SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX + Intel Arc A730M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

97 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 3% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
97%
VS
GPU
96%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX

81,103 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A730M

45,592 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX + Intel Arc A730M

This pairing combines AMD's top-tier mobile CPU with Intel's mid-range mobile GPU in a laptop-class system. The Ryzen 9 8940HX sits in the 95th percentile among all CPUs, while the Arc A730M lands in the 84th percentile among all GPUs, giving the combined platform a 90th percentile overall ranking. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the dataset, so all gaming frame rates discussed here are estimated from the benchmark scores rather than direct measurements.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX is a 16-core, 32-thread processor built on Zen 4 architecture with the Dragon Range codename. It belongs to the 8000 series and operates on a 5 nm TSMC process node, containing 13,140 million transistors across a dual-die design measuring 2x 71 mm². The base clock runs at 2.40 GHz with a boost clock reaching 5.30 GHz, and the multiplier is unlocked for overclocking headroom. The TDP is rated at 55 W, which is modest for a 16-core mobile part, suggesting the platform prioritizes efficiency alongside raw throughput.

Cache configuration is generous: each core receives 64 KB of L1 and 1 MB of L2, with a shared 64 MB L3 pool. This large L3 cache benefits workloads with repeated data access patterns, such as database queries and scientific computing. Memory support is limited to DDR5 in dual-channel configuration, providing 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth. ECC memory is not supported, which slightly narrows its appeal for mission-critical server workloads but does not affect consumer or prosumer tasks.

Benchmark results demonstrate exceptional multi-threaded capability. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 32,521 points places it firmly in workstation-class territory, while the single-core score of 1,917 points indicates strong per-thread performance for everyday responsiveness. PassMark tests reinforce this picture: multithread score of 49,731, integer math at 189,221, floating-point math at 113,921, and extended instructions at 47,802. Data compression score of 650,984 and encryption score of 39,318 show the CPU excels at both archiving tasks and security-related operations. The average benchmark score of 81,103 puts it in the 95th percentile of all CPUs, with nearest rivals including the Intel Xeon w5-3535X (81,115 average score, 0% delta), Intel Core i9-14900KS (81,127, 0% delta), AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 (80,762, 0.4% ahead), and Intel Xeon 638 (80,723, 0.5% ahead). The Ryzen 9 8940HX essentially trades blows with these desktop-class processors, a remarkable feat for a mobile chip.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A730M is a mobile GPU based on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the Alchemist generation from the Arc 7 Mobile lineup. It uses the DG2-512 chip manufactured on a 6 nm TSMC process with 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die. The GPU operates with a base clock of 1100 MHz and a boost clock of 2050 MHz, with memory running at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The 12 GB GDDR6 memory pool connects via a 192-bit bus, yielding 336.0 GB/s of bandwidth — a solid figure for 1080p and 1440p gaming.

Compute resources include 3,072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 render output units. The 24 ray tracing cores provide hardware-accelerated RT support, while the GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Pixel rate reaches 196.8 GPixel/s and texture rate hits 393.6 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is rated at 12.60 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 25.19 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio). The TDP is 80 W, and the slot width is listed as IGP, meaning it's integrated into the laptop motherboard rather than a discrete card module. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16, and display outputs are portable device dependent.

Benchmark scores reflect a capable mid-range mobile GPU. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1,732 and Geekbench scores of 70,352 (OpenCL) and 64,693 (Vulkan) indicate solid DirectX 12 and compute performance. The average benchmark score of 45,592 places it in the 84th percentile of all GPUs. Nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT (45,384 average score, 0.5% ahead), NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation (45,972, 0.8% behind), NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile (45,152, 1% ahead), and NVIDIA RTX A2000 (46,043, 1% behind). The Arc A730M effectively sits between these options, meaning it competes with professional workstation GPUs and some high-end mobile parts, though it trails the top-tier RTX 5090 Mobile only marginally in average score.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Arc A730M's 84th percentile GPU ranking and 12 GB VRAM with 336 GB/s bandwidth suggest it can drive high-refresh displays at 1080p, though the exact refresh rates depend on game optimization. The CPU's 95th percentile position ensures no processor bottleneck in most titles, allowing the GPU to operate at its full potential.

Streaming: The Ryzen 9 8940HX's 16 cores and 32 threads provide ample headroom for simultaneous game encoding and broadcast software. The passmark multithread score of 49,731 and integer math score of 189,221 indicate the CPU can handle encoding workloads without sacrificing game performance.

Video editing: Cinebench R23 multicore score of 32,521 and floating-point math score of 113,921 point to strong rendering performance in applications like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve. The 12 GB GPU memory helps with timeline preview and effect rendering, while the 336 GB/s bandwidth supports 4K video playback and export.

3D rendering: The CPU's 16 cores deliver excellent CPU-based rendering performance, as evidenced by the 95th percentile ranking and near-parity with the Intel Core i9-14900KS (0% delta). The GPU's 12.60 TFLOPS FP32 performance accelerates GPU-based renderers, though it is not a top-tier compute part.

Software development: The 32 threads handle parallel compilation efficiently, with data compression score of 650,984 and random string sorting score of 75,381 indicating strong performance in build tools and code analysis. The 64 MB L3 cache reduces latency for frequently accessed code and data structures.

Student and office work: The single-core Cinebench R23 score of 1,917 and passmark single-thread score of 3,874 ensure snappy responsiveness in productivity applications. The 55 W CPU TDP contributes to reasonable battery life for all-day use, while the GPU's 80 W TDP supports light graphics tasks without excessive heat.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket FL1, which is specific to the Dragon Range mobile platform. Memory support is DDR5 in dual-channel configuration, providing 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth — sufficient for most workloads, though not expandable beyond dual-channel. The PCIe implementation offers Gen 5 with 28 lanes from the CPU, which provides future-proofing for high-speed NVMe storage and external GPUs. The integrated Radeon 610M graphics serve as a fallback when the discrete Arc A730M is not needed, potentially saving power.

The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x16, which is fully compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 lanes, though it runs at Gen 4 speeds. The Arc A730M is marked as end-of-life in production status, meaning future driver optimizations may be limited. The combined TDP of 55 W (CPU) and 80 W (GPU) totals 135 W, which is manageable for a laptop cooling solution. The suggested PSU field is null, so power supply requirements are not specified in the data. A sensible next upgrade would involve replacing the entire laptop, as both CPU and GPU are soldered or integrated into the motherboard. The unlocked CPU multiplier offers some tuning potential, but the overall platform is not designed for component-level upgrades.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all frame rate expectations are estimates derived from the benchmark scores rather than direct testing. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1,732 and Geekbench Vulkan score of 64,693 indicate it should handle most modern titles at 1080p with high settings, though specific frame rates vary by game optimization and CPU-GPU coordination.

At 1080p resolution, the Arc A730M with 12 GB VRAM and 336 GB/s bandwidth should deliver playable frame rates in most AAA titles, with esports titles likely exceeding 60 FPS given the CPU's strong single-core performance. At 1440p, the GPU's 12.60 TFLOPS FP32 performance may struggle with ultra settings in demanding games, requiring medium to high presets for smooth gameplay. The 84th percentile GPU ranking suggests it outperforms roughly 16% of all GPUs, placing it above entry-level but below high-end desktop parts. The CPU's 95th percentile ranking ensures that the GPU will be the primary limiter in most gaming scenarios, which is typical for mobile platforms where thermal constraints affect GPU boost clocks more severely than CPU performance.

Who Should Build It

This laptop configuration targets users who need exceptional CPU performance for compute-heavy tasks but can accept mid-range GPU capabilities for gaming and graphics work. Gamers at 1080p resolution will find the Arc A730M adequate for most titles, especially those who prioritize CPU-heavy simulations or strategy games where the 16-core processor excels. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU's 32,521 Cinebench R23 multicore score and the GPU's 12 GB VRAM for asset loading, though GPU-accelerated renders may be slower than with higher-tier GPUs.

Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the 32 threads and 64 MB L3 cache, which speed up build times and reduce context-switching overhead. Students in engineering or data science programs can leverage the CPU's floating-point math score of 113,921 for numerical analysis, while the integrated graphics provide a backup for basic display tasks. Small business workstations requiring multi-threaded database operations or encryption tasks will find the data encryption score of 39,318 and data compression score of 650,984 valuable. The combined 90th percentile ranking makes this a versatile but not specialized machine — it excels at CPU-bound workloads while offering competent, not exceptional, GPU performance.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 81,103 places it in the 95th percentile of all CPUs, with its nearest rival being the Intel Xeon w5-3535X at 81,115 (0% delta) and the Intel Core i9-14900KS at 81,127 (0% delta). The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 trails by 0.4% (80,762), and the Intel Xeon 638 is 0.5% behind (80,723). This indicates the Ryzen 9 8940HX is competitive with desktop-class workstation processors despite its mobile form factor.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 45,592 places it in the 84th percentile of all GPUs. The AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT is 0.5% behind (45,384), the NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation is 0.8% ahead (45,972), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile is 1% behind (45,152), and the NVIDIA RTX A2000 is 1% ahead (46,043). The Arc A730M sits in a tight cluster where small score differences separate it from professional and high-end mobile GPUs.

The combined platform percentile of 90 reflects the strong CPU offsetting the mid-range GPU. In CPU-heavy benchmarks like Cinebench R23, the 32,521 multicore score demonstrates workstation-level performance. In GPU benchmarks like 3DMark Steel Nomad, the 1,732 score shows competent but not class-leading DirectX 12 performance. The combined picture is a system that excels in compute tasks while providing adequate graphics for mainstream gaming and creative work.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX has 16 cores and 32 threads, based on Zen 4 architecture with Dragon Range codename.

Q: How much VRAM does the Intel Arc A730M have and what is its bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing 336.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 90, with the CPU at 95th percentile and GPU at 84th percentile among all respective parts.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, ECC memory is not supported. The CPU supports DDR5 in dual-channel configuration with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What is the GPU's ray tracing capability?

A: The Intel Arc A730M has 24 ray tracing cores, supporting DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) with hardware-accelerated RT.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core i9-14900KS?

A: The Ryzen 9 8940HX has an average benchmark score of 81,103, which is essentially identical to the Intel Core i9-14900KS at 81,127 (0% delta).

Q: Is measured FPS data available for this combination?

A: No, the dataset contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU pairing, so all frame rate discussions are estimates from benchmark scores.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU's 95th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 84th percentile creates a clear imbalance. In CPU-intensive workloads like data compression (650,984 score), encryption (39,318), and multithreaded rendering (Cinebench R23 32,521), the Ryzen 9 8940HX operates at near-optimal levels with no GPU involvement. Conversely, in GPU-bound tasks like 3DMark Steel Nomad (1,732 score), the Arc A730M is the limiting factor — the CPU could easily feed a faster GPU without becoming a constraint.

Gaming scenarios will show this bottleneck most clearly. The CPU's single-core score of 1,917 in Cinebench R23 and passmark single-thread score of 3,874 ensure high frame pacing, but the GPU's 12.60 TFLOPS FP32 performance will cap frame rates in graphically demanding titles. At lower resolutions like 1080p, the CPU may occasionally become the limiting factor in esports titles where frame rates exceed 200 FPS, but in most AAA games, the GPU will be the primary bottleneck. At higher resolutions, the GPU bottleneck becomes absolute — the 336 GB/s bandwidth and 192-bit memory bus will constrain texture streaming and memory-heavy scenes.

For hybrid workloads like video editing, the balance shifts depending on the task. Export rendering uses both CPU (for codec encoding) and GPU (for effects and scaling), with the CPU's 32 threads providing the main throughput and the GPU accelerating specific operations. The 24 RT cores and DirectX 12 Ultimate support help with ray-traced effects in rendering software, but the GPU's mid-range positioning means heavy RT workloads will be slow.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class system pairing the AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (16-core, 32-thread, Zen 4 mobile processor) with the Intel Arc A730M (12 GB GDDR6, Xe-HPG architecture mobile GPU). The CPU is in the 95th percentile of all CPUs, the GPU is in the 84th percentile of all GPUs, and the combined platform ranks in the 90th percentile. The CPU's average benchmark score of 81,103 rivals desktop workstation processors like the Intel Xeon w5-3535X and Intel Core i9-14900KS, while the GPU's average score of 45,592 places it near the NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation and AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT.

The platform uses AMD Socket FL1 with DDR5 dual-channel memory support (83.2 GB/s), PCIe Gen 5 with 28 CPU lanes, and a combined TDP of 135 W (55 W CPU + 80 W GPU). The CPU is production-active with an unlocked multiplier, while the GPU is end-of-life. This pairing targets users who need exceptional multi-threaded compute performance for CPU-heavy tasks like software compilation, scientific computing, and video encoding, while accepting mid-range GPU performance for gaming and graphics acceleration. The 90th percentile overall ranking indicates a system that is above average but not top-tier in every dimension — it prioritizes CPU capability over GPU performance, making it suitable for professionals and power users who value processor throughput over raw gaming frame rates.