SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX + Intel Arc A570M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

97 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 3% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
97%
VS
GPU
97%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX

81,103 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A570M

58,239 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX + Intel Arc A570M

This pairing combines AMD's top-tier mobile Dragon Range processor with Intel's mid-range Alchemist graphics solution in a laptop configuration. The CPU is a 16-core Zen 4 powerhouse designed for maximum multi-threaded throughput, while the GPU is an 8 GB GDDR6 part built on Intel's Xe-HPG architecture. Benchmark data shows this combination sits at the 92nd percentile overall, indicating a high-performance mobile platform, though no measured frame rate data exists for this exact pairing, so all gaming analysis is estimated from component-level scores.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX is a 16-core, 32-thread processor built on the Zen 4 architecture using TSMC's 5 nm process node. It belongs to the 8000 series Dragon Range family, designed specifically for high-performance laptops. The chip runs at a 2.40 GHz base clock and boosts up to 5.30 GHz, with a 55 W TDP that allows it to fit into mobile thermal envelopes while still delivering desktop-class computational power. The processor features a 64 MB L3 cache, with 1 MB L2 and 64 KB L1 per core, and supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. It is unlocked, meaning overclocking is possible on supported platforms, and it includes a Radeon 610M integrated GPU as a fallback graphics solution.

The benchmark results paint a clear picture of a CPU that excels at heavily threaded workloads. In Cinebench R23, the 8940HX scores 32,521 points in multi-core and 1,917 points in single-core. The multi-core figure is staggering for a mobile part, placing it in the 95th percentile among all CPUs tracked. The single-core score, while less dominant, still indicates strong per-thread performance thanks to the 5.30 GHz boost capability. Cinebench R15 results follow the same pattern: 5,355 multi-core and 292 single-core. PassMark tests reinforce this profile. The multithread score of 49,731 and integer math score of 189,221 are exceptional, while floating-point math reaches 113,921. Data compression scores 650,984, and encryption hits 39,318 — both indicating strong throughput for data-heavy tasks. The extended instructions score of 47,802 shows good SIMD performance for workloads that leverage AVX-512 or similar instruction sets.

Comparing to nearest rivals, the 8940HX's average benchmark score of 81,103 places it essentially level with the Intel Xeon w5-3535X (81,115, 0% delta) and Intel Core i9-14900KS (81,127, 0% delta). It is 0.4% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 (80,762) and 0.5% ahead of the Intel Xeon 638 (80,723). This means the 8940HX delivers performance on par with some of the fastest desktop CPUs ever made, despite being a mobile part. For real workloads, this translates to effortless multi-core rendering, rapid code compilation, and smooth virtualization. The single-thread performance, while not class-leading, is more than adequate for everyday responsiveness and lightly threaded applications.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's aggregate average benchmark score is 81,103, placing it in the 95th percentile of all CPUs. The GPU, an Intel Arc A570M, achieves a Geekbench OpenCL score of 58,239, which puts it in the 88th percentile of all GPUs. The combined platform percentile is 92, indicating a well-balanced high-end laptop configuration.

The GPU's nearest rivals provide context for its compute capability. The AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT scores 58,392, which is 0.3% higher than the Arc A570M. The AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM scores 58,085, just 0.3% lower. The NVIDIA P102-100 scores 58,528 (0.5% higher), and the AMD Radeon PRO V710 scores 58,657 (0.7% higher). This clustering suggests the Arc A570M delivers compute performance roughly equivalent to a mid-range desktop GPU from the previous generation, though the Geekbench OpenCL test primarily measures raw compute throughput rather than gaming-specific metrics.

The combined picture is one of a CPU that is dramatically more powerful than the GPU. The CPU sits at the top of the mobile hierarchy, while the GPU is solidly mid-range. This imbalance means the platform is CPU-bound in most scenarios, which is unusual for a gaming laptop but beneficial for productivity tasks. In compute-heavy workloads like 3D rendering or video encoding, the CPU will be the star, while the GPU will handle graphics acceleration adequately but not spectacularly. No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, so gaming performance must be estimated from the benchmark scores and component capabilities.

FAQ

Q: How does the Ryzen 9 8940HX compare to the Intel Core i9-14900KS?

A: The two processors have nearly identical average benchmark scores — 81,103 for the AMD and 81,127 for the Intel — a difference of 0%. This means the 8940HX delivers comparable overall performance to one of Intel's fastest desktop CPUs, but in a mobile form factor with a 55 W TDP.

Q: What is the GPU's performance tier relative to desktop graphics cards?

A: The Intel Arc A570M's Geekbench OpenCL score of 58,239 places it near the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (58,392, 0.3% higher) and the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM (58,085, 0.3% lower). Its 88th percentile ranking among all GPUs indicates solid mid-range compute capability.

Q: What memory does this platform support?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 224.0 GB/s of dedicated graphics bandwidth.

Q: Is the CPU good for multi-threaded workloads?

A: Yes, exceptionally so. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32,521 and PassMark multithread score of 49,731 place it in the 95th percentile of all CPUs. It rivals desktop processors like the Intel Core i9-14900KS and Intel Xeon w5-3535X in average score.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, it includes a Radeon 610M iGPU. This can be useful for power-saving tasks or as a fallback if the discrete Arc A570M is disabled or malfunctioning.

Q: What is the GPU's architecture and process node?

A: The Arc A570M uses Intel's Xe-HPG architecture (Alchemist generation) built on TSMC's 6 nm process. It features 2,048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units.

Q: How does the CPU's single-thread performance compare to its multi-thread performance?

A: The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1,917 is respectable but not dominant, while the multi-core score of 32,521 is exceptional. The PassMark single-thread score of 3,874 similarly shows modest per-core performance relative to the multithread score of 49,731, which is over 12 times higher.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data reveals a significant imbalance between the CPU and GPU in this pairing. The CPU's 95th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 88th percentile indicates the processor is substantially more capable than the graphics solution. In CPU-bound workloads — such as video encoding, 3D rendering, software compilation, or data processing — the Arc A570M will not be the limiting factor. However, in GPU-bound scenarios like gaming at high resolutions or GPU-accelerated rendering, the graphics card will cap performance well below what the CPU could theoretically support.

This bottleneck manifests clearly in the benchmark deltas. The CPU matches desktop-class processors like the Intel Core i9-14900KS (0% delta) and outperforms the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 by 0.4%. Meanwhile, the GPU sits within 0.7% of mid-range desktop cards like the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM and NVIDIA P102-100. The compute disparity suggests that in mixed workloads, the CPU will frequently be waiting on the GPU to finish tasks. For gaming, this means frame rates will be dictated by the GPU's capabilities, not the CPU's headroom. The CPU can easily feed the GPU with draw calls and physics calculations, but the Arc A570M's 5.325 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 224.0 GB/s memory bandwidth will limit output.

The power envelope reinforces this analysis. The CPU has a 55 W TDP, while the GPU has a 75 W TDP — a combined 130 W for the core compute components, which is modest for a laptop. This suggests the system is designed for balanced power consumption rather than maximum graphics performance. In practice, users will see the CPU dominate in productivity benchmarks, while gaming performance will be moderate, consistent with the GPU's 88th percentile standing. The system is effectively a CPU-first platform with a capable but not exceptional GPU.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Arc A570M's 88th percentile GPU ranking and 8 GB VRAM suggest it can handle esports titles at high frame rates, but demanding AAA games at high settings will likely struggle to maintain 144 FPS at 1080p. The CPU's immense multi-threaded power will not help here, as gaming is typically GPU-limited.

Streaming: The 16-core, 32-thread CPU is ideal for encoding video while gaming. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32,521 provides ample headroom for software encoding (x264/x265) without impacting game performance, though the GPU's moderate gaming capability may limit simultaneous game quality.

Video editing: Excellent. The CPU's PassMark multithread score of 49,731 and data compression score of 650,984 make timeline scrubbing, export rendering, and effect processing very fast. The GPU's OpenCL score of 58,239 provides hardware acceleration for effects and encoding, though not at the level of higher-end GPUs.

3D rendering: The CPU is a rendering powerhouse, rivaling the Intel Xeon w5-3535X (0% delta in average score). CPU-based renderers like Blender Cycles (CPU mode) or V-Ray will run exceptionally well. GPU-accelerated rendering will be limited by the Arc A570M's 5.325 TFLOPS FP32 performance, which is mid-range.

Software development: The 16 cores and 32 threads make parallel compilation fast. The CPU's 95th percentile ranking means build times will be short, and the 64 MB L3 cache helps with large codebases. The GPU is less relevant here, but adequate for UI rendering and basic graphics tasks.

Student and office work: Overkill but functional. The CPU's 3874 PassMark single-thread score ensures snappy application responsiveness, while the GPU handles office graphics, video playback, and light creative work. The 55 W CPU TDP and 75 W GPU TDP suggest reasonable battery life for a high-performance laptop.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. All frame rate figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and component specifications, not from direct testing.

The Intel Arc A570M's Geekbench OpenCL score of 58,239 (88th percentile) indicates performance roughly equivalent to mid-range desktop GPUs from the previous generation, such as the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM (0.3% delta) or NVIDIA P102-100 (0.5% delta). With 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth, the GPU can handle 1080p gaming at medium to high settings in most titles. At 1440p, expect to lower settings to achieve playable frame rates in demanding games. The GPU's 16 ray tracing cores support hardware-accelerated ray tracing, but the 5.325 TFLOPS FP32 performance suggests RT effects will be costly. The CPU will not bottleneck gaming performance in any realistic scenario — its 95th percentile ranking means it can feed the GPU far more frames than the GPU can render. Competitive titles like CS:GO, Valorant, or League of Legends should easily hit high refresh rates at 1080p. AAA open-world games will likely run at 60-80 FPS on medium settings at 1080p, dropping below 60 FPS at higher settings or resolutions. The 12 Ultimate (12_2) DirectX support and Vulkan 1.4 compatibility ensure modern game APIs are fully supported.

Who Should Build It

This platform targets users who prioritize CPU-heavy productivity on a laptop but still want discrete graphics capability. The Ryzen 9 8940HX's 95th percentile CPU performance makes it ideal for 3D artists running CPU-based renderers, video editors working with high-resolution footage, and software developers compiling large projects. The 16 cores and 32 threads handle parallel workloads with desktop-class speed, as evidenced by the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32,521.

Gamers at 1080p will find the Arc A570M sufficient for most titles at medium settings, but those seeking high-refresh 1440p or 4K gaming should look elsewhere — the GPU's 88th percentile ranking and 8 GB VRAM are the limiting factors. Students and office workers will find this laptop exceptionally responsive, though the performance is far beyond what typical coursework or document work requires. Small business users running virtualization, database work, or complex spreadsheets will benefit from the CPU's multithreaded prowess. Content creators who work primarily on the CPU side — such as audio production, photo batch processing, or CPU-based 3D rendering — will see the most value. The platform is a workstation-class CPU paired with a competent mid-range GPU, suited for professionals who need maximum compute power without sacrificing portability.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket FL1, which is specific to the Dragon Range mobile platform. This means upgrades are limited to other FL1-compatible processors, and in practice, laptop CPUs are rarely user-upgradeable — the socket is soldered in most designs. The platform supports dual-channel DDR5 memory, and the 83.2 GB/s bandwidth is a solid baseline, though higher-speed DDR5 modules could improve memory-bound workloads if the laptop's BIOS allows it.

The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 28 lanes, ensuring ample bandwidth for the fastest SSDs and future expansion. The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8, which is sufficient for its 224.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 5.325 TFLOPS compute capability. For storage, PCIe Gen 5 NVMe drives will achieve maximum throughput, though the practical benefit over Gen 4 is minimal for most applications. The suggested PSU is not specified, but the combined 55 W CPU TDP and 75 W GPU TDP indicate a total system draw well under 200 W, meaning a standard laptop power adapter will suffice. A sensible next upgrade would be a faster GPU, though this is typically not possible in a laptop. For external expansion, an eGPU enclosure over Thunderbolt could provide more graphics horsepower, but the CPU's 28 PCIe lanes include support for such connections if the laptop has the appropriate port. The 8 GB GPU memory is a potential bottleneck for future games, so users planning to keep this system for years may need to lower settings as VRAM requirements increase.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining AMD's Ryzen 9 8940HX — a 16-core Zen 4 Dragon Range processor — with Intel's Arc A570M, a mid-range Xe-HPG mobile GPU. The combination ranks in the 92nd percentile overall, placing it firmly in the high-performance tier of laptop configurations. The CPU is the standout component, with a 95th percentile ranking and average benchmark score of 81,103 that rivals desktop processors like the Intel Core i9-14900KS (0% delta). The GPU, while less impressive, still ranks in the 88th percentile with a Geekbench OpenCL score of 58,239, comparable to the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (-0.3% delta). This is a CPU-first platform: the processor delivers desktop-class multi-threaded performance in a mobile power envelope, while the GPU provides solid 1080p gaming and compute acceleration. The platform's 55 W CPU TDP and 75 W GPU TDP make it power-efficient for its performance class, and the 5 nm CPU process node with TSMC fabrication ensures modern efficiency. Overall, this build is best characterized as a mobile workstation that can handle gaming as a secondary task — a powerful tool for professionals who need maximum compute in a portable form factor.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A570M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture (Alchemist generation) using TSMC's 6 nm process with 11,500 million transistors on a 269 mm² die. It features 2,048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units, along with 16 dedicated ray tracing cores. The GPU runs at a 900 MHz base clock and boosts to 1300 MHz, with memory clocked at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). It has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 224.0 GB/s bandwidth. The pixel rate is 83.20 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 166.4 GTexel/s. Compute performance is rated at 5.325 TFLOPS FP32 and 10.65 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1 ratio).

The Geekbench OpenCL score of 58,239 places this GPU in the 88th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals highlight its positioning: the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT scores 58,392 (0.3% higher), the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM scores 58,085 (0.3% lower), and the NVIDIA P102-100 scores 58,528 (0.5% higher). This cluster indicates that the Arc A570M delivers compute performance on par with a range of desktop GPUs, from previous-generation mid-range to high-end parts. For rendering workloads, the 5.325 TFLOPS FP32 performance is sufficient for 1080p gaming and light to moderate GPU-accelerated rendering. The 16 RT cores support hardware ray tracing, but the overall compute throughput will limit ray-traced effects to lower resolutions and settings. The 8 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p textures and moderate 1440p usage, but may be limiting for high-resolution texture packs or VR workloads. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern graphics APIs. The 224.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is reasonable for the GPU's compute capacity, and the 75 W TDP keeps power consumption manageable in a laptop chassis. Overall, this is a capable mid-range GPU that performs well within its class, though it is clearly outclassed by the CPU it is paired with.