SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D + Intel Arc A750

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D

65,914 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A750

20,582 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D + Intel Arc A750: A Desktop Pairing of Extremes

This desktop build pairs AMD's flagship 16-core Zen 4 processor with Intel's mid-range Alchemist graphics card, creating a system where the CPU's immense compute capability far outstrips the GPU's gaming-focused performance. The data shows a combined percentile of 80 against all systems, but the individual components tell divergent stories — the CPU sits at the 93rd percentile while the GPU rests at the 66th. This is a pairing defined by imbalance, where the processor's multi-threaded dominance could serve workstation tasks that the graphics card's 8 GB frame buffer and 17.20 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput handle capably but not spectacularly. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all gaming performance discussion in this analysis is estimated from the benchmark scores.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D is a 16-core, 32-thread processor built on the Zen 4 architecture with the Raphael codename, manufactured on TSMC's 5 nm process with 17,840 million transistors across a 2x 71 mm² die configuration. It operates at a base clock of 4.20 GHz and boosts up to 5.70 GHz, with a 120 W TDP that seems modest given its core count. The cache hierarchy is distinctive: each core gets 64 KB of L1 and 1 MB of L2, but the shared L3 cache totals 128 MB, including a 1x 64MB 3D V-Cache slice. This large cache is the defining feature of the X3D variant, designed to reduce memory latency in cache-sensitive workloads.

Benchmark results confirm the processor's dual nature. In single-threaded tests, it scores 1062 in 3dmark_single_thread, 2053 in Cinebench R23 single-core, and 2548 in Geekbench single-core — strong but not record-breaking figures. The multi-threaded scores are where this CPU separates itself: Cinebench R23 multicore reaches 36291, Geekbench multicore hits 22363, and Passmark multithread scores 62383. The scaling from 2 threads (2102 in 3dmark) to 16 threads (13180) to max threads (14252) shows near-linear expansion, indicating excellent core utilization efficiency. The Passmark integer math score of 214089 and floating point math of 130403 further reinforce that this is a compute powerhouse.

The nearest rivals contextualize these numbers. The Intel Core 9 273PQE scores 66099 against the 7950X3D's 65914 average benchmark score, a delta of -0.3% that places the AMD part essentially tied with that Intel offering. The AMD EPYC 9124 sits 1.2% behind, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus is 1.4% ahead. These are all within a narrow band, suggesting that for average benchmark performance, the 7950X3D competes at the top tier of desktop and even server-class processors. The 93rd percentile rank among all CPUs confirms this positioning.

Real-world implications: the 128 MB L3 cache and 16 cores make this exceptional for code compilation, data compression (Passmark data compression score of 784993), and encryption tasks (47100 in Passmark data encryption). The 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth from dual-channel DDR5 support is adequate but not exceptional for the core count.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data presents a stark imbalance: the CPU's 93rd percentile rank against the GPU's 66th creates a scenario where the processor is rarely the limiting factor in any workload. In gaming, the Arc A750's 8 GB GDDR6 memory and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth will constrain performance at higher resolutions, while the CPU's 16 cores and 5.70 GHz boost clock could easily feed frames at 1080p in most titles. The Passmark physics score of 5053 for the CPU and the GPU's passmark_directx_12 score of 70 (on a scale where directx_9 scores 181) suggest that the GPU handles newer APIs less efficiently relative to its older API performance.

The bottleneck pattern is workload-dependent. For CPU-bound tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, or software compilation, the GPU sits idle while the 7950X3D's 36291 Cinebench R23 multicore score does the heavy lifting. For GPU-bound tasks like 4K gaming or machine learning inference, the CPU's power is largely wasted. The Arc A750's passmark_g3d score of 12534 places it in solid mid-range territory, but its passmark_gpu_compute score of 5368 indicates compute workloads will not leverage the CPU's full potential. The 3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12 score of 2612 for the GPU is modest, suggesting that modern DX12 titles at high settings will be GPU-limited even on this powerful CPU.

The FPS scaling story cannot be measured directly since no measured FPS data exists, but the benchmark scores imply that at 1080p with lower settings, the CPU could push very high frame rates in esports titles, while at 1440p or 4K with ultra settings, the GPU becomes the clear constraint. The CPU's 3dmark_16_threads score of 13180 suggests it can handle even heavily threaded game logic, leaving the GPU as the sole bottleneck in most scenarios.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform foundation is AMD Socket AM5, which supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with ECC capability. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes, offering substantial bandwidth for future GPUs or NVMe storage. The integrated Radeon Graphics provides a fallback display output, which is useful for troubleshooting or basic tasks without the discrete GPU installed. The 120 W TDP of the CPU is modest for a 16-core part, meaning most AM5 motherboards with adequate VRM cooling can handle it.

The GPU side presents a different upgrade consideration. The Intel Arc A750 uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is backward compatible with the AM5 platform. Its 225 W TDP and suggested PSU of 550 W indicate that the power supply headroom depends on the CPU's 120 W plus the GPU's 225 W — a combined 345 W that leaves room for other components within a 550 W unit. The power connectors (1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin) are standard for this class of GPU. However, the Arc A750 is marked as end-of-life with a successor named Battlemage, so the upgrade path for the GPU is toward newer Intel architectures or competitors.

A sensible next upgrade would be a more powerful GPU to match the CPU's capabilities, since the 7950X3D can drive far more graphics performance than the A750 delivers. The CPU's unlocked multiplier allows overclocking, though the 3D V-Cache design may benefit more from maintaining stock clocks. Memory upgrades to higher-speed DDR5 kits could improve the 83.2 GB/s bandwidth ceiling. The platform supports PCIe Gen 5 devices, so a future Gen 5 SSD or GPU would be fully utilized.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need extreme CPU compute but have modest GPU requirements. Software developers compiling large codebases would benefit from the 36291 Cinebench R23 multicore score and Passmark integer math of 214089. Data analysts and scientists running simulations or processing large datasets would leverage the 16 cores and 128 MB cache. The Passmark data compression score of 784993 suggests excellent performance for archival or database workloads.

Students in computer science or engineering fields would find the CPU's multi-threaded performance valuable for parallel programming coursework, while the GPU handles standard desktop and light 3D work. Small business workstations running virtualization or database servers could use the 32 threads effectively, with the ECC memory support adding reliability for long-running processes. Gamers at 1080p who play esports or older titles would see high frame rates thanks to the CPU's single-thread performance (2053 in Cinebench R23 single-core), though the GPU limits modern AAA titles at higher settings.

Content creators face a mixed scenario: video editing software that uses CPU encoding would benefit from the 16 cores, but GPU-accelerated effects or rendering would be constrained by the A750's 17.20 TFLOPS FP32 and 8 GB VRAM. 3D artists using CPU-based renderers would see excellent performance, while GPU-based renderers like Octane or Blender Cycles would be slower.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p with competitive settings, the CPU's 5.70 GHz boost clock and 3dmark_single_thread score of 1062 should drive frame rates well above 144 FPS in less demanding titles, though the GPU's passmark_directx_12 score of 70 relative to directx_9's 181 suggests older API titles may perform better. The 8 GB VRAM could become a limitation in newer games.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 cores and 32 threads can handle both game encoding and streaming simultaneously without performance degradation, as indicated by the 3dmark_max_threads score of 14252. The GPU's lack of a dedicated encoder throughput metric in the data leaves streaming quality to CPU-based x264 encoding, which this processor handles capably.

Video editing: Timeline scrubbing and preview rendering in software like Premiere Pro would benefit from the 36291 Cinebench R23 multicore score and 130403 Passmark floating point math. Export times using CPU encoding would be short, but GPU-accelerated effects like Lumetri or Warp Stabilizer would rely on the A750's 17.20 TFLOPS, which is mid-range.

3D rendering: CPU-based renderers like V-Ray or Arnold would perform exceptionally well with 16 cores and 32 threads, as evidenced by the 14252 3dmark_max_threads score. GPU-based renderers would be limited by the 8 GB VRAM and 17.20 TFLOPS, making complex scenes difficult.

Software development: Compilation times benefit from the 214089 Passmark integer math score and 32 threads. The 128 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency for large codebases, and the 784993 data compression score accelerates packaging and deployment tasks.

Student and office work: The CPU's power is largely unused in typical office tasks, but the integrated Radeon Graphics provides a backup display solution. The 2053 Cinebench R23 single-core score ensures snappy application launches and spreadsheet calculations.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D has 16 cores and 32 threads, with a base clock of 4.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.70 GHz.

Q: How much L3 cache does the CPU have?

A: The CPU has 128 MB of shared L3 cache, which includes a 1x 64MB 3D V-Cache slice.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The Intel Arc A750 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 9 7950X3D supports ECC memory, and it uses dual-channel DDR5 memory with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What is the GPU's ray tracing capability?

A: The Arc A750 has 28 RT cores, and its architecture is Xe-HPG (Alchemist generation). It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival?

A: The 7950X3D's average benchmark score of 65914 is -0.3% versus the Intel Core 9 273PQE (66099), +1.2% versus the AMD EPYC 9124 (65104), and -1.4% versus the Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus (66855).

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 80, with the CPU at the 93rd percentile and the GPU at the 66th percentile.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 65914 places it at the 93rd percentile among all CPUs. Its key scores include 36291 in Cinebench R23 multicore, 2053 in Cinebench R23 single-core, 22363 in Geekbench multicore, 2548 in Geekbench single-core, and 62383 in Passmark multithread. The 3dmark tests show scaling from 2102 at 2 threads to 14252 at max threads, demonstrating excellent multi-threading efficiency. The Passmark suite reveals specialized strengths: 784993 in data compression, 47100 in data encryption, 214089 in integer math, and 130403 in floating point math.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 20582, placing it at the 66th percentile among all GPUs. Its 3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12 score is 2612, while Geekbench OpenCL scores 98554 and Vulkan scores 85631. Passmark results show 12534 in G3D, 5368 in GPU compute, and notably lower DirectX scores: 181 for DX9, 65 for DX10, 72 for DX11, and 70 for DX12. The nearest GPU rival is the Intel Arc B570 with a delta of +0.1%, followed by the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile at +0.2%, and the AMD Radeon R9 M390X at -0.4%.

The combined picture is a CPU that outperforms 93% of all processors paired with a GPU that outperforms 66%, resulting in an 80th percentile system overall. This means the CPU alone could justify a higher system percentile if paired with a stronger GPU, but the A750's mid-range performance drags the combined score down.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build (buildClass: "desktop") pairing AMD's top-tier consumer processor with Intel's mid-range graphics card. The Ryzen 9 7950X3D is an active production part with a launch MSRP of $699, while the Arc A750 is end-of-life with a launch MSRP of 289 USD. The CPU uses the AMD Socket AM5 platform, supports DDR5 memory, and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes. The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16 and requires a 550 W suggested PSU with 1x 6-pin and 1x 8-pin power connectors.

The overall tier from the percentiles is high-end CPU with mid-range GPU. The CPU's 93rd percentile and the GPU's 66th percentile combine for an 80th percentile system, indicating this build is better suited for CPU-intensive workloads than GPU-intensive ones. The 120 W CPU TDP plus 225 W GPU TDP totals 345 W of component draw, leaving headroom in a 550 W PSU for other components. The CPU's integrated Radeon Graphics provides a backup display option, and the GPU's dual-slot design with 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 2.0 outputs supports multi-monitor setups.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A750 is built on the Xe-HPG architecture (Alchemist generation) using the DG2-512 chip, fabricated on TSMC's 6 nm process with 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die. It operates at a base clock of 2050 MHz with a boost clock of 2400 MHz, and its memory runs at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective). The 8 GB GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus provides 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is respectable for the class but limiting for high-resolution textures.

The GPU has 3584 shading units, 224 texture mapping units, and 112 raster output units, along with 28 RT cores for ray tracing. Its pixel rate is 268.8 GPixel/s and texture rate is 537.6 GTexel/s. Compute performance includes 17.20 TFLOPS FP32 and 34.41 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1 ratio). The 225 W TDP is modest for the performance class, with a suggested 550 W PSU.

Benchmark results show a mixed picture. The 3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12 score of 2612 is moderate, indicating decent but not exceptional DX12 performance. Geekbench OpenCL (98554) and Vulkan (85631) scores suggest compute workloads are handled adequately. Passmark results reveal a quirk: DirectX 9 scores 181, but DirectX 10, 11, and 12 score 65, 72, and 70 respectively — significantly lower. This suggests the driver stack or architecture favors older APIs, which could impact modern game performance. The passmark_g3d score of 12534 and GPU compute score of 5368 place it firmly in mid-range territory, with the nearest rival being the Intel Arc B570 at +0.1% delta.

For rendering, the 17.20 TFLOPS FP32 provides capable rasterization performance, while the 28 RT cores offer entry-level ray tracing. The 8 GB VRAM is the primary constraint for 1440p and 4K workloads with high-resolution textures.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all frame rate figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores rather than direct measurements. The CPU's 3dmark_single_thread score of 1062 and Cinebench R23 single-core of 2053 indicate strong per-core performance that should avoid bottlenecking the GPU in most titles. The GPU's 3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12 score of 2612 and passmark_directx_12 score of 70 (relative to DX9's 181) suggest modern DX12 games may underperform compared to older API titles.

At 1080p with high settings, the CPU could likely push frame rates toward the GPU's maximum in esports titles like Counter-Strike or Valorant, given the GPU's 17.20 TFLOPS and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth. At 1440p, the 8 GB VRAM and mid-range compute would likely limit AAA titles to medium or high settings for 60 FPS. At 4K, the GPU would be the clear bottleneck, with the 8 GB frame buffer insufficient for ultra textures in many modern games.

The CPU's 128 MB L3 cache and 16 cores could help maintain consistent frame times in CPU-intensive scenes, but the GPU's passmark_directx_12 score of 70 suggests driver overhead or architectural inefficiencies in DX12 workloads. Older DX9 and DX11 titles might perform relatively better, as indicated by the higher passmark scores in those API tests. Ray tracing performance would be limited by the 28 RT cores, which are entry-level by current standards. Overall, this pairing is better suited for 1080p gaming at medium-to-high settings, with the CPU ensuring no frame drops from processor limitations.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D + Intel Arc A750

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D

Intel Arc A750

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Upgrade Path and Platform

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

GPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds