SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7950X + Intel Arc A350

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

85 Score

Top 15% Ranking

85 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

GPU Bottleneck

CPU

96%

GPU

74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X

69,515 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X is a 16-core, 32-thread desktop processor built on the Zen 4 architecture, while the Intel Arc A350 is an entry-level discrete GPU based on the Xe-HPG architecture. This pairing combines a top-tier enthusiast CPU with a modest graphics solution, creating a system that is heavily skewed toward processor-intensive tasks rather than high-end gaming. The benchmark data for this exact CPU and GPU combination has no measured FPS rows, as the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data; therefore, all frame rate expectations in this analysis are estimates derived from the individual component scores and percentile positions.

Gaming Performance

The data shows that no measured FPS figures exist for this exact CPU+GPU pairing; the `measuredFpsUltraByGame` field is empty, and `dataIsMeasured` is false. As such, all gaming performance expectations are framed as estimates based on the GPU's specifications and the CPU's benchmark scores. The Intel Arc A350 sits at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, which places it squarely in the middle of the performance curve, but its hardware profile suggests it is designed for entry-level 1080p gaming rather than high-end or high-refresh-rate play.

The Arc A350 features 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 24 raster output units, with a boost clock of 2000 MHz. It offers 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, yielding 124.0 GB/s of bandwidth. At 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, this GPU is best suited for older titles or esports games at 1080p with medium to low settings. In graphically demanding AAA games at 1080p ultra settings, the estimate is that frame rates will often fall below 30 FPS, making the experience playable only at reduced quality presets. At 1440p or 4K, the memory bandwidth and 4 GB capacity will become a severe constraint, and the estimate is that most modern titles will be unplayable at acceptable frame rates.

The Ryzen 9 7950X, with its 94th percentile ranking, does not bottleneck the GPU at any resolution, but this does not help the Arc A350 deliver higher frame rates. The GPU is the limiting factor in every gaming scenario. For esports titles like Counter-Strike or Valorant, which are less demanding on the GPU, the estimate is that the Arc A350 can achieve 60 FPS or more at 1080p with competitive settings. However, for triple-A releases, users should expect to lower settings significantly to achieve a playable 30-60 FPS range at 1080p.

Benchmark Performance

The Ryzen 9 7950X delivers exceptional processor benchmark scores. In Cinebench R23, it scores 36523 points in multi-core and 2000 points in single-core. The Geekbench results show 22415 in multi-core and 2613 in single-core. Across the PassMark suite, the CPU achieves a multithread score of 62478 and a single-thread score of 4266. Its overall average benchmark score is 69515, placing it at the 94th percentile of all CPUs. The nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-14700K, scores 69355, which is only 0.2% behind the Ryzen 9 7950X, indicating a near dead heat in overall performance. The AMD EPYC 9115 is 0.3% behind, while the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX trails by 0.5%, and the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F is 0.7% behind.

The Arc A350 has no recorded benchmark scores in its category, with an average benchmark score of 0 and an empty `nearestRivals` list. Its percentile rank of 50 indicates that it performs better than half of all GPUs, but this is a relative measure that does not translate into a specific performance figure. The combined percentile for this build is 72, which reflects the dominance of the CPU in the overall system score. The disparity is stark: the CPU is in the top 6% of all processors, while the GPU is exactly average, resulting in a system that excels at compute workloads but is ordinary at best in graphics tasks.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 9 7950X is built for the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which is a current-generation desktop socket. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, and it also supports ECC memory. The platform offers PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the CPU, which provides ample bandwidth for the fastest NVMe SSDs and future expansion cards. The CPU has an unlocked multiplier, making overclocking possible for users who want to extract additional performance.

The Arc A350 uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is compatible with the AM5 platform's PCIe Gen 5 slots, though the GPU will operate at PCIe 4.0 speeds. The GPU has a TDP of 25 W, and the suggested PSU for the system is 200 W, which is modest for any desktop build. The CPU itself has a TDP of 170 W, so a sensible power supply should accommodate both components without issue. The GPU is end-of-life, with a successor named Battlemage, meaning that users looking for more graphics power will need to replace the GPU entirely. A sensible next upgrade would be to swap the Arc A350 for a higher-end GPU, as the Ryzen 9 7950X has more than enough headroom to support any modern graphics card without becoming a bottleneck. The platform's PCIe Gen 5 support ensures that future GPUs will not be limited by the interface.

Who Should Build It

This build is for users whose primary workload is CPU-intensive and who require minimal graphics acceleration. The Ryzen 9 7950X's 94th percentile ranking makes it ideal for content creators, software developers, and researchers who run multi-threaded applications. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 36523 suggests that video editors, 3D renderers, and data scientists will see exceptional performance in tasks that can utilize 16 cores and 32 threads. The PassMark data encryption score of 49336 and data compression score of 835923 indicate strong performance in security and archiving workloads.

For gamers, this build is only suitable for those who play at 1080p with low to medium settings and prioritize esports titles over AAA visuals. The Arc A350's 50th percentile ranking means it is not a gaming GPU by modern standards. Students and office workers who need a fast, responsive system for coding, compiling, and document work will benefit from the CPU's power, but they will not be playing modern games on this system. Small business workstations that handle database queries, financial modeling, or engineering simulations will find the CPU performance invaluable, but the GPU is only sufficient for basic display output and 2D applications.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance of this system is heavily skewed toward the CPU; the Ryzen 9 7950X is a top-tier processor, while the Arc A350 is an entry-level GPU. In gaming, the GPU is the clear bottleneck, as the CPU's single-thread score of 2000 in Cinebench R23 and 4266 in PassMark single-thread is more than adequate for any game. The Arc A350's 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 124.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth will limit frame rates in all games, regardless of the CPU's power. The data shows that the CPU is at the 94th percentile, while the GPU is at the 50th, so the GPU will be the limiting factor in every graphics-intensive workload.

In non-gaming workloads, the CPU is the determining factor, and the GPU is largely irrelevant. The Ryzen 9 7950X's multi-core scores, including 15579 in 3DMark max threads and 62478 in PassMark multithread, demonstrate that it can handle massive parallel workloads without breaking a sweat. The GPU's 25 W TDP means it will not interfere with CPU performance, but it also means that any task relying on GPU compute, such as video encoding with some codecs, will be slow. The bottleneck analysis is straightforward: for gaming and GPU-accelerated tasks, the Arc A350 is the limit; for CPU-bound tasks like compilation, rendering, and number crunching, the Ryzen 9 7950X provides near-top-tier performance.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming is not a realistic scenario for this build. The Arc A350 has a 50th percentile ranking and 4 GB of VRAM, which cannot sustain the frame rates needed for 144 Hz or 240 Hz monitors in modern titles. Esports games at 1080p with low settings might reach 60-100 FPS, but high-refresh gaming is out of reach.

Streaming is possible, but with limitations. The CPU can handle the encoding workload, as the PassMark multithread score of 62478 suggests ample headroom for software encoding. However, the GPU's limited performance means that the game being streamed will likely run at low settings, which diminishes the stream quality. The GPU's 6 RT cores and 768 shading units are insufficient for high-quality encoding or rendering.

Video editing is a strong suit for this build. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 36523 and the Geekbench multi-core score of 22415 indicate that the CPU can handle 4K video timelines and complex effects without issue. The GPU will accelerate some effects, but its modest compute power means that most of the work will fall on the CPU, which is more than capable.

3D rendering is excellent for the CPU, with the 16 cores and 32 threads providing exceptional performance in CPU-based renderers like Blender's Cycles. The Arc A350's 3.072 TFLOPS will offer some GPU acceleration in renderers that support it, but the 4 GB memory limit will constrain scene complexity.

Software development is a prime use case. The CPU's high multi-thread performance speeds up code compilation, and the 64 MB of L3 cache reduces latency for iterative builds. The PassMark integer math score of 225603 indicates strong performance in logic-heavy tasks.

Student and office work is more than adequately handled. The CPU's 4266 PassMark single-thread score ensures snappy responsiveness in everyday applications, and the GPU is sufficient for spreadsheets, word processing, and web browsing. However, this is overkill for such tasks, and a less powerful CPU would be more practical.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking among all processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X is at the 94th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 69515.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-14700K?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700K has an average score of 69355, which is 0.2% behind the Ryzen 9 7950X, making them nearly identical in overall performance.

Q: What is the GPU's memory size and type?

A: The Intel Arc A350 has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 124.0 GB/s.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this CPU and GPU combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact combination, so all gaming performance figures are estimates based on benchmark scores.

Q: What is the suggested PSU wattage for this build?

A: The suggested PSU for the system is 200 W, which accounts for the GPU's 25 W TDP and the CPU's 170 W TDP.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X supports ECC memory, along with DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration.

Q: What is the GPU's production status?

A: The Intel Arc A350 is end-of-life, with a successor named Battlemage.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that pairs the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, a 16-core, 32-thread processor from the 7000 series, with the Intel Arc A350, a 25 W entry-level GPU. The CPU is in the top 6% of all processors, while the GPU is exactly average at the 50th percentile. The combined percentile for this pairing is 72, reflecting the CPU's dominance. This is not a balanced gaming rig; it is a compute-focused workstation with a basic display adapter. Users who need massive CPU power for rendering, compilation, or data processing will find the Ryzen 9 7950X exceptional, but they should plan to upgrade the GPU if they intend to play modern games.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X is a 16-core, 32-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Raphael. It has a base clock of 4.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.70 GHz, with a TDP of 170 W. The CPU is manufactured on a 5 nm process by TSMC, with 13,140 million transistors spread across two 71 mm² dies. It features 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 64 MB of shared L3 cache. The memory support is DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, and it also supports ECC memory. The CPU uses the AMD Socket AM5 platform and offers PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes.

The benchmark scores paint a picture of a processor that excels in both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. The single-thread score of 2000 in Cinebench R23 and 4266 in PassMark indicate strong per-core performance, which is critical for gaming and everyday tasks. The multi-thread scores are exceptional, including 36523 in Cinebench R23, 15579 in 3DMark max threads, and 62478 in PassMark multithread. The PassMark data encryption score of 49336 and data compression score of 835923 show specialized strengths in security and data handling. The average benchmark score of 69515 places it at the 94th percentile, with the nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-14700K, only 0.2% behind. This means the Ryzen 9 7950X is at the very top of consumer CPU performance, and it will handle any CPU-bound task with ease, from 4K video editing to large-scale software compilation.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7950X + Intel Arc A350

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X

Intel Arc A350

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance

Benchmark Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

Build Overview

CPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds