SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D + Intel Arc A350M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

95%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D

59,641 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350M

24,647 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This laptop pairing combines AMD’s top-tier mobile 3D V-Cache processor with Intel’s entry-level Arc 3 discrete GPU. The result is an extreme mismatch in compute capability, where the CPU operates in an entirely different performance class than the GPU. The data shows a system built for CPU-bound productivity and multitasking, with gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads limited by the Arc A350M’s modest specifications. Since no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, all frame rate discussions below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not empirical results.

Gaming Performance

There is no measured FPS data for this CPU-GPU pairing, so the following figures are estimates based solely on the benchmark scores of each component. The Intel Arc A350M sits at the 70th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 24647. This places it in the same performance bracket as the AMD Radeon RX 590 (deltaPct -0.4) and the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile (deltaPct -0.5), while trailing the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT by 0.8% and leading the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 by 1.5%. These are all older or lower-tier desktop and mobile parts, indicating that the A350M is not designed for high-refresh or high-detail gaming.

At 1080p with ultra settings, expect playable but not impressive frame rates in most titles. The GPU’s 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus with 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will be a hard limiting factor for modern games that exceed 4 GB of VRAM usage. The 3.379 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 105.6 GTexel/s texture rate suggest that lighter e-sports titles could run at medium settings, while AAA games will likely require low or medium presets to maintain 30-60 FPS. The 6 dedicated RT cores and support for DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) mean ray tracing is technically possible, but the low compute throughput will make RT effects costly.

At 1440p or 4K, the Arc A350M will struggle significantly. The pixel rate of 52.80 GPixel/s and the narrow memory bus will cause severe frame rate drops. The CPU’s performance is irrelevant in this context, as the GPU becomes the bottleneck in virtually every gaming scenario. The massive 128 MB of L3 cache on the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D cannot compensate for the GPU’s limited bandwidth and raw compute. For a system that is expected to handle modern gaming at high detail, this pairing underdelivers; for 1080p medium settings in less demanding titles, it is workable.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU and GPU scores paint a picture of extreme disparity. The AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D achieves an average benchmark score of 59641, placing it at the 92nd percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i9-14900F (avgScore 60008, deltaPct -0.6), the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX (avgScore 60099, deltaPct -0.8), the AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX (avgScore 60104, deltaPct -0.8), and the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 9645 (avgScore 58916, deltaPct 1.2). This means the 7945HX3D is within 1% of the top competitor and actually outperforms the Ryzen 5 PRO 9645 by 1.2%. The CPU is a top-tier performer, with a combined percentile of 81 for the entire system.

In specific benchmarks, the CPU shows its strength. In Cinebench R23, it scores 32782 multi-core and 1935 single-core. Geekbench results are 16758 multi-core and 2769 single-core. The PassMark multi-thread score is 57476, with a single-thread score of 4050. The 3DMark results show a clear scaling pattern: 2095 for 2 threads, 3937 for 4 threads, 7330 for 8 threads, 12459 for 16 threads, and 12936 for max threads. This demonstrates excellent multi-threading efficiency, with near-linear scaling from 8 to 16 threads and only a slight gain beyond that.

The GPU’s average benchmark score of 24647 is dwarfed by the CPU’s 59641. In Geekbench, the GPU scores 24546 in OpenCL and 24747 in Vulkan. The combined picture is a system where the CPU is a flagship-level component, but the GPU is entry-level. The percentile gap—92nd for the CPU versus 70th for the GPU—confirms that this is not a balanced gaming machine, but rather a workstation-oriented laptop with a discrete GPU that is only adequate for light graphical tasks.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A350M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture, codenamed Alchemist, and uses the DG2-128 chip manufactured on TSMC’s 6 nm process. It contains 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 24 raster operation units. The chip has 6 dedicated ray tracing cores, though it lacks a specified tensor core count. The GPU’s base clock is 1150 MHz with a boost clock of 2200 MHz, and memory runs at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The memory configuration is 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s.

These specifications produce a pixel rate of 52.80 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 105.6 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 3.379 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 6.758 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio). The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8, and the TDP is a modest 25 W, which is typical for an entry-level mobile part.

For rendering and compute workloads, the Arc A350M’s benchmark scores indicate it competes with the AMD Radeon RX 590 and NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile, both within 0.5% of its average score. However, the 4 GB VRAM capacity is a serious limitation for modern rendering tasks, especially at higher resolutions or with large textures. The 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will throttle complex scenes. The 6 RT cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing, but the low FP32 throughput means ray-traced renders will be slow. The GPU is adequate for 1080p video editing and light 3D work, but it is not suitable for professional-grade rendering or high-end gaming.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly identifies the GPU as the limiting factor in this system. The CPU’s 92nd percentile ranking versus the GPU’s 70th percentile ranking creates a massive imbalance. In gaming, the Arc A350M will always be the bottleneck, regardless of resolution or settings. The CPU’s raw power cannot compensate for the GPU’s 112.0 GB/s bandwidth and 3.379 TFLOPS of compute. Even at 1080p, where the CPU typically has more influence, the GPU will saturate before the CPU is stressed.

Benchmark scores confirm this. The CPU’s single-thread score of 4050 in PassMark and 1935 in Cinebench R23 are more than sufficient for any game. The GPU’s average score of 24647 is the limiting factor. In CPU-bound workloads, such as data compression (PassMark score of 699988), encryption (42367), and integer math (201217), the CPU dominates. In GPU-bound workloads, like 3D rendering or high-resolution gaming, the GPU holds the system back.

The FPS scaling, or lack thereof, is telling. Since the CPU is capable of far more than the GPU can feed, increasing resolution or graphical detail will not shift the bottleneck—it will only further expose the GPU’s limitations. A more balanced pairing would pair this CPU with a GPU in the 90th percentile or above, but the current configuration is heavily weighted toward CPU performance.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D is a 16-core, 32-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Dragon Range. It is manufactured on TSMC’s 5 nm process with 17,840 million transistors spread across a die size of 2x 71 mm². The base clock is 2.30 GHz with a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. The TDP is 55 W, which is remarkably low for a 16-core part, highlighting the efficiency of the Zen 4 architecture.

The standout feature is the cache hierarchy. It has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and a massive 128 MB of shared L3 cache. This includes a 1x 64 MB 3D V-Cache slice, which is the defining characteristic of the X3D series. This large cache is designed to reduce memory latency and improve performance in cache-sensitive workloads, particularly gaming.

The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. It also supports ECC memory, which is a boon for workstation use. The PCIe interface is Gen 5 with 28 lanes from the CPU. The integrated graphics is a Radeon 610M, which is sufficient for basic display output but not for gaming. The processor has an unlocked multiplier, allowing for overclocking, though this is less common in laptops. Part number 100-000001086, released on 2023-07-26, and is currently in active production.

Benchmark results show exceptional multi-threaded performance. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32782 places it in the top tier of mobile processors. The PassMark multithread score of 57476 is similarly impressive. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 12459 is only slightly below the max-thread score of 12936, indicating that the processor is effectively saturated by 16 threads, which aligns with its 16-core design. Single-thread performance is strong but not class-leading, with a Geekbench single-core score of 2769 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1935.

For real workloads, this CPU excels at video editing, 3D rendering, software compilation, and any multi-threaded task. The data compression score of 699988 in PassMark is exceptionally high, indicating strong performance in archiving and file management. The floating-point math score of 121619 is also notable for scientific computing.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who prioritize CPU performance above all else and have minimal GPU requirements. The primary audience is professionals and power users who run CPU-intensive applications on a laptop and only occasionally use GPU-accelerated tasks.

Content Creators: Video editors working with 4K or 8K footage will benefit from the CPU’s 16 cores and 32 threads, especially during timeline scrubbing and export. The GPU is sufficient for basic effects and color correction but will struggle with heavy GPU-accelerated plugins.
Software Developers: Compiling large codebases is a CPU-bound task, and the 7945HX3D’s multi-threaded scores (32782 in Cinebench R23) make it an excellent choice. The GPU is irrelevant for most development work unless doing GPU compute.
Students and Researchers: Anyone running simulations, data analysis, or machine learning training on CPU will see excellent performance. The ECC memory support adds stability for long-running calculations.
Small Business Workstations: For office productivity, spreadsheet analysis, and database management, the CPU is overkill, but the system will never feel slow. The GPU handles basic displays and light graphics work.
Gamers: This is not a gaming laptop. The GPU’s 70th percentile ranking and 4 GB VRAM make it unsuitable for modern AAA titles at high settings. E-sports gamers might find it acceptable at 1080p medium settings.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: Not viable. The Arc A350M’s 3.379 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth are insufficient for high-refresh gaming at 1080p. Expect frame rates below 60 FPS in most titles, and far below that in demanding games. The CPU’s 128 MB L3 cache does not help when the GPU is the bottleneck.

Streaming: The CPU can handle encoding via x264 with its 16 cores, but the GPU lacks a dedicated encoder strong enough for high-quality streaming. The Arc A350M’s low compute and 4 GB VRAM will limit the ability to run a game and encode simultaneously without stuttering.

Video Editing: The CPU excels here. Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32782 ensures fast export times. The GPU’s 24546 OpenCL score in Geekbench is adequate for 1080p editing with basic effects, but 4K work with heavy color grading will be sluggish due to the 4 GB VRAM limit.

3D Rendering: CPU rendering is a strength. The PassMark multithread score of 57476 indicates strong performance in software renderers. GPU rendering is weak. The 6 RT cores and 3.379 TFLOPS are not enough for complex scenes, and the 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will cause long render times.

Software Development: Excellent. The 16-core, 32-thread configuration and 5.40 GHz boost clock make quick work of compilation. The 128 MB L3 cache reduces latency for iterative builds. The GPU is irrelevant for most development tasks.

Student and Office Work: Overkill but effective. The CPU will breeze through any document, spreadsheet, or presentation. The low 55 W TDP means efficient battery life during light usage. The integrated Radeon 610M is sufficient for office tasks, making the discrete GPU optional for this scenario.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the AMD Socket FL1, which is specific to mobile platforms. This means the socket is not user-upgradeable in most laptops. The memory support is DDR5 with dual-channel configuration, which is current-generation. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 28 lanes, ensuring compatibility with the fastest NVMe SSDs and external GPU enclosures.

The GPU is an Intel Arc A350M with a 25 W TDP and no suggested PSU, as it is an integrated part of the laptop motherboard. It is not upgradeable in any meaningful sense. The GPU is end-of-life, so no driver improvements are expected to significantly alter its performance.

For a sensible next upgrade, users should look at the platform level. The CPU is capable of supporting a much more powerful GPU, but the laptop form factor prevents this. An external GPU enclosure via PCIe Gen 5 could theoretically unlock the CPU’s full gaming potential, but this is not practical for most users. The more realistic upgrade path is to a new laptop with a balanced CPU-GPU pairing. The CPU’s performance will remain relevant for years, but the GPU will become increasingly obsolete.

The TDP of 55 W for the CPU and 25 W for the GPU means the system has modest power requirements. The CPU’s unlocked multiplier allows for overclocking, but the laptop’s cooling solution will likely limit headroom. ECC memory support is a unique feature for a mobile CPU, making this a viable choice for error-sensitive workloads.

FAQ

Q: Is this laptop good for gaming?

A: No. The Intel Arc A350M GPU is at the 70th percentile with an average score of 24647, which is comparable to an AMD Radeon RX 590 (deltaPct -0.4). Its 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth limit it to 1080p medium settings in less demanding titles.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Ryzen 9 7945HX3D has an average score of 59641, which is 0.6% lower than the Intel Core i9-14900F (60008), 0.8% lower than the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX (60099), and 0.8% lower than the AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX (60104). It is 1.2% higher than the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 9645 (58916).

Q: What is the GPU’s ray tracing capability?

A: The Arc A350M has 6 dedicated ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2). However, its FP32 compute of 3.379 TFLOPS is too low for practical ray tracing in most games.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes. The Ryzen 9 7945HX3D has ECC memory support, which is unusual for a mobile processor and beneficial for workstation stability.

Q: What is the CPU’s cache size?

A: It has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 128 MB of shared L3 cache, which includes a 64 MB 3D V-Cache slice. This is a key feature for gaming and cache-sensitive workloads.

Q: Is the integrated GPU sufficient for office work?

A: Yes. The Radeon 610M integrated graphics is adequate for basic display output, office applications, and video playback. The discrete Arc A350M is not needed for these tasks.

Q: What is the performance gap between the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU is at the 92nd percentile with an average score of 59641, while the GPU is at the 70th percentile with an average score of 24647. This 2.4x difference in raw benchmark scores creates a significant bottleneck in GPU-bound workloads.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D + Intel Arc A350M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D

Intel Arc A350M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance

Benchmark Performance

GPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds