SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7950X + Intel Arc A310E

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

85 Score

Top 15% Ranking

85 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

GPU Bottleneck

CPU

96%

GPU

74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X

69,515 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A310E

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 9 7950X + Intel Arc A310E — Hardware Analysis

This pairing combines AMD's 16-core Zen 4 flagship desktop processor with Intel's entry-level Alchemist graphics card in a desktop build. The CPU sits at the 94th percentile among all processors, while the GPU lands exactly at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, creating a substantial performance imbalance. No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the FACT PACK, so all gaming frame-rate discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than tested results.

Gaming Performance

Because the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows for this combination, all frame-rate figures presented here are estimates derived from the CPU's benchmark scores and the GPU's known specifications. The data explicitly shows `dataIsMeasured: false`, meaning no game-specific ultra-quality FPS measurements were recorded for this pairing.

The CPU's single-thread performance is strong, with a 3dmark_single_thread score of 1099 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2000. This suggests the processor can feed frames quickly in most gaming scenarios. However, the Intel Arc A310E is the limiting factor for gaming output. With only 768 shading units, 16 ROPs, and 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, this GPU is positioned at the entry level of Intel's Arc 3 lineup.

At 1080p with ultra settings, this combination would likely deliver playable but modest frame rates in esports and older titles, while struggling with modern AAA games. The GPU's 4 GB GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus with 124.0 GB/s bandwidth constrains texture-heavy scenes and higher resolutions. At 1440p and 4K, expect significant frame-rate drops, as the memory bandwidth and VRAM capacity become bottlenecks independent of the CPU's capabilities.

The CPU's 16 cores and 32 threads provide ample headroom for gaming workloads that benefit from background tasks, streaming, or recording. The 3dmark_8_threads score of 7920 indicates strong multi-threaded gaming performance for modern titles that utilize more than four cores. However, the GPU's 50th percentile standing means most gaming scenarios will be GPU-bound, with the CPU rarely breaking a sweat.

Benchmark Performance

The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X delivers exceptional benchmark results across the board. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 36523 in multicore and 2000 in single-core tests. The Geekbench results show 22415 multicore and 2613 single-core. These scores place the processor at the 94th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 69515.

The nearest rival comparison shows a tight cluster at the top. The Intel Core i7-14700K scores 69355, just 0.2% behind the 7950X. The AMD EPYC 9115 trails by 0.3% with 69288. The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX actually edges ahead by 0.5% with 69875, while the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F leads by 0.7% with 69996. These deltas are within noise margins, indicating the 7950X sits at the very top of desktop CPU performance but no longer holds an exclusive lead.

The Arc A310E, by contrast, has no benchmark scores listed in the FACT PACK and no nearest rivals. Its 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs and average benchmark score of 0 indicate it is a mid-pack performer at best, likely due to its entry-level positioning in Intel's discrete GPU lineup.

The combined percentile for this build is 72, reflecting the massive gap between the CPU's top-tier performance and the GPU's mid-range standing. The combined picture is one of extreme CPU over-provisioning relative to GPU capability, which will manifest in most workloads as GPU-bound performance.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A310E is built on the DG2-128 chip using the Xe-HPG architecture, manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process. The chip contains 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die, with a transistor density of 45.9M per mm². This is Intel's Alchemist generation, specifically the Arc 3 tier.

Memory configuration is minimal: 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, providing 124.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 1937 MHz with 15.5 Gbps effective data rate. This bandwidth is adequate for 1080p gaming at medium settings but will constrain higher resolutions and texture-heavy workloads.

The GPU operates at a fixed 2000 MHz base and boost clock. Compute capabilities include 768 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, and 16 raster operation units. The FP32 throughput is 3.072 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 6.144 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio). Pixel rate is 32.00 GPixel/s and texture rate is 64.00 GTexel/s.

Ray tracing hardware includes 6 dedicated RT cores, which is modest but present. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern graphics APIs. The 75 W TDP with no power connectors and a suggested 250 W PSU indicates this is a low-power, single-slot card measuring 168 mm in length.

The GPU's 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs suggests it performs at the median of the graphics card market. For rendering workloads, the 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 6 RT cores provide basic acceleration for DirectX 12 Ultimate titles, but the 4 GB VRAM will limit texture sizes and scene complexity in 3D rendering applications.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance asymmetry here is stark. The CPU sits at the 94th percentile while the GPU sits at the 50th percentile, a 44-point gap that defines this build's character. The combined percentile of 72 reflects this imbalance, pulling the overall system tier below what the CPU alone would suggest.

In gaming workloads, the GPU is the clear bottleneck. The CPU's 3dmark_16_threads score of 14110 and max-threads score of 15579 indicate it can handle any modern game's CPU demands, including those with heavy physics or AI simulation. The GPU's modest compute and memory bandwidth will cap frame rates well before the CPU reaches its limits.

For productivity workloads, the picture reverses. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 36523 and Passmark multithread score of 62478 make it a powerhouse for rendering, compilation, and data processing. The GPU's role in these workloads is limited to GPU-accelerated tasks, where its 3.072 TFLOPS and 6 RT cores provide entry-level acceleration but cannot match the CPU's relative dominance.

The FPS scaling evidence, while not measured, can be inferred from the component percentiles. At low resolutions and settings, the CPU's single-thread performance (2000 in Cinebench R23 single-core, 1099 in 3dmark single-thread) would allow higher frame rates, but the GPU's 16 ROPs and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth will still cap output. At higher resolutions, the GPU bottleneck becomes more pronounced, with VRAM capacity and bandwidth limiting performance regardless of CPU capability.

FAQ

Q: Is the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X a good processor for gaming?

A: Yes, the CPU's 94th percentile ranking and strong single-thread scores (2000 in Cinebench R23 single-core, 1099 in 3dmark single-thread) indicate excellent gaming capability, though the GPU in this build will limit actual frame rates.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the Intel Arc A310E?

A: The GPU has 124.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth from 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, running at 1937 MHz with 15.5 Gbps effective.

Q: Does the Ryzen 9 7950X support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory, and it uses dual-channel DDR5 with a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s.

Q: What is the power requirement for this build?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 170 W and the GPU has a TDP of 75 W, with a suggested power supply of 250 W for the GPU alone.

Q: What socket does the Ryzen 9 7950X use?

A: The CPU uses AMD Socket AM5 and supports PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the CPU.

Q: Does the Arc A310E support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the GPU includes 6 RT cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes ray tracing capabilities.

Q: How does the Ryzen 9 7950X compare to the Intel Core i7-14700K?

A: The 7950X has an average benchmark score of 69515, which is 0.2% higher than the i7-14700K's 69355, making them effectively equivalent in performance.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who need extreme CPU compute power but have modest graphics requirements. Software developers compiling large codebases will benefit from the 16-core, 32-thread configuration, with Passmark integer math at 225603 and extended instructions at 62131 indicating strong compilation throughput.

Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will find the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 36523 and Passmark floating-point math at 138004 invaluable. The GPU can handle basic GPU-accelerated effects, but heavy rendering tasks will rely primarily on the CPU.

Students and small business workstations running office productivity, data analysis, or virtualization workloads will appreciate the CPU's 94th percentile performance. The Passmark data compression score of 835923 and encryption score of 49336 show strong performance for database and security applications.

Gamers at 1080p with esports titles or older games will find this build adequate, but those seeking high-refresh or 1440p+ gaming should look elsewhere, as the GPU's 50th percentile standing and 4 GB VRAM will limit performance.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X is a 16-core, 32-thread processor from the Ryzen 7000 series, built on Zen 4 architecture with the Raphael codename. The CPU is manufactured on TSMC's 5 nm process with 13,140 million transistors across a 2x 71 mm² die configuration.

Clock speeds are substantial: 4.50 GHz base and 5.70 GHz boost. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 64 MB shared L3. Memory support is dual-channel DDR5 with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth and ECC capability. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes and includes integrated Radeon Graphics.

Benchmark results show a processor that excels across all thread counts. The 3dmark scores scale well: 2161 for 2 threads, 4218 for 4 threads, 7920 for 8 threads, 14110 for 16 threads, and 15579 for max threads. This scaling indicates efficient use of the 16-core design.

In Cinebench R15, the CPU scores 5947.5 multicore and 315.5 single-core. The R23 scores are 36523 multicore and 2000 single-core. Geekbench shows 22415 multicore and 2613 single-core. Passmark results include 62478 multithread, 4266 single-thread, 138004 floating-point math, and 225603 integer math.

The 94th percentile ranking places this CPU among the top desktop processors available. The nearest rivals are all within 0.7% in average score, indicating the 7950X is at the frontier of consumer CPU performance. The unlocked multiplier allows overclocking, and the launch MSRP is $699.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining AMD's Ryzen 9 7950X with Intel's Arc A310E. The CPU represents the top tier of consumer processors at the 94th percentile, while the GPU sits at the 50th percentile, making this an extremely CPU-heavy configuration.

The combined percentile of 72 reflects the overall system tier, which is above average but held back by the GPU. This is not a balanced gaming build; it is a workstation-oriented configuration where CPU compute dominates, with the GPU providing basic display output and light acceleration.

The CPU's 16 cores, 32 threads, and 5.70 GHz boost clock make it suitable for demanding multi-threaded workloads. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 3.072 TFLOPS make it suitable for entry-level graphics and compute tasks. The build class is desktop, indicating a stationary, full-size system.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Socket AM5 platform provides a clear upgrade path within the Ryzen 7000 series and potentially future generations. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with ECC capability, and the platform offers PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the CPU.

The Intel Arc A310E uses PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface, which is compatible with the AM5 platform's PCIe Gen 5 slots. The GPU's 75 W TDP with no power connectors means the suggested 250 W PSU is sufficient, leaving considerable headroom for a more powerful GPU upgrade.

A sensible next upgrade would be replacing the Arc A310E with a higher-tier GPU. The CPU's 94th percentile performance can drive far more capable graphics cards, and the AM5 platform's PCIe Gen 5 support ensures future GPUs will not be bandwidth-limited. The 170 W CPU TDP suggests a quality power supply is needed, but the 250 W PSU recommendation for the GPU indicates the current configuration is power-efficient.

The socket's longevity and the CPU's headroom mean users can upgrade the GPU first, then potentially the CPU in later generations, without changing the motherboard or memory.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's single-thread performance (2000 in Cinebench R23 single-core) can drive high frame rates in esports titles, but the GPU's 50th percentile standing and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth will cap FPS well below what the CPU can support. Expect moderate frame rates at 1080p with competitive settings.

Streaming: The 16-core, 32-thread CPU with a 3dmark_max_threads score of 15579 can handle encoding and streaming simultaneously while maintaining game performance. The GPU's limited VRAM may restrict game settings during simultaneous streaming.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 36523 and Passmark floating-point math of 138004 provide strong CPU-based rendering performance. The GPU can accelerate effects and previews with its 3.072 TFLOPS, but the 4 GB VRAM limits working with high-resolution footage.

3D rendering: This build excels at CPU-based rendering. The Passmark multithread score of 62478 and integer math of 225603 handle complex scenes efficiently. GPU-accelerated rendering is possible but limited by the Arc A310E's modest compute and memory.

Software development: The CPU's 16 cores and 32 threads with a Passmark data compression score of 835923 make compilation and testing fast. The GPU provides adequate display output and can assist with parallel compute tasks in development workflows.

Student and office work: The CPU's 94th percentile ranking ensures smooth multitasking across office applications, web browsing, and data analysis. The GPU's 50th percentile standing is more than sufficient for standard office displays and productivity tasks. Single-thread performance of 4266 in Passmark single-thread ensures responsive application interaction.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7950X + Intel Arc A310E

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X

Intel Arc A310E

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance

Benchmark Performance

GPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

Build Overview

Upgrade Path and Platform

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds