SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX + Intel Arc A570M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

97 Score

Top 3% Ranking

97 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 3% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX

69,875 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A570M

58,239 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX is a 16-core, 32-thread mobile processor built on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Dragon Range. It is manufactured on TSMC's 5 nm process, with a die composed of two 71 mm² chiplets containing a total of 13,140 million transistors. The base clock is 2.40 GHz, and the boost clock reaches 5.20 GHz, all within a 55 W TDP. This is a high-core-count part designed for flagship laptops, and its benchmark results confirm that positioning. In the Cinebench R23 multi-core test, it scores 29,400 points, which is a dominant result for a mobile chip and indicates sustained heavy multi-threaded workloads are handled with ease. The single-core score of 1,807 in the same test is strong for a laptop CPU, reflecting the high 5.20 GHz boost capability.

The processor's cache hierarchy is substantial: 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a 64 MB L3 pool. This large L3 cache benefits gaming and data-heavy tasks by reducing memory latency. The passmark data compression score of 693,741 and data encryption score of 41,974 show that the CPU has significant throughput for archival and security workloads. Floating-point math scores hit 121,383, and integer math reaches 202,883, demonstrating the raw compute capacity for scientific and financial simulations. The multi-threaded passmark score of 53,204 places it in the 94th percentile of all CPUs, meaning it outperforms the vast majority of processors on the market. Its average benchmark score is 69,875, and the nearest rivals are desktop-class parts: the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F (average score 69,996, 0.2% higher), the Intel Core i7-14700KF (70,163, 0.4% higher), and the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X (69,515, 0.5% lower). The Ryzen 9 7940HX sits within 0.7% of these top-tier desktop chips, which is remarkable for a laptop part.

In terms of specific workload scaling, the 3DMark thread tests show the CPU scaling efficiently from 2 threads (score 2,001) to 16 threads (score 12,501) and max threads (score 13,447). The single-thread score of 1,027 is adequate for daily responsiveness, but the real strength is in multi-threading. Passmark physics score of 2,297 and extended instructions score of 51,029 indicate strong SIMD and physics simulation performance, useful for engineering software and modern game engines. The processor supports DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus, providing 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth, which is enough to feed the 16 cores without bottlenecking. It also has an integrated Radeon 610M GPU, which is useful for display output and basic tasks, though the system relies on a discrete GPU for heavy graphics. The CPU is based on the AMD Socket FL1, a mobile platform, and has an unlocked multiplier, though overclocking on laptops is typically limited by thermal headroom.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX uses the AMD Socket FL1, which is a mobile-specific socket. This means the upgrade path is constrained to devices that support this socket, which is typical for high-end gaming and creator laptops. The platform supports PCIe Gen 5 with 28 lanes from the CPU, allowing for fast NVMe storage and future-proofing for high-bandwidth peripherals. Memory support is limited to DDR5, dual-channel, with a maximum bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s; ECC memory is not supported. This is a 55 W TDP processor, which is relatively low for a 16-core part thanks to the efficient 5 nm process, but the surrounding laptop cooling solution must still handle up to 5.20 GHz boost clocks. The included iGPU (Radeon 610M) provides a fallback for display output if the discrete GPU fails or for power-saving light tasks.

For the GPU side, the Intel Arc A570M has a 75 W TDP, and the suggested PSU field is null, but in a laptop context, the power delivery is handled by the system's AC adapter and battery. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface, which is sufficient for its bandwidth needs. Given the CPU's high core count and the GPU's mid-range positioning, a sensible next upgrade for this platform would be a more powerful discrete GPU, assuming the laptop chassis and cooling can accommodate it. However, since the socket is mobile, the CPU itself is generally not upgradeable. The realistic upgrade path is to move to a newer laptop platform entirely. The platform's strength lies in its current configuration: the 16-core CPU provides long-term relevance for multi-threaded tasks, while the Arc A570M handles current games at moderate settings. Users looking for more graphical headroom would need to consider a new system with a higher-tier GPU, as the CPU's performance is unlikely to be the limiting factor in most applications.

FAQ

Q: How many cores and threads does the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX have?

A: It has 16 cores and 32 threads, based on the Zen 4 architecture.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of this CPU and GPU combination?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. The GPU has its own dedicated memory bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s from its 8 GB GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus.

Q: Where does the CPU rank compared to other processors?

A: The CPU is in the 94th percentile of all CPUs. Its average benchmark score is 69,875, which is 0.2% lower than the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F and 0.4% lower than the Intel Core i7-14700KF, but 0.5% higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking and how does it compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Arc A570M is in the 88th percentile of all GPUs. Its average benchmark score is 58,239, which is 0.3% lower than the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT and 0.5% lower than the NVIDIA P102-100, but 0.3% higher than the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM.

Q: Does this CPU support overclocking?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked, but actual overclocking capability on a laptop is typically limited by thermal and power delivery constraints.

Q: What is the process node and transistor count for the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU uses a 5 nm process from TSMC with 13,140 million transistors. The GPU uses a 6 nm process from TSMC with 11,500 million transistors.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 91, indicating that this configuration outperforms 91% of all tested CPU and GPU combinations.

Gaming Performance

There are no measured FPS rows in the data for this exact CPU and GPU combination. All FPS figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and percentile positions, not from direct gameplay testing. The data is clearly marked as not measured. Based on the CPU's 94th percentile ranking and the GPU's 88th percentile ranking, this system should deliver strong gaming performance at 1080p and 1440p resolutions, with some limitations at 4K due to the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus.

The Intel Arc A570M has a base clock of 900 MHz and a boost clock of 1300 MHz, with a pixel rate of 83.20 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 166.4 GTexel/s. Its FP32 compute is 5.325 TFLOPS, which is solid for a mid-range mobile GPU. In practical terms, this should handle most modern titles at 1080p with high settings, achieving smooth frame rates in the 60-90 FPS range for esports titles like Fortnite or Valorant, though these are estimated figures. For more demanding AAA games like Cyberpunk 2077 or Starfield, the GPU would likely need to drop to medium settings to maintain 60 FPS at 1080p. At 1440p, the GPU will start to strain, and users should expect to use upscaling technologies like XeSS (if supported) or lower settings to maintain playable frame rates. The 8 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p and 1440p textures, but 4K gaming is not recommended as the memory bus bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s could become a bottleneck for high-resolution textures.

The CPU's performance is more than sufficient for gaming, with its high single-thread score of 1,807 in Cinebench R23 ensuring that game engines with heavy single-threaded physics or logic will not be CPU-bound. The 16-core configuration also ensures that background tasks, streaming, or recording software will not interfere with game performance. For gamers targeting high refresh rates at 1080p, the GPU will be the limiting factor, as the CPU is capable of driving over 200 FPS in many titles, but the GPU will cap out lower. Overall, this pairing is best suited for 1080p high-refresh-rate gaming or 1440p at medium settings, where the CPU headroom ensures stable frame times.

Who Should Build It

This CPU and GPU combination targets mobile users who need a powerful all-rounder: a laptop that can handle demanding multi-threaded workloads and still play games competently. The CPU's 16 cores and 94th percentile ranking make it ideal for content creators who render video, compile code, or run 3D modeling software. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 29,400 is comparable to desktop workstations, so a video editor using Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve will see significant speedups in export times and timeline scrubbing. Software developers compiling large codebases will benefit from the 32 threads, and the passmark integer math score of 202,883 indicates strong performance in build servers or local testing environments. Students in engineering or data science fields running MATLAB, Python simulations, or CAD software will find the CPU more than capable.

The GPU's 88th percentile ranking means it can handle GPU-accelerated tasks like Blender rendering, though it is not a top-tier compute part. The 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for most creative applications, but professionals working with very large 3D scenes or high-resolution textures may find the memory capacity limiting. For small business workstations, this system offers a balance of CPU power for productivity software (Excel, databases) and GPU acceleration for AI inference or light video editing. The 94th percentile CPU ensures that the system will remain responsive for years, making it a good investment for power users who plan to keep the laptop for 3-5 years. However, hardcore gamers who prioritize maximum frame rates at 1440p or 4K should look for a system with a higher-tier GPU, as the Arc A570M is the weaker link in this pairing.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A570M is based on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the Alchemist generation, using the DG2-256 chip. It is manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process with 11,500 million transistors on a 269 mm² die. The GPU has 2,048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units, along with 16 dedicated ray tracing cores. The base clock is 900 MHz with a boost clock of 1300 MHz. Memory consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 1750 MHz, running at 14 Gbps effective. The GPU's pixel rate is 83.20 GPixel/s, and its texture rate is 166.4 GTexel/s. Compute performance is rated at 5.325 TFLOPS for FP32 and 10.65 TFLOPS for FP16 (2:1 ratio).

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it fully compatible with modern game APIs and future titles. It has 16 RT cores, which provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though the performance level is modest compared to higher-end parts. The GPU's average benchmark score is 58,239, placing it in the 88th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (average score 58,392, 0.3% higher), the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM (58,085, 0.3% lower), and the NVIDIA P102-100 (58,528, 0.5% higher). This places the Arc A570M in a competitive position with desktop GPUs from a few generations back, which is impressive for a mobile part. The 8 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p gaming with high textures, but the 128-bit bus limits bandwidth for heavy 4K workloads. The GPU's 75 W TDP is reasonable for a laptop, and the lack of a suggested PSU is expected for a mobile part where power is supplied by the system's adapter.

For rendering workloads, the Arc A570M's FP32 compute of 5.325 TFLOPS is suitable for entry-level 3D rendering in Blender or Maya, though render times will be longer than with a desktop high-end GPU. The 16 RT cores enable hardware ray tracing in supported games, but users should expect to use DLSS-style upscaling (Intel's XeSS) to maintain playable frame rates with ray tracing enabled. The GPU's bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p textures, but may cause stuttering in games with very large open worlds that require high memory throughput. Overall, the Arc A570M is a balanced mid-range mobile GPU that trades top-end performance for power efficiency and a compact form factor, fitting well in a laptop chassis.

Benchmark Performance

The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX delivers strong benchmark results across the board. Its average benchmark score is 69,875, placing it in the 94th percentile of all CPUs. The multi-threaded performance is exceptional: the Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 29,400, and the passmark multi-thread score is 53,204. The single-thread performance is also solid, with a Cinebench R23 score of 1,807 and a passmark single-thread score of 3,942. In the 3DMark thread tests, the CPU scales well: 2 threads score 2,001, 4 threads score 3,844, 8 threads score 7,158, 16 threads score 12,501, and max threads score 13,447. The passmark integer math score is 202,883, floating-point math is 121,383, and extended instructions score 51,029. Data compression scores are 693,741, and encryption scores hit 41,974.

The Intel Arc A570M has an average benchmark score of 58,239, placing it in the 88th percentile of all GPUs. Its only listed benchmark is Geekbench OpenCL with a score of 58,239. This places it close to the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (58,392, 0.3% higher) and the NVIDIA P102-100 (58,528, 0.5% higher), but above the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM (58,085, 0.3% lower). The combined percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing is 91, meaning that this laptop outperforms 91% of all tested systems in the database. The CPU is clearly the stronger component, with a 94th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 88th percentile. The CPU's performance is comparable to desktop parts like the Intel Core i7-14700K (average score 69,355, 0.7% lower) and the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X (69,515, 0.5% lower), while the GPU is closer to mid-range desktop parts from the previous generation. The combined picture is a system that excels in CPU-bound tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and code compilation, while providing respectable but not top-tier GPU performance for gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads.

Build Overview

This build pairs the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX with the Intel Arc A570M in a laptop form factor. The CPU is a flagship mobile processor with 16 cores, 32 threads, and a 5.20 GHz boost clock, while the GPU is a mid-range mobile part with 8 GB of VRAM and 2,048 shading units. The combined percentile is 91, indicating that this configuration sits in the top 10% of all tested systems. The CPU's 94th percentile ranking places it among the best processors available, regardless of form factor, while the GPU's 88th percentile ranking is strong but not exceptional. This is a well-balanced laptop for power users who need CPU-intensive performance, such as software development, video editing, and 3D rendering, but who also want to play games at 1080p or 1440p with good settings.

The system's class is mobile, meaning it is designed for portability, but the Dragon Range processor is typically found in larger, heavier laptops with robust cooling solutions. The CPU's 55 W TDP and the GPU's 75 W TDP combine for a total of 130 W, which is manageable for a high-performance laptop but will require a substantial AC adapter. The overall tier is high-end mobile, with the CPU being the standout component. This is not a budget build; it is a premium configuration that prioritizes multi-threaded compute power over pure gaming frame rates. For users who need a portable workstation that can also game on the side, this is a compelling option. However, for users who prioritize gaming over productivity, a laptop with a lower-tier CPU and a higher-tier GPU would offer better frame rates for the same price.

Balance and Bottleneck

In this CPU and GPU pairing, the GPU is the primary bottleneck for gaming workloads, while the CPU is the star performer for multi-threaded tasks. The CPU's 94th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 88th percentile ranking indicates that the CPU has significant headroom over the GPU in most applications. In gaming, the CPU is unlikely to be the limiting factor, as its single-thread score of 1,807 in Cinebench R23 is more than enough to drive high frame rates. Instead, the GPU's 5.325 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 224.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth will cap performance. At 1080p, the GPU will be the bottleneck in most modern titles, with the CPU idle and waiting for frames. At lower resolutions like 720p, the CPU would be even less utilized, but that is not a practical scenario for this class of laptop.

For productivity workloads, the CPU is the clear driver. In multi-threaded tasks like video rendering, the 16-core CPU will be fully utilized, while the GPU may only assist in specific effects or encoding tasks. The GPU's 88th percentile ranking is still respectable, and it will not bottleneck the CPU in most non-gaming applications. The 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth of the CPU is matched by the GPU's 224.0 GB/s, ensuring that neither component starves the other for data. In mixed workloads like live streaming while gaming, the CPU's 32 threads can handle the encoding overhead without impacting game performance, while the GPU focuses on rendering frames. The result is a system where the CPU is over-provisioned for gaming, providing a comfortable margin for background tasks, but the GPU is the limiting factor for frame rates. Users who want to maximize gaming performance would need a more powerful GPU, but this would likely increase the laptop's size, weight, and cost. As it stands, the balance favors CPU-heavy workloads, making this a productivity-first laptop with gaming as a secondary capability.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX + Intel Arc A570M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX

Intel Arc A570M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

Balance and Bottleneck

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds