SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS + Intel Arc A370M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

89%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

31,593 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A370M

29,175 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS is a mobile processor built on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Phoenix, manufactured on TSMC’s 4 nm process. It contains 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 4.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The chip draws a 35 W TDP and fits the AMD Socket FP8. Its cache hierarchy includes 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 16 MB shared L3. Memory support is DDR5 over a dual-channel bus, delivering 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth, with ECC capability. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes and integrates Radeon 780M graphics. The paired GPU is an Intel Arc A370M, based on the Xe-HPG architecture (Alchemist generation), built on TSMC’s 6 nm process with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. It has 4 GB GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, yielding 112.0 GB/s bandwidth, with base and boost clocks of 1550 MHz and 2050 MHz, memory clock of 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective), 1024 shading units, 64 TMUs, 32 ROPs, and 8 ray tracing cores. The GPU’s FP32 throughput is 4.198 TFLOPS, FP16 is 8.397 TFLOPS (2:1), pixel rate is 65.60 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 131.2 GTexel/s. This is a laptop-class build, with a combined percentile of 78 across both components.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS presents a strong mobile computing profile, with its 8-core, 16-thread configuration and Zen 4 architecture delivering high single-thread and multi-thread performance. Benchmark results place the CPU in the 82nd percentile against all CPUs, indicating it outperforms a substantial majority of processors in the database. The average benchmark score of 31593 is nearly identical to its nearest rivals: the Intel Core i5-13500 scores 31510 (0.3% higher), the Intel Core Ultra 5 225H scores 31508 (0.3% higher), the AMD Ryzen 9 5980HX scores 31495 (0.3% higher), and the Intel Core 7 240H scores 31483 (0.3% higher). This tight clustering suggests the 7940HS is at parity with these desktop and mobile competitors, with performance deltas of only 0.3% in either direction.

Looking at multi-threaded workloads, the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 16713 indicates strong sustained performance across all 16 threads, which translates to efficient handling of video encoding, 3D rendering, and compilation tasks. The Geekbench multicore score of 12724 further confirms this, while the 3DMark max threads score of 7558 and 16-thread score of 7553 show consistent scaling. The 8-thread score of 6205 and 4-thread score of 3725 illustrate that performance scales well with thread count, though with diminishing returns beyond 8 threads. For single-threaded tasks, the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1790 and Geekbench single-core score of 2144 reflect the 5.20 GHz boost clock’s capability, making the CPU responsive for everyday applications and lightly threaded games.

The PassMark suite provides additional granularity on workload characteristics. Integer math scores 103044, floating-point math scores 62897, and extended instructions score 27480, showing robust ALU and FPU performance for scientific and financial computations. Data encryption scores 21777, data compression scores 365352, and random string sorting scores 42386, indicating strong throughput for data-heavy tasks like database operations or file archiving. The find prime numbers score of 92 is notably low, which may reflect a specific algorithm inefficiency in the Zen 4 architecture. The multithread score of 30098 and single-thread score of 3878 align with the CPU’s overall ranking, while physics score of 1450 suggests moderate performance in physics simulation workloads. In real-world terms, this CPU can handle demanding multi-tasking scenarios, such as running virtual machines, compiling large codebases, or processing high-resolution media, without significant bottlenecks. The 35 W TDP indicates efficient power consumption, which is critical for laptop thermals and battery life, though sustained heavy loads may push power draw higher.

FAQ

Q: What is the core and thread count of the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS?

A: The CPU has 8 cores and 16 threads, enabling simultaneous multi-threading for parallel workloads.

Q: How does the Ryzen 9 7940HS compare to its closest rival, the Intel Core i5-13500?

A: The Ryzen 9 7940HS has an average benchmark score of 31593, which is 0.3% higher than the Intel Core i5-13500’s score of 31510, indicating near-identical overall performance.

Q: What memory type and bandwidth does this CPU support?

A: It supports DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, with ECC support available.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Intel Arc A370M has 8 ray tracing cores, and it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing in compatible games.

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile ranking among all GPUs?

A: The Intel Arc A370M ranks in the 74th percentile against all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 29175.

Q: What is the CPU’s cache configuration?

A: The cache includes 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 16 MB shared L3, totaling 16 MB of L3 cache.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: No, the multiplier is locked (multiplierUnlocked is false), so overclocking is not supported.

Benchmark Performance

The combined CPU and GPU performance places this laptop build in the 78th percentile, indicating it outperforms the majority of systems in the database. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 31593, ranking it in the 82nd percentile against all CPUs. This score is nearly identical to its nearest rivals, with deltas of only 0.3%: the Intel Core i5-13500 (31510), Intel Core Ultra 5 225H (31508), AMD Ryzen 9 5980HX (31495), and Intel Core 7 240H (31483). This indicates the 7940HS is competitively positioned but not ahead of these alternatives, offering essentially identical performance to a desktop-class i5.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 29175, placing it in the 74th percentile against all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH (29197, 0.1% higher), AMD FirePro W8000 (29211, 0.1% higher), AMD Radeon RX 470 (28996, 0.6% lower), and AMD Radeon RX 6800M (28874, 1% lower). The GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score is 29676, and its Vulkan score is 28673, showing consistent performance across compute APIs. Notably, the Radeon RX 6800M, typically a high-end mobile GPU, scores 1% lower, which suggests the Arc A370M is more capable than expected for its class. The combined picture is a system where the CPU is slightly above average and the GPU is moderately above average, with the CPU being the stronger component in raw benchmark terms.

Since no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination (the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows), all frame rate discussions are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The CPU’s high single-thread performance (e.g., Cinebench R23 single-core 1790) supports strong gaming frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios, while the GPU’s 74th percentile ranking indicates it can handle modern titles at moderate settings, though not at the highest tiers.

Who Should Build It

This laptop build targets users who need balanced performance for both productivity and light-to-moderate gaming. The CPU’s 82nd percentile ranking and multi-core scores (Cinebench R23 multicore 16713) make it suitable for content creators who edit video or render 3D scenes, as these workloads benefit from the 8 cores and 16 threads. Software developers compiling large projects will appreciate the PassMark integer math score of 103044 and multithread score of 30098, which indicate strong compilation throughput. Students and office workers handling spreadsheets, document processing, and web browsing will find the single-thread performance (Geekbench single-core 2144) more than adequate for everyday tasks.

Gamers at 1080p resolution can expect playable frame rates in most titles, given the GPU’s 74th percentile ranking, though high-refresh-rate gaming (144 Hz or higher) will require lowering settings from ultra. The GPU’s 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for esports and older games, but newer AAA titles may exceed this capacity at high textures. Small business workstations that run virtual machines or database applications will benefit from the CPU’s data encryption (21777) and compression (365352) scores, which indicate efficient data handling. The 35 W TDP of both CPU and GPU suggests this is a thin-and-light laptop that prioritizes portability over raw performance, making it ideal for professionals who travel frequently.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: At 1080p with medium settings, the Arc A370M’s 74th percentile ranking suggests it can push frame rates above 60 FPS in many titles, but the 4 GB VRAM may limit texture quality. The CPU’s single-thread score of 1790 (Cinebench R23) ensures minimal bottleneck in CPU-intensive games.

Streaming: The CPU’s 16 threads handle encoding workloads effectively, with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 16713 supporting simultaneous gameplay and streaming. The GPU’s 8 ray tracing cores and DirectX 12 Ultimate support enable hardware-accelerated encoding via supported APIs.

Video Editing: The multicore performance (Geekbench multicore 12724) accelerates timeline rendering and export, while the GPU’s OpenCL score of 29676 assists with effects and color grading. The 16 MB L3 cache reduces latency for frequently accessed data.

3D Rendering: Cinebench R15 multicore score of 2656 and R23 score of 16713 indicate the CPU can handle complex scenes, though the GPU’s 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is modest for GPU rendering, making CPU-based rendering more practical.

Software Development: PassMark integer math (103044) and extended instructions (27480) scores indicate fast compilation of code, while the 35 W TDP keeps thermals manageable during long build sessions. The ECC memory support adds reliability for critical workloads.

Student and Office Work: Single-thread performance (PassMark single-thread 3878) ensures snappy responsiveness in word processors and browsers. The integrated Radeon 780M provides a backup for lightweight graphics tasks, and the dual-channel DDR5 memory (89.6 GB/s) handles multitasking efficiently.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this CPU+GPU combination, so all frame rate figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not direct measurements. The CPU’s 82nd percentile ranking and high single-thread performance (Geekbench single-core 2144) indicate it will not bottleneck the GPU in most gaming scenarios. The GPU’s 74th percentile ranking, based on an average score of 29175, suggests it performs similarly to the AMD Radeon RX 470 (which scores 28996, 0.6% lower) and slightly better than the Radeon RX 6800M (which scores 28874, 1% lower). This positions the Arc A370M as a mid-range mobile GPU.

At 1080p with ultra settings, expect frame rates in the 40-60 FPS range for AAA titles, based on the GPU’s performance tier. Esports titles like Counter-Strike or Valorant may achieve higher frame rates, possibly exceeding 100 FPS, due to lower graphical demands. At 1440p, ultra settings are likely too demanding, with estimated frame rates dropping below 30 FPS for most modern games. The 4 GB VRAM is a constraint; textures at ultra settings in recent titles can exceed this capacity, causing stuttering or reduced quality. Lowering settings to medium or high at 1080p will yield smoother gameplay, with estimated frame rates in the 60-80 FPS range for many titles. The GPU’s 8 ray tracing cores enable ray tracing at 1080p, but performance will suffer significantly, likely halving frame rates, so it’s best reserved for less demanding games or disabled for competitive play.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a relatively balanced pairing, with the CPU (82nd percentile) slightly stronger than the GPU (74th percentile). In CPU-bound workloads, such as physics simulation (PassMark physics 1450) or data compression (365352), the CPU will be the primary driver, and the GPU will have minimal impact. In GPU-bound tasks like 3D rendering via OpenCL, the GPU’s score of 29676 becomes the limiting factor, as the CPU’s higher percentile cannot compensate for the GPU’s lower compute throughput. For gaming, the bottleneck shifts depending on resolution and settings. At 1080p with low or medium settings, the CPU’s single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core 1790) is sufficient to feed the GPU, so the GPU becomes the bottleneck, limiting frame rates based on its 74th percentile ranking. At higher resolutions (1440p or 4K), the GPU’s 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth become the primary constraints, causing frame rates to drop more sharply than the CPU could handle.

The FPS scaling from the benchmark scores suggests that increasing resolution will degrade performance more than increasing CPU load, consistent with the GPU being the weaker component. The CPU’s 3DMark 2-thread score of 1952 and 4-thread score of 3725 indicate it can handle the thread requirements of modern games without stuttering, so CPU bottlenecks are unlikely in most titles. However, in massively multiplayer online games or simulations with many AI entities, the CPU’s 8 cores may be taxed, and the 35 W TDP could limit sustained boost clocks, potentially causing frame drops in long sessions. Overall, the GPU is the more likely bottleneck for gaming, while the CPU is the more capable component for productivity tasks.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket FP8, which is a mobile-specific socket, so upgrades are limited to other FP8 processors within the same generation. The platform supports DDR5 memory, which is the current standard, and the dual-channel bus (89.6 GB/s bandwidth) is adequate for most workloads. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes, allowing for fast NVMe storage and external GPU enclosures, though the laptop form factor (buildClass: laptop) means internal upgrades are limited to memory and storage, not the CPU or GPU. The GPU is integrated (slotWidth: IGP), so it cannot be upgraded independently; the entire motherboard would need replacement for a GPU upgrade.

The TDP for both CPU and GPU is 35 W each, totaling 70 W, which is within the range of typical laptop power delivery. No suggested PSU is provided, but the combined 70 W TDP suggests a 100 W or higher power adapter is sufficient for the system. A sensible next upgrade would be increasing RAM capacity if the laptop supports it, as the dual-channel DDR5 memory can benefit from higher capacity for multitasking. Storage upgrades to faster NVMe PCIe Gen 4 drives would reduce load times, leveraging the CPU’s 20 PCIe lanes. Given the GPU’s end-of-life production status (released 2022-03-29), users should not expect driver optimizations for future games, so the platform’s longevity depends on the CPU’s continued support.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: laptop) pairing the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (8-core Zen 4 mobile CPU) with the Intel Arc A370M (4 GB GDDR6 mobile GPU). The combined percentile of 78 indicates the system outperforms 78% of all builds in the database, placing it in the upper-midrange tier. The CPU’s 82nd percentile and GPU’s 74th percentile show a slight CPU bias, meaning the processor is the stronger component. The system is designed for users who need a portable workstation capable of handling productivity tasks and moderate gaming, with the CPU excelling in multi-threaded workloads (Cinebench R23 multicore 16713) and the GPU providing adequate graphics performance for 1080p gaming at medium settings. The 35 W TDP of both components suggests efficient power usage, suitable for thin-and-light chassis that prioritize battery life over raw performance. The build’s overall tier is competitive with desktop CPUs like the Intel Core i5-13500 (0.3% delta) and mobile GPUs like the AMD Radeon RX 470 (0.6% delta), making it a versatile choice for students, professionals, and casual gamers.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A370M is a mobile GPU built on the Xe-HPG architecture, part of the Alchemist generation (Arc 3 Mobile). It uses the DG2-128 chip, manufactured on TSMC’s 6 nm process with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 45.9M per mm². The GPU has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth, with memory clocked at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The base clock is 1550 MHz and boost clock is 2050 MHz, with 1024 shading units, 64 TMUs, 32 ROPs, and 8 ray tracing cores. The FP32 throughput is 4.198 TFLOPS, and FP16 is 8.397 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio), indicating strong compute capability for its class.

The GPU’s benchmark performance places it in the 74th percentile against all GPUs, with an average score of 29175. Its closest rival is the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH, which scores 29197 (0.1% higher), followed by the AMD FirePro W8000 (29211, 0.1% higher), AMD Radeon RX 470 (28996, 0.6% lower), and AMD Radeon RX 6800M (28874, 1% lower). The Geekbench OpenCL score of 29676 and Vulkan score of 28673 show that the GPU performs well in compute workloads, with OpenCL slightly ahead. For rendering, the 8 ray tracing cores and DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) support enable hardware ray tracing, while the pixel rate of 65.60 GPixel/s and texture rate of 131.2 GTexel/s provide adequate fill rates for 1080p gaming. The 4 GB VRAM is the primary limitation; modern games at high textures may exceed this capacity, causing performance drops or requiring reduced settings. The GPU’s 35 W TDP is low, making it suitable for thin laptops, but it limits sustained boost clocks under heavy loads. The production status is end-of-life, meaning driver support may not be extended to future game releases, so users should consider this when expecting long-term gaming compatibility.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS + Intel Arc A370M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

Intel Arc A370M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds