SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D + Intel Arc A770

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

97 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 3% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
97%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D

65,914 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A770

68,809 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D and Intel Arc A770 pairing is a desktop configuration that combines a flagship 16-core processor with a high-end enthusiast graphics card. This combination targets the upper echelon of the performance spectrum, with the CPU ranking in the 93rd percentile of all processors and the GPU in the 90th percentile of all graphics cards. The combined system percentile of 92 places it firmly in the premium tier of desktop builds, suggesting a platform designed for demanding workloads and high-fidelity gaming.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D is built on the Zen 4 architecture (codenamed "Raphael") and manufactured on a 5 nm process by TSMC. It is a 16-core, 32-thread processor with a base clock of 4.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.70 GHz. The chip incorporates a substantial 128 MB of shared L3 cache, which includes a dedicated 1x 64MB 3D V-Cache slice, a key feature for gaming performance. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s and is compatible with ECC memory, indicating a workstation-capable design.

Benchmark data shows this processor’s exceptional multi-threaded prowess. In Cinebench R23, it scores 36,291 points in the multi-core test, while its single-core score is 2,053. The Geekbench results are similarly strong, with a multi-core score of 22,363 and a single-core score of 2,548. The PassMark suite reveals specialized strengths: the multi-thread score is 62,383, with particularly high marks in integer math (214,089) and floating-point math (130,403). Data compression scores an impressive 784,993, and extended instructions achieve 58,515. The 3DMark tests show strong scaling from 2 threads (2,102) up to 16 threads (13,180), with the maximum thread score reaching 14,252. This scaling pattern suggests the processor is capable of utilizing its full core count effectively in heavily threaded applications.

The average benchmark score of 65,914 places the 7950X3D in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs. When compared to its nearest rivals, the data shows a near-tie at the top. It trails the Intel Core 9 273PQE by a mere 0.3% and the Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus by 0.4%. Conversely, it leads the AMD EPYC 9124 by 1.2% but is 1.4% behind the Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus. The data indicates that while the 7950X3D is a top-tier performer, its nearest competitors are within a 1.5% performance envelope, making the choice between them less about raw compute and more about platform features and specific workload optimization. The single-thread score of 1,062 in 3DMark and 4,146 in PassMark confirms that this is not just a multi-core monster; its single-core performance is robust and ensures responsiveness in everyday tasks and lightly-threaded applications.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A770 is based on the Xe-HPG architecture (Alchemist generation) and is built on a 6 nm process at TSMC. It features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a substantial bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s. The GPU operates with a base clock of 2100 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz, with memory running at an effective 16 Gbps. The chip contains 4,096 shading units, 256 TMUs, and 128 ROPs, along with 32 dedicated ray tracing cores. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern graphics APIs. The card’s FP32 performance is rated at 19.66 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 39.32 TFLOPS (2:1).

In benchmark tests, the Arc A770 scores 2,969 in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test. Its Geekbench results show an OpenCL score of 109,175 and a Vulkan score of 94,284. The average benchmark score is 68,809, placing it in the 90th percentile of all GPUs. The nearest rivals include the NVIDIA CMP 90HX, which is 0.3% faster, and the AMD Radeon Instinct MI25, which is 0.4% slower. The AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 is 1.5% faster, and the NVIDIA Quadro P6000 is 1.7% faster. These comparisons show the A770 holding its own against professional workstation cards, though it sits slightly below the highest-performing options in its immediate vicinity. The high VRAM capacity and bandwidth are significant for rendering and compute workloads, but the benchmark scores suggest it is a competent, if not class-leading, performer in the upper-midrange to high-end segment.

Benchmark Performance

The combined picture from the benchmark scores reveals a CPU that excels in multi-threaded productivity and a GPU that provides solid, reliable graphics performance. The Ryzen 9 7950X3D’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 36,291 is a strong indicator of its capability in video rendering and 3D modeling tasks. The PassMark integer and floating-point math scores of 214,089 and 130,403, respectively, suggest robust performance in scientific computing and financial modeling. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2,969 and Geekbench Vulkan score of 94,284 demonstrate its ability to handle modern game engines and compute shaders.

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 65,914 versus the GPU’s 68,809 shows a balanced system where neither component is drastically outclassing the other in aggregate. The CPU’s 93rd percentile and the GPU’s 90th percentile are closely aligned, indicating a system built for high-end performance. The combined percentile of 92 reinforces this, suggesting that in most applications, the platform will perform well above average. However, the data implies that in CPU-bound scenarios, the processor will be the stronger component, while in GPU-bound scenarios, the graphics card will be the limiting factor. This is typical for a high-end desktop build where the CPU often has more headroom in compute-heavy tasks than the GPU does in rasterization or ray tracing.

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark results indicate a system where the CPU is the more dominant component in multi-threaded workloads. The 7950X3D’s 3DMark score scaling from 4,123 at 4 threads to 14,252 at max threads shows near-linear scaling, meaning the CPU can effectively feed even the most demanding parallel tasks. In contrast, the GPU’s performance, while strong, is more likely to be the bottleneck in gaming scenarios, particularly at higher resolutions where the rasterization load increases.

The data suggests that for productivity, the CPU will rarely be the limiting factor. The high PassMark data compression score of 784,993 indicates that archiving and compression tasks will fly. For gaming, the balance is more nuanced. The CPU’s 3D V-Cache is designed to reduce latency and improve frame pacing, but the GPU’s raw throughput will ultimately cap the frame rate. The lack of measured FPS data for this combination means that the exact scaling is unknown, but based on the benchmark scores, a user can expect the A770 to be the bottleneck in most games, especially at 1440p and 4K resolutions. This is not a negative; it is a standard configuration where the CPU has headroom for background tasks, streaming, or recording while gaming without impacting performance. The 0.4% difference between the CPU and GPU average scores suggests a well-matched pairing where the system operates efficiently without severe imbalance in either direction.

Who Should Build It

This system is tailored for users who require maximum CPU compute power for professional workloads and also desire a high-refresh gaming experience. Target users include content creators who edit 4K video and render 3D scenes in applications like Blender or After Effects, where the CPU’s 16 cores and 32 threads will drastically reduce render times. Software developers compiling large codebases will benefit from the multi-threaded performance, with the PassMark multi-thread score of 62,383 indicating strong parallel compilation throughput. For students and researchers in engineering or data science fields, the CPU’s floating-point math score of 130,403 and support for ECC memory make it a suitable platform for simulations and data analysis. Small business workstations handling database management or virtualization will also find the CPU’s core count and memory bandwidth advantageous.

For gamers, the CPU is an excellent choice for high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p and 1440p, where its single-thread performance (3DMark single-thread score of 1,062) and large cache can push high frame rates. The GPU is capable of handling modern titles at high settings, though its performance will be more moderate than the CPU’s. This build is not for budget-conscious users; it is for professionals and enthusiasts who prioritize performance and are willing to invest in a premium platform.

Gaming Performance

Note: There are no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data, so all gaming performance figures below are estimates based on the individual benchmark scores of the components.

Based on the CPU’s strong single-thread and multi-thread scores, and the GPU’s 90th percentile ranking, this system is estimated to provide a high-refresh experience at 1080p and 1440p in most titles. The CPU’s 3D V-Cache should ensure excellent frame pacing and low 1% lows. For AAA games at 1080p Ultra settings, the A770’s 19.66 TFLOPS of FP32 performance suggests it can deliver frame rates well above 60 FPS, potentially in the 90-120 FPS range, depending on the title’s optimization. At 1440p, the 512.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 16 GB of VRAM will help maintain performance, but frame rates will likely drop to the 60-90 FPS range for demanding games. At 4K, the GPU will be the limiting factor, and users should expect to adjust settings to achieve playable frame rates. Esports titles like CS:GO or Valorant, which are CPU-bound, will likely run at very high frame rates, potentially exceeding 200 FPS, thanks to the 7950X3D’s strong single-core performance. For ray-traced games, the 32 RT cores will provide a playable experience, but performance will be lower than rasterized settings.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile for this CPU and GPU pairing is 92, placing it in the top tier of desktop builds.

Q: How does the Ryzen 9 7950X3D compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core 9 273PQE?

A: The Ryzen 9 7950X3D trails the Intel Core 9 273PQE by 0.3% in average benchmark score, making them effectively equal in performance.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the Intel Arc A770?

A: The Intel Arc A770 has a memory bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s, provided by 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D supports ECC memory, which is beneficial for workstation and stability-critical applications.

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile ranking among all graphics cards?

A: The Intel Arc A770 ranks in the 90th percentile of all GPUs, based on its average benchmark score of 68,809.

Q: What is the boost clock of the CPU?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D has a boost clock of 5.70 GHz.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this specific combination?

A: No, there is no measured FPS data for this exact CPU and GPU pairing. All gaming performance discussions are estimates based on component benchmark scores.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build that pairs a 16-core, 32-thread AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D with an Intel Arc A770 graphics card. The CPU, based on the Zen 4 architecture, is a top-tier processor in the 93rd percentile, while the GPU is a high-end card in the 90th percentile. The build’s combined percentile of 92 indicates it is a premium configuration designed for demanding tasks. The CPU’s massive 128 MB L3 cache and 5.70 GHz boost clock make it ideal for gaming and content creation. The GPU’s 16 GB of VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth are suited for high-resolution textures and rendering workloads. This is a high-performance pairing that prioritizes CPU compute power while still delivering a strong graphics experience.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes, ensuring compatibility with the latest NVMe SSDs and graphics cards for future upgrades. The Intel Arc A770 uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 lanes. The system’s CPU TDP is 120 W, and the GPU TDP is 225 W, with a suggested PSU rating of 550 W. This provides a reasonable power headroom for the current components, but a user looking to upgrade to a more power-hungry GPU in the future would need to consider a higher-wattage power supply.

The most sensible next upgrade would be to the GPU, as the CPU has significant headroom for more powerful graphics cards. The CPU’s 16 cores and 32 threads are capable of supporting even the most powerful GPUs on the market without bottlenecking. A user could also upgrade the CPU to a future AM5 generation processor, as the socket is expected to be supported for several years. Memory upgrades are also possible, as the platform supports dual-channel DDR5, and users could increase capacity or speed. The platform’s support for ECC memory is a unique feature that could be leveraged for error-sensitive workloads.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The CPU’s 3DMark single-thread score of 1,062 and large 128 MB cache will drive high frame rates in esports and CPU-bound titles. The GPU’s 90th percentile performance ensures that the system can handle AAA games at high settings, though the CPU will be the primary driver for maximum FPS.

Streaming: The 16-core, 32-thread CPU provides ample resources for encoding video while gaming. The PassMark multi-thread score of 62,383 indicates that the CPU can handle the encoding workload without impacting game performance, making it an excellent choice for single-PC streaming setups.

Video Editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 36,291 and PassMark data compression score of 784,993 suggest that video editing software will run smoothly. Timeline scrubbing, effects rendering, and export tasks will benefit from the CPU’s high core count and the GPU’s 16 GB of VRAM for previewing and applying effects.

3D Rendering: The CPU’s floating-point math score of 130,403 is a strong indicator of performance in 3D rendering engines that rely on CPU compute. The GPU’s 32 RT cores and 19.66 TFLOPS of FP32 performance will accelerate ray-traced renders, though the CPU will still be the main workhorse for final frame rendering.

Software Development: The CPU’s high multi-thread score and support for ECC memory make it a reliable platform for compiling large codebases and running multiple virtual machines. The PassMark integer math score of 214,089 indicates fast data processing, which is beneficial for code analysis and testing.

Student and Office Work: This system is overkill for basic office tasks, but the CPU’s single-thread performance ensures snappy application load times and responsiveness. For students in engineering or computer science, the CPU’s multi-threaded capabilities will handle simulations and complex computations with ease, while the GPU’s 16 GB of VRAM can support CAD applications and data visualization.