SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D + Intel Arc A350

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

84 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
74%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D

47,908 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D paired with the Intel Arc A350 is a desktop configuration built around a high-end 12-core processor and a low-power entry-level graphics card. The benchmark data shows a stark performance imbalance: the CPU ranks in the 90th percentile among all processors, while the GPU sits exactly at the 50th percentile, and the combined build percentile is 70. This pairing is characterized by an extreme processor advantage that cannot be fully utilized by the accompanying graphics hardware.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D is a 12-core, 24-thread desktop processor built on the Zen 4 architecture with the Raphael codename. It is manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC and features a base clock of 4.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz. The chip has a 120 W TDP and operates on the AMD Socket AM5 platform with support for DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, providing 83.2 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The CPU is unlocked, meaning the multiplier can be adjusted for overclocking, and it supports ECC memory.

A defining feature of this processor is its cache hierarchy: 64 KB of L1 and 1 MB of L2 per core, but a substantial 128 MB of shared L3 cache, which includes a 1x 64MB 3D V-Cache slice. This large cache is designed to reduce memory latency and improve performance in cache-sensitive workloads. The CPU also integrates Radeon Graphics, a PCIe Gen 5 interface with 24 lanes from the CPU, and was released on January 3, 2023, with a launch MSRP of $599.

Benchmark results demonstrate the processor's strength across various test types. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 42,767 in multicore and 6,037 in single-core tests. The multicore score is particularly strong, indicating that the 12 cores and 24 threads scale effectively under heavy load. The single-core score of 6,037 also shows robust per-thread performance, which is essential for lightly-threaded tasks.

The 3DMark results show a clear scaling pattern: 1,049 in single-thread, 2,071 in 2-threads, 4,041 in 4-threads, 7,315 in 8-threads, 10,144 in 16-threads, and 11,480 in max-threads. This scaling indicates that performance increases consistently as more threads are utilized, though the gains diminish slightly between the 16-thread and max-thread tests, which use all 24 threads. Similarly, Geekbench reports 2,456 for single-core and 18,808 for multicore.

PassMark tests provide further insight into specialized workloads. The CPU achieves 593,838 in data compression, 35,293 in data encryption, 44,567 in extended instructions, and 160,779 in integer math. Floating-point math scores 97,246, and the multithread score is 50,317. The physics score of 4,728 and random string sorting of 70,662 round out the results. These numbers indicate a processor that excels in both integer-heavy and floating-point operations, with the V-Cache providing a measurable advantage in data-intensive tasks.

The average benchmark score for this CPU is 47,908, placing it in the 90th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 9 3900 with a delta of 0%, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265T with a delta of 0.4%, and the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 with a delta of -0.5%. These comparisons show that the 7900X3D is competitive with, and in some cases slightly ahead of, processors from different generations and architectures.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU and GPU combination, and the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. Therefore, all frame rate discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores of the individual components and should be treated as qualitative expectations rather than verified results.

The gaming potential of this pairing is heavily constrained by the Intel Arc A350. The GPU has an average benchmark score of 0 and a percentile ranking of 50, which places it at the midpoint of all GPUs. In contrast, the CPU is at the 90th percentile. This creates a situation where the processor can easily feed data to the graphics card, but the GPU is likely to become the limiting factor in most gaming scenarios.

For high-refresh-rate gaming at lower resolutions, the CPU's strong single-thread performance of 6,037 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 2,456 in Geekbench single-core suggests it can handle high frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios. However, the Arc A350's modest specifications—4 GB of VRAM and a 64-bit memory bus with 124.0 GB/s bandwidth—indicate it will struggle to maintain high frame rates at 1080p in demanding titles. At higher resolutions, such as 1440p or 4K, the GPU load increases further, and the Arc A350's limitations become even more pronounced.

The lack of measured FPS data means these conclusions are inferred from the components' benchmark scores. The CPU's 90th percentile ranking supports its ability to handle modern game engines, but the GPU's 50th percentile ranking suggests it will deliver only average frame rates at best. In esports titles or older games, the Arc A350 might provide playable performance, but it is unlikely to sustain high refresh rates in graphically intensive AAA games. The estimated figures for gaming performance should be viewed as cautious approximations based on the component hierarchy.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's performance is well-documented across multiple benchmarks, while the GPU has no individual benchmark scores in the provided data. The CPU achieves a 3DMark max-threads score of 11,480 and a single-thread score of 1,049. In Cinebench R20, it scores 17,962 in multicore and 2,535 in single-core, while the R15 results are 4,310 multicore and 608 single-core. These scores consistently show the CPU's ability to handle both multi-threaded and single-threaded workloads effectively.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 47,908 places it in the 90th percentile of all CPUs, which is a strong result for a desktop processor. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 3900, has an average score of 47,918, a negligible 0% difference. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265T is 0.4% ahead, while the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 is 0.5% behind. This tight grouping indicates that the 7900X3D is positioned among a cluster of similarly performing processors, but its 90th percentile rank confirms it is in the upper tier of all CPUs.

The GPU, Intel Arc A350, has an average benchmark score of 0 and a percentile ranking of 50 against all GPUs. It has no nearest rivals listed. The combined percentile for this build is 70, which reflects the high CPU contribution pulling the overall score upward despite the GPU's average standing. The data presents a clear picture: a powerful processor paired with a modest graphics card creates a system whose overall benchmark profile is defined by the processor's dominance.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's single-thread performance is sufficient for high-refresh gaming, with a Geekbench single-core score of 2,456 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 6,037. However, the Intel Arc A350's 50th percentile ranking and 4 GB VRAM limit its ability to drive high frame rates at 1080p in modern titles. The system is better suited for competitive games with lower graphics requirements.

Streaming: The 12 cores and 24 threads provide ample capacity for encoding and streaming simultaneously. The 3DMark max-threads score of 11,480 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 42,767 indicate that the CPU can handle both game rendering and stream encoding without significant performance degradation. The GPU's role in streaming is minimal, making the CPU the primary asset here.

Video editing: Video editing benefits from the CPU's multi-threaded performance. The PassMark floating-point math score of 97,246 and integer math score of 160,779 support smooth timeline editing and export tasks. The 128 MB L3 cache helps with large file handling, but the GPU's limited VRAM may be a constraint for effects-heavy workflows that rely on GPU acceleration.

3D rendering: This workload aligns closely with the CPU's strengths. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 42,767 is a strong indicator of rendering capability, and the PassMark multithread score of 50,317 supports this conclusion. The Arc A350's 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 performance is adequate for basic viewport rendering but will be slower for final frame rendering compared to higher-end GPUs.

Software development: The CPU's compilation times benefit from its 24 threads, as shown by the 3DMark max-threads score of 11,480. The PassMark data compression score of 593,838 suggests efficient handling of large codebases and build artifacts. The GPU is not a significant factor in standard development tasks, so the CPU's performance is the main determinant.

Student and office work: For everyday tasks like word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing, the system is over-provisioned. The CPU's single-thread performance of 4,126 in PassMark single-thread ensures responsive application usage, while the GPU is more than sufficient for office graphics. The 120 W TDP is reasonable for a desktop, though the overall system power draw is dominated by the CPU.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A350 is an entry-level desktop GPU based on the Xe-HPG architecture with the DG2-128 chip. It is manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC and contains 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. The GPU has a base and boost clock of 2000 MHz, with memory clocked at 1937 MHz or 15.5 Gbps effective. It features 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing 124.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

The GPU has 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 24 render output units. It includes 6 ray tracing cores, though it has no tensor cores listed. The pixel rate is 48.00 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 96.00 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 3.072 TFLOPS, while FP16 performance is 6.144 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio. The TDP is 25 W, with a suggested PSU of 200 W, and it uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.

A notable detail is that the display outputs field lists "No outputs," which is unusual for a desktop GPU. This suggests the Arc A350 may be intended for specific embedded or compute roles rather than traditional consumer graphics. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, indicating modern API compatibility. Its production status is end-of-life, with a predecessor of Xe Graphics and a successor of Battlemage.

The GPU's benchmark scores are empty, and its percentile ranking is 50, which means it performs at the median level of all GPUs. The lack of benchmark data makes direct performance comparisons difficult. The 4 GB VRAM is a limiting factor for modern games at high settings, and the 64-bit memory bus restricts bandwidth-sensitive workloads. For rendering tasks, the 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 performance is modest, and the 6 ray tracing cores provide only baseline ray tracing capability. The GPU is best suited for light workloads and low-resolution gaming.

Who Should Build It

This system is primarily suited for users who require substantial CPU processing power but have minimal graphics demands. The CPU's 90th percentile ranking makes it an excellent choice for professionals in software development, data analysis, and multi-threaded productivity tasks where the 12 cores and 24 threads are fully utilized. The 128 MB L3 cache is particularly beneficial for workloads with large datasets that fit within the cache.

Content creators focused on video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 42,767, but they should be aware that the Arc A350's 4 GB VRAM and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth will limit GPU-accelerated effects and high-resolution texture work. The system could serve as a capable workstation for CPU-heavy tasks, with the GPU handling basic display output and light acceleration.

Gamers at 1080p with modest expectations may find the system playable for older or less demanding titles, but the GPU's 50th percentile ranking suggests it will not deliver high settings in modern AAA games. Students and office workers would find the system over-specified for their needs, though the CPU's efficiency in single-threaded tasks ensures smooth everyday performance. The 25 W TDP of the GPU makes this a low-power option for the graphics side, which could appeal to users building a system where power consumption is a priority.

The target user is someone who prioritizes CPU performance and is willing to sacrifice gaming fidelity or GPU-accelerated workloads. The system's 70th combined percentile confirms it is above average overall, but this is driven almost entirely by the processor.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data reveals a severe imbalance between the CPU and GPU in this pairing. The CPU's 90th percentile ranking and average benchmark score of 47,908 dwarf the GPU's 50th percentile ranking and average benchmark score of 0. In any workload that engages the GPU, the Arc A350 will be the bottleneck. The CPU's high single-thread and multi-thread scores mean it can easily keep up with or exceed what the GPU can process.

In gaming, the bottleneck is almost always the GPU. The CPU's single-thread performance of 6,037 in Cinebench R23 is more than sufficient to feed frames to the GPU, but the Arc A350's 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus will limit frame rates, especially at higher resolutions. The GPU's 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 performance is a fraction of what higher-end cards offer, so the system's gaming performance is capped by the graphics card.

For CPU-bound workloads like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation, the bottleneck shifts to the processor, but this is a positive scenario because the CPU is very capable. The 3DMark max-threads score of 11,480 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 42,767 show that the CPU can handle heavy multi-threaded loads without becoming a limiting factor. In these cases, the GPU's role is minimal, so the imbalance has less impact.

The combined percentile of 70 reflects this imbalance: the CPU pulls the system up, while the GPU holds it back. The data suggests that a user who upgrades the GPU would see a substantial improvement in graphics-related performance, whereas upgrading the CPU would yield diminishing returns. The current configuration is best understood as a CPU-centric system with an auxiliary GPU for basic display and light acceleration duties.

Build Overview

This build pairs the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D with the Intel Arc A350 in a desktop form factor. The CPU is a high-end 12-core processor from the 7000 series, based on Zen 4 architecture, while the GPU is an entry-level Alchemist generation card from Intel's Arc 3 series. The combined percentile for this build is 70, indicating above-average overall performance among all CPU and GPU pairings.

The CPU is the dominant component, with a 90th percentile ranking against all CPUs and a substantial 128 MB of L3 cache. The GPU, by contrast, sits at the 50th percentile and has no recorded benchmark scores. This pairing is unusual: it combines a processor designed for demanding multi-threaded workloads with a graphics card intended for low-power or basic display tasks. The data shows that the CPU is capable of handling intensive processing, but the GPU limits the system's graphics potential.

The desktop class and the components' specifications indicate a system that could serve as a powerful workstation for CPU-intensive tasks, with the GPU functioning as a secondary component. The launch MSRP of the CPU is $599, and the GPU has no launch MSRP listed. The overall tier, as defined by the 70th combined percentile, places this build in the upper-mid range of system performance, though its capabilities are heavily skewed toward the processor.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D has 12 cores and 24 threads, with a base clock of 4.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz.

Q: How does the CPU's performance compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score is 47,908, which is 0% different from the AMD Ryzen 9 3900, 0.4% behind the Intel Core Ultra 7 265T, and 0.5% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The Intel Arc A350 has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 124.0 GB/s.

Q: Does the system have measured FPS data for gaming?

A: No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU and GPU combination, so all gaming frame rates are estimated from benchmark scores.

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking among all processors?

A: The CPU is in the 90th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 47,908.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking and benchmark score?

A: The GPU is in the 50th percentile of all GPUs, and its average benchmark score is 0.

Q: What is the combined percentile for this build?

A: The combined percentile for this CPU and GPU pairing is 70, indicating above-average performance relative to all builds.