SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX + Intel Arc A770M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

97%

GPU

90%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX

81,103 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A770M

18,383 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX + Intel Arc A770M

This build pairs AMD's top-tier mobile processor, the Ryzen 9 8940HX, with Intel's Arc A770M discrete GPU in a laptop configuration. The CPU sits in the 95th percentile among all processors, while the GPU rests at the 62nd percentile, resulting in a combined percentile of 79. The data clearly shows a processor-heavy system where the 16-core Zen 4 chip provides workstation-class multi-threaded throughput, while the Arc A770M delivers solid mid-range 1080p and 1440p gaming capability.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX is a 16-core, 32-thread mobile processor built on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Dragon Range. It belongs to the 8000 series and is manufactured on TSMC's 5 nm process node with 13,140 million transistors spread across two 71 mm² dies. The chip runs at a base clock of 2.40 GHz and boosts up to 5.30 GHz, which is exceptional for a mobile part with a 55 W TDP. The 64 MB of L3 cache, supplemented by 1 MB L2 and 64 KB L1 per core, provides ample data locality for multi-threaded workloads.

Benchmark results confirm this processor's position in the 95th percentile of all CPUs. In Cinebench R23, the 8940HX scores 32,521 points in multi-core and 1,917 points in single-core tests. The multi-core figure is particularly telling: it exceeds the score of many desktop processors from just a few generations ago, making this chip a genuine desktop replacement in a laptop form factor. The single-core score of 1,917 in R23 indicates strong per-thread performance, essential for responsiveness and lightly-threaded applications. In Cinebench R15, the processor achieves 5,355 multi-core and 292 single-core points.

PassMark results reinforce the processor's strengths. The multithread score of 49,731 and single-thread score of 3,874 demonstrate balanced performance across both threaded and single-threaded tasks. Data compression scores 650,984, while encryption hits 39,318, and floating-point math reaches 113,921. Integer math scores 189,221, extended instructions 47,802, and prime number finding 251. Physics simulation scores 2,104, and random string sorting 75,381. These numbers suggest the chip excels in data-heavy tasks, scientific computing, and content creation workflows that leverage parallel execution.

When compared to its nearest rivals, the 8940HX sits within a tight performance band. The Intel Xeon w5-3535X averages 81,115 points, essentially identical to the 8940HX's 81,103 average. The Intel Core i9-14900KS matches at 81,127, while the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 trails by 0.4% at 80,762. The Intel Xeon 638 is 0.5% behind at 80,723. This places the 8940HX in the company of elite desktop and workstation processors, despite being a mobile part.

Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark picture shows a system where the CPU far outpaces the GPU in relative standing. The Ryzen 9 8940HX achieves an average benchmark score of 81,103, placing it in the 95th percentile of all CPUs. The Intel Arc A770M, by contrast, averages 18,383 in its benchmarks, placing it in the 62nd percentile of all GPUs. The combined percentile for this build is 79, reflecting the CPU's dominance in the overall performance equation.

In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the Arc A770M scores 2,278 points. Geekbench results show 89,494 in OpenCL and 74,422 in Vulkan, indicating strong compute capability. PassMark GPU tests show a directX 9 score of 178, directX 10 of 56, directX 11 of 69, and directX 12 of 70. The G2D score is 711, G3D is 11,774, and GPU compute is 4,778. These numbers place the Arc A770M in the same performance class as the AMD Radeon RX 460 (0.1% ahead at 18,373), AMD FirePro D500 (0.8% behind at 18,533), AMD Radeon Pro 5700 (1.1% behind at 18,189), and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile (1.2% behind at 18,159).

The discrepancy between CPU and GPU percentiles is stark: the 8940HX outperforms 95% of all processors, while the Arc A770M outperforms only 62% of GPUs. This creates a system where CPU-bound tasks like compilation, rendering, and scientific computing will see elite-level performance, while GPU-bound tasks like gaming at high resolutions will see mid-range results.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A770M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the DG2-512 chip, and belongs to the Alchemist generation (Arc 7 Mobile). It is manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process with 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1650 MHz and boosts to 2050 MHz, with memory running at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective). It features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

The GPU contains 4,096 shading units, 256 texture mapping units, and 128 raster operation units. It has 32 ray tracing cores, supporting hardware-accelerated ray tracing for compatible titles. The pixel rate is 262.4 GPixel/s, texture rate is 524.8 GTexel/s, and FP32 compute reaches 16.79 TFLOPS. FP16 performance doubles to 33.59 TFLOPS via the 2:1 ratio. The card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring modern API compatibility. It connects via PCIe 4.0 x16 and has a 120 W TDP.

Benchmark results show the Arc A770M's position in the 62nd percentile of all GPUs. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,278 indicates competent DirectX 12 gaming performance. Geekbench OpenCL at 89,494 and Vulkan at 74,422 show strong compute throughput for a mid-range mobile GPU. The PassMark DirectX scores, ranging from 56 in DirectX 10 to 70 in DirectX 12, suggest consistent performance across API generations, though the low absolute numbers indicate these tests are not the GPU's strongest showing. The G3D score of 11,774 and GPU compute of 4,778 confirm solid mid-range positioning.

For rendering workloads, the 16 GB VRAM is a significant advantage, allowing larger textures and scenes than 8 GB competitors. The 512 GB/s bandwidth supports high-resolution texture streaming and compute-heavy tasks. However, the GPU's 62nd percentile ranking means it will not compete with high-end desktop or even top-tier mobile GPUs in raw rasterization performance.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Arc A770M's 62nd percentile ranking suggests it can drive 1080p gaming at high settings with competitive frame rates, though 1440p high-refresh gaming will push its limits. The CPU's 95th percentile position ensures frame pacing is never processor-limited.

Streaming: The 8940HX's 32 threads provide ample headroom for simultaneous encoding and gaming. The CPU's high multithread score of 49,731 in PassMark indicates it can handle streaming workloads while maintaining game performance.

Video editing: The 8940HX's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32,521 accelerates video encoding and export tasks dramatically. The Arc A770M's 16 GB VRAM and 512 GB/s bandwidth handle 4K timelines and effects processing, though GPU acceleration will be mid-range.

3D rendering: The CPU's 95th percentile ranking makes it exceptional for CPU-based rendering engines like Blender Cycles or V-Ray. The GPU's compute scores (89,494 OpenCL) provide usable GPU acceleration for compatible renderers.

Software development: With 16 cores and 32 threads, compilation times will be minimal. The 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth and PCIe Gen 5 support ensure fast I/O for large codebases, and the single-thread score of 3,874 handles interactive tooling responsively.

Student and office work: This pairing is overkill for typical productivity tasks, but the 95th percentile CPU ensures zero latency in any office application. The 16 GB GDDR6 VRAM is wasted on spreadsheet work, but the system will never feel slow.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX uses the AMD Socket FL1 and belongs to the Dragon Range platform. It supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth, with ECC memory not supported. The CPU provides 28 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, enabling fast NVMe storage and future expansion. This is a laptop platform, so upgrades are largely limited to memory and storage rather than CPU or GPU replacement.

The CPU's TDP of 55 W and the GPU's TDP of 120 W combine for a total of 175 W, which is manageable for a high-performance laptop cooling solution. The CPU is multiplier-unlocked, suggesting enthusiast-level tuning options where the laptop BIOS permits. The integrated Radeon 610M GPU provides a fallback for power-saving modes or when the discrete GPU is disabled.

For a sensible next upgrade, increasing memory capacity or speed within the DDR5 standard would benefit memory-bandwidth-sensitive workloads. Adding a PCIe Gen 5 NVMe drive would maximize storage throughput given the CPU's lane support. The GPU is not upgradable in a laptop, so the Arc A770M is a fixed component of this build.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFpsUltraByGame rows, so all frame rate discussions are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The Arc A770M's 62nd percentile ranking and its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,278 suggest it performs similarly to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile, which is 1.2% ahead in average score.

At 1080p ultra settings, the Arc A770M should deliver playable frame rates in most modern titles, with competitive shooters likely exceeding 60 FPS and demanding AAA games hovering near 60 FPS. At 1440p ultra, frame rates will drop, with the GPU likely falling below 60 FPS in graphically intensive titles. The 16 GB VRAM provides headroom for high-resolution textures, but the GPU's raw compute (16.79 TFLOPS FP32) limits overall throughput.

The CPU's 95th percentile position ensures games are never processor-bound, even at lower resolutions where CPU overhead is higher. In CPU-intensive titles like strategy games or simulations, the 8940HX's strong single-thread score of 3,874 will keep frame rates high.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who need exceptional CPU performance in a laptop form factor. Gamers at 1080p will find the Arc A770M sufficient for high settings, while 1440p gamers should expect to adjust settings for smooth frame rates. Content creators working with video editing, 3D rendering, or software compilation will benefit most from the 8940HX's 95th percentile CPU performance.

Developers compiling large codebases will see dramatic time savings from the 16-core, 32-thread processor. Students in engineering or scientific fields running simulations or data analysis will appreciate the CPU's multithread score of 49,731. Small business workstations handling databases or virtualization will find the 32 threads and 64 MB L3 cache well-suited to parallel workloads.

The GPU's 16 GB VRAM makes this build viable for lightweight machine learning or 3D modeling tasks, though the 62nd percentile GPU ranking means it is not intended for heavy GPU compute. This is a CPU-first build for users who prioritize processing power over graphics performance.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile is 79, reflecting the CPU's 95th percentile and the GPU's 62nd percentile positions.

Q: How does the Ryzen 9 8940HX compare to the Intel Core i9-14900KS?

A: The two processors have nearly identical average benchmark scores: 81,103 for the 8940HX and 81,127 for the i9-14900KS, a 0% delta.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The Intel Arc A770M has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Does this build support PCIe Gen 5?

A: Yes, the CPU provides 28 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, though the GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x16.

Q: What are the CPU's Cinebench R23 scores?

A: The 8940HX scores 32,521 in multi-core and 1,917 in single-core tests.

Q: How does the Arc A770M compare to the RTX 3060 Mobile?

A: The RTX 3060 Mobile averages 18,159, which is 1.2% higher than the Arc A770M's 18,383 average.

Q: Is measured FPS data available for this combination?

A: No, no measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU pairing; all FPS discussions are estimates from benchmark scores.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data reveals a clear asymmetry between CPU and GPU capabilities. The Ryzen 9 8940HX sits at the 95th percentile, matching elite desktop processors like the Intel Xeon w5-3535X and Core i9-14900KS. The Arc A770M sits at the 62nd percentile, roughly equivalent to the RTX 3060 Mobile. This creates a system where the CPU is never the limiting factor in any workload.

In gaming, the GPU will bottleneck performance at all resolutions above 1080p. The Arc A770M's 62nd percentile ranking means frame rates are determined by GPU throughput, not CPU capability. At 1080p, the CPU's strong single-thread performance (3,874 PassMark) ensures it can feed frames to the GPU without becoming a constraint, but the GPU's 16.79 TFLOPS FP32 compute will cap maximum frame rates.

In CPU-bound workloads like rendering, compilation, or data processing, the GPU's lower standing becomes irrelevant. The 8940HX's 32,521 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and 49,731 PassMark multithread score deliver elite-level performance independent of the GPU. The 64 MB L3 cache and 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth further reduce bottlenecks in data-intensive tasks.

The practical bottleneck analysis shows this build is GPU-limited in graphics workloads and CPU-optimized for compute workloads. Users should expect the Arc A770M to be the constraining factor in gaming and GPU-accelerated tasks, while the CPU will excel in multi-threaded processing.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build pairing the AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX with the Intel Arc A770M. The CPU is a 16-core, 32-thread Zen 4 mobile processor in the 95th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is a mid-range Alchemist-generation mobile part in the 62nd percentile. The combined percentile of 79 places this system in the upper tier of laptop configurations.

The build's identity is defined by its processor: a Dragon Range chip that delivers desktop-class multi-threaded performance in a mobile form factor. The Arc A770M complements it with 16 GB of VRAM and 512 GB/s bandwidth, providing sufficient graphics performance for 1080p gaming and light GPU compute. This system is best suited for users who prioritize CPU throughput for content creation, development, and scientific workloads over extreme gaming performance.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX + Intel Arc A770M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX

Intel Arc A770M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

GPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Upgrade Path and Platform

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds