SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D + Intel Arc A370M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

95%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D

59,641 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A370M

29,175 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D paired with the Intel Arc A370M is a laptop-class configuration with a very strong 16-core CPU and a modest mobile GPU. This fact pack contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of each component rather than direct gameplay data. The CPU sits at the 92nd percentile among all processors, while the GPU sits at the 74th percentile, indicating a large performance gap between the two. This imbalance shapes every workload, making the pairing a study in what happens when a top-tier processor is matched with a mid-range graphics solution.

Gaming Performance

Because no measured FPS data exists for this CPU+GPU combination, the following paragraphs estimate frame rates based on the benchmark scores of each part. The CPU’s single-thread score of 2769 in Geekbench and 1935 in Cinebench R23 single-core are strong, meaning the processor can feed frames quickly, but the GPU’s compute power and memory capacity will ultimately set the ceiling. The Arc A370M has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory, a 64-bit bus, and 112 GB/s bandwidth, which limits texture streaming and frame buffer size at high resolutions. At 1080p with ultra settings, the GPU’s 4.198 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput suggests that older or lighter titles could reach playable frame rates, but modern AAA games will likely require reduced settings or lower resolutions to stay smooth. At 1440p, the 4 GB VRAM becomes a hard constraint, and the 64-bit bus will reduce memory bandwidth efficiency, so even if the CPU has headroom, the GPU will be the primary bottleneck. The CPU’s 3DMark 16-thread score of 12459 indicates it can handle high refresh-rate physics and simulation tasks, but the GPU’s percentile of 74 means it falls behind many discrete gaming GPUs, so the gaming experience will be closer to a mid-range laptop than a high-end gaming rig. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so these are estimates based on benchmark scores alone.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU has an average benchmark score of 59641, placing it in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival is the Intel Core i9-14900F with an average score of 60008, which is 0.6% higher, and the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX with a score of 60099, which is 0.8% higher. The AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX is also 0.8% ahead, and the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 9645 is 1.2% behind. This places the 7945HSX3D in the same performance tier as those chips, with differences of less than 1.2% either way. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 29175, placing it in the 74th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH at 29197, which is 0.1% ahead, and the AMD FirePro W8000 at 29211, also 0.1% ahead. The AMD Radeon RX 470 is 0.6% behind, and the AMD Radeon RX 6800M is 1% behind. The GPU’s scores are Geekbench OpenCL 29676 and Geekbench Vulkan 28673. The combined percentile of the CPU+GPU pairing is 83, which places it above the typical laptop configuration but well below the top 5% because of the GPU. The CPU is clearly the stronger half of this build, and the GPU holds the overall rank down.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 7945HSX3D is a 16-core, 32-thread processor from the 7000 series, built on the Zen 4 architecture and the Dragon Range codename. It runs on a 5 nm process from TSMC, with 17,840 million transistors spread across a dual-die design of 2x 71 mm². The base clock is 2.30 GHz and the boost clock reaches 5.40 GHz, with a TDP of 55 W. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 128 MB of shared L3, plus an extra 1x 64MB 3D V-Cache slice, which is the key differentiator of the X3D part. Memory support is DDR5 dual-channel with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s and ECC capability. The processor has 28 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, and an integrated Radeon 610M GPU. In terms of raw compute, the CPU scores 32,782 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 1,935 in single-core. The Geekbench multi-core score is 16,758 and single-core is 2,769. PassMark tests show a multi-thread score of 57,476, a single-thread score of 4,050, and floating-point math at 121,619, integer math at 201,217, and data compression at 699,988. The CPU’s nearest rival is the Intel Core i9-14900F, which scores 60,008 on average, only 0.6% higher. The AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX scores 60,099, 0.8% higher, and the Ryzen 7 8745HX scores 60,104, also 0.8% higher. These deltas are small enough that the 7945HSX3D is effectively on par with those CPUs. The 3D V-Cache gives the CPU a unique advantage in cache-sensitive workloads, though the benchmarks do not isolate this effect. For real workloads, the 16 cores and 32 threads make it an exceptional multi-threaded processor for rendering, video encoding, and scientific computing. The single-thread scores are also strong, ensuring good responsiveness in everyday tasks. The CPU’s percentile of 92 means it outperforms 92% of all CPUs, so it is a top-tier part for laptop use.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU is in the 92nd percentile, while the GPU is in the 74th percentile, a gap of 18 points. This indicates that the CPU will rarely be the limiting factor in any workload, and the GPU will become the bottleneck in most graphics-intensive tasks. In gaming, the CPU can easily maintain high frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios, but the GPU’s 4 GB of VRAM and 64-bit bus will cause the GPU to saturate much earlier than the CPU. For example, the CPU’s single-thread score of 2,769 in Geekbench suggests it can push high frame rates in esports titles, but the GPU’s FP32 performance of 4.198 TFLOPS will cap the actual frame rate. The CPU has a 3DMark 16-thread score of 12,459, which is excellent for physics and simulation, but the GPU’s pixel rate of 65.60 GPixel/s and texture rate of 131.2 GTexel/s are modest. For productivity, the CPU’s 16 cores will dominate multi-threaded tasks, and the GPU’s role is secondary. In rendering tasks that use the GPU, the A370M will be the limiting factor because of its 4 GB memory and 112 GB/s bandwidth. The CPU’s PassMark multithread score of 57,476 is far above the GPU’s average score of 29,175, so the CPU is much more capable. The gap in percentiles means the system is CPU-heavy; any workload that relies on the GPU will underperform relative to the CPU’s potential. The lack of measured FPS data means we cannot quantify the exact bottleneck in games, but the relative percentiles strongly indicate that the GPU is the limiting component for gaming and any GPU-accelerated workload.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s strong single-thread performance (Geekbench single-core 2,769) can push high frame rates in lightly-threaded games, but the GPU’s 74th percentile and 4 GB VRAM will prevent stable high refresh at 1080p in most modern titles. Expect to play at medium settings or lower to achieve high FPS.

Streaming: The CPU has 16 cores and 32 threads, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32,782, so it can encode video and run games simultaneously without stuttering. The GPU’s limited VRAM may affect game visuals, but the CPU can handle the encoding load.

Video editing: CPU-based rendering will be fast because of the high multi-core scores. The GPU’s 4 GB VRAM and 112 GB/s bandwidth are enough for 1080p previews, but 4K editing with effects will likely exceed the GPU’s memory capacity, so the CPU will handle most of the work.

3D rendering: The CPU’s 16 cores and 32 threads are ideal for CPU-based renderers, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32,782. The GPU’s 4 GB VRAM and 4.198 TFLOPS are insufficient for complex scenes, so GPU acceleration will be limited.

Software development: The CPU’s 16 cores and 32 threads excel at compiling and running multiple virtual machines, and the single-thread score of 2,769 ensures fast IDEs. The GPU is not a major factor for most development work, but the 4 GB VRAM is enough for basic UI.

Student and office work: The CPU is massively overkill for word processing and spreadsheets, but its efficiency and strong single-thread score of 2,769 means quick and responsive. The GPU is sufficient for basic graphics and display, but the system’s 35 W TDP GPU and 55 W CPU TDP mean the laptop will be heavy and battery drain.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets a niche user who wants maximum CPU performance in a laptop but does not need high-end graphics. The CPU is in the 92nd percentile, making it suitable for power users who run multi-threaded workloads such as software compilation, large data analysis, or virtual machines. The GPU is in the 74th percentile, which is adequate for casual gaming at 1080p with lowered settings, but not for serious gaming. Content creators who use CPU-heavy editing suites will benefit from the 16 cores and 32 threads. Students and office workers who need a fast processor for compiling code or running simulations will find the CPU useful, but the GPU is not necessary. Small business workstations that rely on CPU compute for financial models or engineering simulations can use this build, but the GPU is not a selling point. The 83rd combined percentile means it is above average overall, but the GPU holds it back from the top tier. The 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit bus make it unsuitable for 4K gaming or professional GPU rendering. For a laptop that will primarily serve as a mobile workstation with occasional light gaming, the pairing makes sense. For any gaming-centric buyer, the GPU is a weak link.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s single-core performance compared to its rivals?

A: The CPU’s Geekbench single-core score is 2,769, and its Cinebench R23 single-core is 1,935. Its nearest rivals, the Intel Core i9-14900F and AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, are only 0.6% and 0.8% ahead in average benchmark score, so single-core performance is essentially tied.

Q: How much L3 cache does the CPU have?

A: The CPU has 128 MB of shared L3 cache, plus an additional 1x 64MB 3D V-Cache slice, which is a key feature for cache-sensitive workloads.

Q: Does the GPU have ray tracing capabilities?

A: Yes, the Intel Arc A370M has 8 RT cores, which support ray tracing, but the GPU’s overall performance is limited by its 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is provided by 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus.

Q: How does the CPU’s multi-thread performance compare to the AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score is 59,641, while the AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX scores 60,104, which is 0.8% higher. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the CPU scores 32,782.

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile among all GPUs?

A: The GPU is in the 74th percentile, with an average benchmark score of 29,175.

Q: Is the CPU or the GPU the bottleneck in gaming?

A: The CPU is in the 92nd percentile and the GPU is in the 74th percentile, so the GPU will be the bottleneck in most gaming scenarios. The CPU’s single-thread performance is strong, but the GPU’s 4 GB VRAM and 112 GB/s bandwidth will limit frame rates.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining an AMD Ryzen 9 7945HSX3D CPU and an Intel Arc A370M GPU. The CPU is a high-end 16-core, 32-thread mobile processor from the 7000 series, built on Zen 4 with 3D V-Cache. The GPU is an entry-level Arc 3 mobile chip with 4 GB of GDDR6 memory. The overall performance percentile of the combination is 83rd, meaning it outperforms 83% of all tested CPU+GPU pairings. The CPU alone is in the 92nd percentile, while the GPU is in the 74th percentile, so the pairing is clearly CPU-dominant. The build is not a gaming powerhouse, but it is a capable mobile workstation for CPU-heavy tasks. The CPU’s 16 cores and 32 threads make it suitable for professional applications that rely on multi-threading, while the GPU provides basic acceleration for graphics and compute tasks. The laptop form factor means the system is portable, but the 55 W CPU and 35 W GPU TDP will generate heat and draw power.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A370M is a mobile GPU from the Alchemist generation (Arc 3 Mobile), built on the Xe-HPG architecture and a 6 nm process from TSMC. The chip is DG2-128 with 7,200 million transistors and a die size of 157 mm², giving a transistor density of 45.9M / mm². The base clock is 1550 MHz, boost clock is 2050 MHz, and memory clock is 1750 MHz with an effective rate of 14 Gbps. The memory consists of 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, yielding 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU has 1024 shading units, 64 TMUs, 32 ROPs, and 8 RT cores. It does not list a tensor core count. Pixel rate is 65.60 GPixel/s, texture rate is 131.2 GTexel/s, and FP32 performance is 4.198 TFLOPS. FP16 is 8.397 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Its benchmark scores are Geekbench OpenCL of 29,676 and Vulkan of 28,673, with an average score of 29,175, placing it in the 74th percentile. Its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH at 29,197 (0.1% higher) and the AMD FirePro W8000 at 29,211 (0.1% higher). The GPU is end-of-life, released on 2022-03-29. For rendering, the 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit bus are the primary constraints. The FP32 of 4.198 TFLOPS is modest, meaning GPU-accelerated rendering will be slower than mid-range desktop GPUs. The 8 RT cores allow ray tracing, but the low memory bandwidth will limit ray-traced performance. The GPU’s percentile of 74 means it is better than 74% of GPUs, but it is not a high-end part. The 35 W TDP makes it a low-power option for thin laptops, but the CPU’s high TDP will be the primary heat source. The GPU’s 1024 shading units and 64 TMUs are sufficient for 1080p gaming at medium settings, but the 4 GB VRAM will fill quickly in modern titles, causing stuttering or texture drop. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8, which is fine for a mobile GPU. The display outputs are portable device dependent, so the laptop’s design determines the output. The GPU is a secondary component in this build; the CPU is the star.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D + Intel Arc A370M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D

Intel Arc A370M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance

Benchmark Performance

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

FAQ

Build Overview

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds