SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX + Intel Arc A370M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

95 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
97%
VS
GPU
93%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX

81,103 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A370M

29,175 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX + Intel Arc A370M: A High-Core Mobile CPU Paired with Entry-Level Arc Graphics

This pairing combines AMD's 16-core Dragon Range flagship mobile processor with Intel's entry-level Arc A370M GPU, creating a laptop configuration where the CPU sits in the 95th percentile among all processors while the GPU lands in the 74th percentile among all graphics cards. The data shows a compute-heavy workload champion paired with a modest graphics solution, making this combination best suited for CPU-intensive tasks rather than high-end gaming. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all frame-rate discussion in this analysis is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than derived from direct testing.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX is a 16-core, 32-thread processor built on the Zen 4 architecture with the Dragon Range codename, manufactured on TSMC's 5 nm process node. It features a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, with a 55 W TDP that places it firmly in the high-performance mobile segment. The chip carries 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and a substantial 64 MB of L3 cache, with a dual-channel DDR5 memory bus delivering 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth.

The benchmark scores paint a picture of a processor that excels in both single-threaded and heavily threaded workloads. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 32,521 in multi-core and 1,917 in single-core, while the older Cinebench R15 run shows 5,355 multi-core and 292 single-core. The PassMark suite reveals particularly strong integer math performance at 189,221, floating-point math at 113,921, and data compression at 650,984. The multithread score of 49,731 and the single-thread score of 3,874 both reinforce the impression of a well-rounded high-end mobile processor.

The 95th percentile ranking among all CPUs places this chip in the top 5% of processors ever benchmarked on the database. Its average benchmark score of 81,103 puts it in a dead heat with the Intel Xeon w5-3535X (81,115, 0% delta) and the Intel Core i9-14900KS (81,127, 0% delta), while edging out the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 (80,762, 0.4% faster) and the Intel Xeon 638 (80,723, 0.5% faster). This near-identical scoring against desktop-class workstation and enthusiast processors is remarkable for a mobile part, indicating that the 8940HX delivers desktop-equivalent compute performance in a laptop form factor.

For real workloads, the 16 cores and 32 threads mean that compilation, video encoding, 3D rendering, and scientific computing tasks will see near-linear scaling benefits. The high single-core boost clock of 5.30 GHz also ensures that lightly threaded applications like office software, web browsing, and legacy games remain responsive. The 5 nm process and 13,140 million transistors across a 2x 71 mm² die size contribute to the efficiency that allows this performance within a 55 W TDP envelope.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A370M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture with the DG2-128 chip, manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. It features 1,024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, 32 raster output units, and 8 ray tracing cores. The GPU runs at a base clock of 1550 MHz with a boost clock of 2050 MHz, and its 4 GB of GDDR6 memory operates at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) across a 64-bit bus, delivering 112.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

The compute capabilities include 4.198 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 8.397 TFLOPS of FP16 performance (2:1 ratio), with a pixel rate of 65.60 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 131.2 GTexel/s. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, meaning it has full hardware support for ray tracing and mesh shaders. The 35 W TDP makes it a relatively power-efficient mobile GPU, and it connects via PCIe 4.0 x8.

In Geekbench compute tests, the A370M scores 29,676 in OpenCL and 28,673 in Vulkan. Its average benchmark score of 29,175 places it in the 74th percentile among all GPUs. The nearest rivals show a tight cluster: the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH scores 29,197 (0.1% faster), the AMD FirePro W8000 scores 29,211 (0.1% faster), the AMD Radeon RX 470 scores 28,996 (0.6% slower), and the AMD Radeon RX 6800M scores 28,874 (1% slower). This clustering indicates that the A370M performs roughly on par with older desktop mid-range cards and some integrated flagship solutions, despite being a mobile-first part.

For rendering workloads, the 4 GB VRAM capacity and 112 GB/s bandwidth are the primary constraints. The 8 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, but the modest FP32 throughput of 4.198 TFLOPS means that ray-traced scenes will render slowly compared to dedicated desktop GPUs. The 64-bit memory bus is narrow, and this limits effective bandwidth for large textures and high-resolution workloads. The GPU is best suited for 1080p gaming at medium settings, light content creation, and hardware-accelerated encoding tasks rather than compute-heavy rendering.

Benchmark Performance

The combined picture from benchmark data shows a CPU that outperforms nearly all other processors and a GPU that sits comfortably in the mid-range. The CPU's 95th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 74th percentile ranking creates a significant performance gap between the two components. The combined percentile for this pairing is 85, indicating that the overall build ranks higher than most configurations due to the exceptional CPU.

Looking at specific CPU benchmark scores: the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32,521 places this chip in territory usually occupied by high-end desktop processors, and the single-core score of 1,917 is competitive with the best mobile chips available. The PassMark multithread score of 49,731 and integer math score of 189,221 suggest that productivity workloads will fly, while the data encryption score of 39,318 and extended instructions score of 47,802 indicate strong performance in security and cryptography applications.

The GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 29,676 and Vulkan score of 28,673 are consistent with its 74th percentile ranking. The near-identical scores between OpenCL and Vulkan suggest balanced performance across different API families. When compared to its nearest rivals, the A370M is essentially performance-equivalent to the RX Vega M GH and FirePro W8000, and only 1% faster than the RX 6800M, which is surprising given the 6800M is typically a much higher-tier mobile GPU. This suggests that the A370M's compute performance in these specific tests is competitive despite its modest specifications.

The combined picture is one of a system that will excel in CPU-bound tasks like software compilation, video encoding, 3D rendering with CPU-based renderers, and data processing, while GPU-bound tasks such as high-fidelity gaming and GPU rendering will be limited by the A370M's mid-range capabilities. The 85th combined percentile reflects this strong CPU-bias in the overall build.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX uses the AMD Socket FL1, which is specific to the Dragon Range mobile platform. This socket supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and the CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 28 lanes. The integrated Radeon 610M graphics provide a fallback display output and basic 3D acceleration when the discrete GPU is not in use.

The CPU has an unlocked multiplier, which theoretically allows for overclocking, though in a laptop form factor this is typically limited by thermal and power constraints. The 55 W TDP is modest for a 16-core processor, suggesting that the chip is designed to operate efficiently within the thermal envelope of a large gaming or workstation laptop.

The Intel Arc A370M has a 35 W TDP and is marked as "IGP" for slot width, meaning it is soldered to the motherboard and cannot be upgraded. The suggested PSU field is null, and the GPU's power connectors are null, which is expected for a mobile part that draws power from the motherboard rather than a separate PSU. The CPU's 55 W TDP combined with the GPU's 35 W TDP means the total power draw for these two components is 90 W, leaving substantial headroom for a laptop power brick in the 180-230 W range typical for gaming notebooks.

A sensible next upgrade path for this platform would focus on the GPU, but since the A370M is integrated into the laptop chassis, the only practical upgrade is to a new laptop with a more powerful discrete GPU. The CPU itself is at the top of the mobile stack, so it is unlikely to be a bottleneck for any workload in the foreseeable future. The DDR5 memory support and PCIe Gen 5 connectivity ensure that the platform is current with modern standards, and the 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth is sufficient for the CPU's computing needs.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data reveals a system where the CPU dramatically outclasses the GPU. The CPU sits in the 95th percentile while the GPU is in the 74th percentile, a 21-point gap that indicates the GPU will be the limiting factor in most graphics-intensive workloads. In gaming, the A370M will determine frame rates, and the powerful CPU will often be waiting on the GPU to finish rendering frames.

For CPU-bound workloads, the balance is much better. Tasks like software compilation, data processing, and multi-threaded productivity applications will be limited solely by the CPU, and the 8940HX's performance in these areas is exceptional. The 16 cores and 32 threads handle parallel workloads with ease, and the high boost clock of 5.30 GHz ensures that even lightly threaded tasks benefit from the CPU's capabilities.

The bottleneck analysis shows a clear division: any workload that relies on GPU compute or rendering will be GPU-limited, while everything else will be CPU-limited. The FPS scaling in games will be heavily constrained by the A370M's 4 GB VRAM and 112 GB/s bandwidth, which are modest by modern standards. Users who prioritize gaming should expect the GPU to be the determining factor in performance, regardless of how fast the CPU is. For productivity and content creation tasks that use CPU-based rendering, the system will perform at a level consistent with the CPU's 95th percentile ranking.

Gaming Performance

Since no measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination, all gaming frame rates discussed here are estimates based on the benchmark scores and the GPU's 74th percentile ranking. The Intel Arc A370M's 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus will limit performance in modern titles, particularly at higher resolutions and with high texture quality settings.

At 1080p with medium settings, the A370M should deliver playable frame rates in most esports titles and older games, and the CPU's high single-thread performance will ensure consistent frame pacing. The 8 RT cores provide some ray tracing capability, but the 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 throughput means that ray-traced scenes will see significant performance penalties. At 1440p and above, the 4 GB VRAM will become a limiting factor, causing texture pop-in and reduced detail settings in demanding titles.

For competitive gaming at 1080p, the A370M can likely push 60+ FPS in games like Counter-Strike 2, Valorant, and League of Legends, where the CPU's strong single-thread performance will help maintain high frame rates. For AAA titles at 1080p, frame rates will typically fall in the 30-60 FPS range depending on the game and settings, with newer and more demanding titles requiring reduced settings to maintain playability. The GPU's 74th percentile ranking suggests it outperforms roughly three-quarters of all GPUs, but the nearest rivals include the RX 6800M, which is surprising and suggests the A370M punches above its weight in compute benchmarks.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX has 16 cores and 32 threads, built on the Zen 4 architecture with a 5 nm process from TSMC.

Q: How much memory bandwidth does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, and it provides PCIe Gen 5 with 28 lanes.

Q: What is the GPU's VRAM capacity and bandwidth?

A: The Intel Arc A370M has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, delivering 112.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score of 81,103 is within 0.5% of the Intel Xeon w5-3535X, Intel Core i9-14900KS, AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395, and Intel Xeon 638, placing it in the 95th percentile of all CPUs.

Q: What API support does the GPU offer?

A: The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, including hardware ray tracing via 8 RT cores.

Q: Is the CPU's multiplier unlocked?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked, though overclocking in a laptop is typically limited by thermal and power constraints.

Q: What is the combined percentile ranking for this CPU-GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 85, reflecting the CPU's 95th percentile and the GPU's 74th percentile performance.

Build Overview

This build pairs the AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, a flagship mobile processor in the 8000 series, with the Intel Arc A370M, an entry-level Arc 3 mobile GPU. The build class is laptop, and the combination targets users who need extreme CPU performance in a portable form factor. The CPU's 16 cores and 32 threads, combined with a 5.30 GHz boost clock, make this one of the fastest mobile processors available, while the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 112 GB/s bandwidth provide moderate graphics capability.

The overall tier from the percentiles is high on the CPU side (95th percentile) and mid-range on the GPU side (74th percentile), with a combined percentile of 85. This configuration is best characterized as a workstation-class CPU paired with an entry-to-mid-range GPU, making it suitable for CPU-heavy professional workloads but not for high-end gaming or GPU-accelerated rendering.

Who Should Build It

This pairing is ideal for software developers who compile large codebases, data scientists running CPU-intensive analyses, and content creators who use CPU-based rendering engines. The 16 cores and 32 threads, combined with the PassMark integer math score of 189,221 and floating-point math score of 113,921, make this system a strong choice for parallel compute tasks.

Gamers at 1080p with modest settings will find the A370M sufficient for esports titles and less demanding games, but those seeking high-refresh-rate gaming or 1440p+ gaming should look elsewhere. Students and professionals who need a laptop for programming, office work, and research will benefit from the CPU's exceptional single-thread performance, though the GPU is more than adequate for basic graphics tasks. Small business workstations that rely on multi-threaded productivity applications will see significant performance gains from the 8940HX.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's 3,874 PassMark single-thread score and 1,917 Cinebench R23 single-core score will drive high frame rates in esports and CPU-bound games, but the A370M's 4 GB VRAM and 112 GB/s bandwidth will limit 1080p performance to medium settings in most AAA titles, and 1440p gaming is not practical.

Streaming: The 16 cores provide ample headroom for software encoding, and the PassMark multithread score of 49,731 indicates strong parallel performance, allowing simultaneous gaming and streaming without a dedicated encoder, though the GPU's modest graphics power will limit the gaming side.

Video editing: CPU-based editing workflows will benefit from the 32,521 Cinebench R23 multi-core score, making timeline scrubbing and export rendering fast, but the GPU's 4 GB VRAM will limit GPU-accelerated effects and 4K preview performance.

3D rendering: CPU rendering engines like Blender Cycles (CPU mode) will perform exceptionally well given the 95th percentile CPU ranking, but GPU rendering will be constrained by the A370M's 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 4 GB VRAM, making GPU renders slow and memory-limited.

Software development: Compilation tasks will benefit from the 32 threads and 64 MB L3 cache, and the 189,221 PassMark integer math score indicates strong performance in build systems, while the 650,984 data compression score speeds up packaging and version control operations.

Student and office work: The 5.30 GHz boost clock ensures responsive performance in web browsing, document editing, and spreadsheet work, and the 3,874 PassMark single-thread score places this system among the fastest for everyday tasks, though the 55 W CPU TDP means battery life will be shorter than in lower-power laptops.