SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D

47,908 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

23,172 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 pairing represents a high-end desktop configuration that combines a 12-core Zen 4 processor with a last-generation Ampere flagship GPU. The data shows a system with exceptional CPU throughput for professional workloads, paired with a GPU that, while aging, still holds a respectable position in the benchmark hierarchy. This analysis examines the performance characteristics, platform attributes, and usage scenarios for this combination, based exclusively on the provided benchmark data.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 is built on the Ampere architecture using Samsung's 8 nm process, with a substantial 28,300 million transistors on a 628 mm² die. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1440 MHz and boosts to 1710 MHz, with memory running at 1188 MHz, translating to 19 Gbps effective. Its memory subsystem consists of 10 GB of GDDR6X across a 320-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 760.3 GB/s. This memory configuration is sufficient for 1440p and many 4K workloads, though the 10 GB capacity can be a limiting factor in the most demanding modern titles at maximum texture settings.

The compute configuration includes 8704 shading units, 272 texture mapping units, and 96 raster operation processors. The RTX 3080 also houses 68 RT cores and 272 tensor cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and DLSS. The FP32 throughput is rated at 29.77 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance at the same 29.77 TFLOPS due to a 1:1 ratio. Pixel fill rate is 164.2 GPixel/s, and texture fill rate is 465.1 GTexel/s. These specifications position the card for strong traditional rasterization performance, with ray tracing capabilities that are functional but may require DLSS assistance for high frame rates at 4K.

In benchmark testing, the GPU scores 4407 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 152423 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 33620 in Geekbench Vulkan. The PassMark suite shows a G3D score of 25086 and a GPU compute score of 14397. The GPU's percentile ranking versus all GPUs is 68, placing it in the upper third of all tested graphics cards. However, the nearest rivals are notable: the NVIDIA P106-100, AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16, and AMD Radeon RX 6600M all score within 0.4% of the RTX 3080's average benchmark score of 23172. This is a surprising result, as these are not typically considered peers, but the data indicates that in synthetic average scores, the RTX 3080 is effectively tied with these parts. This suggests that while the raw specifications are strong, the average benchmark score is heavily influenced by compute and older API tests, not just modern gaming workloads.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU delivers a robust set of benchmark scores. In 3DMark, the Ryzen 9 7900X3D scores 1049 in single-thread, 2071 in 2-thread, 4041 in 4-thread, 7315 in 8-thread, 10144 in 16-thread, and 11480 in max-thread tests. Cinebench R23 results are 6037 for single-core and 42767 for multi-core. Geekbench scores are 2456 for single-core and 18808 for multi-core. PassMark results include 4126 for single-thread, 50317 for multithread, 97246 for floating point math, 160779 for integer math, and 593838 for data compression. The CPU's average benchmark score is 47908, and it holds a 90th percentile ranking versus all CPUs.

The combined system percentile is 79, reflecting the GPU's lower relative standing compared to the CPU. The CPU's nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 9 3900 with an average score of 47918 (0% delta), the Intel Core Ultra 7 265T at 47697 (0.4% delta), the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 at 48171 (-0.5% delta), and the Intel Core Ultra 5 235A at 48201 (-0.6% delta). This places the 7900X3D in a performance tier that matches the previous-generation Ryzen 9 3900 almost exactly, while slightly trailing the newer Intel Ultra parts. The CPU's strength is clearly in multi-threaded throughput, as evidenced by the 42767 Cinebench R23 multi-core score, which is over 7 times its single-core score.

The combined picture is one of CPU dominance over the GPU. The CPU sits at the 90th percentile, while the GPU sits at the 68th percentile. This gap suggests that in many gaming scenarios, particularly at lower resolutions, the GPU will be the limiting factor. However, for productivity and content creation tasks that leverage CPU multi-threading, the system will perform exceptionally well. The data shows a system that is far more capable on the processor side than on the graphics side, which is a critical consideration for potential buyers.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D is a 12-core, 24-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Raphael. It is manufactured on TSMC's 5 nm process, containing 17,840 million transistors across a dual-chiplet design with a total die size of 2x 71 mm². The base clock is 4.40 GHz, with a boost clock of 5.60 GHz. The TDP is rated at 120 W. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and a substantial 128 MB of shared L3 cache, which includes a 1x 64MB 3D V-Cache slice. This large L3 cache is a defining feature, designed to reduce memory latency in gaming and data-intensive tasks.

The memory support is DDR5, operating on a dual-channel bus with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, and ECC memory is supported. The processor integrates Radeon Graphics, providing a basic display output capability. PCIe support is Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the CPU. The multiplier is unlocked, allowing for overclocking. The processor was released on 2023-01-03 and has a launch MSRP of $599.

Benchmark results indicate strong single-threaded performance, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 6037 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2456. These scores are competitive with the best current processors and indicate snappy responsiveness in everyday tasks and games that rely on a few fast cores. The multi-threaded scores are even more impressive: Cinebench R23 multi-core at 42767, Geekbench multi-core at 18808, and PassMark multithread at 50317. The PassMark integer math score of 160779 and floating point math score of 97246 further illustrate the processor's capability in compute-heavy workloads. The data compression score of 593838 suggests excellent performance in file archiving and compression tasks. The extended instructions score of 44567 indicates strong AVX-512 or similar instruction set performance. These numbers paint a picture of a processor that excels in any workload that can utilize its 12 cores and 24 threads, from video encoding to 3D rendering to software compilation.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the provided data. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data for this pairing, so all FPS figures presented here are estimates based on the benchmark scores of the individual components. The dataIsMeasured field is false, which must be considered when interpreting any gaming performance claims.

Based on the CPU's 90th percentile ranking and its strong single-thread score of 6037 in Cinebench R23, the Ryzen 9 7900X3D is unlikely to be a bottleneck in most gaming scenarios. The 128 MB of L3 cache is specifically designed to improve gaming performance by reducing latency. The GPU, however, presents a different story. With a 68th percentile ranking, the RTX 3080 is capable but not top-tier by current standards. Its 10 GB of GDDR6X memory will be sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but at 4K with ultra textures, some titles may exceed the 10 GB capacity, causing stuttering or reduced texture quality.

Estimated performance at 1080p ultra settings would be very high, with the GPU likely to be the limiting factor. The CPU's 3DMark 8-thread score of 7315 suggests it can feed the GPU adequately. At 1440p, the system should still deliver excellent frame rates, with the RTX 3080's 760.3 GB/s bandwidth proving adequate. At 4K, performance will be more modest, with the GPU's memory capacity and compute power stretched by the higher resolution. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4407 suggests the GPU can handle DirectX 12 titles, but the PassMark DirectX 12 score of 100 (which appears to be a normalized score) indicates that raw DX12 performance may not be its strongest suit. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 33620 suggests decent Vulkan API performance. Overall, this system is best suited for high-refresh 1440p gaming, with playable but not maxed-out 4K performance.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The platform is built around the AMD Socket AM5, which supports the Ryzen 9 7900X3D. The processor uses DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. The CPU provides 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, offering high-bandwidth connectivity for the latest storage and expansion cards. The motherboard will need to support these standards.

The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is backward compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 slots, ensuring full bandwidth is available. The RTX 3080 has a TDP of 320 W, and the suggested PSU for the GPU is 700 W. The CPU has a TDP of 120 W. A system with this pairing would require a power supply that can handle the combined load, and the 700 W suggestion for the GPU alone should be considered a minimum, with headroom for the CPU and other components.

For a sensible next upgrade, the data points to the GPU as the primary bottleneck. The CPU is at the 90th percentile, while the GPU is at the 68th percentile. Upgrading the GPU to a more modern, higher-performing model would better balance the system. The memory is already DDR5, so a capacity or speed upgrade is possible, but the current 83.2 GB/s bandwidth is a baseline. The CPU is a 12-core part with strong multi-threaded performance, so it will remain relevant for several more years. The platform supports PCIe Gen 5, so a Gen 5 NVMe SSD could be added for faster storage. The most impactful upgrade, based on the percentile gap, would be a new graphics card.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

High-refresh gaming: This system is well-suited for high-refresh 1080p and 1440p gaming. The CPU's 3DMark single-thread score of 1049 and its 90th percentile ranking ensure it can keep up with the GPU, which has a PassMark G3D score of 25086. The 128 MB of L3 cache on the CPU minimizes latency. However, the GPU's 68th percentile ranking and 10 GB memory may limit performance in the most demanding titles at 1440p ultra, where frame rates may not consistently hit 144 Hz.

Streaming: The CPU is a strong streaming processor. Its 24 threads, evidenced by a 3DMark max-thread score of 11480 and a PassMark multithread score of 50317, provide more than enough headroom for encoding video while gaming. The GPU's NVENC encoder is also capable, but the CPU's raw throughput can handle x264 encoding without impacting gaming performance significantly.

Video editing: This is a strong scenario for this build. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42767 and PassMark integer math score of 160779 will accelerate video encoding and rendering times. The GPU's 29.77 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 760.3 GB/s bandwidth will assist with effects and timeline scrubbing. The 10 GB VRAM is sufficient for 4K editing in most programs.

3D rendering: The CPU is the star here, with a Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 17962 and a Geekbench multi-core score of 18808. These scores indicate excellent performance in CPU-based rendering engines. The GPU can also contribute with its 29.77 TFLOPS FP32 throughput, but its 10 GB VRAM may be a constraint for very large scenes. The combined CPU and GPU horsepower makes this a capable workstation for 3D artists.

Software development: The 12 cores and 24 threads are ideal for compilation tasks. The PassMark data compression score of 593838 and floating point math score of 97246 indicate strong performance in code compilation and testing. The large L3 cache helps with frequently accessed data. The system's memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s is sufficient for most development workloads.

Student and office work: This system is significantly over-powered for standard office tasks. The CPU's Geekbench single-core score of 2456 ensures instant responsiveness in word processors and web browsers. However, the GPU and CPU draw significant power, and the cost of this build is far beyond what is needed for such tasks. It would be a capable, but inefficient, choice for this scenario.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

This build targets users who prioritize CPU-intensive workloads and are willing to accept a slightly less powerful GPU. The primary audience is gamers who play at 1440p and want to ensure their processor is never a bottleneck, as evidenced by the CPU's 90th percentile versus the GPU's 68th percentile. They will get excellent frame rates in most games, but may need to lower settings in the most demanding titles to achieve high refresh rates.

Content creators, particularly video editors and 3D renderers, are the ideal audience. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42767 and Geekbench multi-core score of 18808 demonstrate exceptional rendering and encoding performance. The GPU's 29.77 TFLOPS FP32 compute adds acceleration for effects and GPU rendering. Software developers will also benefit from the 24 threads and high integer math score of 160779 for faster compilation.

Students and office workers should avoid this build. Its performance is far beyond their needs, and the power draw and cost are not justified. Small business workstations, however, could benefit if the business performs video production or complex data analysis. The system is not ideal for 4K gaming enthusiasts due to the GPU's 10 GB VRAM limitation, but it is a solid choice for high-refresh 1440p gaming and serious productivity.

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data (format: Q: ... A: ...)

Q: What is the CPU's performance percentile compared to all other CPUs?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D has a percentile rank of 90 versus all CPUs.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 3080 have, and what is its memory type?

A: The RTX 3080 has 10 GB of GDDR6X memory.

Q: What is the combined percentile ranking of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for this build is 79.

Q: What is the CPU's base and boost clock speed?

A: The base clock is 4.40 GHz, and the boost clock is 5.60 GHz.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for the RTX 3080?

A: The suggested PSU is 700 W.

Q: What is the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score?

A: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 42767.

Q: What is the GPU's PassMark G3D score?

A: The PassMark G3D score is 25086.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The data clearly indicates an imbalance in this system, with the CPU being significantly more powerful than the GPU. The CPU's 90th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 68th percentile creates a scenario where the GPU is the primary bottleneck in graphics-intensive tasks. In gaming, this means that at lower resolutions like 1080p, the GPU will be the limiting factor, preventing the system from achieving the maximum possible frame rates that the CPU could support. As resolution increases to 1440p and 4K, the GPU's load increases, and the bottleneck remains with the graphics card, though the CPU's strong single-thread performance (1049 in 3DMark) ensures it can still feed the GPU adequately.

In contrast, for CPU-bound workloads, the GPU is not the limiting factor. Tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation rely on the CPU's 12 cores and 24 threads, as evidenced by the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42767. In these scenarios, the GPU's role is secondary, and the CPU's performance will dictate overall system speed. The GPU's compute score of 14397 in PassMark is respectable, but it cannot match the CPU's raw throughput for most integer and floating-point operations.

The FPS scaling evidence is not available from measured data, as the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps figures. However, based on the percentile gap, the GPU will limit gaming performance. For users seeking to balance the system, the next upgrade should be the graphics card. The CPU has enough headroom to support a more powerful GPU, and its 90th percentile ranking suggests it will not become a bottleneck for several generations of graphics cards.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a desktop-class build (buildClass: desktop) that pairs a top-tier CPU with a mid-to-high-tier GPU. The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D is a 12-core, 24-thread processor from the 7000 series, based on the Zen 4 architecture. It is a flagship-level processor for the AM5 platform, with a 90th percentile ranking. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 is a high-end GPU from the GeForce 30-series, based on the Ampere architecture, but it is now end-of-life and holds a 68th percentile ranking.

The combined percentile for this pairing is 79, placing it in the upper quarter of all systems. The overall tier can be described as a high-performance productivity workstation with strong gaming capabilities, but it is not a top-tier gaming system due to the GPU's age and the 10 GB VRAM limitation. This is a system that will excel in CPU-intensive tasks like 3D rendering, video editing, and software development, where the CPU's 42767 Cinebench R23 multi-core score is a major asset. It will also provide a very good gaming experience at 1440p, but users seeking maximum 4K performance should look for a more modern GPU. The build represents a solid choice for users who need serious compute power and play games as a secondary concern.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data (format: Q: ... A: ...)

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds