SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX + Intel Arc A370M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

94 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
95%
VS
GPU
93%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX

60,099 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A370M

29,175 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX + Intel Arc A370M: A Curious Mobile Pairing

This build pairs a flagship 16-core mobile processor with a modest entry-level discrete GPU, creating a significant performance asymmetry. The AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX sits at the 92nd percentile among all CPUs, while the Intel Arc A370M lands at the 74th percentile among GPUs. The combined configuration ranks at the 83rd percentile overall. Because no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the database, all gaming performance figures presented here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of each component, rather than direct gameplay measurements.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this CPU+GPU pairing, so this section provides estimated frame rates based strictly on the benchmark scores. The Intel Arc A370M's Geekbench Vulkan score of 28673 and OpenCL score of 29676 indicate a GPU that is positioned for 1080p gaming at medium to high settings, not for high-resolution or maximum-detail workloads. The GPU's 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, delivering 112.0 GB/s bandwidth, further constrains its ability to handle large textures or high-resolution assets.

At 1080p with ultra settings, this pairing would likely struggle to maintain smooth frame rates in modern titles. The GPU's FP32 throughput of 4.198 TFLOPS places it in a performance class where competitive esports titles should run acceptably, but demanding AAA games would require significant settings reductions. The 8 RT cores and DirectX 12 Ultimate support indicate ray tracing capability, but the raw compute power suggests that ray-traced effects would come at a steep performance cost. At 1440p or 4K, the estimated frame rates would drop substantially, likely making most modern games unplayable at high detail levels.

The Ryzen 9 7945HX's exceptional CPU performance—with a PassMark multithread score of 54548 and single-thread score of 4040—means the processor will rarely be the limiting factor in gaming. However, the GPU's 74th percentile standing relative to all GPUs means that the Arc A370M will cap frame rates well below what the CPU could otherwise support. The 1024 shading units and 32 ROPs provide a pixel rate of 65.60 GPixel/s and texture rate of 131.2 GTexel/s, which are modest figures that reinforce the 1080p-oriented nature of this GPU. Overall, the gaming experience would be defined by the GPU's limitations, with the CPU's power going largely underutilized in most gaming scenarios.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU benchmarks for the Ryzen 9 7945HX are consistently strong across synthetic workloads. In Cinebench R23, the processor scores 33459 in multi-core and 1940 in single-core tests. Geekbench results show 18254 in multi-core and 2391 in single-core. The 3DMark thread scaling tests reveal a steady progression: 2063 with 2 threads, 3972 with 4 threads, 7355 with 8 threads, 12737 with 16 threads, and 13612 with max threads. This scaling pattern indicates excellent multi-threading efficiency, with the 16-core, 32-thread configuration extracting nearly full performance from additional cores.

The CPU's avgBenchmarkScore of 60099 places it at the 92nd percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX with an average score of 60104 (0% delta), the Intel Core i9-14900F at 60008 (0.2% delta), the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D at 59641 (0.8% delta), and the Intel Xeon Gold 6338T at 60572 (-0.8% delta). These tight margins—all within 1% of the Ryzen 9 7945HX—indicate that this processor is squarely in the top tier of available CPUs, competing directly with desktop-class parts.

The GPU benchmarks are far more modest. The Intel Arc A370M scores 29676 in Geekbench OpenCL and 28673 in Geekbench Vulkan, with an avgBenchmarkScore of 29175 at the 74th percentile. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH at 29197 (-0.1% delta), the AMD FirePro W8000 at 29211 (-0.1% delta), the AMD Radeon RX 470 at 28996 (0.6% delta), and the AMD Radeon RX 6800M at 28874 (1% delta). Interestingly, the Arc A370M sits within 1% of the Radeon RX 6800M, a much larger GPU, though the RX 6800M's similarity in average score likely reflects different workload characteristics rather than equivalent gaming performance. The combined picture is a CPU that ranks among the best available, paired with a GPU that is solidly mid-pack, creating a substantial performance gap between the two components.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Arc A370M's 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 112.0 GB/s memory bandwidth suggest it can handle 1080p gaming at moderate refresh rates, but the 74th percentile GPU standing indicates it is not suited for 144Hz or 240Hz gaming at high detail settings. The CPU's 92nd percentile standing and strong single-thread score of 4040 in PassMark would support high frame rates in CPU-bound titles, but the GPU would cap performance well below competitive esports levels in most cases.

Streaming: The Ryzen 9 7945HX's 32 threads and 16 cores provide substantial headroom for encoding and streaming workloads while gaming. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 33459 indicates the CPU can handle simultaneous gaming, encoding, and overlay tasks without becoming a bottleneck. However, the GPU's limited performance would constrain the gaming experience being streamed, making this pairing better suited for CPU-heavy streaming tasks than for high-quality game streaming.

Video editing: The CPU's PassMark floating-point math score of 123390 and integer math score of 207524 indicate strong computational performance for video processing. The 64 MB shared L3 cache and 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth on DDR5 support smooth timeline scrubbing and render operations. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus would limit hardware-accelerated effects and high-resolution video work, making this a CPU-centric editing workstation with modest GPU acceleration.

3D rendering: The Ryzen 9 7945HX's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 33459 and 3DMark max-threads score of 13612 position it as a capable rendering CPU, competitive with desktop parts like the Intel Core i9-14900F. The Arc A370M's 1024 shading units and 8 RT cores provide some GPU-accelerated rendering capability, but the 4 GB VRAM would severely limit scene complexity and texture sizes in GPU-based renderers.

Software development: The CPU's PassMark data compression score of 707249 and data encryption score of 42703 indicate strong performance for build processes, code compilation, and cryptographic operations. The 16 cores and 32 threads handle parallel compilation tasks efficiently, while the single-thread score of 4040 ensures responsive IDE performance. The GPU is largely irrelevant for most development tasks.

Student and office work: This pairing is substantially over-specified for typical student and office workloads. The CPU's 92nd percentile standing provides far more compute power than document editing, web browsing, or spreadsheet work requires, while the GPU's 74th percentile standing is more than adequate for basic productivity and media consumption. The 55W CPU TDP and 35W GPU TDP suggest this is a mobile workstation-class configuration that would offer excellent application responsiveness but likely shorter battery life than more balanced configurations.

Who Should Build It

The target user for this configuration is someone who needs extreme CPU performance in a laptop form factor but has modest GPU requirements. The Ryzen 9 7945HX's 92nd percentile CPU standing makes this an excellent choice for content creators, developers, and engineers who run heavily multi-threaded workloads such as code compilation, scientific computing, or 3D rendering. The PassMark multithread score of 54548 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 33459 demonstrate capability that rivals desktop processors, making this suitable for professionals who need workstation-class CPU performance on the go.

For gamers, this configuration serves a specific niche: those who play at 1080p with moderate settings and prioritize CPU-intensive simulation or strategy games over graphically demanding titles. The Arc A370M's 74th percentile GPU standing and 4 GB VRAM mean that gamers should target esports titles or older games rather than modern AAA releases at high detail. The GPU's Geekbench Vulkan score of 28673 suggests it can handle DirectX 12 and Vulkan titles at acceptable frame rates, but the 112.0 GB/s memory bandwidth will limit texture quality and resolution options.

Small business workstations and student systems benefit from the CPU's exceptional multi-threading for productivity suites, data analysis, and virtual machines, though the configuration is likely overkill for these use cases. The 16 cores and 32 threads with ECC memory support (indicated in the CPU's memory support specifications) make this suitable for professional workstations where data integrity is critical. The build class is laptop, so this configuration targets mobile professionals who need desktop-level CPU performance without the GPU overhead of gaming-focused laptops.

Balance and Bottleneck

This configuration exhibits a pronounced CPU-to-GPU imbalance. The Ryzen 9 7945HX sits at the 92nd CPU percentile, while the Arc A370M sits at the 74th GPU percentile—an 18-point gap that indicates the GPU is the primary bottleneck for gaming and graphics-intensive workloads. The CPU's avgBenchmarkScore of 60099 compared to the GPU's 29175 further quantifies this disparity, with the CPU delivering more than double the average benchmark score of the GPU.

In gaming scenarios, the GPU will cap frame rates well below what the CPU can support. The CPU's single-thread score of 4040 in PassMark and 1940 in Cinebench R23 ensure that even the most demanding game logic and physics calculations will not strain the processor. However, the GPU's 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 65.60 GPixel/s pixel rate will limit resolution and detail settings. The FPS scaling between 1080p and higher resolutions would be dictated entirely by the GPU, as the CPU would remain underutilized even at 1080p in most titles.

For CPU-bound workloads such as rendering, compilation, and data processing, the bottleneck reverses. The Arc A370M's 74th percentile standing means it provides adequate but not exceptional GPU acceleration for tasks like video encoding or GPU-accelerated compute. The CPU's 16 cores, 32 threads, and 64 MB L3 cache would be the primary driver of performance in these scenarios, with the GPU playing a supporting role. The 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth and DDR5 support ensure the CPU has sufficient data throughput for multi-threaded workloads.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A370M is built on the DG2-128 chip using the Xe-HPG architecture on a 6 nm TSMC process. It contains 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die, with a transistor density of 45.9M per square millimeter. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1550 MHz and a boost clock of 2050 MHz, with memory running at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The 4 GB GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus delivers 112.0 GB/s bandwidth, which is modest by modern standards and will limit performance in memory-intensive scenarios.

The GPU's compute configuration includes 1024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 ROPs. This yields a pixel rate of 65.60 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 131.2 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance of 4.198 TFLOPS and FP16 performance of 8.397 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio) place this GPU in the entry-level discrete segment. The 8 dedicated ray tracing cores and DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) support provide modern graphics features, but the limited compute throughput means ray tracing will be a feature that exists more for compatibility than for practical high-performance use.

The GPU's benchmark scores of 29676 in Geekbench OpenCL and 28673 in Geekbench Vulkan place it at the 74th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH, scores 29197, a -0.1% delta, indicating the Arc A370M is essentially equivalent to that part in synthetic benchmarks. The GPU's proximity to the Radeon RX 6800M (1% delta) is notable, though this likely reflects specific workload advantages rather than overall gaming equivalence. The production status is listed as end-of-life, and the GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x8. The 35W TDP makes this an efficient GPU for thin-and-light laptops, but the performance class is firmly entry-level.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX is a 16-core, 32-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Dragon Range. It operates at a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, with a 55W TDP. The CPU is manufactured on a 5 nm TSMC process with 13,140 million transistors across a dual-die design (2x 71 mm²). The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 64 MB shared L3, providing substantial on-die storage for multi-threaded workloads.

The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, delivering 83.2 GB/s bandwidth. It also supports ECC memory, a feature typically found in workstation-class processors. The PCIe Gen 5 interface with 28 lanes provides high-bandwidth connectivity for storage and peripherals. The integrated Radeon 610M GPU provides basic display output, though this configuration pairs the CPU with the discrete Arc A370M. The processor is unlocked, allowing overclocking in supported platforms, and uses the AMD Socket FL1.

Benchmark results demonstrate exceptional multi-threaded performance. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 33459 is competitive with desktop processors, while the single-core score of 1940 indicates strong per-thread performance. The Geekbench multi-core score of 18254 and single-core score of 2391 reinforce this picture. The PassMark suite shows a multithread score of 54548, with particularly strong results in integer math (207524), floating-point math (123390), and data compression (707249). The 3DMark thread scaling from 2063 (2 threads) to 13612 (max threads) demonstrates near-linear scaling, indicating the 16 cores are effectively utilized.

The CPU's 92nd percentile ranking places it among the top processors available. Its nearest rivals include the Ryzen 7 8745HX at 0% delta, the Core i9-14900F at 0.2% delta, the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D at 0.8% delta, and the Xeon Gold 6338T at -0.8% delta. These sub-1% margins mean the Ryzen 9 7945HX is statistically tied with the best desktop and mobile processors, making it a top-tier choice for CPU-intensive applications.

Build Overview

This configuration pairs a flagship mobile CPU with an entry-level mobile GPU in a laptop form factor. The AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX represents the pinnacle of the AMD 7000 series mobile lineup, with 16 cores and 32 threads that rival desktop processors. The Intel Arc A370M represents Intel's entry point into the discrete GPU market, based on the Xe-HPG architecture in its Alchemist generation. The combined percentile of 83 indicates this build sits in the upper tier of all configurations, though the CPU and GPU contribute very different levels of performance.

The build class is laptop, meaning this configuration targets mobile users who need high performance on the go. The CPU's 92nd percentile and the GPU's 74th percentile create a configuration that excels at CPU-heavy tasks while providing adequate but not exceptional graphics performance. The 55W CPU TDP and 35W GPU TDP suggest this is a high-performance laptop that may require robust cooling, but the total power draw is manageable for a mobile platform.

The overall tier of this build is defined by its 83rd combined percentile. This places it in the upper quartile of all configurations, but the substantial gap between CPU and GPU performance means the experience will vary dramatically by workload. For CPU-intensive tasks like software development, scientific computing, and content creation, this build ranks among the best available. For gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads, it is a competent but not exceptional performer, limited by the Arc A370M's 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s memory bandwidth.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 83, placing this configuration in the upper quartile of all builds. The CPU sits at the 92nd percentile while the GPU sits at the 74th percentile.

Q: How does the Ryzen 9 7945HX compare to its nearest CPU rivals?

A: The Ryzen 9 7945HX has an average benchmark score of 60099. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX at 60104 (0% delta), Intel Core i9-14900F at 60008 (0.2% delta), AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D at 59641 (0.8% delta), and Intel Xeon Gold 6338T at 60572 (-0.8% delta).

Q: How much VRAM does the Intel Arc A370M have?

A: The Arc A370M has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, delivering 112.0 GB/s bandwidth. The memory operates at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective).

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock and TDP?

A: The Ryzen 9 7945HX has a boost clock of 5.40 GHz and a base clock of 2.50 GHz, with a TDP of 55W. It uses the AMD Socket FL1 and supports DDR5 memory.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Intel Arc A370M has 8 dedicated ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2). However, the GPU's FP32 throughput of 4.198 TFLOPS suggests ray tracing performance will be limited.

Q: What is the production status of the Intel Arc A370M?

A: The Arc A370M is listed as end-of-life in the database. The CPU is listed as active, with the Ryzen 9 7945HX having a release date of January 3, 2023.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Arc A370M has an average benchmark score of 29175. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH at 29197 (-0.1% delta), AMD FirePro W8000 at 29211 (-0.1% delta), AMD Radeon RX 470 at 28996 (0.6% delta), and AMD Radeon RX 6800M at 28874 (1% delta).

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 9 7945HX uses the AMD Socket FL1, which is specific to mobile platforms. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, delivering 83.2 GB/s bandwidth, with ECC memory support for workstation applications. The PCIe Gen 5 interface with 28 lanes provides high-bandwidth connectivity, and the motherboard platform would need to support these specifications. The CPU's 55W TDP is relatively modest for a 16-core processor, suggesting the platform is designed for high-performance laptops with adequate cooling.

The Intel Arc A370M connects via PCIe 4.0 x8 and has a 35W TDP. The suggested PSU is not specified in the database, but the combined 90W TDP of CPU and GPU indicates this laptop configuration requires a substantial power delivery system. The GPU is marked as end-of-life, meaning it is not a platform for future upgrades. For users seeking better graphics performance, the primary upgrade path would be a different laptop configuration with a more powerful GPU, as the Arc A370M's 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus present fundamental limitations.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would focus on the GPU, though the socket and form factor constraints of a laptop limit practical upgrade options. The CPU's 92nd percentile standing means it has substantial headroom for future GPU upgrades—the 16 cores, 32 threads, and PCIe Gen 5 support could easily feed a much more powerful graphics card. The 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth would support higher-end GPUs without becoming a bottleneck. However, the mobile form factor means users would likely need to purchase a new laptop to access a more powerful GPU. The Arc A370M's end-of-life status and the CPU's active production status suggest that the CPU will remain relevant for years, while the GPU represents the limiting factor for future-proofing this configuration.