SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D + Intel Arc A310E

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

85 Score

Top 15% Ranking

85 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

GPU Bottleneck

CPU

96%

GPU

74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D

65,914 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A310E

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This pairing combines AMD's top-tier 16-core desktop processor with Intel's entry-level discrete graphics card. The data shows a desktop build with a combined performance percentile of 72, placing it above most systems, though the GPU is the clear limiting factor for graphics-intensive work. The benchmark information reveals a stark performance gap between the CPU and GPU, making this a specialized configuration rather than a balanced gaming machine.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D sits on the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which represents AMD's current desktop infrastructure. The CPU supports DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, and it can handle ECC memory for error-checking workloads. The processor provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the CPU itself, offering modern connectivity for storage and expansion cards. The Intel Arc A310E, by contrast, uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface, which is narrower and older than what the CPU can supply, though it remains functional for the GPU's modest bandwidth demands.

The CPU has a TDP of 120 watts, while the GPU has a TDP of 75 watts and a suggested PSU of 250 watts. This means the total system power draw is modest by desktop standards, and the suggested PSU figure of 250 watts reflects the GPU's low power appetite. A user looking to upgrade this build would find the AM5 platform accommodating: the 7950X3D has a multiplier unlocked, so overclocking is possible, and the platform's PCIe Gen 5 lanes can handle faster graphics cards or NVMe storage. The integrated Radeon Graphics in the CPU provides a fallback display output, which is useful for troubleshooting or basic tasks without the Arc GPU.

A sensible next upgrade path involves replacing the Intel Arc A310E with a more capable graphics card. The CPU's 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes and 120-watt TDP leave substantial headroom for a higher-tier GPU, and the 250-watt PSU suggestion would need revision for a more powerful card, but the platform itself can support it. The 128 MB of L3 cache and 16 cores mean the CPU will remain relevant for years, so the GPU is the bottleneck and the natural first upgrade target. The DDR5 memory support and ECC capability also position this platform for long-term use in professional or content-creation environments.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU benchmark scores paint a picture of a high-end processor. In Cinebench R23, the 7950X3D scores 36,291 in multicore and 2,053 in single-core tests. The Geekbench results show 22,363 multicore and 2,548 single-core. The 3DMark suite shows scaling from 1,062 single-thread to 14,252 max-threads, with intermediate results of 13,180 for 16 threads, 7,641 for 8 threads, 4,123 for 4 threads, and 2,102 for 2 threads. PassMark results include a multithread score of 62,383 and a single-thread score of 4,146, with specialized workloads like integer math at 214,089, floating-point math at 130,403, and data compression at 784,993.

The CPU's percentile versus all CPUs is 93, meaning it outperforms 93% of processors in the database. Its average benchmark score is 65,914. The nearest rivals show tight competition: the Intel Core 9 273PQE scores 66,099, a delta of -0.3% relative to the 7950X3D; the Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus scores 66,159, a delta of -0.4%; the AMD EPYC 9124 scores 65,104, a delta of 1.2%; and the Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus scores 66,855, a delta of -1.4%. These deltas indicate the 7950X3D sits within a small performance cluster, trailing the fastest rivals by 1.4% while leading the EPYC by 1.2%.

The GPU, however, has no benchmark scores in the data — its benchmark array is empty, and its average benchmark score is 0. Its percentile versus all GPUs is 50, placing it exactly at the median of the GPU database. The combined percentile for the build is 72. The data clearly states that no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all FPS discussion must be treated as estimated from the benchmark scores. The CPU's strong scores suggest it can feed any GPU, but the A310E's 50th percentile position indicates mid-pack graphics capability at best.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, this build is mismatched. The CPU's 93rd percentile and strong single-thread scores — 2,053 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 4,146 in PassMark single-thread — indicate it can handle game logic and physics at high frame rates. However, the GPU's 50th percentile and 4 GB VRAM limit resolution and detail settings. At 1080p with low-to-medium settings, the A310E might deliver playable frame rates in less demanding titles, but high-refresh monitors (144Hz or above) would remain out of reach in most modern games. The CPU would sit idle waiting for the GPU, making this a poor choice for competitive esports at high refresh rates.

Streaming is a mixed scenario. The 7950X3D's 16 cores and 32 threads — with a PassMark multithread score of 62,383 — can handle encoding and streaming overhead while gaming. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 36,291 reinforces this capability. However, the GPU's low VRAM and mid-pack performance mean the game itself would run at modest settings, and the stream quality would be limited by the game's rendering quality. The CPU could easily handle software encoding, but the overall stream experience would be constrained by the A310E.

Video editing benefits heavily from the CPU. The 16 cores and 32 threads, combined with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 36,291 and Geekbench multicore of 22,363, provide strong performance for timeline scrubbing, effects processing, and export tasks. The PassMark data compression score of 784,993 and integer math score of 214,089 support this, as video codecs rely on integer operations. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth would limit GPU-accelerated effects and 4K preview, but the CPU handles the heavy lifting. Export times would be CPU-bound and fast, while preview performance at high resolutions would suffer.

3D rendering is a CPU-dominated workload, and this CPU excels. The Cinebench R15 multicore score of 5,974 and R23 multicore of 36,291 indicate strong rendering throughput. The PassMark floating-point math score of 130,403 and physics score of 5,053 further support this. The GPU's 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 performance is modest and would provide some acceleration in renderers that support it, but the 4 GB VRAM limits scene complexity. CPU-based rendering would be the primary path, and the 7950X3D's 16 cores would keep render times competitive with high-end workstations.

Software development is a strong use case. The CPU's 93rd percentile and high multithread scores mean compilation times are short. The 128 MB L3 cache helps with large codebases, and the 16 cores handle parallel builds efficiently. The PassMark extended instructions score of 58,515 indicates strong support for modern instruction sets. The GPU is irrelevant for most development tasks, though the 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 outputs allow multiple monitors for code, documentation, and testing environments. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long compile sessions.

Student and office work is overkill but smooth. The CPU's single-thread scores — 2,053 in Cinebench R23 and 4,146 in PassMark — handle office applications and web browsing with ease. The integrated Radeon Graphics in the CPU can drive displays even without the Arc GPU, though the A310E provides additional outputs. The 75-watt GPU TDP and 250-watt suggested PSU keep the system quiet and cool. For document editing, spreadsheet work, and research, this build is massively overpowered, but it would never feel slow. The 4 GB GPU memory is more than enough for office workloads.

FAQ

Q: What socket does the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D use?

A: The CPU uses AMD Socket AM5, which supports DDR5 memory through a dual-channel bus with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth and PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the CPU.

Q: How does the 7950X3D compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core 9 273PQE?

A: The 7950X3D has an average benchmark score of 65,914, while the Intel Core 9 273PQE scores 66,099, a delta of -0.3%, meaning the Intel part is marginally faster by less than one percent.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The Intel Arc A310E has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus with 124.0 GB/s bandwidth, and a memory clock of 1937 MHz (15.5 Gbps effective).

Q: Does the build support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D supports ECC memory, which is useful for error-checking in professional and scientific workloads.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The build has a combined percentile of 72, while the CPU alone is at the 93rd percentile and the GPU is at the 50th percentile.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this CPU+GPU combination?

A: No, the data contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination; all FPS discussion must be treated as estimated from the benchmark scores.

Q: What is the GPU's power requirement?

A: The Intel Arc A310E has a TDP of 75 watts and a suggested PSU of 250 watts, with no power connectors required, drawing power from the PCIe slot.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a severe imbalance between the CPU and GPU. The CPU sits at the 93rd percentile against all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 50th percentile against all GPUs. This 43-point gap means the CPU vastly outperforms the GPU in relative terms. In gaming workloads, the GPU would be the bottleneck: the A310E's 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus limit texture loading and resolution, while its 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 performance constrains shader complexity. The CPU's single-thread score of 2,053 in Cinebench R23 and PassMark single-thread of 4,146 indicate it can generate frame data far faster than the GPU can render it.

In CPU-bound workloads like video editing, rendering, and compilation, the CPU is the dominant component, and the GPU becomes nearly irrelevant. The PassMark multithread score of 62,383 and Cinebench R23 multicore of 36,291 show the CPU handles these tasks with ease, while the GPU's 50th percentile means it provides minimal acceleration. The CPU's 128 MB L3 cache and 16 cores with 32 threads give it a massive advantage in parallel tasks, while the GPU's 768 shading units and 16 ROPs are entry-level figures.

The FPS scaling evidence is absent — no measured FPS rows exist for this combination. However, the benchmark scores suggest that in gaming, the GPU would cap frame rates at low-to-mid levels, and the CPU would rarely exceed 30-40% utilization. In productivity, the CPU would run at high utilization while the GPU idles. The combined percentile of 72 reflects this imbalance: the CPU drags the average up, but the GPU prevents the system from reaching higher-tier performance. A balanced build would aim for a GPU in the 85-95th percentile to match the CPU's 93rd percentile, but the A310E at the 50th percentile is far below that.

Who Should Build It

This build targets specific users who prioritize CPU performance over graphics. Gamers at 1080p with low-to-medium settings in esports or older titles would find the CPU capable of high frame rates, but the GPU limits them to around 60 FPS in most modern games. Gamers at 1440p or 4K would struggle, as the 4 GB VRAM is insufficient for high-resolution textures, and the 64-bit memory bus throttles bandwidth. Content creators working with video editing, 3D rendering, or software compilation would benefit most, as these workloads are CPU-bound and the 7950X3D's 16 cores deliver strong performance.

Developers building large codebases would see short compile times, and the ECC memory support adds stability for long-running builds. Students in computer science or engineering programs would find the CPU overkill but effective for coursework, and the integrated Radeon Graphics provides a backup display. Small business workstations handling data analysis, financial modeling, or scientific computing would leverage the CPU's PassMark integer math score of 214,089 and floating-point score of 130,403. The 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 outputs on the GPU support multi-monitor setups for productivity.

This build is not for gamers seeking high-refresh experiences or for professionals needing GPU acceleration. The 50th percentile GPU means it performs like an average graphics card, and the 4 GB VRAM is below modern standards for AAA titles. However, for users who need extreme CPU throughput and only light graphics, this pairing makes sense. The CPU's 93rd percentile ensures it competes with the best processors available, and the AM5 platform offers a future upgrade path to a better GPU without changing the motherboard or memory.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D is a 16-core, 32-thread processor from the 7000 series, built on Zen 4 architecture with the Raphael codename. It uses a 5 nm process from TSMC with 17,840 million transistors spread across a 2x 71 mm² die size. The base clock is 4.20 GHz with a boost clock of 5.70 GHz, and the TDP is 120 watts. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 128 MB of shared L3 cache, with a 1x 64MB 3D V-Cache slice contributing to that total. The processor has an unlocked multiplier, supports ECC memory, and includes integrated Radeon Graphics.

The benchmark scores demonstrate exceptional multithreaded performance. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 36,291 and Geekbench multicore of 22,363 place it among the fastest desktop processors. The 3DMark max-threads score of 14,252 shows strong scaling from the 16-thread score of 13,180, indicating the additional threads provide a modest 8% improvement. The single-thread scores — 2,053 in Cinebench R23, 4,146 in PassMark, and 1,062 in 3DMark — are competitive with high-end desktop CPUs. The PassMark results show balanced performance across workloads: integer math at 214,089, floating-point at 130,403, data encryption at 47,100, and extended instructions at 58,515.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 65,914 places it in the 93rd percentile, and its nearest rivals are all within 1.4% in either direction, indicating a tight cluster of high-performance processors. The 128 MB L3 cache is a standout feature, benefiting workloads with large working sets like gaming, databases, and scientific simulations. The 4.20 GHz base clock and 5.70 GHz boost clock provide strong single-thread responsiveness, while the 16 cores handle parallel tasks efficiently. The 5 nm process and 120-watt TDP make it power-efficient relative to its performance, and the ECC support adds professional appeal.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that pairs the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D with the Intel Arc A310E. The CPU is a high-end 16-core processor from AMD's 7000 series, while the GPU is an entry-level Arc 3 product from Intel. The combined percentile of 72 places this build above average, but the individual components are far apart in capability: the CPU at the 93rd percentile and the GPU at the 50th percentile. This is a CPU-centric build where the processor dominates the performance profile.

The build class is desktop, meaning it uses desktop components in a standard form factor. The CPU's AM5 socket and DDR5 memory support are current-generation features, while the GPU's PCIe 4.0 x8 interface is a step behind the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 capability. The overall tier, based on the combined percentile of 72, is upper-midrange — better than most systems but not flagship-tier due to the GPU's mediocrity. The CPU alone would place this in the top 7% of processors, but the GPU pulls the combined score down.

The data shows no measured FPS for this combination, so the build's gaming performance is estimated from the benchmark scores. The CPU's high scores suggest it would not bottleneck any GPU, but the A310E's 50th percentile and 4 GB VRAM limit gaming to low or medium settings at 1080p. For productivity, the build is far stronger: the CPU's 16 cores and 128 MB L3 cache handle demanding workloads, and the GPU provides basic display output and light acceleration. This is a workstation-class CPU paired with a basic GPU, creating a lopsided but capable system for CPU-intensive tasks.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A310E is a graphics card based on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the DG2-128 chip from the Alchemist generation (Arc 3). It uses a 6 nm process from TSMC with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 45.9 million per mm². The GPU has 768 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, and 16 raster output units, along with 6 ray tracing cores. The clocks are fixed at 2000 MHz for both base and boost, with memory running at 1937 MHz (15.5 Gbps effective). The memory configuration is 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, providing 124.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

The GPU's compute capabilities are modest. It delivers 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 6.144 TFLOPS of FP16 with a 2:1 ratio. The pixel rate is 32.00 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 64.00 GTexel/s. The TDP is 75 watts with a suggested PSU of 250 watts, and it requires no power connectors, drawing power from the PCIe slot. The card is single-slot with dimensions of 168 mm in length, 69 mm in height, and 20 mm in width, and it offers 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 outputs. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, with 6 ray tracing cores for hardware-accelerated ray tracing.

The GPU's percentile versus all GPUs is 50, placing it exactly at the median. It has no benchmark scores in the data, and its average benchmark score is 0, so its performance is judged solely by its percentile and specifications. The 4 GB VRAM is the most significant limitation: modern games at 1080p often exceed this capacity, causing texture streaming issues or reduced detail settings. The 64-bit memory bus and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth are also entry-level figures, limiting performance in memory-intensive scenarios. The 6 ray tracing cores provide basic RT capability, but the low shading unit count means RT performance would be poor. For rendering workloads, the 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 is suitable for light acceleration, but the 4 GB VRAM restricts scene complexity. The card's production status is end-of-life, with Battlemage as its successor, indicating it is a legacy product.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D + Intel Arc A310E

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D

Intel Arc A310E

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Upgrade Path and Platform

Benchmark Performance

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

Build Overview

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds