SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D + Intel Arc A380

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

86%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D

65,914 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A380

8,558 Benchmark Score

Top 14% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D paired with an Intel Arc A380 is a profoundly lopsided desktop combination. The CPU is a top-tier 16-core processor that sits in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is a modest entry-level card in the 44th percentile. The data shows a system where the processor is the dominant component by a massive margin, making the pairing suitable for specific compute-heavy tasks but severely limiting for gaming. There are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all frame rate discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D is a 16-core, 32-thread desktop processor built on the Zen 4 architecture (codenamed Raphael) and manufactured on a 5 nm process by TSMC. It uses the AMD Socket AM5 platform and supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The CPU has a base clock of 4.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.70 GHz, with a TDP of 120 W. Its cache layout is notable: 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a large 128 MB of shared L3 cache, which includes a dedicated 64 MB 3D V-Cache slice. The processor also integrates Radeon Graphics and supports ECC memory.

Benchmark results show this CPU is a multi-threaded powerhouse. In Cinebench R23, it scores 36291 in multi-core and 2053 in single-core. The single-core score is strong, but the multi-core score is exceptional, indicating that heavily threaded workloads will scale extremely well across the 16 cores. The Geekbench results confirm this pattern: a multi-core score of 22363 versus a single-core score of 2548. The 3DMark thread scaling tests are revealing: the processor scores 2102 with 2 threads, 4123 with 4 threads, 7641 with 8 threads, 13180 with 16 threads, and 14252 with max threads. The scaling from 8 to 16 threads shows a near-doubling of performance, and the jump from 16 to max threads is smaller, indicating that the 16-core configuration is well-utilized and that additional threads provide diminishing returns.

The PassMark suite adds further detail. The multi-thread score is 62383, while the single-thread score is 4146. Data compression scores 784993, and data encryption scores 47100. Floating-point math scores 130403, integer math scores 214089, and extended instructions score 58515. Physics processing scores 5053, and random string sorting scores 92784. These numbers indicate that the CPU excels at integer-heavy and floating-point workloads, making it suitable for scientific computing, data processing, and complex simulations. The average benchmark score for this CPU is 65914, placing it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core 9 273PQE, has an average score of 66099, which is 0.3% higher, making the two effectively tied. The AMD EPYC 9124 is 1.2% lower, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus is 0.4% lower and the Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus is 1.4% lower.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance here is extremely skewed toward the CPU. The Ryzen 9 7950X3D sits in the 93rd CPU percentile, while the Intel Arc A380 sits in the 44th GPU percentile. This creates a scenario where the GPU is almost certainly the limiting factor in any graphics-bound workload. For gaming, the GPU will bottleneck the CPU, preventing the system from reaching the high frame rates that the CPU alone could support. The CPU's single-thread performance (a Geekbench single-core score of 2548 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2053) is strong enough for high-refresh gaming, but the GPU's low compute throughput will cap the actual output. The GPU's PassMark G3D score is 6252, which is modest, and its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 808. These scores suggest that the GPU will struggle with modern titles at high settings, making the CPU's headroom largely unused in that context.

In compute workloads that do not rely on the GPU, the CPU is the clear driver. The data shows that the CPU's multi-thread scores dominate its own single-thread scores, meaning that applications that can use all 16 cores and 32 threads will be fully utilized. The GPU's compute capability, measured by a PassMark GPU compute score of 2762, is far lower than the CPU's PassMark multi-thread score of 62383. For tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, or software compilation, the CPU will be the primary engine, and the GPU will have a minimal role unless the software offloads specific tasks to it. The FPS scaling, estimated from the benchmark scores, indicates that in gaming, the GPU will limit performance, while in productivity, the CPU will be the star.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Ryzen 9 7950X3D has the single-thread muscle for high-refresh gaming, with a Geekbench single-core score of 2548 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2053. However, the Intel Arc A380, with a PassMark G3D score of 6252, will be the bottleneck. The GPU's 6 GB of VRAM and 186.0 GB/s of bandwidth are modest, so estimated FPS at high settings will be low, making this pairing unsuitable for 144Hz or 240Hz gaming at demanding resolutions.

Streaming: The 16-core, 32-thread CPU can handle game capture and encoding simultaneously without breaking a sweat. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 36291 provides ample headroom for x264 encoding while gaming. The GPU will handle the rendering side, but its low performance will cap the gaming experience. The CPU's high thread count makes this a viable, if unusual, streaming setup where the game runs on the GPU and the CPU does the heavy lifting.

Video editing: This workload favors the CPU heavily. The Geekbench multi-core score of 22363 and the PassMark multi-thread score of 62383 indicate that timeline scrubbing, effect rendering, and export will be very fast. The GPU's low compute scores (PassMark GPU compute of 2762) mean that GPU-accelerated effects will be slower, but the CPU can compensate for many tasks.

3D rendering: The CPU is a rendering beast. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 36291 and the 3DMark max threads score of 14252 show that CPU-based rendering engines will perform exceptionally well. The GPU's DirectX 12 score of 35 and DirectX 11 score of 38 indicate that GPU-based renderers will not be a strong option, so users should rely on CPU rendering.

Software development: Compilation tasks will benefit from the high core count. The PassMark integer math score of 214089 and data compression score of 784993 suggest that code compilation and data processing will be fast. The CPU's high multi-thread scores will reduce build times significantly, making this a strong choice for developers who work on large codebases.

Student and office work: This is overkill. The CPU's single-thread score of 4146 in PassMark is more than enough for web browsing, document editing, and spreadsheets. The GPU is also sufficient for basic 2D tasks, as shown by its PassMark G2D score of 610. The system will be responsive, but the cost and power are wasted on such light workloads.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need extreme CPU compute power but have minimal GPU requirements. Gamers at 1080p with low settings or esports titles might see playable frame rates, but the GPU's 44th percentile ranking means that modern AAA games at high settings will be unplayable. Content creators who work with CPU-intensive rendering or video encoding will benefit most, as the CPU's 93rd percentile ranking ensures top-tier performance in those tasks. Developers who compile large codebases or run complex simulations will also find the CPU valuable. Students and small business workstations that run office applications will be vastly over-provisioned, but the system will handle any such task with ease. The GPU is not suitable for professional 3D workloads, as its DirectX 12 score of 35 is extremely low, and its 6 GB VRAM is insufficient for large scenes.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A380 is an entry-level graphics card based on the Xe-HPG architecture (codenamed DG2-128) and manufactured on a 6 nm process by TSMC. It has 1024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 raster output units. The GPU has 8 ray tracing cores, but no tensor cores are listed. It operates at a base clock of 2000 MHz and a boost clock of 2050 MHz. The memory subsystem consists of 6 GB of GDDR6 on a 96-bit bus, providing 186.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The card's pixel rate is 65.60 GPixel/s, and its texture rate is 131.2 GTexel/s. It has a TDP of 75 W and requires a single 8-pin power connector, with a suggested PSU of 250 W.

Benchmark results show this is a low-performance GPU. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 808, which is very low. Geekbench OpenCL scores 38224, and Vulkan scores 36736. PassMark scores are more revealing: DirectX 10 scores 37, DirectX 11 scores 38, DirectX 12 scores 35, and DirectX 9 scores 73. The G3D score is 6252, and the GPU compute score is 2762. The G2D score is 610. The average benchmark score is 8558, placing the GPU in the 44th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD FirePro W5170M, is 0.4% faster, while the AMD Radeon HD 8870M is 1.1% slower and the NVIDIA GeForce MX330 is 1.2% slower. These scores indicate that the GPU is suitable for light gaming, media playback, and basic productivity, but it will struggle with modern games at high settings. The FP32 performance of 4.198 TFLOPS is modest, and the FP16 performance of 8.397 TFLOPS (2:1) is also low, meaning compute-heavy tasks will be slow.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's multi-core performance compared to its nearest rivals?

A: The Ryzen 9 7950X3D has an average benchmark score of 65914. Its closest rival, the Intel Core 9 273PQE, scores 66099, which is 0.3% higher. The Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus is 0.4% lower, and the AMD EPYC 9124 is 1.2% lower.

Q: How does the GPU's performance compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Arc A380 has an average benchmark score of 8558. The AMD FirePro W5170M is 0.4% higher, while the AMD Radeon HD 8870M is 1.1% lower and the NVIDIA GeForce MX330 is 1.2% lower.

Q: What is the CPU's single-thread performance?

A: The CPU scores 2548 in Geekbench single-core and 2053 in Cinebench R23 single-core. In PassMark, the single-thread score is 4146.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The GPU has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 186.0 GB/s.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 9 7950X3D supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the GPU's ray tracing capability?

A: The GPU has 8 ray tracing cores, but its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 808 is low, indicating that ray tracing performance will be limited.

Q: What is the CPU's cache configuration?

A: The CPU has 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 128 MB of shared L3 cache, which includes a 64 MB 3D V-Cache slice.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The CPU provides 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which is a high-bandwidth connection for future devices. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is sufficient for its bandwidth needs but is a step below the CPU's Gen 5 capability. The CPU has a TDP of 120 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 75 W, with a suggested PSU of 250 W. This means the system has low power requirements overall, and a modest power supply will suffice.

The most sensible next upgrade is the GPU. The CPU is already in the 93rd percentile, so it has plenty of headroom. Replacing the Arc A380 with a more powerful GPU would unlock the CPU's full gaming potential. The CPU's high multi-thread scores would also benefit from a GPU with better compute performance for tasks like video encoding or 3D rendering. The platform supports PCIe Gen 5, so a newer GPU with a Gen 5 interface would be fully compatible. The memory is DDR5, which is current, and the 128 MB of L3 cache is large, so no immediate CPU upgrade is needed. The 120 W TDP means that cooling is not a major concern, and the 250 W suggested PSU leaves room for a more power-hungry GPU in the future.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that combines a top-tier CPU with an entry-level GPU. The build class is desktop. The CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D, is a 16-core, 32-thread processor from the 7000 series, released in January 2023 with a launch MSRP of $699. The GPU, the Intel Arc A380, is an end-of-life product released in June 2022 with a launch MSRP of $149. The combined percentile for this pairing is 69, which reflects the strong CPU and weak GPU. The system is a compute-oriented workstation that happens to have a graphics card, rather than a gaming rig. The CPU's 93rd percentile ranking makes it one of the best processors available, while the GPU's 44th percentile ranking places it in the lower half of all graphics cards. This is a pairing for users who prioritize CPU-bound workloads over GPU-bound ones.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's exact benchmark scores are as follows: 3DMark 16 threads scores 13180, 2 threads scores 2102, 4 threads scores 4123, 8 threads scores 7641, max threads scores 14252, and single thread scores 1062. Cinebench R15 multi-core scores 5974 and single-core scores 326. Cinebench R23 multi-core scores 36291 and single-core scores 2053. Geekbench multi-core scores 22363 and single-core scores 2548. PassMark data compression scores 784993, data encryption scores 47100, extended instructions scores 58515, find prime numbers scores 495, floating-point math scores 130403, integer math scores 214089, multithread scores 62383, physics scores 5053, random string sorting scores 92784, and single-thread scores 4146. The CPU's average benchmark score is 65914, placing it in the 93rd percentile.

The GPU's exact benchmark scores are: 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 scores 808, Geekbench OpenCL scores 38224, Geekbench Vulkan scores 36736, PassMark DirectX 10 scores 37, DirectX 11 scores 38, DirectX 12 scores 35, DirectX 9 scores 73, G2D scores 610, G3D scores 6252, and GPU compute scores 2762. The GPU's average benchmark score is 8558, placing it in the 44th percentile. The combined picture is clear: the CPU is a top-10% performer, while the GPU is below average. In CPU-bound tasks, this system will outperform nearly all others. In GPU-bound tasks, it will be limited to entry-level performance. The 69th combined percentile reflects this imbalance, showing a system that is strong in one dimension but weak in another.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D + Intel Arc A380

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D

Intel Arc A380

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

Benchmark Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds