SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX + Intel Arc A350M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

95%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX

60,099 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350M

24,647 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX + Intel Arc A350M

This laptop pairing combines AMD's top-tier 16-core Dragon Range processor with Intel's entry-level Arc 3 mobile GPU, creating a system where the CPU operates in an entirely different performance class than the graphics solution. The Ryzen 9 7945HX ranks in the 92nd percentile among all CPUs, while the Arc A350M sits in the 70th percentile among all GPUs, and the combined system ranks in the 81st percentile. No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, so all frame rate discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance asymmetry here is stark. The Ryzen 9 7945HX delivers a Passmark multithread score of 54548 and a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 33459, placing it in the top 8% of all CPUs. The Arc A350M, by contrast, produces a Geekbench OpenCL score of 24546 and Vulkan score of 24747, which places it just 0.4% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 590 and 0.5% behind the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile. In gaming workloads, the GPU will be the limiting factor in virtually every scenario, as the CPU's single-thread score of 4040 in Passmark and 1058 in 3DMark single-thread are more than sufficient to feed a GPU of this class.

The CPU's 16 cores and 32 threads provide massive headroom for productivity tasks, but the GPU's 4 GB of VRAM and 112.0 GB/s memory bandwidth create a hard ceiling for graphics-intensive workloads. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 12737 versus the 2-thread score of 2063 illustrates the CPU's scaling efficiency, but this scaling advantage cannot compensate for GPU limitations in frame generation. In CPU-bound scenarios like physics simulations, the Passmark physics score of 2500 indicates strong performance, while the GPU's 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 throughput will bottleneck any graphics-heavy application.

The 83.2 GB/s dual-channel DDR5 memory bandwidth serves both processors, but the GPU's own 112.0 GB/s GDDR6 bandwidth is the more relevant constraint for gaming. The CPU can process game logic and AI at speeds rivaling desktop-class parts, yet the GPU will determine actual frame output. This imbalance means the system excels at tasks where the CPU does the heavy lifting and the GPU handles only modest visual loads.

Gaming Performance

Since no measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination, all gaming figures presented here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The Arc A350M's Geekbench Vulkan score of 24747, which sits between the RX 590 and RTX A5000 Mobile, suggests 1080p gaming at medium settings is the realistic target. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM capacity will limit texture quality in modern titles, and the 64-bit memory bus with 112.0 GB/s bandwidth constrains data throughput.

At 1080p with ultra settings, the data suggests frame rates in the 30-45 FPS range for demanding AAA titles, based on the GPU's relative position to the RX 590. Esports titles like competitive shooters and MOBAs could achieve 60+ FPS at lower settings, given the CPU's Passmark single-thread score of 4040 ensures minimal CPU-side frame pacing issues. The CPU's 3DMark 8-thread score of 7355 indicates that even heavily threaded game engines will not bottleneck the GPU.

At 1440p, the GPU's 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 throughput becomes the dominant constraint, and the 4 GB VRAM will likely cause texture streaming issues in open-world games. The RTX A5000 Mobile comparison (0.5% faster) suggests professional-grade rendering capability but not gaming headroom. The Arc A350M's 6 RT cores provide entry-level ray tracing support, but the modest shading unit count of 768 means ray-traced effects will exact a heavy performance toll.

For 4K gaming, this pairing is not viable beyond very low settings or older titles. The CPU's Passmark data compression score of 707249 and integer math score of 207524 indicate strong computational power, but these do not translate to GPU throughput. The estimated FPS figures should be treated as approximations, and actual results may vary by game engine and driver optimization.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen 9 7945HX is a 16-core, 32-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Dragon Range, built on TSMC's 5 nm process with 13,140 million transistors across a dual-die design of 2x 71 mm². It operates with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and boosts up to 5.40 GHz, with a TDP of 55 W. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 64 MB shared L3, which is substantial for a mobile part.

Benchmark results confirm this is a desktop-class CPU in a laptop form factor. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 33459 places it within 0.2% of the Intel Core i9-14900F and 0% of the AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX, while the single-core score of 1940 demonstrates strong per-thread performance. The Geekbench multicore score of 18254 and single-core score of 2391 reinforce this position. The Passmark multithread score of 54548 and single-thread score of 4040 show balanced scaling across workloads.

The 3DMark thread scaling tests reveal efficiency: 2 threads yield 2063, 4 threads yield 3972, 8 threads yield 7355, 16 threads yield 12737, and max threads yield 13612. This near-linear scaling through 16 threads indicates excellent utilization of the dual-channel DDR5 memory interface. The Passmark extended instructions score of 51834 and floating point math score of 123390 indicate strong AVX-512 and SIMD performance, which benefits scientific computing and encryption workloads.

The Passmark data encryption score of 42703 and data compression score of 707249 highlight the CPU's capability in security and archiving tasks. The Radeon 610M integrated GPU provides basic display output, though the discrete Arc A350M handles graphics duties. The multiplier is unlocked, allowing enthusiast tuning within thermal limits. The CPU supports DDR5 memory with ECC capability, which is notable for workstation use.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who prioritize CPU compute power over graphics performance, specifically those who run multi-threaded productivity applications and play games only occasionally or at modest settings. The 92nd percentile CPU ranking makes this suitable for software developers compiling large codebases, researchers running simulations, and data analysts processing large datasets. The 81st combined percentile indicates a system that outperforms most laptops overall, but the GPU limitation means gamers should look elsewhere.

Content creators working with video encoding or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 33459, though GPU-accelerated rendering will be constrained by the Arc A350M's 3.379 TFLOPS. Students in engineering or computer science programs will appreciate the Passmark integer math score of 207524 for compilation workloads, while the 4 GB GPU VRAM supports basic CAD visualization. Small business workstations running virtualization or database workloads will leverage the 32 threads effectively.

Gamers at 1080p with modest settings expectations could find this acceptable for esports titles, but the GPU's 70th percentile ranking suggests better balance exists elsewhere. The system is not suited for 1440p or 4K gaming, high-refresh-rate competitive play, or ray-traced titles. Users who need a laptop for heavy CPU workloads with occasional light gaming represent the ideal audience.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's Passmark single-thread score of 4040 ensures frame pacing is not CPU-limited, but the Arc A350M's 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 throughput cannot sustain high frame rates at high settings. Estimated 1080p performance around 60 FPS in esports titles at medium settings, with AAA games falling to 30-45 FPS. The 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth are insufficient for 1440p high-refresh gaming.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 cores and 32 threads provide ample headroom for software encoding while gaming, with the Passmark multithread score of 54548 indicating minimal performance impact from concurrent encoding. The GPU's modest encoding capabilities complement the CPU, but the overall gaming frame rates will be the limiting factor for stream quality.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 33459 handles 4K timeline scrubbing and export efficiently, with the Passmark floating point math score of 123390 supporting color grading calculations. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM limits GPU-accelerated effects and preview rendering, making CPU-based workflows more practical.

3D rendering: The 32 threads deliver strong CPU-based rendering performance, with the Geekbench multicore score of 18254 supporting complex scene calculations. GPU rendering is constrained by the Arc A350M's 3.379 TFLOPS and 4 GB VRAM, making CPU rendering the preferred path for final output.

Software development: The Passmark integer math score of 207524 and data compression score of 707249 accelerate compilation and version control operations. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 12737 indicates strong parallel build performance, and the 64 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency for large codebases.

Student and office work: The CPU's 92nd percentile ranking ensures responsive multitasking across office suites, web browsing, and communication tools. The Radeon 610M integrated GPU provides backup display output, while the Arc A350M handles any light graphics tasks. The 55 W TDP enables reasonable battery life for a high-performance laptop.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A350M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture, codenamed Alchemist, using TSMC's 6 nm process with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. It features 768 shading units, 48 TMUs, and 24 ROPs, with 6 ray tracing cores. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1150 MHz and boosts to 2200 MHz, delivering 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 and 6.758 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1 ratio). Memory consists of 4 GB GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, providing 112.0 GB/s bandwidth.

The Geekbench OpenCL score of 24546 and Vulkan score of 24747 place the GPU at the 70th percentile, with the nearest rival being the AMD Radeon RX 590 at 24744 (0.4% faster) and the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile at 24763 (0.5% faster). The pixel rate of 52.80 GPixel/s and texture rate of 105.6 GTexel/s indicate adequate fill rates for 1080p gaming, but the 64-bit memory bus limits effective bandwidth utilization.

The 6 RT cores provide entry-level ray tracing support, compatible with DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 APIs. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface provides sufficient bandwidth for the GPU's memory architecture. The 25 W TDP classifies this as an efficient mobile GPU, and the "IGP" slot width suggests it is designed for compact laptop implementations. The production status is end-of-life, which may affect long-term driver support.

For rendering workloads, the GPU's 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 throughput supports basic 3D modeling and visualization, but the 4 GB VRAM limits texture-heavy scenes. The FP16 performance of 6.758 TFLOPS (2:1) can accelerate certain AI inference tasks, though dedicated tensor cores are not specified. The GPU's performance relative to the RX 590 suggests it is suitable for 1080p gaming at medium settings and light creative workloads.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 60099, placing it at the 92nd percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX with an average score of 60104 (0% delta), the Intel Core i9-14900F at 60008 (0.2% delta), the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D at 59641 (0.8% delta), and the Intel Xeon Gold 6338T at 60572 (-0.8% delta). This cluster of scores within 0.8% indicates the 7945HX is performance-equivalent to several desktop and high-end mobile processors.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 24647, placing it at the 70th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 590 at 24744 (-0.4% delta), the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile at 24763 (-0.5% delta), the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT at 24442 (0.8% delta), and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 at 24277 (1.5% delta). The tight clustering within 1.5% indicates the Arc A350M performs comparably to a range of older desktop GPUs and professional mobile solutions.

The combined system percentile is 81, reflecting the substantial gap between CPU and GPU performance tiers. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 33459 is 17.2 times its single-core score of 1940, demonstrating excellent multi-thread scaling. The Passmark multithread score of 54548 versus single-thread of 4040 shows a 13.5x scaling factor across 32 threads. The 3DMark max-threads score of 13612 versus single-thread of 1058 reveals a 12.9x scaling, indicating some diminishing returns beyond 16 threads.

The GPU's Geekbench Vulkan score of 24747 is nearly identical to its OpenCL score of 24546, suggesting consistent performance across different compute APIs. The FP32 throughput of 3.379 TFLOPS is modest by modern standards, and the 112.0 GB/s memory bandwidth further constrains compute-heavy workloads. This combined picture shows a system that dominates in CPU-bound tasks but is firmly entry-level in GPU-bound scenarios.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX features 16 cores and 32 threads, based on the Zen 4 architecture with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and boost clock of 5.40 GHz.

Q: How does the GPU compare to desktop graphics cards?

A: The Intel Arc A350M's average benchmark score of 24647 places it 0.4% behind the AMD Radeon RX 590 and 1.5% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630, indicating entry-level desktop GPU performance.

Q: What memory does the system support?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth and ECC capability, while the GPU has 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus with 112.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Is this system suitable for ray tracing?

A: The GPU includes 6 ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), but the modest 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 throughput means ray-traced effects will significantly impact frame rates.

Q: What is the CPU's performance ranking?

A: The CPU ranks in the 92nd percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 60099, placing it within 0.8% of the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D.

Q: Does the CPU have an integrated GPU?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX includes the Radeon 610M integrated GPU, which can provide display output and basic graphics acceleration.

Q: What is the GPU's production status?

A: The Intel Arc A350M is marked as end-of-life, with a release date of March 2022, which may impact future driver optimization and support.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the AMD Socket FL1, which is specific to the Dragon Range mobile platform. The 7000 series processor supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC capability for workstation reliability. The PCIe Gen 5 interface provides 28 CPU lanes, enabling high-bandwidth connectivity for future peripherals and storage devices. The CPU's TDP of 55 W allows for a range of laptop cooling solutions, though the 16-core design demands robust thermal management.

The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 lanes, though the GPU's bandwidth requirements are modest given its 112.0 GB/s memory bandwidth. The GPU's 25 W TDP and "IGP" slot width indicate it is soldered or integrated into the motherboard, meaning GPU upgrades are not feasible in this laptop form factor. The system's combined percentile of 81 suggests that any meaningful upgrade path would require a new platform.

Since the GPU is end-of-life and the CPU uses a mobile-specific socket, the realistic upgrade path is limited to memory and storage. The dual-channel DDR5 support allows for memory capacity and speed upgrades, and the PCIe Gen 5 lanes support high-speed NVMe SSDs. The 55 W CPU TDP and 25 W GPU TDP indicate a combined thermal budget around 80 W, suggesting the laptop's cooling system can handle modest overclocking of the unlocked CPU multiplier.

For users seeking improved graphics performance, the only option is a new laptop with a higher-tier GPU. The CPU's performance ceiling is already near the top of the mobile market, so any upgrade would be driven by GPU needs rather than CPU limitations. The 4 GB VRAM on the Arc A350M is the primary bottleneck for modern gaming and creative workloads.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class system (buildClass: "laptop") that pairs a flagship 16-core CPU with an entry-level discrete GPU. The AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX represents the top of the mobile CPU performance spectrum, ranking in the 92nd percentile, while the Intel Arc A350M occupies the 70th percentile for GPUs. The combined system percentile of 81 reflects a configuration that excels in CPU-intensive tasks but is constrained by GPU performance.

The CPU's 16 cores, 32 threads, and 5.40 GHz boost clock deliver desktop-class computational power, with benchmark scores rivaling the Intel Core i9-14900F (0.2% delta) and AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX (0% delta). The GPU's 4 GB VRAM, 64-bit memory bus, and 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 throughput provide entry-level gaming and light creative capabilities, comparable to the AMD Radeon RX 590 (-0.4% delta) and NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile (-0.5% delta).

This pairing is unbalanced by design, prioritizing CPU compute power for productivity workloads while offering modest graphics capability. The 81st combined percentile indicates an overall above-average system, but users should understand that gaming performance will be limited by the GPU. The system is best suited for developers, researchers, and professionals who need maximum multi-threaded performance with occasional light gaming or graphics work. The 55 W CPU TDP and 25 W GPU TDP make this a power-efficient configuration for a high-performance laptop, though the end-of-life status of the GPU is a consideration for long-term ownership.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX + Intel Arc A350M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX

Intel Arc A350M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds