SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX + Intel Arc A350M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX

69,875 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350M

24,647 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX paired with the Intel Arc A350M is a study in extremes—a top-tier 16-core mobile processor designed for demanding workstation tasks, paired with a modest entry-level graphics solution aimed at mainstream 1080p gaming. This combination creates a laptop with a clear identity: raw multi-threaded CPU power for productivity, alongside sufficient GPU muscle for lighter gaming and accelerated content creation. The data shows a system that will handle heavy compilation, rendering, and multitasking with ease, while the gaming experience will be defined by the GPU's limitations rather than the CPU's capabilities.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The Intel Arc A350M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the DG2-128 chip manufactured on a 6 nm process by TSMC. It features 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 24 raster operation pipelines. The GPU is equipped with 6 dedicated ray tracing cores, though the architecture does not list dedicated tensor cores. The clock speeds are set at a base of 1150 MHz with a boost of 2200 MHz. Memory configuration consists of 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s, with an effective memory clock of 14 Gbps. The GPU also supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The memory subsystem is the most constraining factor. With only 4 GB of VRAM and a 64-bit memory bus, the A350M is suited for 1080p gaming at medium to high settings in less demanding titles, but it will struggle with high-resolution textures or modern AAA games that exceed the VRAM capacity. The 112.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for the GPU's compute throughput, but it limits performance in memory-intensive workloads like 3D rendering or high-resolution video processing.

Benchmark scores for the GPU are limited to two tests: Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan, scoring 24546 and 24747 respectively. The average benchmark score for the GPU is 24647, which places it in the 70th percentile of all GPUs. This is a surprisingly strong showing for an entry-level part, placing it in the company of desktop GPUs like the AMD Radeon RX 590 (deltaPct -0.4) and NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile (deltaPct -0.5). It is also within 0.8% of the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT, a significantly larger desktop card. For rendering tasks, the FP32 performance of 3.379 TFLOPS and FP16 of 6.758 TFLOPS (2:1) suggest adequate performance for light 3D work or GPU-accelerated effects in video editing, but the 4 GB VRAM will cap the complexity of scenes and the size of textures that can be handled efficiently.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The combined build percentile is 82, indicating that this configuration outperforms the majority of tested systems. The CPU dominates the performance profile. In 3DMark CPU tests, the Ryzen 9 7940HX scores 12501 in 16-thread, 2001 in 2-thread, 3844 in 4-thread, 7158 in 8-thread, 13447 in max-thread, and 1027 in single-thread. The Cinebench R23 results are 29400 for multicore and 1807 for singlecore. PassMark scores include a multithread score of 53204 and a single-thread score of 3942. The average benchmark score for the CPU is 69875, placing it in the 94th percentile of all CPUs.

The CPU’s nearest rivals, based on average score, are the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F (avgScore 69996, deltaPct -0.2), the Intel Core i7-14700KF (avgScore 70163, deltaPct -0.4), the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X (avgScore 69515, deltaPct 0.5), and the Intel Core i7-14700K (avgScore 69355, deltaPct 0.7). This places the 7940HX in a virtual tie with these desktop-class processors, with performance deltas under 1% in either direction. This is remarkable for a mobile chip, as it indicates the 7940HX can match the multi-threaded output of some of the best desktop CPUs available.

The GPU, in contrast, is a more modest performer. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 24546 and Vulkan score of 24747 put it in the 70th percentile. The combined picture is a system that can chew through CPU-bound workloads at a desktop-class level, while GPU-bound tasks like gaming will see frame rates dictated by the A350M's 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 performance. The average benchmark score of 69875 for the CPU dwarfs the GPU's 24647, confirming that the processor is the star of this show and the GPU is the limiting factor for graphics-intensive applications.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX is a 16-core, 32-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Dragon Range. It belongs to the Ryzen 9 series within the 7000 series family. The base clock is 2.40 GHz with a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, and it operates within a 55 W TDP. The CPU is built on a 5 nm process by TSMC, with a total of 13,140 million transistors across a die size of 2x 71 mm². The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 and 1 MB of L2 per core, plus a large 64 MB L3 cache.

The benchmark scores paint a clear picture of a multi-threaded powerhouse. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 29400 is exceptional for a mobile chip, matching the scores of desktop parts like the Intel Core i7-14700KF (deltaPct -0.4). The 3DMark max-thread score of 13447 and the PassMark multithread score of 53204 reinforce this, showing that the CPU scales exceptionally well with thread count. The data compression score of 693741 and integer math score of 202883 in PassMark indicate strong performance in data-heavy tasks like file archiving and code compilation. The floating-point math score of 121383 suggests capable performance in scientific computing and financial modeling.

Single-thread performance is also solid. The Cinebench R23 singlecore score of 1807 and the PassMark single-thread score of 3942 are competitive, though the 3dmark_single_thread score of 1027 is relatively lower. The 2-thread score of 2001 in 3DMark indicates the CPU can handle lightly-threaded tasks like web browsing or office applications without issue. The "find prime numbers" score of 273 is low, but this is a specific test that does not represent typical workloads. For real-world use, the 7940HX excels in multi-threaded rendering, video encoding, and software development builds, where its 32 threads can be fully utilized. The 64 MB L3 cache is also beneficial for gaming and data-heavy applications, reducing latency and improving hit rates.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The balance between the CPU and GPU is heavily skewed. The CPU's 94th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 70th percentile creates a scenario where the GPU is almost always the bottleneck in graphics-intensive workloads. In gaming, the A350M's 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 4 GB VRAM will cap frame rates, regardless of the CPU's headroom. For instance, in a game where the CPU could theoretically push 200 FPS, the GPU might only manage 60 FPS at 1080p ultra settings. The CPU will be underutilized, waiting on the GPU to finish rendering each frame.

Conversely, in CPU-bound workloads such as video encoding, 3D scene simulation, or software compilation, the GPU is idle or lightly loaded. Here, the 7940HX's 32 threads and high boost clock will dominate, and the A350M will not be a limiting factor. The PassMark multithread score of 53204 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 29400 demonstrate that this CPU can sustain massive multi-threaded loads without breaking a sweat, making the GPU irrelevant for those tasks.

The bottleneck is situational but clear. For gaming, the GPU is the constraint, and the CPU's power is wasted. For productivity, the GPU is sufficient for basic acceleration (e.g., OpenCL score of 24546), but the CPU is the primary driver of performance. The FPS scaling evidence is absent due to no measured data, but the score differential—69875 for the CPU versus 24647 for the GPU—strongly suggests that the system will feel CPU-bound in everyday use and GPU-bound in any 3D application. Users should be aware that upgrading the GPU is impossible in a laptop, so the balance is fixed.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

The data set contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination of the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX and Intel Arc A350M. Therefore, all frame rate figures discussed here are estimates based on the GPU's benchmark scores and are not measured results. The Intel Arc A350M, with its 4 GB GDDR6 memory and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth, is positioned for 1080p gaming. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 24747, which places it in the 70th percentile and near the AMD Radeon RX 590 (deltaPct -0.4), suggests it can handle esports titles like League of Legends or CS:GO at high refresh rates on a 1080p monitor.

For more demanding AAA titles, the GPU will likely require medium settings to achieve playable frame rates. The 4 GB VRAM will be a significant limitation for games with high-resolution texture packs, potentially causing stuttering or texture pop-in. The 6 ray tracing cores are present, but the limited FP32 throughput of 3.379 TFLOPS means ray tracing effects will be a heavy burden, likely tanking frame rates. The pixel rate of 52.80 GPixel/s and texture rate of 105.6 GTexel/s are modest, further indicating that 1080p is the target resolution, with 1440p being playable only in less demanding or older titles. Based on the scores, users should expect 30-60 FPS at 1080p on medium-to-high settings in most modern games, with lower frame rates in VRAM-heavy or ray-traced scenarios. The CPU will never be the limiting factor in these cases; the GPU is the definitive performance ceiling.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

High-refresh gaming: This scenario is limited by the GPU. The Arc A350M's 70th percentile ranking and 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 performance can drive esports titles at high frame rates on a 1080p display, but it will not consistently deliver 144+ FPS in modern AAA games. The CPU's 94th percentile ranking ensures no bottleneck, but the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will cap performance.

Streaming: The Ryzen 9 7940HX is a streaming beast. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 29400 provides ample headroom for encoding video with x264 or x265 while gaming. The 32 threads handle encoding and game logic simultaneously without significant frame drops, making this an excellent choice for a single-PC streaming setup, with the GPU handling the game rendering.

Video editing: The combination of a strong CPU and a capable GPU makes this a good laptop for video editing. The PassMark multithread score of 53204 accelerates export times and timeline scrubbing in software like Premiere Pro, while the GPU's OpenCL score of 24546 can accelerate effects and color grading. The 4 GB VRAM is a limitation for heavy motion graphics or 4K timelines, but the CPU will power through most editing tasks.

3D rendering: This is a CPU-dominated task, and the 7940HX excels. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 29400 puts it on par with desktop processors like the Intel Core i7-14700K (deltaPct 0.7), meaning it can render complex scenes in Blender or Maya with relative speed. The GPU's 6.758 TFLOPS FP16 performance can assist with viewport rendering, but its 4 GB VRAM limits the complexity of scenes that can be worked on interactively.

Software development: The CPU is a compiler's dream. The PassMark integer math score of 202883 and data compression score of 693741 indicate fast build times and efficient handling of large codebases. The 32 threads allow for parallel compilation of multiple modules, and the 64 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency. The GPU is adequate for running multiple IDE instances and web servers simultaneously.

Student and office work: This configuration is overkill for basic productivity. The single-thread score of 3942 in PassMark handles word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing with ease. The 55 W TDP and mobile design make it portable, though the powerful CPU may drain battery faster under load. For any office task, the system will be vastly more responsive than needed, but the GPU is fine for accelerated web rendering and light photo editing.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

This build targets users who prioritize CPU performance above all else. Content creators and video editors who work with 1080p or light 4K footage will benefit from the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 29400, which speeds up rendering and export times. Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the PassMark multithread score of 53204, which reduces build times significantly. The 94th percentile CPU ranking makes this a viable desktop replacement for professionals who need workstation-class processing power in a laptop form factor.

Gamers at 1080p who play esports or older titles will find the GPU adequate, given its 70th percentile ranking and similarity to the AMD Radeon RX 590 (deltaPct -0.4). However, those seeking high-refresh 1440p or 4K gaming should look elsewhere, as the A350M's 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will be insufficient. Students in engineering or data science fields will benefit from the CPU's data encryption score of 41974 and extended instructions score of 51029, which are relevant for simulation and cryptography coursework. Small business workstations requiring heavy multitasking, such as running virtual machines or processing large spreadsheets, will find the 32 threads and 64 MB L3 cache more than capable.

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Q: What is the CPU's average benchmark score and percentile ranking?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX has an average benchmark score of 69875, placing it in the 94th percentile of all CPUs.

Q: How does the Intel Arc A350M compare to the AMD Radeon RX 590?

A: The Arc A350M has an average benchmark score of 24647, which is 0.4% lower than the AMD Radeon RX 590's average score of 24744.

Q: What is the memory configuration of the Intel Arc A350M?

A: The GPU features 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s and an effective memory clock of 14 Gbps.

Q: What is the boost clock of the Ryzen 9 7940HX?

A: The boost clock is 5.20 GHz, with a base clock of 2.40 GHz.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, the Ryzen 9 7940HX does not support ECC memory, and it supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s.

Q: What is the process node for the Intel Arc A350M?

A: The Intel Arc A350M uses a 6 nm process node, manufactured by TSMC.

Q: What is the combined percentile ranking for this build?

A: The combined percentile for this CPU and GPU pair is 82.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX is a mobile processor on the AMD Socket FL1 platform, meaning it is soldered to the motherboard and not upgradeable. The system supports DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, with a maximum bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 28 lanes, which is ample for the latest NVMe SSDs and future expansion cards. The Intel Arc A350M is also integrated into the laptop chassis (slot width is listed as "IGP"), so the GPU is not upgradeable either.

The TDP for the CPU is 55 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 25 W. There is no suggested PSU rating provided, but given the low total power draw, the system will not require a high-wattage power supply or advanced cooling solutions. The primary upgrade path for a user would be to increase the amount of DDR5 RAM, as the CPU's memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s is the only readily accessible component. Upgrading storage to a PCIe Gen 5 NVMe drive would also be possible, given the CPU's lane support. For users needing more GPU performance, there is no upgrade path within this laptop; a new system with a more powerful GPU would be the only option. The platform is otherwise future-proof on the CPU side, but the GPU's end-of-life production status and 4 GB VRAM mean the system is best suited for its intended CPU-heavy workloads rather than future gaming demands.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX + Intel Arc A350M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX

Intel Arc A350M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds