SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS + Intel Arc A350M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

89%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

31,593 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350M

24,647 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Balance and Bottleneck

The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS and Intel Arc A350M pairing presents a pronounced imbalance in compute capability. The CPU sits at the 82nd percentile among all processors, while the GPU lands at the 70th percentile among all graphics cards. That twelve-point gap in percentile ranking indicates the processor is the stronger component in this laptop configuration, and in CPU-bound workloads the 7940HS will be waiting on the Arc A350M to keep pace.

The CPU's multi-threaded performance is substantial. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 7553 nearly matches the max-thread score of 7558, which means the processor's eight cores and sixteen threads are being fully utilized with virtually no scaling headroom lost to hyperthreading inefficiency. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16713 places the chip in a competitive position against desktop-class rivals, and the single-core score of 1790 indicates strong per-thread performance as well.

The GPU's compute resources are more modest. The Arc A350M delivers 3.379 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput, which is roughly one-tenth the raw compute of what a high-end desktop GPU would provide. In gaming scenarios, the CPU will rarely be the limiting factor at standard resolutions because the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus will saturate well before the processor's eight Zen 4 cores reach their limits. The bottleneck profile is therefore GPU-bound in graphics-intensive tasks, CPU-bound in lightly threaded productivity workloads, and balanced in moderately threaded applications where both components operate near their respective ceilings.

The memory bandwidth differential reinforces this analysis. The CPU accesses DDR5 memory at 89.6 GB/s over a dual-channel interface, while the GPU accesses its dedicated GDDR6 at 112.0 GB/s over a 64-bit bus. The GPU's bandwidth advantage is narrow, and with only 4 GB of VRAM, the Arc A350M will frequently spill into system memory in texture-heavy scenes, which further amplifies the GPU bottleneck in gaming. For compute workloads that fit within VRAM limits, the GPU can sustain its peak rates, but the small frame buffer is a structural constraint that no driver optimization can fully mitigate.

# GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A350M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the DG2-128 chip manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The die contains 7,200 million transistors across a 157 mm² area, yielding a transistor density of 45.9 million per square millimeter. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1150 MHz and a boost clock of 2200 MHz, with memory running at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective).

The memory subsystem consists of 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, providing 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is a narrow configuration by modern standards, and it directly constrains the GPU's performance in high-resolution rendering. The 24 ROPs deliver a pixel rate of 52.80 GPixel/s, while the 48 texture mapping units produce 105.6 GTexel/s. The 768 shading units handle FP32 compute at 3.379 TFLOPS and FP16 at 6.758 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio.

The ray tracing hardware includes 6 RT cores, which is a modest count relative to desktop Arc parts. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, meaning the feature set is current even if the raw throughput is limited. The PCIe interface is Gen 4.0 with an x8 link, which provides adequate bandwidth for the GPU's needs given its 112 GB/s memory bandwidth.

Benchmark results place the Arc A350M at the 70th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 24647. The Geekbench OpenCL score is 24546 and the Vulkan score is 24747, showing consistent performance across both compute APIs. The nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX 590 (0.4% faster), NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile (0.5% faster), AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT (0.8% slower), and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 (1.5% slower). The GPU's performance cluster is therefore mid-range, roughly matching desktop GPUs from several generations ago.

For rendering workloads, the 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is sufficient for entry-level 3D modeling and light rendering, but the 4 GB VRAM will limit texture sizes and scene complexity. The RT cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing, but the low shading throughput means ray-traced scenes will render slowly. The GPU's end-of-life production status suggests that driver optimizations are unlikely to yield significant future gains.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 31593, placing it at the 82nd percentile among all processors. The nearest rivals are the Intel Core i5-13500 (0.3% faster), Intel Core Ultra 5 225H (0.3% faster), AMD Ryzen 9 5980HX (0.3% faster), and Intel Core 7 240H (0.3% faster). This cluster of rivals within a 0.3% delta indicates that the 7940HS is competitively positioned in the upper-mid range of CPU performance, with no single rival holding a meaningful advantage.

In individual benchmarks, the CPU shows strong multi-threaded performance. The Geekbench multi-core score of 12724 and single-core score of 2144 indicate balanced throughput. The Passmark multi-thread score of 30098 and single-thread score of 3878 corroborate this picture. The Cinebench R23 scores of 16713 (multi-core) and 1790 (single-core) are consistent with an eight-core Zen 4 part running at up to 5.20 GHz boost.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 24647, placing it at the 70th percentile among all GPUs. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 24546 and Vulkan score of 24747 show that the GPU performs nearly identically across compute APIs. The nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 590, is only 0.4% faster, which means the Arc A350M is effectively a peer of that desktop GPU from 2018.

Combined, the CPU and GPU achieve a 76th percentile ranking among all CPU-GPU pairings in the database. This combined percentile is lower than the CPU's individual percentile but higher than the GPU's, reflecting the fact that the pairing's overall performance is constrained by the GPU in graphics workloads. The combined picture is a laptop that excels at CPU-bound tasks such as compilation, productivity, and multi-threaded content creation, while delivering mid-range graphics performance suitable for 1080p gaming at medium to high settings.

# FAQ

Q: How does the Ryzen 9 7940HS compare to its nearest CPU rivals?

A: The 7940HS has an average benchmark score of 31593, which is 0.3% lower than the Intel Core i5-13500, 0.3% lower than the Intel Core Ultra 5 225H, 0.3% lower than the AMD Ryzen 9 5980HX, and 0.3% higher than the Intel Core 7 240H. All four rivals fall within a 0.3% delta, making them statistically equivalent.

Q: What is the GPU's performance tier relative to other graphics cards?

A: The Arc A350M sits at the 70th percentile among all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 24647. Its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon RX 590, which is 0.4% faster, and the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile, which is 0.5% faster. The AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT is 0.8% slower, and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 is 1.5% slower.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Arc A350M includes 6 RT cores dedicated to ray tracing hardware. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes ray tracing features. However, the GPU's FP32 throughput of 3.379 TFLOPS means ray-traced workloads will be slow compared to higher-tier GPUs.

Q: What is the CPU's memory bandwidth and how does it affect performance?

A: The 7940HS supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. This is sufficient for the eight Zen 4 cores, which have a 16 MB shared L3 cache to mitigate memory latency. The GPU's dedicated memory bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s is higher but constrained by the 64-bit bus width.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: No, the multiplier is locked, and the processor is designed for mobile platforms with a 35 W TDP. The boost clock of 5.20 GHz is the maximum achievable frequency under appropriate thermal and power conditions.

Q: What are the CPU's cache specifications?

A: The 7940HS has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. This cache hierarchy is standard for Zen 4 Phoenix mobile processors.

Q: How does the CPU's single-threaded performance compare to its multi-threaded performance?

A: The single-threaded Cinebench R23 score is 1790, while the multi-core score is 16713, giving a scaling ratio of approximately 9.3x across eight cores. The 3DMark single-thread score of 1003 versus the 16-thread score of 7553 shows a similar scaling pattern, indicating efficient multi-threading with minimal overhead.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 9 7940HS uses the AMD Socket FP8, which is a mobile-specific socket. This means the CPU is not upgradeable in the traditional sense; the processor is soldered to the motherboard in most laptop implementations. The platform supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with ECC capability, which is notable for a mobile processor. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, enabling fast NVMe storage and discrete GPU connectivity.

The GPU is an integrated part of the laptop's motherboard, using a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. Since the Arc A350M is an IGP (integrated graphics package) with slot width listed as IGP, it is not a replaceable MXM module. The GPU has a TDP of 25 W, which is low enough that no external power connectors are required. The suggested PSU is not listed, but given the 35 W CPU TDP and 25 W GPU TDP, the total system power draw is modest by laptop standards.

The upgrade path for this platform is limited to memory and storage. The CPU's launch MSRP is not available, and the GPU has reached end-of-life status. The most sensible next upgrade for a user of this system would be to maximize DDR5 memory capacity and install the fastest NVMe SSD supported by the CPU's 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes. The integrated Radeon 780M GPU in the CPU provides a fallback display output, though the discrete Arc A350M is significantly faster.

For users considering a new laptop purchase, the platform's strengths are the CPU's multi-threaded performance and the GPU's modern feature set. The weaknesses are the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus, which limit future-proofing for graphics-intensive applications. The 35 W CPU TDP and 25 W GPU TDP indicate this is an ultraportable-class configuration, so thermal headroom for sustained workloads will depend on the laptop's cooling solution.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination in the database. All FPS figures discussed below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than measured results.

Based on the GPU's average benchmark score of 24647 and its proximity to the AMD Radeon RX 590 (0.4% faster), the Arc A350M can be expected to deliver playable frame rates at 1080p with medium to high settings in most titles. The GPU's 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 112.0 GB/s memory bandwidth are sufficient for esports titles and older AAA games at high settings, but modern AAA releases will require reduced settings or lower resolutions to maintain 60 FPS.

The CPU's strong single-threaded performance (1790 in Cinebench R23 single-core) ensures that frame pacing will be stable in CPU-bound scenarios, preventing stutter in titles that are sensitive to processor performance. The 4 GB VRAM is the primary constraint; games that exceed this capacity will experience texture pop-in and reduced frame rates as assets stream from system memory.

For competitive shooters and multiplayer titles, the CPU's 5.20 GHz boost clock and low-latency Zen 4 architecture will deliver high frame rates, though the GPU will cap maximum FPS in most scenarios. For single-player AAA games, the expected experience is 1080p at medium settings with frame rates in the 40-60 FPS range, depending on the title's optimization. Ray tracing should be disabled or used sparingly, as the 6 RT cores will struggle with ray-traced effects at playable frame rates.

# Who Should Build It

The Ryzen 9 7940HS with Intel Arc A350M is a laptop-class build targeting users who need strong CPU performance for productivity tasks and modest GPU performance for light gaming and content consumption. The CPU's 82nd percentile ranking makes it suitable for software developers compiling large codebases, students running data analysis tools, and small business users handling spreadsheet-heavy workloads.

Content creators who work primarily with CPU-bound tasks such as video encoding, 3D rendering in CPU-based renderers, and software development will benefit from the 8-core, 16-thread configuration. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16713 indicates the processor can handle demanding multi-threaded workloads, while the Geekbench single-core score of 2144 ensures responsive performance in daily use.

Gamers at 1080p with modest expectations for graphical fidelity will find the Arc A350M adequate for esports and older titles. The GPU's 70th percentile ranking places it above the median GPU, and its performance parity with the RX 590 means it can handle most games at medium settings. Users who require high-refresh-rate gaming at 1440p or above should look elsewhere, as the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus will bottleneck.

Students and office workers will appreciate the 35 W CPU TDP, which enables long battery life in well-designed laptops. The CPU's Passmark single-thread score of 3878 ensures snappy application launches and smooth web browsing, while the integrated Radeon 780M provides a fallback if the discrete GPU encounters driver issues.

# Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS processor with the Intel Arc A350M discrete GPU. The CPU is an 8-core, 16-thread Zen 4 part from the 7000 series, manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC with 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. The GPU is an Intel Arc 3 mobile part from the Alchemist generation, built on a 6 nm process with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die.

The combined percentile ranking is 76th among all CPU-GPU pairings in the database. This places the configuration above the median but below high-end gaming laptops. The CPU's individual percentile of 82 is notably higher than the GPU's 70, indicating that the processor is the stronger component and that the pairing's overall tier is constrained by graphics performance.

The build is designed for ultraportable laptops, with a 35 W CPU TDP and 25 W GPU TDP. The CPU supports DDR5 memory with ECC, and the GPU uses GDDR6 memory. The GPU has reached end-of-life production status, while the CPU remains active. The configuration represents a balanced mainstream laptop that prioritizes CPU performance for productivity while offering entry-level discrete graphics for light gaming and GPU-accelerated tasks.

# CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS is an 8-core, 16-thread mobile processor from the 7000 series, based on the Zen 4 architecture with the Phoenix codename. It is manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC, containing 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. The base clock is 4.00 GHz with a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, and the TDP is 35 W.

The cache hierarchy consists of 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 16 MB shared L3 cache. Memory support is dual-channel DDR5 with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, and ECC memory is supported. The processor provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes and includes integrated Radeon 780M graphics as a fallback. The CPU uses the AMD Socket FP8, has a locked multiplier, and is classified as a mobile part.

In 3DMark benchmarks, the CPU scores 1003 in single-thread, 3725 in 4-thread, 6205 in 8-thread, and 7553 in 16-thread tests. The scaling from 4 to 8 threads is approximately 1.67x, and from 8 to 16 threads is approximately 1.22x, indicating diminishing returns from hyperthreading. Cinebench R23 scores are 1790 single-core and 16713 multi-core, while Geekbench scores are 2144 single-core and 12724 multi-core.

The Passmark suite shows a mix of strengths. Integer math scores 103044, floating-point math scores 62897, and extended instructions score 27480. Data compression scores 365352, data encryption scores 21777, and random string sorting scores 42386. Find prime numbers scores 92, physics scores 1450, and multithread scores 30098. The single-thread score is 3878.

The CPU's 82nd percentile ranking indicates it performs better than 82% of all processors in the database. The nearest rivals are all within 0.3% performance delta, which means the 7940HS is essentially tied with the Intel Core i5-13500, Intel Core Ultra 5 225H, AMD Ryzen 9 5980HX, and Intel Core 7 240H. For real workloads, this means the 7940HS excels at multi-threaded productivity tasks such as video rendering, software compilation, and data analysis, while also providing strong single-threaded performance for responsive daily use.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's 5.20 GHz boost clock and strong single-threaded performance (1790 Cinebench R23 single-core) ensure high frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios, but the GPU's 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 4 GB VRAM cap the maximum FPS. Esports titles at 1080p with medium settings should achieve high frame rates, but modern AAA games will be GPU-limited.

Streaming: The 8-core, 16-thread CPU with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16713 can handle encoding and gaming simultaneously, but the GPU's 4 GB VRAM may be insufficient for games with high texture requirements while streaming software consumes additional memory. Software encoding on the CPU is viable given the multi-threaded headroom.

Video editing: The CPU's Passmark multi-thread score of 30098 and the GPU's OpenCL score of 24546 provide a balanced platform for video editing. The CPU handles timeline playback and effects processing, while the GPU accelerates rendering and export. The 4 GB VRAM limits the use of GPU-accelerated effects with large texture requirements.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering engines will perform well given the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16713. GPU-based rendering with the Arc A350M is possible but limited by the 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 4 GB VRAM, which restricts scene complexity and texture sizes.

Software development: The CPU's 82nd percentile ranking and strong multi-threaded scores make this an excellent platform for compilation, testing, and running virtual machines. The Passmark data encryption score of 21777 indicates strong performance for security-related tasks.

Student and office work: The 35 W TDP and integrated Radeon 780M graphics enable efficient operation for document editing, web browsing, and spreadsheet analysis. The CPU's single-thread score of 3878 ensures responsive application performance, and the 16 threads handle multitasking with ease.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS + Intel Arc A350M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

Intel Arc A350M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds