SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7950X + Intel Arc A770

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

97 Score

Top 3% Ranking

97 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 3% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X

69,515 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A770

68,809 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X and Intel Arc A770 pairing is a desktop configuration built around a 16-core, 32-thread Zen 4 flagship CPU and a 16 GB graphics card from Intel’s Alchemist generation. The CPU, part of the 7000 series on the AMD Socket AM5 platform, was released in late 2022 with a launch MSRP of $699. The GPU, based on the DG2-512 chip and Xe-HPG architecture, also launched in late 2022 with a launch MSRP of 329 USD. Data for this analysis is drawn from the benchmark scores and specifications provided in the FACT PACK; no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, so all gaming performance discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen 9 7950X is a 16-core, 32-thread processor built on TSMC’s 5 nm process, with a base clock of 4.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.70 GHz. The architecture is Zen 4, codenamed Raphael, and the die consists of 13,140 million transistors across two 71 mm² chiplets. Cache configuration includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 64 MB of shared L3. The processor supports DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, and it includes integrated Radeon Graphics. With a TDP of 170 W and an unlocked multiplier, the CPU is designed for high-end desktop workloads.

Benchmark results place this CPU in the 94th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 69515. The nearest rivals show a tight cluster: the Intel Core i7-14700K scores 69355, a 0.2% delta, while the AMD EPYC 9115 scores 69288, a 0.3% delta. The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX scores 69875, putting it 0.5% ahead, and the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F scores 69996, 0.7% ahead. This means the 7950X is effectively at parity with these competitors—differences of less than one percent are within noise for most workloads. The practical takeaway is that the 7950X is not the single fastest CPU in its peer group, but it is firmly at the top tier.

In multi-threaded tasks, the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 36523 and Geekbench multicore score of 22415 indicate strong throughput for rendering and compilation work. The 3DMark max threads score of 15579 and PassMark multithread score of 62478 reinforce this. Single-thread performance is also competitive, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2000 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2613. The 3DMark single-thread score of 1099 and PassMark single-thread score of 4266 show that the high boost clock of 5.70 GHz delivers responsive performance in lightly threaded applications.

Specialized workloads show tailored strengths. PassMark data compression scores 835923, while data encryption scores 49336, and extended instructions score 62131. Floating-point math scores 138004, integer math scores 225603, and find prime numbers scores 337. Random string sorting scores 98501. These numbers suggest the CPU handles encryption, compression, and math-heavy tasks with ease, though the prime number score is relatively low compared to other sub-tests, indicating a specific weakness in that particular workload. The PassMark physics score of 3102 is modest, which may matter for simulation-heavy tasks.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 9 7950X uses the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which supports DDR5 memory only. The memory bus is dual-channel with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, and ECC memory is supported. PCIe connectivity is Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the CPU. This platform is current and active, with the CPU production status listed as Active. The socket has a clear forward path, as AM5 is designed to support multiple generations of AMD processors, though the FACT PACK does not specify which future CPUs are compatible.

The Intel Arc A770 uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface. The GPU has a TDP of 225 W, and the suggested PSU is 550 W. The CPU TDP is 170 W, so the combined power draw of these two components is within the 550 W PSU suggested for the GPU alone, but only if the rest of the system is efficient. The GPU requires a 1x 6-pin and 1x 8-pin power connector, which is a specific requirement for the power supply. The CPU has a TDP of 170 W, which is high but standard for a 16-core flagship.

The GPU is listed as End-of-life production status, with a successor named Battlemage. This means the Arc A770 is at the end of its retail life, and users should consider that driver updates may taper off. The CPU is Active, so it remains a current product. For a sensible next upgrade, the CPU has headroom in the platform—AM5 is not a dead-end socket. The GPU, however, is the component most likely to be replaced first, as its End-of-life status and the arrival of Battlemage suggest. The PCIe 4.0 x16 interface on the GPU is backward compatible with the CPU’s Gen 5 lanes, so a newer GPU can be installed without changing the motherboard.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, the data indicates this is a strong pairing, but with caveats. The CPU’s single-thread performance, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2000 and 3DMark single-thread score of 1099, is excellent for frame generation. The GPU scores a 90th percentile ranking among all GPUs, with a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2969. The combination should handle 1080p and 1440p gaming at high refresh rates, though the exact FPS is not measured. The CPU’s 94th percentile ranking ensures it will not be the bottleneck in most games.

For streaming, the CPU is well-suited. With 16 cores and 32 threads, the 3DMark 16-thread score of 14110 and max threads score of 15579 show ample headroom for encoding while gaming. The GPU has no dedicated encoder mentioned, but the CPU can handle x264 encoding without sacrificing game performance, given the multi-threaded scores. The PassMark multithread score of 62478 confirms this.

For video editing, the Geekbench multicore score of 22415 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 36523 indicate fast export times. The GPU’s 16 GB of GDDR6 memory with 512.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for 4K timelines. The PassMark data compression score of 835923 is relevant for codec-heavy workflows.

For 3D rendering, the CPU is the star. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 36523 places it near the top, and the 3DMark max threads score of 15579 supports heavy multi-threaded render tasks. The GPU’s 19.66 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 32 ray tracing cores can accelerate viewport and final-frame renders, though the GPU is not a professional render card.

For software development, the CPU’s high core count and single-thread speed are ideal. The PassMark integer math score of 225603 and random string sorting score of 98501 suggest strong compile times and code analysis. The 64 MB of L3 cache helps with large codebases. The GPU is less relevant here, but the CPU alone justifies this build for a developer.

For student and office work, this is overkill. The CPU’s 94th percentile and the GPU’s 90th percentile are far beyond what spreadsheets and web browsing require. However, the 16 cores and 32 threads mean the system will remain responsive for years, and the 16 GB of GPU memory can handle large datasets. The PassMark single-thread score of 4266 ensures snappy UI responsiveness.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Ryzen 9 7950X and the Intel Arc A770 is skewed toward the CPU. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 69515, while the GPU’s is 68809, and the combined percentile is 92. The CPU is in the 94th percentile, and the GPU is in the 90th percentile, so the CPU is slightly stronger relative to its peers than the GPU is relative to its peers. In gaming, this means the GPU will be the limiting factor at high resolutions, while the CPU can easily feed it at lower resolutions.

The nearest rival data clarifies the CPU’s position: the Intel Core i7-14700K is 0.2% behind, and the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX is 0.5% ahead. This is a dead heat, so the CPU is not the bottleneck in any workload that is not purely single-threaded. The GPU’s nearest rivals, including the NVIDIA CMP 90HX at -0.3% and the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 at -1.5%, show the A770 is competitive, but it is not a top-tier enthusiast card.

In gaming, the bottleneck analysis hinges on the FPS scaling. Since no measured FPS data exists, we estimate from the benchmark scores. The CPU’s single-thread scores are high enough to drive 240 Hz monitors in esports titles, but the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2969 suggests it will cap out at high refresh rates in demanding titles. The GPU’s 16 GB memory is generous, but the 256-bit bus and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth are not exceptional for 4K. At 1080p, the CPU may hold back the GPU in some games, but at 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes the clear limit.

The CPU’s PassMark physics score of 3102 is a potential bottleneck in physics-heavy games, as this is lower than the multithread score would suggest. The GPU’s pixel rate of 307.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 614.4 GTexel/s are solid for rasterization, but the ray tracing cores are only 32, which is modest for a modern card.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark suite shows a consistent high-performance profile. The 3DMark tests scale from 2161 at 2 threads to 15579 at max threads, indicating strong scaling. The Cinebench R15 multicore score is 5947.5, and the single-core is 315.5. The Geekbench multicore score is 22415, and single-core is 2613. The PassMark suite shows a multithread score of 62478 and a single-thread score of 4266. The average benchmark score for the CPU is 69515, placing it in the 94th percentile.

The GPU has fewer benchmarks in the FACT PACK. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 2969. The Geekbench OpenCL score is 109175, and the Vulkan score is 94284. The average benchmark score for the GPU is 68809, placing it in the 90th percentile. The combined percentile for the CPU and GPU pair is 92, which is lower than the CPU’s individual percentile but higher than the GPU’s, reflecting the CPU’s slight edge.

Comparing to rivals, the CPU is 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core i7-14700K, 0.3% ahead of the AMD EPYC 9115, 0.5% behind the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX, and 0.7% behind the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F. The GPU is 0.3% behind the NVIDIA CMP 90HX, 0.4% ahead of the AMD Radeon Instinct MI25, 1.5% behind the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200, and 1.7% behind the NVIDIA Quadro P6000. The combined picture is a system that is slightly above average for both components, with the CPU being the stronger half.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who need extreme multi-threaded CPU performance and are willing to accept a mid-range GPU. Gamers at 1440p will find the GPU sufficient, but those at 4K should look elsewhere. The CPU’s 94th percentile ranking makes it ideal for content creators—video editors using Cinebench R23’s 36523 score, 3D artists relying on the 16 cores, and developers compiling code with the PassMark integer math score of 225603. The 16 GB GPU memory is a plus for large texture packs and machine learning inference, but the GPU’s 90th percentile is not top-tier.

Students in engineering or computer science will benefit from the CPU’s multi-threaded scores, but the cost is high. Small business workstations running virtualization or database workloads will see strong performance from the 32 threads and 64 MB of L3 cache. The GPU’s End-of-life status means this is not a future-proof choice for gamers, but the CPU is Active and has a viable upgrade path.

FAQ

Q: How does the Ryzen 9 7950X compare to the Intel Core i7-14700K?

A: The 7950X has an average benchmark score of 69515, which is 0.2% higher than the i7-14700K’s 69355. This is a negligible difference, so the two CPUs are effectively equal in overall performance.

Q: Is the Intel Arc A770 a good match for the Ryzen 9 7950X?

A: Yes, but the CPU is stronger. The CPU is in the 94th percentile, and the GPU is in the 90th percentile. In CPU-bound tasks, the GPU will not be a bottleneck; in GPU-bound tasks, the CPU will have headroom.

Q: What is the combined performance tier of this build?

A: The combined percentile is 92, which places the system in the top 8% of all desktop configurations. The CPU’s average score is 69515, and the GPU’s is 68809.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 9 7950X supports ECC memory. It also supports DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus and a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s.

Q: What is the power supply requirement for the GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the Intel Arc A770 is 550 W. The GPU has a TDP of 225 W and requires a 1x 6-pin and 1x 8-pin power connector.

Q: Is the GPU still in production?

A: No, the Intel Arc A770 is listed as End-of-life, with a successor named Battlemage. The CPU is Active and still in production.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU has a launch MSRP of $699, and the GPU has a launch MSRP of 329 USD.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build class configuration combining the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X CPU and the Intel Arc A770 GPU. The CPU is a 16-core, 32-thread Zen 4 processor on the AM5 socket, and the GPU is a 16 GB GDDR6 card based on the Xe-HPG architecture. The combined percentile is 92, meaning this system outperforms 92% of all desktop builds in the benchmark database. The CPU’s individual percentile is 94, and the GPU’s is 90, so the CPU is the stronger component. This is a high-end desktop with a top-tier CPU and a mid-to-high-tier GPU.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X and Intel Arc A770 combination. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact pairing, so all gaming performance figures are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The CPU’s single-thread performance, with a 3DMark single-thread score of 1099 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2000, is capable of driving high frame rates in most games. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2969 and its 90th percentile ranking suggest it can handle 1080p and 1440p gaming at high settings, but 4K gaming will be limited.

At 1080p, the CPU is likely to be the bottleneck in esports titles, as the GPU has enough raw power to keep up. At 1440p, the GPU becomes the limiting factor, and at 4K, the GPU will struggle with demanding titles. The GPU’s 16 GB of memory is sufficient for high-resolution textures, but the 512.0 GB/s bandwidth is not exceptional. The 32 ray tracing cores provide some ray tracing capability, but performance will not match higher-tier GPUs. The CPU’s PassMark physics score of 3102 may cause dips in physics-heavy games, but overall, this is a capable 1440p gaming system with the CPU providing headroom for future GPU upgrades.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7950X + Intel Arc A770

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X

Intel Arc A770

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Usage Scenarios

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

FAQ

Build Overview

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds