SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX + Intel Arc A770M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

90%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX

69,875 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A770M

18,383 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX paired with the Intel Arc A770M is a laptop-class combination that pairs an elite mobile processor with a mid-range mobile GPU, and the asymmetry between those two parts defines everything about this build. The CPU sits in the 94th percentile of all processors benchmarked, while the GPU lands at the 62nd percentile, producing a combined percentile of 78. No measured FPS data exists for this exact pairing in the database — all frame-rate discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than measured, and should be treated accordingly.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 9 7940HX is a mobile Dragon Range processor built on AMD's Socket FL1, which means this is a soldered, non-socketed platform in practical terms — the upgrade path within the same machine is essentially limited to memory and storage, not the CPU itself. The chip supports DDR5 on a dual-channel bus with 83.2 GB/s of memory bandwidth, and it exposes PCIe Gen 5 with 28 CPU lanes. That lane count is generous for a laptop platform and matters here: the Arc A770M connects over PCIe 4.0 x16, so it runs comfortably within the platform's capabilities, with lanes to spare for fast NVMe storage.

Power envelopes are modest for the performance on tap. The CPU is rated at 55 W TDP and the GPU at 120 W, so the combined system draws are modest by desktop standards but substantial for a notebook — cooling capacity, not the power supply, will be the practical limiter in a laptop chassis. There is no suggested PSU figure for this configuration, which is expected for a mobile build. The integrated Radeon 610M graphics provide a fallback if the discrete GPU is disabled, useful for battery-saving scenarios.

A sensible "next upgrade" is not another chip swap but a move to a newer-generation platform when the time comes. Because the CPU already sits in the 94th percentile, the upgrade pressure in this pairing comes entirely from the GPU side — the Arc A770M is a discontinued, end-of-life part, so the realistic path forward is a future laptop built around a stronger discrete GPU, keeping the CPU class as the baseline.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU numbers are excellent for a mobile part. In Cinebench R23 multi-core the 7940HX scores 29400, with a single-core score of 1807 — a strong showing that indicates the full 16-core, 32-thread complement scales well. The 3DMark CPU profile tells the same story from a different angle: 1027 single-thread, 2001 at 2 threads, 3844 at 4 threads, 7158 at 8 threads, 12501 at 16 threads, and 13447 at max threads. Note that the max-threads score is only modestly above the 16-thread score, which is typical behavior for a 32-thread SMT design where the final threads add diminishing returns.

PassMark results reinforce the multi-core strength: 53204 multithread against 3942 single-thread, plus 693741 in data compression, 41974 in encryption, 202883 in integer math, 121383 in floating point math, 81775 in string sorting, 2297 in physics, 273 in prime finding, and 51029 in extended instructions. The aggregate average benchmark score is 69875.

Context matters more than the raw number. The nearest rivals by average score are the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F at 69996 (the 7940HX is 0.2 percent behind), the Intel Core i7-14700KF at 70163 (0.4 percent behind), the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X at 69515 (0.5 percent ahead), and the Intel Core i7-14700K at 69355 (0.7 percent ahead). In other words, this mobile chip trades blows with desktop flagships within a margin of under one percent in every direction — remarkable for a 55 W part.

The GPU side is far more middling. The Arc A770M averages 18383 across its benchmark suite and sits at the 62nd percentile of all GPUs. Its rivals are the AMD Radeon RX 460 at 18373 (0.1 percent behind the A770M), the AMD FirePro D500 at 18533 (0.8 percent ahead), the AMD Radeon Pro 5700 at 18189 (1.1 percent behind), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile at 18159 (1.2 percent behind). Clustering within about one percent of an RTX 3060 Mobile is the most useful anchor here: this is a mainstream mobile tier, not an enthusiast one. Individual scores include 2278 in 3DMark Steel Nomad, 89494 Geekbench OpenCL, 74422 Geekbench Vulkan, 11774 PassMark G3D, 4778 PassMark GPU compute, 711 in G2D, and DirectX scores of 178 (DX9), 56 (DX10), 69 (DX11), and 70 (DX12).

The combined picture: a top-five-percent CPU dragging a mid-pack GPU. The 78th combined percentile overstates the gaming experience and understates the productivity experience.

FAQ

Q: Is the Ryzen 9 7940HX a desktop CPU in a laptop? A: No — it is a mobile segment processor, but its benchmark average of 69875 puts it within a fraction of a percent of desktop parts like the Ryzen 9 7950X and Core i7-14700K.

Q: How much better is the CPU than the GPU in this pairing? A: The CPU sits in the 94th percentile of all CPUs; the GPU sits in the 62nd percentile of all GPUs. The CPU is clearly the stronger half.

Q: Can this build play modern games at high settings? A: With no measured FPS data for this exact pairing, estimates must come from the benchmark scores. The A770M's position roughly alongside the RTX 3060 Mobile in average score suggests mainstream settings rather than ultra at high resolutions.

Q: How much memory bandwidth does each component have? A: The CPU's dual-channel DDR5 provides 83.2 GB/s; the GPU's 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus provides 512.0 GB/s — over six times the system memory bandwidth.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking? A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked. Note also the Arc A770M boosts to 2050 MHz from a 1650 MHz base.

Q: Is the Arc A770M still in production? A: No. Its production status is end-of-life, which matters for driver support expectations and long-term serviceability.

Q: What integrated graphics does the laptop fall back on? A: The Ryzen 9 7940HX includes a Radeon 610M iGPU, suitable for basic display output and low-power operation.

Gaming Performance

To be clear: there are no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU and GPU combination in the database, so every frame-rate statement in this section is an estimate derived from the benchmark scores, not a measurement.

Starting from the A770M's average score of 18383 and its rivals — essentially tied with an RTX 3060 Mobile and a Radeon RX 460 in aggregate terms — the expectation is 1080p gaming at high settings in most titles, with ultra presets viable in lighter or older engines and demanding AAA games requiring setting reductions. The 16 GB of VRAM is the standout asset: many GPUs in this performance tier ship with less, and modern games with large texture pools will fit comfortably, which reduces the stutter and texture-pop issues that plague smaller-VRAM cards at this level.

The DirectX API scores show an interesting pattern worth noting: DX9 scores 178 against 56 for DX10, 69 for DX11, and 70 for DX12 on the PassMark scale. Older DirectX 9 titles run disproportionately well on Alchemist hardware relative to its modern-API performance, so legacy and esports titles should overperform relative to the card's overall tier. The Vulkan score of 74422 versus 89494 for OpenCL in Geekbench also indicates solid modern-API compute throughput.

The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2278 places this firmly in mainstream mobile territory for a heavy modern rasterization load. Ray tracing is supported — 32 RT cores and DirectX 12 Ultimate with the 12_2 feature level — but RT at ultra settings is not the realistic play here; the raw rasterization scores suggest disabling or heavily reducing ray tracing in demanding titles.

Balance and Bottleneck

This is one of the most GPU-bottlenecked configurations the percentile data can describe. The CPU occupies the 94th percentile and the GPU the 62nd; a gap of that magnitude means the CPU will be waiting on the GPU in virtually every gaming scenario at every resolution. Evidence for this comes directly from the scaling of the CPU's own numbers: the 3DMark max-threads score of 13447 versus 8-thread score of 7158 shows the processor has headroom far beyond what any game engine will request, since most games load well under 16 threads.

For gaming, the bottleneck sits squarely on the A770M at 1080p and even more so as resolution climbs — the GPU's 512 GB/s of bandwidth and 16.79 TFLOPS of FP32 define the ceiling. The 7940HX's single-thread score of 1807 in Cinebench R23 and 1027 in 3DMark single-thread are strong enough that frame pacing and simulation-heavy scenes will not be CPU-limited.

Flip the workload and the picture inverts. In GPU compute tasks — rendering, encoding via OpenCL (89494 in Geekbench OpenCL), or any CUDA-style workload routed to the GPU — the A770M becomes the limiting factor, and the 94th-percentile CPU is left underused unless the software splits work across both devices. The practical takeaway: this configuration is compute-rich on the CPU side and merely adequate on the GPU side, so workloads should be steered toward the processor wherever the software allows.

Who Should Build It

For gamers, this pairing targets 1080p players above all. The GPU's position alongside the RTX 3060 Mobile in average score makes it a sensible match for high-refresh 1080p gaming, with 1440p possible at reduced settings in many titles. 4K ultra gaming is not what the numbers support. The unusually large 16 GB VRAM buffer also makes this attractive for anyone who plays texture-heavy open-world games where VRAM, not raw shader throughput, is the first wall hit.

Content creators get the better half of this build. A Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 29400 with 16 cores and 32 threads is workstation-grade throughput in a laptop, and the strong PassMark compression (693741) and encryption (41974) scores mean file-heavy workflows — archive management, backup pipelines, full-disk encryption — run quickly. Video editors will appreciate the CPU for timeline scrubbing and export, though GPU-accelerated effects will be constrained by the A770M's mid-tier compute score of 4778 in PassMark GPU compute.

Developers and students compiling code are excellent candidates: compilation scales with multi-thread performance, and the 94th-percentile CPU with 53204 PassMark multithread handles builds, containerized environments, and local test suites without complaint. The 512 GB/s of GPU bandwidth and 16 GB VRAM also make this a workable entry point for students experimenting with GPU compute or machine learning inference, where the large memory matters more than peak throughput.

Small business workstations benefit from the same math: data compression, encryption, and sorting scores are all strong, ECC is not supported, and the end-of-life status of the GPU should be weighed for long deployments. For a portable workstation whose heavy lifting is CPU-bound — spreadsheets, databases, software builds — this is a strong fit.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen 9 7940HX is a Zen 4 "Dragon Range" design on TSMC's 5 nm node, carrying 13140 million transistors across a 2x 71 mm² dual-die layout. Sixteen cores and 32 threads run from a 2.40 GHz base up to a 5.20 GHz boost, which is a wide operating range that explains both the strong single-core results and the efficiency at the 55 W TDP. The cache hierarchy is generous: 64 KB of L1 and 1 MB of L2 per core, backed by 64 MB of shared L3 — that large L3 is a major reason the multi-core scaling holds up as thread counts climb.

The benchmark scores map cleanly to real workloads. The 3DMark thread-scaling curve (1027 single, 3844 at four threads, 7158 at eight, 13447 at max) shows near-linear gains through the mid range before flattening — exactly the profile software compilers, renderers, and video encoders exploit. The Cinebench R23 gap between 1807 single-core and 29400 multi-core, a factor of over sixteen, confirms the chip rewards properly threaded software rather than depending on clock speed alone.

Perhaps the most telling datum is the rival set. Sitting within 0.7 percent of the Core i7-14700K and 0.5 percent ahead of the desktop Ryzen 9 7950X in average score means this mobile chip delivers full desktop-class throughput. The PassMark suite backs it up with an integer math score of 202883 and floating point of 121383 — numbers that translate directly into fast spreadsheet recalculation, simulation, and numerical work. The unlocked multiplier and PCIe Gen 5 with 28 lanes round out a spec sheet that reads like a desktop flagship's.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build: a 94th-percentile mobile CPU paired with a 62nd-percentile mobile GPU, combining for a 78th percentile overall. The classification matters. The 7940HX is a market-segment Mobile processor on Socket FL1, and the A770M is an integrated-mobile ("IGP" slot width) discrete GPU with portable-device-dependent display outputs — meaning this is a fixed configuration inside a notebook, not a components list a builder assembles.

The tier can be summarized precisely: workstation-grade processing power attached to mainstream gaming graphics. The combined 78th percentile is respectable on paper, but the spread between the two halves is the defining characteristic. Anyone evaluating this configuration should read the combined number as an average of an excellent CPU result and an ordinary GPU result — which is exactly what it is.

Production status is split: the CPU is active while the GPU is end-of-life. For a pre-built laptop this is less of an issue than for a desktop, but it does frame expectations for driver longevity on the graphics side.

GPU Analysis

The Arc A770M is Intel's Alchemist Xe-HPG design, the DG2-512 chip on TSMC's 6 nm process, with 21700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die at a density of 53.4 million transistors per square millimeter. The silicon is substantial: 4096 shading units, 256 texture mapping units, 128 render output units, and 32 ray tracing cores. Clocks run from a 1650 MHz base to a 2050 MHz boost, with memory at 16 Gbps effective.

The memory subsystem is the card's strongest asset — 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus delivering 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth. For a GPU at the 62nd percentile, that is an unusually large and fast framebuffer, and it is the main reason this part punches above its tier in texture-heavy scenarios and GPU-compute workloads that need capacity, such as large-model inference or heavy scene rendering.

Throughput figures: 16.79 TFLOPS FP32 and 33.59 TFLOPS FP16 at 2:1 rate, with a pixel rate of 262.4 GPixel/s and texture rate of 524.8 GTexel/s. For rendering work, the Geekbench OpenCL score of 89494 and Vulkan score of 74422 indicate solid API-level compute, while PassMark G3D at 11774 and Steel Nomad at 2278 place real-time 3D performance firmly in the mainstream mobile bracket — clustering within roughly one percent of the RTX 3060 Mobile and slightly ahead of the Radeon RX 460 and Radeon Pro 5700 in aggregate terms.

API support is modern and complete: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6, plus hardware ray tracing via the 32 RT cores. Tensor hardware is not listed for this part, so AI-accelerated workloads should be expected to run on general shader compute. The 120 W TDP is the practical ceiling for sustained performance in a laptop chassis. The verdict on the GPU: a bandwidth-rich, VRAM-rich mainstream part that handles 1080p gaming and moderate GPU rendering well, but is the clear limiting component in this otherwise elite pairing — and every frame-rate expectation stated above is an estimate from these benchmark scores, not a measured figure.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX + Intel Arc A770M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX

Intel Arc A770M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Upgrade Path and Platform

Benchmark Performance

FAQ

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

Build Overview

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds