SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7950X + Intel Arc A380

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
86%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X

69,515 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A380

8,558 Benchmark Score
Top 14% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X is a 16-core, 32-thread desktop processor built on the Zen 4 architecture, while the Intel Arc A380 is an entry-level discrete GPU based on the Xe-HPG architecture. The benchmark data for this pairing shows a combined percentile of 69 across all CPUs and GPUs, indicating a configuration that sits above the median but is heavily skewed by the processor's high performance. The database contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores rather than direct gameplay captures.

Gaming Performance

Since no measured FPS data exists for the Ryzen 9 7950X paired with the Arc A380, the following gaming expectations are framed as estimates based on the GPU's benchmark scores and the CPU's capacity to feed frames. The Arc A380's PassMark G3D score of 6252 places it at the 44th percentile among all GPUs, which signals entry-level rasterization performance. In practical terms, this GPU is suited for 1080p gaming at medium to low settings in modern titles, with the 6 GB GDDR6 memory and 96-bit bus providing 186.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU's DirectX 12 score of 35 in PassMark is modest, and the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 808 further confirms that the A380 is not designed for high-fidelity rendering at demanding resolutions.

At 1080p, the A380 could deliver playable frame rates in esports titles and older games, where the CPU's single-thread score of 1099 in 3DMark and 4266 in PassMark single-thread ensure that frame pacing is not CPU-bound. The Ryzen 9 7950X's 16 cores and 5.70 GHz boost clock mean that even the most CPU-intensive game logic will be handled with headroom, but the GPU will be the limiting factor for frame rate. At 1440p, the A380's 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 65.60 GPixel/s pixel rate would struggle to maintain 60 FPS in AAA titles, likely requiring low settings or upscaling. At 4K, the combination is not viable for smooth gameplay, as the GPU's bandwidth and compute resources are insufficient for the pixel workload.

The Arc A380's support for DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4 means it can run modern APIs, but the benchmark scores suggest that frame rates will be modest. The GPU's 8 ray tracing cores are present, but with only 4.198 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, ray-traced effects will carry a heavy performance penalty. The PassMark DirectX 9 score of 73 is the highest among the DirectX tests, indicating that older titles may run relatively better, while DirectX 11 and 12 scores of 38 and 35 respectively suggest more modern workloads will be slower. The estimated FPS figures for this pairing are therefore best described as 1080p-focused, with the CPU providing no bottleneck whatsoever.

Benchmark Performance

The Ryzen 9 7950X delivers exceptional CPU benchmark scores across the board. In Cinebench R23, it scores 36523 in multicore and 2000 in single-core, while Geekbench shows 22415 in multicore and 2613 in single-core. The 3DMark thread scaling tests reveal strong multi-threading: 14110 for 16 threads, 15579 for max threads, and 7920 for 8 threads. The PassMark multithread score of 62478 and average benchmark score of 69515 place the CPU at the 94th percentile among all CPUs. The nearest rivals include the Intel Core i7-14700K with an average score of 69355 and a delta of 0.2%, the AMD EPYC 9115 at 69288 with a 0.3% delta, and the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX at 69875 with a -0.5% delta. This means the 7950X is effectively tied with these competitors, with performance differences under one percent.

The Intel Arc A380, by contrast, shows a much weaker benchmark profile. Its average benchmark score is 8558, and it sits at the 44th percentile among all GPUs. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 38224 and Vulkan score of 36736 are moderate, but the PassMark G3D score of 6252 is the key indicator of rasterization performance. The GPU's nearest rivals include the AMD FirePro W5170M with a delta of -0.4%, the AMD Radeon HD 8870M at 1.1%, the NVIDIA GeForce MX330 at 1.2%, and the AMD Radeon 880M at 1.4%. These are all older or lower-tier parts, confirming the A380's position as an entry-level GPU. The combined picture is a CPU that ranks near the top of the desktop processor market and a GPU that ranks in the lower half of the GPU market, creating a stark performance disparity.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data indicates a severe bottleneck imbalance in this pairing. The CPU's 94th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 44th percentile means that in any workload where both are active, the GPU will be the limiting factor. For gaming, the A380's PassMark G3D score of 6252 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 808 suggest that frame rates will be constrained by the GPU's compute and memory bandwidth, not the CPU's ability to issue draw calls. The CPU's 3DMark single-thread score of 1099 and PassMark single-thread score of 4266 are more than sufficient for even the most demanding game engines, so the CPU will sit idle while the GPU works at full capacity.

In compute-heavy tasks, the bottleneck shifts. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 36523 and PassMark integer math score of 225603 indicate massive parallel processing capability, while the GPU's PassMark GPU compute score of 2762 is comparatively tiny. For tasks like 3D rendering or video encoding that use the GPU, the A380 will limit throughput. For tasks that use the CPU, such as software compilation or data compression, the 7950X will dominate, with PassMark data compression scoring 835923 and data encryption scoring 49336. The FPS scaling evidence, though estimated, shows that raising resolution or graphical settings will further expose the GPU as the bottleneck, while the CPU's performance headroom will remain untapped.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This scenario is not viable with the Arc A380. The GPU's 44th percentile ranking and PassMark DirectX 12 score of 35 mean that achieving 144 Hz or higher frame rates at 1080p is unrealistic in modern titles. The CPU's 5.70 GHz boost clock can handle high frame rate game logic, but the GPU will cap output well below that.

Streaming: The Ryzen 9 7950X's 16 cores and 32 threads provide ample headroom for software encoding while gaming. The PassMark multithread score of 62478 means that x264 encoding at high presets will have minimal impact on CPU-bound tasks. However, the A380's limited GPU performance will constrain the game's frame rate, making the stream quality dependent on the game's playability at low settings.

Video editing: The CPU excels in this workload, with Geekbench multicore at 22415 and Cinebench R23 multicore at 36523 providing fast export times. The GPU's 6 GB VRAM and 186.0 GB/s bandwidth can handle basic effects and timeline acceleration, but the A380's 44th percentile position means that GPU-accelerated effects will be slower than on higher-tier cards. The combination is workable for 1080p editing but not for heavy multi-layer 4K work.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering is a strength, with the 7950X's 16 cores producing strong results in Cinebench R15 multicore at 5947.5 and PassMark floating point math at 138004. GPU-based rendering with the A380 will be slow due to its 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 and 8 ray tracing cores, which are insufficient for complex scenes. The bottleneck is clearly the GPU in this scenario.

Software development: The CPU's PassMark integer math score of 225603 and data compression score of 835923 indicate fast compilation and code processing. The GPU is largely irrelevant here, so the 7950X's 94th percentile ranking ensures that build times and multi-threaded test suites will run efficiently. The A380 adds no value but also does not hinder CPU-centric workflows.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread performance is strong, with Geekbench single-core at 2613 and PassMark single-thread at 4266, making everyday tasks responsive. The GPU's 610 PassMark G2D score is adequate for 2D desktop rendering and office applications. This pairing is overkill for basic productivity, as the CPU's power is unused, but it will handle any office workload without issue.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X is a 16-core, 32-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Raphael, and built on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It operates with a base clock of 4.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.70 GHz, with a TDP of 170 W. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 64 MB shared L3, which supports the high bandwidth demands of 16 cores. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, and it includes ECC memory support for error correction in professional workloads.

The benchmark scores reflect the architecture's efficiency. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 14110 and max-thread score of 15579 show that scaling beyond 16 threads yields diminishing returns, as the 32 threads are handled by 16 physical cores with simultaneous multithreading. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 36523 places it among the top desktop CPUs, while the single-core score of 2000 confirms strong per-thread performance. The PassMark scores for extended instructions (62131) and find prime numbers (337) indicate robust ALU and FPU capabilities. The CPU's 13,140 million transistors on a die size of 2x 71 mm² highlight the density of the Zen 4 design, and the unlocked multiplier allows for overclocking, though the stock boost clock of 5.70 GHz already approaches the architecture's limits.

For real workloads, the 7950X excels in multi-threaded tasks like rendering, encoding, and scientific computing, as evidenced by the Cinebench and PassMark multithread scores. The single-thread performance is also strong, making it suitable for gaming and lightly threaded applications. The CPU's integrated Radeon Graphics provides a fallback display output, but it is not intended for gaming. The 170 W TDP requires adequate cooling, but the performance per watt is high given the 5 nm process node.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 9 7950X uses the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which supports DDR5 memory exclusively. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the CPU, enabling high-speed NVMe storage and graphics cards. The platform supports dual-channel memory, and the 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth is sufficient for the 16-core processor, though faster DDR5 kits could improve performance in memory-sensitive workloads.

The Intel Arc A380 uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is sufficient for its bandwidth needs. The GPU has a TDP of 75 W and requires a 250 W suggested PSU, leaving substantial headroom for upgrades. The power connectors on the A380 include 1x 8-pin, and the card is dual-slot with a length of 222 mm. Given the CPU's 170 W TDP and the GPU's 75 W TDP, a system with a 250 W PSU would be tight, but the suggested PSU figure accounts for the entire system, not just these two components.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be a higher-tier GPU, as the CPU's 94th percentile ranking means it can drive any current graphics card without becoming a bottleneck. The PCIe Gen 5 lanes and DDR5 memory support future-proof the platform, and the AM5 socket has a clear upgrade path within the Ryzen 7000 series and beyond. The 7950X's 16 cores and 32 threads are sufficient for years of software development and content creation, so the primary upgrade would be to replace the A380 with a GPU that matches the CPU's performance class. The PSU headroom from the 250 W suggested PSU indicates that a more powerful GPU would require a PSU upgrade, as high-end cards often draw over 200 W.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who prioritize CPU performance above all else. Gamers at 1080p who play esports titles or older games will find the Arc A380 adequate, but those seeking high refresh rates in AAA titles should look elsewhere. The CPU's 94th percentile ranking ensures that frame rates are never CPU-limited, but the GPU's 44th percentile means that visual quality must be sacrificed. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 36523, but they must rely on CPU-based rendering, as the GPU's 4.198 TFLOPS is insufficient for GPU-accelerated tasks.

Software developers will find the 7950X's PassMark integer math score of 225603 and data compression score of 835923 ideal for compilation and testing, and the GPU is irrelevant for this workload. Students and small business users will have a system that handles any office task with ease, though the CPU's power is wasted on such light usage. The build is best suited for a professional who needs a high-core-count CPU for parallel workloads and only requires basic graphics capability, such as a developer who games casually or a researcher who runs CPU-bound simulations. The Arc A380 is an entry-level GPU that serves as a placeholder until a more capable card is added.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X has 16 cores and 32 threads, based on the Zen 4 architecture with a 5 nm process.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The 7950X's average benchmark score of 69515 is 0.2% higher than the Intel Core i7-14700K, 0.3% higher than the AMD EPYC 9115, and 0.5% lower than the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The Intel Arc A380 has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus, providing 186.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking?

A: The Arc A380 sits at the 44th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 8558.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 9 7950X supports ECC memory, which is useful for error-sensitive professional workloads.

Q: What is the GPU's TDP and suggested PSU?

A: The Arc A380 has a TDP of 75 W, and the suggested PSU for the system is 250 W.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 69, indicating a configuration that is above average overall but heavily skewed by the CPU's high performance.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A380 is based on the DG2-128 chip with the Xe-HPG architecture, built on a 6 nm process at TSMC. It contains 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die, with a transistor density of 45.9M per mm². The GPU has 1024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 raster output pipelines, along with 8 ray tracing cores. The base clock is 2000 MHz, and the boost clock is 2050 MHz, with memory running at 1937 MHz or 15.5 Gbps effective. The 6 GB GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus provides 186.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is a limiting factor for higher resolutions.

The benchmark scores show the GPU's position. The PassMark G3D score of 6252 and the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 808 indicate entry-level performance. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 38224 and Vulkan score of 36736 show that compute workloads are possible but not fast. The PassMark GPU compute score of 2762 is low, confirming that the GPU is not suited for general-purpose compute. The pixel rate of 65.60 GPixel/s and texture rate of 131.2 GTexel/s are modest, and the FP32 performance of 4.198 TFLOPS is a fraction of what high-end GPUs offer.

For rendering, the A380's 8 ray tracing cores support DirectX Raytracing, but the low FP32 compute means that ray-traced scenes will render slowly. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6, ensuring compatibility with modern APIs. The 6 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p textures but will be a constraint at higher resolutions. The display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 2.0, supporting modern monitors. The GPU is end-of-life, with the successor being Battlemage, and its predecessor was Xe Graphics. The launch MSRP is 149 USD, but the performance is best described as a capable entry-level card for 1080p gaming at low settings.

Build Overview

This build pairs the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, a 16-core desktop CPU, with the Intel Arc A380, a 6 GB entry-level GPU, in a desktop class configuration. The combined percentile of 69 places this system above the median, but the distribution is extremely lopsided. The CPU ranks at the 94th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 69515, while the GPU ranks at the 44th percentile, with an average score of 8558. This means the system's overall tier is defined by the CPU's exceptional multi-threading and single-thread performance, while the GPU drags the gaming and graphics compute potential down to entry-level.

The Ryzen 9 7950X is a top-tier processor for productivity, with Cinebench R23 multicore at 36523 and Geekbench multicore at 22415, making it suitable for rendering, encoding, and development. The Arc A380 is a low-power GPU with a 75 W TDP and a 250 W suggested PSU, which keeps the system's power draw modest but limits gaming to 1080p with reduced settings. The pairing is unusual, as the CPU's performance class is typically matched with a high-end GPU, but the data shows that this combination is viable for users who need CPU horsepower and only occasional graphics acceleration. The build class is desktop, and the overall tier is mid-range due to the GPU's low percentile, despite the CPU's near-flagship status.