SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

86 Score

Top 14% Ranking

86 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 14% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

79%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D

47,908 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

2,690 Benchmark Score

Top 21% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER represent a high-end desktop pairing built on the latest available platforms. This analysis examines the data for this specific combination, noting upfront that no measured frame rate (FPS) rows exist for this exact configuration. Consequently, all gaming performance discussions are estimated from the component benchmark scores and their relative performance percentiles, not from direct in-game testing data.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU is built for the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which serves as the foundation for the Ryzen 7000 series. This socket is the current mainstream AMD desktop standard, ensuring a clear path for future upgrades without necessarily requiring a motherboard change. The platform supports DDR5 memory, moving past older DDR4 standards, and utilizes a dual-channel memory bus that provides a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. The processor also supports ECC memory, a feature useful for workstations where data integrity is critical. For expansion and storage, the CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the processor itself, offering high-bandwidth connectivity for the fastest NVMe SSDs and graphics cards available.

The CPU has a TDP of 120 W, which is moderate for a 12-core processor. This figure indicates that a capable air cooler or a standard 240mm-class liquid cooler should be sufficient for most users. The GPU, conversely, has a TDP of 275 W and requires a single 16-pin power connector. The combined thermal and power demands of this system are significant but not extreme; a quality power supply unit with sufficient wattage for a high-end desktop is required. The GPU’s slot width is dual-slot, and its physical dimensions are 245 mm in length, 115 mm in height, and 40 mm in width, so case compatibility is generally good for mid-tower and larger chassis.

Looking at the upgrade path, the most sensible next step for a user on this platform would be to upgrade the graphics card, as the AM5 socket and DDR5 memory support provide a solid foundation for future Ryzen processors. The PCIe Gen 5 interface on the CPU ensures that bandwidth for even the most demanding next-generation GPUs will not be a bottleneck. The CPU's unlocked multiplier also allows for overclocking to extend its lifespan, though the 3D V-Cache design typically benefits more from stock or PBO (Precision Boost Overdrive) settings than manual all-core overclocks. The platform's support for PCIe Gen 5 also future-proofs storage and accelerator add-in cards.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU and GPU present a stark contrast in their benchmark standing. The Ryzen 9 7900X3D scores in the 90th percentile among all CPUs, indicating it is a top-tier processor for compute-heavy workloads. Its average benchmark score is 47908, placing it in direct competition with the AMD Ryzen 9 3900 (avgScore 47918, deltaPct 0), the Intel Core Ultra 7 265T (avgScore 47697, deltaPct 0.4), and the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 (avgScore 48171, deltaPct -0.5). These deltas are all within one percent, showing that the 7900X3D is the performance peer of these specific high-end chips. In multi-threaded tests, the CPU achieves a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 42767 and a Geekbench multicore score of 18808, reinforcing its strength in parallel workloads. Single-thread performance is also strong, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 6037 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2456, ensuring snappy responsiveness in everyday tasks and solid performance in lightly-threaded applications.

The GPU, however, tells a very different story. The RTX 5070 SUPER scores in the 18th percentile among all GPUs, which indicates performance that is far below the current high-end standard. Its only benchmark score, 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, is 2690. This score places it in the company of entry-level cards like the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M (avgScore 2664, deltaPct 1), the NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (avgScore 2662, deltaPct 1.1), and the Intel Arc Pro B50 (avgScore 2660, deltaPct 1.1). The deltaPct values are positive, meaning the RTX 5070 SUPER is slightly faster than these rivals, but it is a marginal difference. This 18th percentile ranking suggests the GPU is a significant performance bottleneck in this pairing, limiting the overall system capability, especially in graphics-intensive tasks.

The combined picture is one of a massive imbalance. The CPU is a top-10% performer, while the GPU is in the bottom 20%. The combined percentile for this build is 54. This data suggests that while the CPU can handle the most demanding computational tasks with ease, the GPU will struggle to keep up in modern games and GPU-accelerated rendering. The system's overall performance tier is held back entirely by the graphics card, making it a poor pairing for gaming or GPU-centric creative work.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: This scenario is severely compromised by the GPU. With an 18th percentile score, the RTX 5070 SUPER is not positioned to drive high-refresh-rate monitors at high resolutions. While the CPU's strong single-thread score (6037 in Cinebench R23) is excellent for maintaining high frame rates in CPU-bound titles, the GPU will be the limiting factor. Estimates suggest that users would have to significantly lower graphical settings and resolution to achieve high frame rates, making this pairing unsuitable for a high-refresh gaming build.

Streaming: The CPU is well-equipped for streaming. The 12 cores and 24 threads provide ample headroom for encoding video while gaming, as evidenced by its high multi-threaded scores (PassMark multithread score of 50317). The GPU also has dedicated NVENC encoders via its tensor cores, but the GPU's low 3D performance will limit the in-game frame rates. A streamer could use the CPU for x264 encoding at good quality, but the gaming experience itself would be subpar due to the GPU bottleneck.

Video Editing: The CPU's performance is a boon for video editing. The high Cinebench R23 multicore score (42767) and strong PassMark integer math score (160779) will allow for fast timeline scrubbing and efficient export times. However, the GPU is critical for effects processing, rendering previews, and applying transitions. With the GPU's low benchmark standing, export times and real-time playback with heavy effects would be poor. The system would be effective for simple cuts and light color correction but would falter with complex motion graphics or 4K timelines.

3D Rendering: This workload relies heavily on both CPU and GPU. The CPU's strong multi-core performance (11480 in 3DMark max threads) will accelerate CPU-based rendering engines like those found in some 3D software, and its 128 MB of L3 cache helps with complex scene data. However, GPU-accelerated rendering, which is the standard in modern engines, would be very slow due to the GPU's low benchmark scores. The system would be adequate for CPU rendering but severely underpowered for GPU rendering.

Software Development: This is a scenario where the build makes sense. Compilation is heavily multi-threaded, and the CPU excels here with its high PassMark multithread score (50317) and data compression score (593838). The GPU is less relevant for code compilation, though it can help with some development tools. The fast I/O from PCIe Gen 5 and the large cache are beneficial for large codebases. This pairing would be a productivity powerhouse for a developer.

Student and Office Work: The system is massively overqualified for standard office tasks like word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The CPU's single-thread performance (4126 in PassMark single thread) ensures smooth operation, but the power and cost of this system would be wasted on such workloads. The GPU is irrelevant for these tasks. A student or office worker would see no benefit from this configuration over a much more modest system.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data clearly identifies the GPU as the primary bottleneck in this system. The CPU is in the 90th percentile, while the GPU is in the 18th. This 72-point difference creates a massive imbalance. In any workload that relies on the GPU, the RTX 5070 SUPER will be completely saturated, unable to keep up with the data being fed to it by the powerful CPU. This means in gaming, the frame rate will be dictated by the GPU, and the CPU will spend most of its time idle, waiting for the GPU to finish its tasks.

Conversely, in CPU-bound workloads like code compilation or data processing, the GPU will be idle, and the CPU's high performance will shine. The system is not "balanced" in the traditional sense; it is two distinct components with wildly different performance tiers. The CPU does not limit the GPU in any workload, but the GPU severely limits the CPU in graphics-intensive scenarios. The combined percentile of 54 reflects this compromise, placing the entire system in the mid-range category despite having a top-tier CPU. The FPS scaling in games would be directly proportional to the GPU's 3DMark score, which is near entry-level, meaning users should expect frame rates consistent with a GT 1030 or similar class of GPU, rather than the high-end performance the CPU suggests.

FAQ

Q: Is the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D a good CPU for this system?

A: Yes, the data shows it is a top-tier processor, scoring in the 90th percentile of all CPUs. Its average benchmark score of 47908 puts it on par with other high-end chips like the AMD Ryzen 9 3900 and Intel Core Ultra 7 265T.

Q: What is the performance class of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER?

A: The benchmark results indicate it is an entry-level GPU, scoring in the 18th percentile. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2690 places it in the same performance tier as the NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 and Intel Arc Pro B50.

Q: How much L3 cache does the CPU have?

A: The CPU has a large 128 MB of shared L3 cache, which includes a 1x 64MB slice of 3D V-Cache. This is a key feature for gaming performance, though it is bottlenecked by the GPU in this specific build.

Q: What type of memory does this system use?

A: The system uses DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, providing a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. The memory bus width for the GPU is 192-bit.

Q: Is this build suitable for 4K gaming?

A: No. The GPU's low benchmark scores (18th percentile) indicate it lacks the rendering power for 4K gaming. The CPU is capable, but the GPU would be the limiting factor, requiring very low settings to achieve playable frame rates.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile for this CPU and GPU pairing is 54, placing it firmly in the mid-range category overall. This is a direct result of the low-performing GPU dragging down the high-performing CPU.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, the CPU includes Radeon Graphics. This can be useful for troubleshooting or basic display output, but it is not intended for gaming or demanding graphics work.

Who Should Build It

This build is not a coherent gaming or general-purpose graphics system. The pairing makes sense only for users whose primary workload is heavily multi-threaded and CPU-bound, and who do not require significant graphics processing power. The target user is a software developer, data scientist, or researcher running complex simulations, compiling large codebases, or processing massive datasets. The CPU's 12 cores, 24 threads, and 128 MB of cache provide exceptional performance for these tasks, as shown by its high scores in PassMark multithread (50317) and data compression (593838).

Content creators who work primarily with CPU-based rendering engines could also benefit, but they would be sorely disappointed by the GPU's performance in GPU-accelerated tasks. The system is also a poor choice for students or small business workstations, as the cost and power are unjustified for office productivity, where the GPU's low performance is irrelevant and the CPU's power is wasted. For anyone whose primary use is gaming, video editing, or 3D modeling with GPU acceleration, this pairing is fundamentally flawed. The only sensible user is one who prioritizes CPU compute over everything else and is willing to accept an entry-level GPU for basic display output only.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture and uses the GB205 chip, manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It has 18 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 672.0 GB/s. The card has a base clock of 2325 MHz and a boost clock of 2512 MHz, with memory running at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective). It features 6400 shading units, 200 texture mapping units, and 80 raster output pipelines. For ray tracing and AI workloads, it has 50 RT cores and 200 tensor cores.

The benchmark data, however, shows that these specifications do not translate into high performance. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2690 is the sole data point, and it places the GPU in the 18th percentile. This score is nearly identical to the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M (score 2664, deltaPct 1) and the GeForce GT 1030 (score 2662, deltaPct 1.1). This indicates that, despite modern architecture and high memory capacity, the card's actual rendering performance is on par with decade-old entry-level parts. The FP32 performance of 32.15 TFLOPS and pixel rate of 201.0 GPixel/s are theoretical maxima that are not realized in the benchmark. This suggests a severely disabled or limited chip, or perhaps a very early engineering sample, as the specifications would normally suggest much higher performance. The 275 W TDP is high for the performance level shown, indicating the card is not power-efficient in this state. For rendering, the 18 GB of VRAM is ample, but the bandwidth and compute power are too low for professional workloads.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build, as indicated by the buildClass field. It pairs a top-tier Ryzen 9 7000-series processor with a graphics card that benchmarks in the bottom 20% of all GPUs. The CPU is a 12-core, 24-thread Zen 4 part with a base clock of 4.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz. It has a TDP of 120 W and uses the AM5 socket. The GPU is an NVIDIA GeForce 50-series part with 18 GB of memory. The combined percentile for this pairing is 54, which places the overall system in the mid-range tier. This is a stark contrast to the CPU's individual 90th percentile ranking. The build is defined by this massive discrepancy in component capability. It is a system that would excel in CPU-intensive applications but would be a poor choice for any graphics-dependent task. The data suggests that this is not a balanced gaming rig but rather a high-performance compute workstation with a placeholder or severely underperforming graphics solution.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D is a desktop processor from the 7000 series, built on the Zen 4 architecture with the Raphael codename. It is manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC, containing 17,840 million transistors across a die size of 2x 71 mm². The CPU has 12 cores and 24 threads, with a base clock of 4.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz. It has a TDP of 120 W and features an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Its cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 and 1 MB of L2 per core, along with a massive 128 MB of shared L3 cache, which includes a 64MB 3D V-Cache slice.

The benchmark results place the CPU in the 90th percentile of all processors, confirming its high-end status. Its average score of 47908 is virtually identical to the AMD Ryzen 9 3900 (deltaPct 0) and slightly ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265T (deltaPct 0.4). In practical terms, the CPU shows exceptional multi-threaded performance, as evidenced by its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 42767 and PassMark multithread score of 50317. This makes it ideal for rendering, video encoding, and scientific computing. Single-thread performance is also strong, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 6037, ensuring fast application launch times and responsive gameplay in CPU-bound scenarios. The large L3 cache is a significant advantage for gaming and data-heavy workloads, providing low-latency access to frequently used data. However, in this specific build, the CPU's potential is hampered by the GPU's inability to render frames fast enough to utilize the CPU's processing power fully.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Upgrade Path and Platform

Benchmark Performance

Usage Scenarios

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

Build Overview

CPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds