SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7940H + Intel Arc A350M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7940H

40,431 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350M

24,647 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This is a laptop pairing built around a high-end mobile CPU and an entry-level discrete GPU. The AMD Ryzen 9 7940H is a top-tier processor, while the Intel Arc A350M is a modest graphics solution. Benchmark results show a significant performance disparity between the two components. The data indicates that this system is heavily CPU-bound in most graphics-intensive tasks. It is important to note that the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact combination; all FPS discussion is therefore estimated from the benchmark scores.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data reveals a clear imbalance between the AMD Ryzen 9 7940H and the Intel Arc A350M. The CPU's average benchmark score of 40431 places it at the 87th percentile of all CPUs, a strong result. In contrast, the GPU's average score of 24647 places it at the 70th percentile of all GPUs. This 17-percentile gap indicates that the processor is capable of significantly more work than the graphics card can keep up with in gaming and GPU-accelerated tasks.

In gaming workloads, the A350M will almost certainly be the limiting factor. The CPU’s single-thread score of 3952 in PassMark and its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3487 are more than adequate to feed frames to a GPU of this class. The data suggests that at lower resolutions and detail settings, the GPU will be saturated, and the CPU will have spare capacity. For high-refresh-rate gaming, the GPU will be the bottleneck, preventing the system from achieving the frame rates the CPU could theoretically support.

For productivity and compute workloads, the balance shifts. The CPU's multi-threaded performance is exceptional, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24703. Tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation will be heavily CPU-bound and will run very quickly. The GPU will play a smaller role in these scenarios, meaning the system's overall performance will be much closer to the CPU's high percentile ranking. The bottleneck is workload-dependent, but the GPU is the primary limiting factor for any task that relies on graphics processing.

Benchmark Performance

The AMD Ryzen 9 7940H demonstrates excellent raw performance. In Cinebench R23, it scores 24703 points in multi-core and 3487 points in single-core. The multi-core score is particularly strong, indicating a processor that can handle demanding parallel workloads with ease. Its PassMark multithread score of 29063 and single-thread score of 3952 reinforce this, with the latter being crucial for responsive day-to-day use and gaming. The processor's average benchmark score of 40431 places it in the 87th percentile of all CPUs. Compared to its nearest rivals, it trades blows with the Intel Core i9-13905H, which has an average score of 40313, a delta of 0.3%, and the Intel Core Ultra X7 368H, which scores 40518, a -0.2% delta.

The Intel Arc A350M’s benchmark results are far more modest. It scores 24546 in Geekbench OpenCL and 24747 in Geekbench Vulkan, for an average of 24647. This puts it in the 70th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon RX 590, which scores 24744, a -0.4% delta, and the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile, which scores 24763, a -0.5% delta. While these are older or higher-tier parts, the A350M’s performance is comparable to these desktop-class GPUs from a previous generation. The combined picture is a system with a top-tier CPU and an entry-level discrete GPU, resulting in a 79th combined percentile for the build.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 7940H is an 8-core, 16-thread mobile processor built on TSMC's 4nm process node. It belongs to the 7000 series and is based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Phoenix. The chip has a base clock of 4.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, which explains its strong single-thread performance. The 16 MB of shared L3 cache and 1 MB per-core L2 cache help feed the cores efficiently. The CPU supports DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, offering a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, which is sufficient for most tasks.

Benchmark results indicate a processor that excels in both lightly-threaded and heavily-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R20 single-core score of 1464 and multi-core score of 10375 show a linear scaling from single to multi-core, indicating that all 8 cores are being utilized effectively. The PassMark data shows strong performance in integer math (101977), floating-point math (62057), and extended instructions (26804). The data encryption score of 21096 is also respectable. The 87th percentile ranking confirms that this is a high-end mobile CPU that can handle demanding professional applications, including software development, video editing, and 3D rendering. The integrated Radeon 780M graphics provide a functional fallback, though the discrete GPU will be used for demanding tasks.

FAQ

Q: Is the AMD Ryzen 9 7940H a good processor for gaming?

A: Yes, the CPU has strong single-thread performance, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3487 and a PassMark single-thread score of 3952. This is more than sufficient for gaming, but the Intel Arc A350M GPU will be the limiting factor in achieving high frame rates.

Q: How does the Intel Arc A350M compare to other GPUs?

A: The A350M has an average benchmark score of 24647, placing it in the 70th percentile. The data shows it performs near the level of an AMD Radeon RX 590, which has a delta of -0.4%, and the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile, which has a delta of -0.5%.

Q: Can this laptop handle video editing?

A: Yes, video editing is a CPU-intensive task, and the Ryzen 9 7940H is very capable. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24703 and PassMark multithread score of 29063 indicate it can process 4K video and complex effects smoothly. The GPU will assist with effects and rendering, but it is not the primary driver.

Q: What is the performance difference between the CPU and GPU in this system?

A: The CPU is significantly more powerful than the GPU. The CPU is in the 87th percentile, while the GPU is in the 70th percentile. This means the GPU will be the bottleneck in graphics-intensive tasks like gaming, while the CPU will dominate in compute-heavy workloads like rendering.

Q: Is this a good system for 3D rendering?

A: For CPU-based rendering, this is an excellent system. The Ryzen 9 7940H's high multi-core score of 24703 in Cinebench R23 will render scenes quickly. For GPU-accelerated rendering, the A350M's 3.379 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is modest and will be slower than the CPU for many tasks.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen 9 7940H supports ECC memory. This is a feature typically found in workstation-class systems, making this processor suitable for tasks where data integrity is critical.

Q: How much memory bandwidth does this platform have?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. This is adequate for feeding the 8-core CPU but is not as high as some high-end desktop platforms.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The Ryzen 9 7940H has the single-thread performance to drive high frame rates, but the Intel Arc A350M will hold it back. In esports titles, the GPU will likely be the limiting factor, and achieving very high refresh rates (above 144Hz) will be difficult. The system is more suited to 1080p gaming at medium settings.

Streaming: The CPU is powerful enough to handle game encoding via software (x264) without a significant performance hit, given its 8 cores and 16 threads. The PassMark multithread score of 29063 indicates ample headroom for streaming and gaming simultaneously. The GPU's encoding capabilities are not a factor based on the data.

Video Editing: This is a strong scenario for the 7940H. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24703 will make timeline scrubbing, effects, and export times very fast. The A350M will help with some GPU-accelerated effects, but the CPU will be the main workhorse.

3D Rendering: CPU-based rendering will be excellent. The high multi-core performance will significantly reduce render times in applications like Blender or V-Ray. GPU-based rendering will be limited by the A350M's 3.379 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, which is entry-level.

Software Development: The Ryzen 9 7940H is well-suited for compilation and multi-tasking. The high integer math score of 101977 and multithread score of 29063 will speed up code builds and running virtual machines. The GPU is less relevant for this workload.

Student and Office Work: This system is overkill for basic tasks. The CPU's performance ensures that document editing, web browsing, and spreadsheet work are extremely responsive. The discrete GPU is not necessary for these tasks, but it is available for light photo editing or casual gaming.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A350M is an entry-level mobile GPU based on the Xe-HPG architecture, codenamed Alchemist. It is built on a 6nm process and features 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 24 raster operations pipelines. The GPU has a base clock of 1150 MHz and a boost clock of 2200 MHz. It is equipped with 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s. This memory configuration is a limiting factor for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games.

The A350M includes 6 ray tracing cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing in supported titles, though its performance in this area will be modest. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6. Its pixel rate is 52.80 GPixel/s, and its texture rate is 105.6 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 3.379 TFLOPS, which is low compared to the CPU's compute capabilities. The Geekbench scores of 24546 (OpenCL) and 24747 (Vulkan) place it in the 70th percentile, near the level of the AMD Radeon RX 590. This indicates it is a capable GPU for 1080p gaming at medium to low settings in modern titles, but it will struggle with high-detail settings or high resolutions. The 4 GB VRAM also limits texture quality in modern games.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen 9 7940H uses the AMD Socket FP8 and is part of the mobile platform, meaning the CPU and motherboard are typically soldered and not upgradeable. The platform supports DDR5 memory and PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU. The GPU connects via a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. The CPU has a TDP of 35W, and the GPU has a TDP of 25W, indicating a power-efficient pairing.

The primary upgrade path for this system is not component-level but rather system-level. Since the CPU and GPU are not swappable, a user looking for more graphics performance would need to purchase a new laptop. The data suggests that the CPU has significant headroom for a more powerful GPU. A sensible next upgrade would be a laptop with a similar high-performance CPU but paired with a GPU in a higher percentile rank. The 25W TDP of the A350M is very low, and the system likely has thermal and power headroom for a more capable GPU, but this is not accessible to the user. The socket and platform are tied to the motherboard, so there is no viable upgrade path for the processor.

Build Overview

This build combines a top-tier mobile processor with an entry-level discrete graphics card in a laptop form factor. The AMD Ryzen 9 7940H is a high-end 8-core, 16-thread CPU based on the Zen 4 architecture, which delivers class-leading multi-threaded and single-threaded performance. The Intel Arc A350M is an entry-level GPU designed for basic gaming and light creative work. The system's combined percentile is 79, reflecting the strength of the CPU pulling up the weaker GPU.

This is a laptop configuration, not a desktop. The pairing is unusual, as the CPU is powerful enough to support a much faster GPU. This creates a system that is exceptionally fast for productivity and CPU-bound tasks but only average for gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads. The 87th percentile CPU and 70th percentile GPU create a lopsided performance profile. The overall tier of this build is that of a high-performance productivity machine with modest gaming capabilities.

Who Should Build It

This configuration is best suited for users who prioritize CPU performance above all else. It is an excellent choice for software developers who need fast compilation times and the ability to run multiple virtual machines, as indicated by the high integer math score of 101977 and multithread score of 29063. Students in engineering or computer science fields will benefit from the processing power for simulations and coding tasks, while the GPU is sufficient for general use.

Content creators who work primarily with CPU-based rendering, such as video editors using software encoding or 3D artists using CPU renderers, will find this system very capable. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24703 ensures quick export times. However, gamers at 1080p will find the A350M sufficient for esports and older titles at medium settings, but it will not handle the latest AAA games at high detail. This is not a system for those seeking high-refresh-rate gaming or GPU-accelerated rendering, as the 70th percentile GPU limits those experiences. It is a workstation-first laptop that can handle some light gaming on the side.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7940H + Intel Arc A350M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 7940H

Intel Arc A350M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

CPU Analysis

FAQ

Usage Scenarios

GPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

Who Should Build It

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds