SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7940H + Intel Arc A770M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
92%
VS
GPU
90%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7940H

40,431 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A770M

18,383 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 7940H and Intel Arc A770M pairing is a laptop configuration that places the CPU as the clear performance leader. The processor sits at the 87th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU holds a comparatively modest 62nd percentile among all GPUs. This 25-point gap in percentile ranking indicates a platform where the graphics solution is the primary constraint in graphics-bound tasks, but where the CPU provides exceptional headroom for productivity and compute-heavy workloads. The combined percentile of 75 reflects a balanced system that leans on the considerable strengths of the Ryzen 9 to carry the overall experience.

Balance and Bottleneck

The bottleneck dynamics of this system are clearly defined by the benchmark data. The Ryzen 9 7940H produces a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24703, placing it in the 87th percentile, while the Arc A770M’s Passmark G3D score of 11774 lands it in the 62nd percentile. In gaming scenarios, the GPU will be the limiting factor, as the CPU’s compute capability far exceeds what the GPU can translate into frames. The data indicates that the CPU is not the bottleneck in any realistic graphics workload; instead, the Arc A770M’s performance ceiling will dictate frame rates at demanding settings.

For productivity and compute tasks, the balance shifts. The CPU’s Passmark multi-thread score of 29063 and data compression score of 352077 demonstrate massive parallel processing power, which is essential for video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation. The GPU’s compute capability, reflected in a Passmark GPU compute score of 4778, is comparatively modest, meaning tasks that rely on GPU acceleration, such as certain rendering engines or machine learning inference, will not scale as well as CPU-bound workloads.

The FPS scaling picture is inferred from the benchmark scores, as no measured FPS data exists for this combination. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3487 ensures that frame pacing and minimum FPS in CPU-light scenes will be excellent, but the overall FPS ceiling is set by the Arc A770M’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2278. This suggests that in esports titles at lower resolutions, the CPU can push high frame rates, but the GPU will cap performance in more demanding titles at higher resolutions. The system is not evenly balanced; it is a CPU-dominant platform where the GPU is the limiting factor for graphics, but the CPU provides an exceptional foundation for non-graphics workloads.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark results are consistently strong across the board. In Cinebench R23, the Ryzen 9 7940H scores 24703 multi-core and 3487 single-core, with the multi-core result placing it in the 87th percentile of all CPUs. The Passmark suite reinforces this, with a multi-thread score of 29063, a single-thread score of 3952, and an integer math score of 101977. These numbers place the processor in the same tier as the Intel Core i9-13905H, which has an average score of 40313, a delta of 0.3%. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 40431 is nearly identical to the Intel Xeon 6507P, which scores 40426, showing the Ryzen 9 is a top-tier mobile processor.

The GPU’s performance is more modest. The Arc A770M scores 2278 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 11774 in Passmark G3D, and 89494 in Geekbench OpenCL. Its average benchmark score of 18383 places it in the 62nd percentile, and it is closely matched with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile, which scores 18159, a delta of 1.2%. The Passmark DirectX 12 score of 70 is relatively low compared to the G3D score, suggesting the GPU performs better in synthetic graphics tests than in some API-specific workloads.

The combined picture is a system where the CPU is a top-5% performer, while the GPU is a solid mid-range mobile option. The combined percentile of 75 reflects this disparity. In CPU-bound tasks, this system will outperform the vast majority of laptops. In GPU-bound tasks, it will compete with mid-range gaming laptops but will not challenge high-end desktop replacements. The data shows a platform that is exceptional for compute and productivity but only average for pure graphics performance.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the CPU’s Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3487 ensures that frame times are consistent, but the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2278 will limit maximum FPS in demanding titles. Players can expect solid performance in esports titles, but for AAA games, a 144Hz panel may not be fully utilized at high settings.

Streaming: The CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads, combined with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24703, provide ample headroom for software encoding. The data shows that the Ryzen 9 can handle a game and an encoding workload simultaneously without significant frame drops, as the processor’s multi-thread capability is far above what is required for streaming.

Video editing: The Passmark data compression score of 352077 and floating-point math score of 62057 indicate that timeline scrubbing, effects, and exports will be smooth. The CPU is the primary driver here, and its 87th percentile standing means it will handle 4K footage. The GPU’s 16 GB of memory can assist with GPU-accelerated effects, but its compute score of 4778 suggests it will not speed up rendering as much as a higher-tier GPU.

3D rendering: For CPU-based rendering, the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24703 is exceptional, placing the system well ahead of most laptops. For GPU-based renderers, the Arc A770M’s FP32 performance of 16.79 TFLOPS is adequate but not spectacular, meaning hybrid rendering workloads will see a significant boost from the CPU.

Software development: The Passmark integer math score of 101977 and data encryption score of 21096 show that compilation, code analysis, and cryptographic tasks are handled quickly. The 16 threads and 16 MB of L3 cache ensure that parallel builds are efficient, making this a strong platform for developers working with large codebases.

Student and office work: The CPU’s single-thread score of 3952 ensures that everyday applications, web browsing, and office suites feel snappy. The integrated Radeon 780M provides a fallback for light graphics, while the Arc A770M handles any occasional GPU-accelerated tasks. The system’s performance is overkill for this use case, but it will never feel sluggish.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the AMD Socket FP8, which supports the Ryzen 9 7940H and is exclusive to mobile systems. This means the CPU is not upgradeable in a traditional sense, as it is soldered to the motherboard. The memory support is DDR5 with a dual-channel bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, which is sufficient for the CPU’s Zen 4 architecture. The PCIe interface is Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, allowing for a fast NVMe SSD and a dedicated GPU.

The Intel Arc A770M uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface and has a TDP of 120 W. The CPU has a TDP of 35 W, so the total system power draw is manageable for a laptop. The suggested PSU is not listed, but the combined TDP of 155 W for the CPU and GPU suggests that a capable laptop power brick is required. The GPU is marked as end-of-life, so upgrades would involve replacing the entire laptop rather than swapping the GPU.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform is not a component swap but rather ensuring the system has ample RAM and storage. The CPU’s memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s means that high-speed DDR5 modules will maximize performance. For storage, the PCIe Gen 4 support allows for fast NVMe drives, which will complement the CPU’s high data compression score of 352077. If the laptop chassis allows, adding more RAM to take advantage of the 16 threads would be beneficial for multi-tasking.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 7940H is a mobile processor from the 7000 series, based on the Zen 4 architecture with the codename Phoenix. It has 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 4.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The CPU is manufactured on a 4 nm process by TSMC, with 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache.

The benchmark scores reflect a processor that excels in both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3487 is exceptionally high, indicating that the 5.20 GHz boost clock is effective in lightly-threaded tasks. The multi-core score of 24703 is equally impressive, showing that the 8 cores scale well under load. The Passmark scores for integer math (101977) and floating-point math (62057) confirm that the CPU is well-suited for both general-purpose and scientific computing.

The integrated Radeon 780M provides a basic graphics solution that can handle everyday tasks and light gaming, but the dedicated Arc A770M is the primary GPU. The CPU supports ECC memory and has a dual-channel DDR5 bus with 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth. The 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes from the CPU provide ample connectivity for a high-end GPU and storage. Overall, the Ryzen 9 7940H is a top-tier mobile processor that delivers desktop-class performance in a laptop form factor, and its benchmark data supports this assessment.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s multi-core performance compared to its nearest rivals?

A: The Ryzen 9 7940H has an average benchmark score of 40431, which is nearly identical to the Intel Xeon 6507P at 40426 (0% delta) and 0.3% ahead of the Intel Xeon 6369P at 40327. It is 0.2% behind the Intel Core Ultra X7 368H at 40518.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile?

A: The Arc A770M has an average benchmark score of 18383, which is 1.2% higher than the RTX 3060 Mobile’s score of 18159. This places the two GPUs in the same performance tier.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this system?

A: The system has a combined percentile of 75, which reflects a strong CPU (87th percentile) paired with a mid-range GPU (62nd percentile).

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 9 7940H supports ECC memory. It also supports DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus and a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s.

Q: Is the GPU upgradeable?

A: The Intel Arc A770M is marked as end-of-life and is a mobile GPU. It is not a user-upgradeable component, as it is soldered to the motherboard.

Q: What are the CPU’s clock speeds?

A: The CPU has a base clock of 4.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. These clocks contribute to its high single-thread score of 3487 in Cinebench R23.

Q: What is the CPU’s process node and die size?

A: The CPU is manufactured on a 4 nm process by TSMC, with 25,000 million transistors on a die size of 178 mm².

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU and GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows, so all FPS figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3487 indicates excellent frame pacing, while the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2278 sets the overall graphics performance ceiling.

In esports titles like Counter-Strike or Valorant, the CPU’s high single-thread performance will allow the Arc A770M to reach its maximum frame output, likely exceeding 144 FPS at 1080p with low to medium settings. In more demanding AAA titles, the GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 11774 suggests that 1080p at high settings will be achievable, but frame rates may dip below 60 FPS in the most graphically intensive scenes. At 1440p, the GPU’s 16 GB of memory will help with texture loading, but the raw compute power may not be sufficient for consistently high frame rates. At 4K, the system will struggle, and users should expect to lower settings to achieve playable frame rates.

The GPU’s DirectX 12 score of 70 in Passmark is relatively low, which may indicate driver overhead or API-specific inefficiencies. However, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2278 is a modern benchmark, suggesting that the GPU handles current DirectX 12 titles reasonably well. Overall, this system is best suited for 1080p gaming, where the CPU can ensure high and stable frame rates, with the GPU providing a solid mid-range experience.

Build Overview

This build is a laptop-class system pairing the AMD Ryzen 9 7940H with the Intel Arc A770M. The CPU is a high-end mobile processor, as evidenced by its 87th percentile ranking, while the GPU is a mid-range mobile solution at the 62nd percentile. The combined percentile of 75 places this system in the upper echelon of laptops, but it is not a top-tier gaming machine.

The Ryzen 9 7940H is the star of this build, providing desktop-class multi-threaded performance that is ideal for content creation and development. The Arc A770M, with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory and a 256-bit bus, provides a bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s, which is sufficient for 1080p gaming and light GPU compute. The GPU’s 4096 shading units and 32 ray tracing cores support DirectX 12 Ultimate, making it capable of modern graphics features.

The system is a laptop, meaning it trades upgradeability for portability. The CPU’s TDP of 35 W and the GPU’s TDP of 120 W indicate a total draw of 155 W for the core components, which is typical for a performance laptop. This is not a budget build; it is a high-performance mobile workstation that prioritizes CPU throughput over raw graphics power.

Who Should Build It

This system is ideal for users who prioritize CPU performance over GPU performance. Content creators, particularly video editors and 3D renderers, will benefit from the Ryzen 9 7940H’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24703 and Passmark data compression score of 352077. Software developers will appreciate the high integer math score of 101977 and the 16 threads for parallel compilation.

Gamers looking for a laptop that can handle 1080p gaming at high settings will find the Arc A770M sufficient, but those seeking high-refresh 1440p or 4K gaming should look elsewhere. Students and office workers will find the CPU’s single-thread score of 3952 more than adequate for everyday tasks, and the integrated Radeon 780M provides a power-efficient fallback for light use.

Small business workstations that require heavy multi-threading for financial modeling, data analysis, or scientific computing will benefit from the CPU’s Passmark multi-thread score of 29063. The GPU’s 16 GB of memory can also assist with data visualization tasks. However, users who need top-tier GPU compute for machine learning or heavy 3D rendering should consider a system with a higher-end GPU, as the Arc A770M’s compute score of 4778 is a limiting factor. This is a builder’s choice for CPU-centric workloads in a mobile form factor.