SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7950X + Intel Arc B770

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

85 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
GPU Bottleneck
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X

69,515 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc B770

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X and Intel Arc B770 form a desktop pairing that targets high-end productivity with a strong balance of CPU and GPU capabilities. The CPU is a 16-core, 32-thread Zen 4 part on the AMD Socket AM5 platform, while the GPU is Intel’s Battlemage-architecture card with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory. Benchmark data shows the CPU performing near the top of its class, while the GPU sits at the midpoint of all GPUs, creating a system where processing power leads and graphics follow. This analysis walks through the raw scores, percentile positions, and workload implications, using only the facts provided.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X is a 16-core, 32-thread processor built on the Zen 4 architecture with the Raphael codename, manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It has a base clock of 4.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.70 GHz, with a TDP of 170 W. The CPU supports DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, with a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, and it includes ECC memory support. The PCIe interface is Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the CPU, and it features integrated Radeon Graphics. The cache hierarchy consists of 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 64 MB of shared L3. The processor has a launch MSRP of $699.

In benchmark terms, the 7950X delivers strong scaling from low to high thread counts. The 3DMark scores show a clear progression: 2,161 for 2 threads, 4,218 for 4 threads, 7,920 for 8 threads, 14,110 for 16 threads, and 15,579 for max threads. The single-thread score is 1,099, which is modest compared to the multi-thread results, but still respectable for a high-core-count part. Cinebench R23 scores are 36,523 for multi-core and 2,000 for single-core, while Geekbench results are 22,415 for multi-core and 2,613 for single-core. The PassMark suite shows a multi-thread score of 62,478 and a single-thread score of 4,266, with specialized tests like data compression at 835,923, data encryption at 49,336, and floating-point math at 138,004. Integer math reaches 225,603, and physics scores 3,102.

The CPU’s percentile rank against all CPUs is 94, meaning it outperforms the vast majority of processors in the database. Its average benchmark score is 69,515. The nearest rivals include the Intel Core i7-14700K with an average score of 69,355 (a 0.2% difference), the AMD EPYC 9115 at 69,288 (0.3% difference), the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX at 69,875 (-0.5% difference), and the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F at 69,996 (-0.7% difference). These deltas are tiny, indicating the 7950X sits in a cluster of similarly performing CPUs, but it edges out the i7-14700K and EPYC 9115 by a hair. For real workloads, this means the 7950X is excellent for heavily threaded tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation, where its 16 cores and 32 threads shine. The single-thread scores, while lower, are still adequate for everyday responsiveness and lighter workloads, though not class-leading.

Benchmark Performance

The combined picture for this build shows a CPU that is at the 94th percentile and a GPU at the 50th percentile, with an overall combined percentile of 72. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 69,515 is nearly identical to its nearest rivals, with a spread of less than 1% across four other processors. This suggests that the 7950X is not a performance outlier in either direction but rather a solid performer that trades blows with the i7-14700K and others. The GPU, however, has no benchmark scores listed in the data, and its average benchmark score is 0, which means its performance is unquantified in this database. The GPU’s percentile of 50 places it at the median of all GPUs, implying it is neither a high-end nor a low-end part.

The lack of measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination means that gaming performance cannot be directly assessed from real-world tests. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows, so all FPS figures mentioned in this analysis are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The CPU’s strong multi-thread performance suggests it will not bottleneck in most scenarios, but the GPU’s mid-tier percentile indicates that graphics-heavy workloads will be limited by the Arc B770. For productivity tasks, the CPU carries the load, and the GPU’s role is secondary. The combined percentile of 72 reflects a system that is above average overall, but the gap between CPU and GPU performance is significant, with the CPU being far stronger relative to its peers than the GPU.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc B770 is built on the Xe2-HPG architecture, part of the Battlemage generation, with the BMG-G31 chip manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The die size is 368 mm². It has a base clock of 2100 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz, with memory running at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective). The GPU features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s. It has 4,096 shading units, 256 texture mapping units, and 128 raster operation units. There are 32 ray tracing cores, and the pixel rate is 307.2 GPixel/s with a texture rate of 614.4 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 19.66 TFLOPS, and FP16 is 39.32 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio. The GPU has a TDP of 225 W and requires a dual-slot cooler, with power connectors of one 6-pin and one 8-pin, and a suggested PSU of 550 W. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16, and display outputs include one HDMI 2.1a and three DisplayPort 2.1. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The benchmark scores for the Arc B770 are empty, so there are no specific performance numbers to cite. The percentile vs all GPUs is 50, which places it at the median. Without scores, the analysis relies on its architecture and specs. The 16 GB of VRAM and 512 GB/s bandwidth are substantial, suggesting it can handle high-resolution textures and memory-intensive workloads like 3D rendering or video editing, where the large frame buffer is useful. The 32 ray tracing cores indicate hardware support for ray-traced effects, though the actual performance is unmeasured. The FP32 throughput of 19.66 TFLOPS is moderate, and the pixel and texture rates are decent for a mid-range card. For rendering tasks, the combination of 16 GB VRAM and 512 GB/s bandwidth should allow for complex scenes without running out of memory, but the raw compute power is not top-tier. The lack of tensor core data means AI acceleration specifics are unknown, but the Xe2 architecture likely includes some matrix operations. Overall, the GPU is positioned as a capable mid-range option, but its performance relative to rivals cannot be quantified from the provided data.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Ryzen 9 7950X and the Arc B770 is heavily skewed toward the CPU. The CPU’s 94th percentile rank vastly exceeds the GPU’s 50th percentile, indicating that in most workloads, the GPU will be the limiting factor. The CPU’s multi-thread scores, such as the Cinebench R23 multi-core of 36,523 and PassMark multi-thread of 62,478, show it can handle demanding computational tasks with ease. The GPU, with no measured scores, offers no comparable data, but its median percentile suggests it will struggle to keep up with the CPU’s output in graphics-heavy applications. This means that in gaming, the Arc B770 will likely cap frame rates, while the CPU sits underutilized. In productivity tasks that rely on GPU acceleration, such as video rendering or 3D modeling, the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM and 512 GB/s bandwidth will help, but the compute performance may lag behind the CPU’s capabilities.

The combined percentile of 72 reflects this imbalance—the system is above average overall, but the CPU is the star. For CPU-bound tasks like software compilation, data compression (PassMark score of 835,923), or encryption (49,336), the 7950X delivers near-top-tier results, and the GPU barely matters. For GPU-bound tasks like gaming at high resolutions or ray tracing, the Arc B770 becomes the bottleneck, as its mid-tier percentile will limit performance. The absence of measured FPS data means the exact degree of bottlenecking is unknown, but the percentile gap strongly suggests that upgrading the GPU would yield larger gains than upgrading the CPU. In a balanced system, the two components would have closer percentiles, but here the CPU is clearly the dominant component.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who prioritize CPU performance over GPU performance, making it ideal for professionals and enthusiasts whose work involves heavy multi-threading. Content creators who render videos, process images, or encode streams will benefit from the 16 cores and 32 threads, with Cinebench R23 multi-core of 36,523 indicating strong rendering throughput. Software developers compiling large codebases will see reduced build times, as the PassMark integer math score of 225,603 and extended instructions score of 62,131 show robust computational capability. Students in engineering or data science fields can run simulations or process large datasets, leveraging the 64 MB of L3 cache and DDR5 memory support. Small business workstations that handle scientific computing, financial modeling, or database operations will find the CPU’s multi-thread scores, like the 3DMark max threads of 15,579, more than sufficient. Gamers, however, should be cautious: the GPU’s 50th percentile means that at high resolutions or with demanding graphics settings, performance will be average, not exceptional. This is not a gaming-first build; it is a productivity-first system with a mid-range GPU bolted on.

Gaming Performance

There are no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the FACT PACK, so all gaming performance figures are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The CPU’s single-thread score of 1,099 in 3DMark and 2,000 in Cinebench R23 suggests it can handle game logic and physics well, but the GPU’s unmeasured performance and 50th percentile rank imply that graphics will be the limiting factor. With 16 GB of VRAM and 512 GB/s bandwidth, the Arc B770 can handle high-resolution textures without memory overflow, but the raw rasterization and ray tracing performance is unknown. At 1080p, the CPU might push higher frame rates, but the GPU could still cap them. At 1440p or 4K, the GPU’s mid-tier status will likely result in moderate frame rates, possibly requiring settings adjustments to maintain playability. The lack of data means these are speculative, and users should expect performance in line with a median GPU, not a high-end one.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X has 16 cores and 32 threads, based on the Zen 4 architecture.

Q: How much VRAM does the Intel Arc B770 have?

A: The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the CPU’s percentile rank compared to all CPUs?

A: The 7950X is at the 94th percentile, meaning it outperforms 94% of CPUs in the database.

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile rank compared to all GPUs?

A: The Arc B770 is at the 50th percentile, placing it at the median of all GPUs.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the 7950X supports ECC memory, along with DDR5 and dual-channel memory.

Q: What is the suggested PSU wattage for the GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the Intel Arc B770 is 550 W, based on its TDP of 225 W.

Q: Are there any measured FPS results for this CPU+GPU combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact pairing, so all gaming performance is estimated.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X with the Intel Arc B770. The CPU is a high-end desktop processor from the 7000 series, released in 2022, with a 94th percentile rank, while the GPU is a mid-range desktop card from the Battlemage generation, with a 50th percentile rank. The combined percentile is 72, indicating an above-average system overall. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 69,515 places it in a tight competition with the Intel Core i7-14700K, AMD EPYC 9115, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX, and AMD Ryzen 7 9700F, all within 0.7% of each other. The GPU has no benchmark scores, so its performance is undefined beyond its specifications. This pairing is best described as a CPU-centric desktop, where the processor leads and the GPU provides adequate but not outstanding graphics capability.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s single-thread scores (3DMark single-thread 1,099, Cinebench R23 single-core 2,000) are decent but not top-tier, and the GPU’s 50th percentile suggests frame rates will be moderate. At high refresh rates, the GPU may struggle to keep up, especially at higher resolutions, so this scenario is not ideal without GPU upgrades.

Streaming: The CPU’s 16 cores and 32 threads, with a PassMark multi-thread score of 62,478, can handle encoding while gaming, as the multi-thread performance is strong. The GPU’s lack of measured scores means its encoding capabilities are unquantified, but the CPU can shoulder the load.

Video editing: Cinebench R23 multi-core of 36,523 and PassMark floating-point math of 138,004 indicate the CPU excels at rendering and processing. The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM and 512 GB/s bandwidth help with timeline previews and effects, but the compute power is mid-tier.

3D rendering: The CPU’s high multi-thread scores, such as 3DMark max threads of 15,579, make it excellent for CPU-based rendering. The GPU can assist with GPU-accelerated rendering, but its median percentile means it won’t be a powerhouse.

Software development: PassMark integer math of 225,603 and data compression of 835,923 show the CPU handles compilation and data processing efficiently. The GPU is less relevant here, so this is a strong use case.

Student and office work: The CPU’s single-thread performance is adequate for everyday tasks, and the 32 threads handle multitasking. The GPU is overkill for office work, but the system is more than capable for any academic workload.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X uses the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which supports DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus with ECC capability. The CPU offers PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes, providing ample bandwidth for fast storage and expansion. The memory bandwidth is 83.2 GB/s, which is sufficient for current workloads. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 slots, though it runs at Gen 4 speeds. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 550 W, and the CPU’s TDP is 170 W, so a PSU in that range should cover the system, but higher-wattage units would provide headroom for future upgrades. The CPU has an unlocked multiplier, allowing overclocking, and it is still in active production. A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-performing GPU, given that the CPU’s 94th percentile far exceeds the GPU’s 50th percentile. Swapping the Arc B770 for a higher-tier GPU would balance the system and unlock the CPU’s full gaming potential. Alternatively, adding more DDR5 memory could benefit memory-intensive workloads, though the current dual-channel setup with 83.2 GB/s is already solid. The platform supports future AM5 CPUs, so a drop-in CPU upgrade is possible without changing the motherboard. The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM is generous, so memory capacity is not a primary upgrade driver; instead, raw compute performance should be the focus.