SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7940H + Intel Arc A550M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7940H

40,431 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A550M

49,737 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 7940H and Intel Arc A550M represent a specific kind of laptop pairing: a high-core-count, power-efficient CPU matched with a mid-range discrete GPU. The data shows this is a capable combination for demanding workloads, placing in the 87th percentile overall. Since the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, all discussion of frame rates is estimated from the individual benchmark scores of the CPU and GPU.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen 9 7940H is an 8-core, 16-thread processor built on TSMC's 4 nm process, using the Zen 4 architecture under the Phoenix codename. This is a mobile-focused chip, part of AMD's 7000 series, designed to balance multi-threaded throughput with power efficiency. Its base clock sits at 4.00 GHz, boosting up to 5.20 GHz, which provides substantial single-thread headroom for everyday responsiveness and lightly-threaded applications.

The benchmark scores paint a clear picture of a high-end mobile processor. In Cinebench R23, it scores 24703 in multi-core and 3487 in single-core. The multi-core figure indicates strong sustained performance for tasks like video encoding or 3D rendering, while the single-core score shows excellent per-thread speed. The Cinebench R20 scores of 10375 multi-core and 1464 single-core corroborate this, showing a consistent scaling pattern from single to multi-threaded workloads.

In the Passmark suite, the chip shows its strengths in specific computational areas. The integer math score of 101977 and floating-point math score of 62057 indicate robust general-purpose and scientific computing capability. Data compression and encryption scores of 352077 and 21096 respectively highlight its ability to handle archival tasks and secure data operations quickly. The extended instructions score of 26804 points to good performance with modern SIMD workloads. However, the find prime numbers score of 81 is relatively low, suggesting that this CPU is not optimized for that specific type of integer workload.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 40431 places it in the 87th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals illustrate its positioning: it sits within 0.3% of the Intel Xeon 6507P (40426) and Intel Xeon 6369P (40327), and is 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra X7 368H (40518). The Intel Core i9-13905H is a direct competitor as well, with a score of 40313 and a delta of 0.3%. This data suggests the Ryzen 9 7940H delivers performance competitive with recent high-end desktop-class Xeons and other flagship mobile parts, making it a top-tier choice for a laptop.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 9 7940H uses the AMD Socket FP8, which is a mobile-specific socket, meaning there is no traditional user-upgrade path for the CPU itself. This is a soldered or BGA-style platform. Memory support is limited to DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, with a maximum memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The system also supports ECC memory, which is a notable feature for users running memory-intensive or error-sensitive workloads, such as financial modeling or scientific computing.

For expansion, the CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes. This is the primary interface for the discrete GPU and high-speed NVMe storage. The Intel Arc A550M GPU connects via a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is a standard configuration. The CPU also includes an integrated Radeon 780M GPU, which provides a fallback for low-power tasks or when the discrete GPU is not needed.

The thermal and power design point of the CPU is a 35 W TDP. The GPU has a 60 W TDP. There is no suggested PSU in the data, but for a laptop, the power delivery is handled by the system's AC adapter and internal power management. The combined TDP of 95 W for the two primary components indicates a system that will require a substantial power brick, but it is not an extreme power draw for a high-performance laptop. A sensible next upgrade for an existing system with this platform would be to increase memory capacity or swap the primary storage to a faster PCIe Gen 4 NVMe drive, rather than expecting to change the processor.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark data shows a CPU that is performing near the top of its class, with a percentile rank of 87. Its average benchmark score of 40431 is virtually identical to the Intel Xeon 6507P (40426) and slightly higher than the Intel Core i9-13905H (40313). This positions the Ryzen 9 7940H as a direct competitor to those chips, offering similar multi-threaded muscle. The data suggests that in a laptop, the Ryzen 9 7940H will not be the limiting factor in most workloads; it has the compute headroom to feed even a robust discrete GPU.

The Intel Arc A550M GPU achieves a Geekbench OpenCL score of 49894 and a Vulkan score of 49580. Its average benchmark score is 49737, ranking it in the 86th percentile of all GPUs. The closest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti (49957, delta -0.4%), the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 (50001, delta -0.5%), and the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT (48477, delta 2.6%). The data indicates that the Arc A550M is a mid-to-high-range part, but it is outclassed by the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT, which scores 50951 and is 2.4% ahead.

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 87, which reflects the high standing of both components. Since no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, frame rates in games must be estimated. The CPU's single-core score of 3487 in Cinebench R23 suggests it will not bottleneck the GPU in most titles, while the GPU's OpenCL and Vulkan scores suggest it can handle modern rendering APIs competently. The estimated FPS will depend heavily on the game and resolution, but the performance tier is clear: this is a high-end mobile setup.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need a laptop for heavy, sustained workloads rather than just light browsing or document editing. The CPU's 87th percentile ranking and strong multi-core scores make it ideal for content creators, particularly video editors and 3D artists who rely on CPU-based rendering. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24703 and Passmark integer math score of 101977 show a system that can chew through long render times and complex simulations.

Software developers will find the 8-core, 16-thread configuration useful for compiling large codebases, and the ECC memory support is a boon for running virtual machines or database servers where data integrity is critical. The Passmark data encryption score of 21096 also indicates solid performance for cryptographic tasks. Students in engineering or computer science fields will benefit from the processing power for their projects, while small business workstations that need to handle data analysis, financial modeling, or CAD software will find this configuration capable.

Gamers are a target audience, but with a caveat. The GPU's 86th percentile ranking and its proximity to the RX 6800 XT in benchmark scores suggest it can handle high-refresh gaming at 1080p and likely 1440p in many titles. However, it is not a top-tier 4K GPU. The estimated FPS will be high in competitive titles, but may require settings adjustments in the most demanding AAA games. This is a system for users who want a balance of CPU rendering power and solid GPU gaming performance, not for those seeking the absolute highest frame rates.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The combination of a strong single-core CPU (3487 in Cinebench R23) and a mid-high-range GPU (86th percentile) suggests this system is well-suited for high-refresh gaming at 1080p. The estimated frame rates in esports titles should be very high, and the system should handle most modern games at high settings with smooth performance.

Streaming: The 8-core, 16-thread CPU provides ample headroom for software encoding while gaming. The Passmark multithread score of 29063 and the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24703 indicate that the CPU can handle the encoding workload without significantly impacting game performance, making this a viable single-PC streaming setup.

Video editing: This is a strong scenario for this hardware. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24703 will accelerate timeline rendering and export times. The GPU's 8 GB of VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth can assist with GPU-accelerated effects and previews, and the Vulkan score of 49580 suggests good compute performance for supported tasks.

3D rendering: The CPU is the primary workhorse here. The high multi-core scores in Cinebench R20 (10375) and R23 (24703) show excellent performance for CPU-based renderers. The GPU can also contribute via its 8.397 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 16 RT cores, which can accelerate ray-traced previews in supported applications.

Software development: The 16 threads and high integer math score (101977) will make code compilation faster. The large cache hierarchy (16 MB L3, 1 MB L2 per core) helps with frequently accessed data. The ECC memory support is a significant advantage for developers running containers, databases, or other services where memory errors can cause corruption.

Student and office work: This is overkill for basic tasks, but it provides a future-proof experience. The CPU's 3952 Passmark single-thread score ensures that the system feels snappy for everyday use, and the integrated Radeon 780M can handle light tasks when the discrete GPU is not needed, potentially saving power and extending battery life.

FAQ

Q: What is the performance class of the AMD Ryzen 9 7940H?

A: The Ryzen 9 7940H has an average benchmark score of 40431, placing it in the 87th percentile of all CPUs. It performs within 0.3% of the Intel Xeon 6507P and Intel Xeon 6369P, indicating it is a top-tier mobile processor.

Q: How does the Intel Arc A550M compare to other GPUs?

A: The Arc A550M has an average benchmark score of 49737, placing it in the 86th percentile. It is 2.4% behind the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT (50951) and 2.6% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT (48477).

Q: Does this CPU support error-correcting memory?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 9 7940H supports ECC memory, which is a feature often found in workstation-class systems for improved data reliability.

Q: What is the memory configuration for this processor?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a maximum memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: No, the multiplier is locked. The CPU is not designed for overclocking, which is typical for a mobile processor.

Q: What is the socket type for the Ryzen 9 7940H?

A: It uses the AMD Socket FP8, which is a mobile-specific socket. This means the CPU is not user-upgradeable and is intended to be soldered to the motherboard.

Q: What integrated graphics does the CPU have?

A: The Ryzen 9 7940H includes the Radeon 780M integrated GPU, which can be used for display output and light tasks to save power when the discrete Intel Arc A550M is not required.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Ryzen 9 7940H and the Intel Arc A550M is well-matched for a laptop. The CPU, with its 87th percentile ranking, is an exceptionally strong component. The GPU, at the 86th percentile, is also very good but is the more likely bottleneck in graphics-intensive scenarios. This is a common and sensible pairing: the CPU ensures that game physics, AI, and frame pacing are never a concern, while the GPU handles the rendering load.

In CPU-bound workloads such as 3D rendering, video encoding, or code compilation, the CPU is the primary driver. The Ryzen 9 7940H's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24703 is the key metric here. In GPU-bound tasks like gaming at high resolutions or GPU-accelerated rendering, the Arc A550M becomes the limiting factor. The GPU's 8 GB of VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth will be the constraints in these cases, particularly at 1440p or 4K with high-detail textures. The estimated FPS scaling will follow the GPU's performance curve in these scenarios.

The data suggests there is no severe bottleneck in either direction. The CPU has enough headroom to feed the GPU in most games, and the GPU is fast enough to make the system feel powerful for gaming. The combined percentile of 87 reflects a balanced, high-performance platform.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build, as indicated by the buildClass field. It pairs the AMD Ryzen 9 7940H with the Intel Arc A550M. The CPU is a high-end mobile processor with 8 cores and 16 threads, based on the Zen 4 architecture. The GPU is a mid-to-high-range mobile part based on Intel's Xe-HPG architecture. The combined performance percentile is 87, placing this pairing in the upper echelon of portable systems.

The overall tier is high. The CPU's 87th percentile and the GPU's 86th percentile position this as a premium configuration. The data shows this is a system capable of handling demanding professional workloads like 3D rendering and video editing, as well as high-refresh gaming. It is not the absolute fastest configuration available, but it sits comfortably in the top 15% of all systems in the database, making it a strong choice for users who need a powerful and versatile laptop.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A550M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture, using the DG2-512 chip. It is fabricated on TSMC's 6 nm process, with 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die. The GPU is equipped with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s. This memory configuration is sufficient for 1080p and entry-level 1440p gaming, but it is a limiting factor for high-resolution textures in the most demanding titles.

The GPU has 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units. It also features 16 ray tracing cores, which are part of the DirectX 12 Ultimate feature set. The base clock is 900 MHz, with a boost clock of 2050 MHz. The pixel rate is 131.2 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 262.4 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 8.397 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance of 16.79 TFLOPS (2:1). The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

In benchmark terms, the Arc A550M scores 49894 in Geekbench OpenCL and 49580 in Geekbench Vulkan. Its average score of 49737 places it in the 86th percentile. The data shows it is competitive with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti (49957) and AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 (50001), but trails the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT (50951) by 2.4%. This indicates that the Arc A550M is a capable GPU for 1080p gaming and moderate content creation, but it is not a top-tier part for high-end 4K rendering. For a laptop, it offers a solid balance of performance and power efficiency with its 60 W TDP.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7940H + Intel Arc A550M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 7940H

Intel Arc A550M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

Build Overview

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds