneck at higher resolutions, where texture data exceeds the memory capacity.

For multi-threaded workloads that use both CPU and GPU (e.g., video encoding with GPU acceleration), the CPU's 16 threads can handle the encode pipeline while the GPU offloads specific tasks. However, the GPU's 25 W TDP and 64-bit memory bus limit its ability to sustain heavy compute loads. The CPU's PassMark data compression score of 356508 and integer math score of 101226 indicate strong general-purpose throughput, which will not be bottlenecked by the GPU in non-graphics tasks.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This is not a high-refresh gaming platform. The A350M's 3.379 TFLOPS and 4 GB VRAM will struggle to maintain high frame rates at 1080p ultra settings in modern titles. Estimated FPS would be playable for esports titles but far from high-refresh (144 Hz+) performance. The CPU is not the constraint; the GPU is.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 threads and strong multi-core scores (16795 Cinebench R23 multi-core, 29780 PassMark multithread) can handle software encoding at reasonable quality. The GPU's fixed-function encoders are not listed, but the CPU alone can manage a 1080p stream while gaming, though the GPU's limited headroom will reduce in-game FPS.

Video editing: The CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads, combined with a PassMark multithread score of 29780, provide solid performance for timeline editing and export. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 112 GB/s bandwidth are enough for 1080p effects and basic color grading, but 4K timelines with heavy effects will exceed its capacity. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 24546 suggests the GPU can accelerate some effects, but the CPU will carry most of the load.

3D rendering: The GPU's 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 and 6.758 TFLOPS FP16 are entry-level for rendering. The 6 RT cores provide limited ray tracing acceleration. The CPU's multi-core score of 16795 in Cinebench R23 makes it the primary render engine for CPU-based renderers. For GPU-based renderers, the A350M will be slow but functional, and the 4 GB VRAM limits scene complexity.

Software development: This is a strong use case. The CPU's single-thread score of 1013 in 3DMark and 3850 in PassMark single-thread, combined with 16 threads, handles compilation, static analysis, and test execution efficiently. The GPU is irrelevant for most development tasks, so the CPU's 82nd percentile performance shines.

Student and office work: Excellent. The CPU's single-thread performance (2116 Geekbench single-core, 1805 Cinebench R23 single-core) handles spreadsheet, word processing, and web browsing with ease. The GPU's 70th percentile is overkill for office tasks but provides smooth UI rendering. The 45 W CPU TDP and 25 W GPU TDP mean long battery life in a thin-and-light chassis.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need strong CPU performance in a laptop but do not require high-end graphics. Gamers at 1080p with reduced settings will find the A350M adequate for esports and older titles, but those targeting 1440p or high refresh rates should look elsewhere. Content creators working with 1080p video and CPU-based rendering will benefit from the 8945HS's multi-core muscle. Software developers and data analysts will appreciate the CPU's 82nd percentile performance, which rivals desktop parts like the Core i7-12700F.

Students and office workers in need of a responsive, portable machine will find the CPU more than sufficient, with the GPU providing a modest boost for light creative work. Small business workstations that run CPU-intensive applications like accounting software, database queries, or engineering simulations will perform well, provided the GPU is not a factor. The 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus make this unsuitable for machine learning training or large-scale 3D modeling, but suitable for inference and light visualization.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Hawk Point. It is part of the Ryzen 9 lineup within the 8000 series, built on TSMC's 4 nm process. The base clock is 4.00 GHz with a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, and the TDP is 45 W. Cache is organized as 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 16 MB shared L3. The integrated Radeon 780M GPU provides a fallback for display output when the discrete Arc A350M is not engaged.

Benchmark results show a processor that scales well with thread count. The 3DMark scores from 1013 single-thread to 7775 max-threads indicate efficient multi-threading, with the 16-thread score nearly identical to max-threads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16795 is strong for a mobile part, and the single-core score of 1805 is competitive for daily tasks. Geekbench multi-core of 12276 and single-core of 2116 corroborate the Cinebench results.

The PassMark suite reveals specific strengths: integer math at 101226 and floating point math at 61821 indicate strong arithmetic throughput. Data encryption at 21323 and extended instructions at 26964 show good cryptographic and SIMD performance. The find prime numbers score of 92 is low, suggesting that the CPU does not excel at highly serialized integer workloads, but this is a minor weakness. The physics score of 1434 and random string sorting of 43202 round out the profile.

The CPU's 82nd percentile ranking and near-identical average score to the desktop Core i7-12700F (31081 vs 31074) is a key takeaway. This is a mobile processor that delivers desktop-class multi-threaded performance, making it suitable for heavy workloads in a portable form factor.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining an AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS CPU with an Intel Arc A350M GPU. The CPU is a high-end mobile part from the 8000 series, while the GPU is an entry-level discrete part from Intel's Alchemist generation. The combined percentile is 76, indicating that this pairing outperforms three-quarters of all CPU+GPU combinations in the database.

The CPU is the dominant component, ranking at the 82nd percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU ranks at the 70th percentile among all GPUs. The GPU's average benchmark score of 24647 places it in the same league as desktop GPUs like the RX 590 and GTX 1630, which are several years old. The CPU's average score of 31074 places it alongside modern desktop mid-range processors.

The overall tier is upper-midrange, driven almost entirely by the CPU. This is a system for users who prioritize processing power over graphics. The 45 W CPU TDP and 25 W GPU TDP suggest a laptop that can be passively cooled in light loads and has modest power demands under stress. The production status of the CPU is active, while the GPU is end-of-life, which may affect long-term driver support and availability.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's performance ranking against all CPUs?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS sits at the 82nd percentile, with an average benchmark score of 31074, nearly matching the Intel Core i7-12700F (31081, 0% delta).

Q: How does the GPU compare to desktop graphics cards?

A: The Intel Arc A350M scores 24647 on average, which is -0.4% versus the AMD Radeon RX 590 (24744) and +1.5% versus the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 (24277).

Q: What memory bandwidth does the platform support?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 with 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth, while the GPU has its own 4 GB GDDR6 memory with 112.0 GB/s over a 64-bit bus.

Q: Is the CPU socket upgradeable?

A: No, the CPU uses AMD Socket FP8, which is a mobile BGA package. The CPU cannot be removed or upgraded.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Intel Arc A350M has 6 ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), but its 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 throughput limits ray-traced performance.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile?

A: This CPU+GPU pairing ranks at the 76th percentile against all combinations, driven primarily by the CPU's 82nd percentile performance.

Q: Are there measured FPS values for this combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this pairing. All frame rate expectations are estimated from benchmark scores.

Gaming Performance

There are no measured FPS rows for the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS + Intel Arc A350M combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data, so the following frame rate expectations are estimates derived from the GPU's benchmark scores and the CPU's performance, not direct measurements.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 24647, comparable to an RX 590 or GTX 1630, suggests 1080p gaming is feasible at medium to high settings in titles from a few years ago. For esports games like CS:GO or League of Legends, the CPU's strong single-thread performance (1013 in 3DMark single-thread, 3850 in PassMark single-thread) will help maintain high frame rates, potentially exceeding 60 FPS at 1080p with reduced settings. The GPU's 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 and 6.758 TFLOPS FP16 provide enough compute for 30-60 FPS in older AAA titles at 1080p medium settings.

Modern AAA titles at 1080p ultra settings will likely struggle. The 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth are insufficient for high-resolution textures and complex scenes. Estimated frame rates would drop below 30 FPS in demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 or Assassin's Creed Valhalla at ultra settings. Ray-traced titles would see even lower performance due to the 6 RT cores and limited bandwidth.

At 1440p, the GPU is not viable for gaming beyond low settings and older titles. The 64-bit memory bus and 25 W TDP cap the GPU's ability to push higher resolutions. The CPU's 16 threads will not compensate for the GPU's bandwidth limitations. For 4K gaming, this system is not suitable.

Estimated frame rates for 1080p: esports titles 60-100 FPS at medium settings, older AAA titles 40-60 FPS at medium, modern AAA titles 25-40 FPS at low-medium. These are estimates based on the GPU's benchmark scores and should be treated as rough guidance, not measured results. The CPU's performance will rarely be the bottleneck; the A350M is the limiting factor in all gaming scenarios.