SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7940H + Intel Arc A570M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

95 Score

Top 5% Ranking

95 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7940H

40,431 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A570M

58,239 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 7940H and Intel Arc A570M combination targets the upper tier of mobile computing, placing in the 88th percentile for the combined CPU and GPU pair. The data shows a system built around a high-end 8-core processor paired with a capable mid-range graphics solution, creating a specific set of strengths and trade-offs. This analysis will break down the performance characteristics, upgrade potential, and target use cases based solely on the benchmark scores provided.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance profile of this pairing is defined by a significant imbalance between the CPU and GPU. The Ryzen 9 7940H is a powerhouse, achieving an average benchmark score of 40431 and ranking in the 87th percentile of all CPUs. In contrast, the Intel Arc A570M, while no slouch, scores 58239 in its Geekbench OpenCL test, placing it in the 88th percentile of all GPUs. While both are high performers, the CPU's relative strength is more pronounced. This suggests that in many workloads, particularly those that are not heavily GPU-bound, the CPU will be the component driving the system's performance ceiling, while the GPU will be the limiting factor in graphically intensive tasks.

The data indicates that the system is well-balanced for gaming at higher resolutions, where the GPU is typically the bottleneck. The Arc A570M's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth are enough to feed a 1080p or 1440p display, and its performance percentile suggests it can handle modern titles. However, the CPU's power is not wasted; in CPU-heavy scenarios like strategy games or physics simulations, the Ryzen 9 7940H will ensure that the GPU is not starved of data. The benchmark results indicate a system that will not suffer from CPU-induced stutters in most scenarios, allowing the GPU to work at its full potential. The primary bottleneck will be the GPU when pushing high frame rates or high graphical settings at 1440p, but for productivity tasks, the CPU will be the clear leader.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark scores paint a picture of a highly capable mobile processor. In Cinebench R23, it scores 24703 in multi-core and 3487 in single-core, demonstrating strong performance in both heavily threaded and lightly threaded workloads. Its average benchmark score of 40431 places it in the 87th percentile of all CPUs, and the nearest rivals confirm its position. It sits just 0.3% ahead of the Intel Core i9-13905H and 0.3% ahead of the Intel Xeon 6369P, while being 0.2% behind the Intel Core Ultra X7 368H. This places it in the upper echelon of mobile processors, trading blows with the best Intel has to offer.

The GPU's benchmark data is more limited, with a single Geekbench OpenCL score of 58239. This score places the Arc A570M in the 88th percentile of all GPUs, which is a strong showing. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, which is 0.3% faster, and the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM, which is 0.3% slower. This is a notable result, as it suggests the mobile A570M is in the same performance class as a high-end desktop GPU from a previous generation. The combined picture is one of a system that is in the 88th percentile for both CPU and GPU, making it a top-tier performer for a laptop, though the GPU's performance is less dominant than the CPU's relative to their respective markets.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 7940H is built on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Phoenix, and manufactured on a 4 nm process by TSMC. It features 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 4.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. This high boost clock, combined with the modern architecture, explains its strong single-core performance of 3487 in Cinebench R23. The processor is designed for high-performance mobile workloads, and the data confirms it can deliver desktop-class performance in a laptop form factor.

The cache hierarchy is substantial, with 64 KB of L1 and 1 MB of L2 per core, plus a shared 16 MB of L3 cache. This layout helps feed the processor's high clock speeds and contributes to its strong integer math score of 101977 and floating-point math score of 62057 in PassMark. The data compression score of 352077 and encryption score of 21096 further indicate a well-rounded performer. While the 35 W TDP is a crucial constraint for mobile systems, the benchmark results show that the architecture is efficient enough to extract excellent performance. The integrated Radeon 780M graphics is also present, though the discrete Arc A570M will handle the heavy lifting. The CPU's support for DDR5 memory and ECC memory makes it suitable for professional and creative workloads where data integrity is paramount.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU and GPU combination, so all FPS figures below are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The data shows the Arc A570M is in the 88th percentile of all GPUs, with a Geekbench OpenCL score of 58239. This suggests it is a capable 1080p and 1440p gaming GPU. For esports titles, the high single-core performance of the CPU (3487 in Cinebench R23) will help push frame rates to very high levels, potentially exceeding 144 FPS in many competitive games at 1080p with lower settings.

For AAA titles, the estimated performance is more complex. The GPU's 8 GB of VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for 1080p ultra settings and 1440p high settings in most games. However, with a boost clock of just 1300 MHz and an FP32 performance of 5.325 TFLOPS, it may not be able to sustain very high frame rates in the most demanding titles at 1440p ultra. The 16 ray tracing cores are present, but given the GPU's overall performance class, ray tracing will likely be a feature to use sparingly, perhaps at 1080p with upscaling, rather than a default setting. The system is best positioned for high-refresh-rate 1080p gaming or smooth 60 FPS gameplay at 1440p. The CPU will rarely be the limiting factor in gaming, ensuring consistent frame delivery.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU is a mobile part using the AMD Socket FP8, which is specific to laptops and not user-upgradable. The platform supports dual-channel DDR5 memory, and the CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes. The GPU connects via a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. In a laptop, the upgrade path is typically limited to memory and storage. The data shows support for DDR5, so a user could upgrade to faster or higher-capacity DDR5 modules if the laptop allows. The PCIe Gen 4 support ensures that the fastest NVMe SSDs available will work at full speed.

The CPU has a TDP of 35 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 75 W, meaning the total power draw for these components is modest. While the suggested PSU is not listed, the power requirements are low enough for any laptop with a standard 100 W or higher power adapter. The upgrade path is not about swapping components but about ensuring the system has sufficient memory and storage to match the CPU's capabilities. The CPU's support for ECC memory is a standout feature for a mobile platform, pointing toward professional use. A sensible "next upgrade" for this system would be to maximize the DDR5 memory capacity and ensure storage is a high-speed PCIe Gen 4 NVMe drive to avoid any bottlenecks in data transfer.

Usage Scenarios

This system is a strong candidate for high-refresh-rate gaming. The CPU's 87th percentile performance and high boost clock will ensure high minimum frame rates, while the GPU's 88th percentile score is sufficient for 1080p high-refresh displays. The estimated performance suggests it can handle most esports titles at 144+ FPS and many AAA games at 60+ FPS with adjusted settings.

For streaming, the CPU is the star. Its 8-core/16-thread configuration and high Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24703 provide ample headroom to encode video while gaming. The GPU also has hardware encoding capabilities via its Xe-HPG architecture, which can offload the streaming workload. The system is well-equipped for a single-PC streaming setup, though the GPU's performance will be slightly impacted while encoding.

Video editing will be a smooth experience. The CPU's high multi-core score will make timeline scrubbing and export faster. The GPU's 8 GB of VRAM is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p editing in software like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve, and its hardware encoders will accelerate export times. The PassMark data encryption score of 21096 also suggests strong performance in tasks involving media file encryption.

3D rendering is where the CPU excels. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24703 indicates that this processor can handle complex 3D scenes in CPU-based renderers like Blender's Cycles. The GPU's 5.325 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 2048 shading units will also be able to contribute to GPU-accelerated rendering, though its performance class is not as dominant as the CPU. The 16 RT cores will help with real-time viewport rendering.

Software development is a key strength for this CPU. The high single-core score of 3487 in Cinebench R23 ensures snappy compilation for many smaller projects, while the multi-core power helps with large build systems. The PassMark integer math score of 101977 is particularly relevant, as it indicates strong performance in the kind of arithmetic-heavy code found in many applications. The support for ECC memory is a boon for long-running build servers or data processing tasks.

For student and office work, this system is overkill but will provide a flawless experience. The CPU's single-core performance ensures that document editing, web browsing, and spreadsheet work are instant. The 8-core/16-thread configuration means that even with dozens of tabs open and multiple office applications running, there will be no slowdown. The integrated Radeon 780M can handle basic graphics tasks, though the discrete GPU will be used for anything more demanding. This is a system that will not feel slow for many years for these workloads.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A570M is based on the Xe-HPG architecture, codenamed Alchemist, and is built on a 6 nm process by TSMC. It features the DG2-256 chip with 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units. The GPU has a base clock of 900 MHz and a boost clock of 1300 MHz. Its memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s. This is a solid configuration for 1080p and entry-level 1440p gaming.

The GPU's compute capabilities are defined by its 5.325 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 10.65 TFLOPS of FP16 performance. The 16 ray tracing cores are present, supporting DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. While the GPU's raw performance is good, its boost clock of 1300 MHz is relatively low, which can limit its performance in heavily clock-dependent workloads. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 58239 places it in the 88th percentile, with its nearest rival being the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, which is 0.3% faster. This is a remarkable result, showing the A570M is competitive with a high-end desktop GPU from the previous generation. For rendering, the 8 GB of VRAM is adequate, but the relatively low bandwidth may be a limiting factor in large, complex scenes. The GPU is best suited for 1080p gaming with high settings, where it can deliver smooth frame rates, and for hardware-accelerated encoding and decoding, where its feature set is strong.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of the AMD Ryzen 9 7940H and Intel Arc A570M pairing?

A: The combinedPercentile for this CPU and GPU pair is 88.

Q: How does the CPU's average benchmark score compare to the Intel Core i9-13905H?

A: The Ryzen 9 7940H has an average benchmark score of 40431, which is 0.3% higher than the Intel Core i9-13905H's score of 40313.

Q: What is the GPU's performance relative to the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT?

A: The Intel Arc A570M's Geekbench OpenCL score is 58239, which is 0.3% lower than the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT's score of 58392.

Q: What is the CPU's single-core and multi-core performance in Cinebench R23?

A: The CPU scores 3487 in single-core and 24703 in multi-core tests in Cinebench R23.

Q: How much memory bandwidth does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration and bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s.

Q: Does the data include measured FPS for this system?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data for this exact combination, so all FPS figures are estimates based on benchmark scores.

Who Should Build It

This system is a compelling choice for a mobile workstation or high-end gaming laptop. The data shows it is ideal for gamers targeting high-refresh-rate 1080p gaming or smooth 60 FPS gameplay at 1440p, as the GPU's 88th percentile performance is more than adequate for these resolutions. The CPU's 87th percentile standing makes it an excellent choice for content creators, particularly video editors and 3D artists, who need the multi-core power of the 8-core/16-thread Zen 4 processor for rendering and export tasks. The strong single-core performance and high integer math score make it a great fit for software developers who compile large codebases or run complex simulations.

For professionals in fields like architecture, engineering, or data science, the support for ECC memory is a significant advantage, offering data integrity that is crucial for long-running calculations. The system is also a powerful, if over-specified, choice for students and small business workstations, ensuring it will handle any productivity software with ease and remain responsive for years. While the GPU is the weaker link, its performance class is still high, meaning it can handle professional graphics workloads like CAD or light 3D modeling. This is not a system for budget-conscious buyers, but rather for users who need a single device that can handle demanding gaming, creative, and professional tasks without compromise.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7940H + Intel Arc A570M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 7940H

Intel Arc A570M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

CPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Usage Scenarios

GPU Analysis

FAQ

Who Should Build It

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds