SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D + Intel Arc A310

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

89 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
85%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D

47,908 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A310

7,550 Benchmark Score
Top 15% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This pairing is a study in extremes. The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D is a top-tier 12-core processor that sits in the 90th percentile of all CPUs, while the Intel Arc A310 is an entry-level, low-profile graphics card that lands in the 40th percentile of all GPUs. Benchmark data shows a massive capability gap between the two components, making this a highly specialized build where the CPU is the undisputed star and the GPU serves as a basic display and media output solution. The data indicates this is not a balanced gaming rig, but rather a workstation-grade CPU paired with a placeholder GPU for basic visual output.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D is a 12-core, 24-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Raphael. It is manufactured on a 5 nm process by TSMC and features a base clock of 4.40 GHz with a boost clock of 5.60 GHz. The chip uses the AMD Socket AM5 platform and has a TDP of 120 W. A defining feature is its cache layout: 64 KB of L1 and 1 MB of L2 per core, alongside a massive 128 MB of shared L3 cache, which includes a 1x 64MB 3D V-Cache slice. This substantial L3 cache is designed to reduce memory latency in cache-sensitive workloads.

The benchmark scores for this CPU are exceptional across the board. In Cinebench R23, the processor scores 42,767 points in multi-core and 6,037 points in single-core tests. These scores indicate that the CPU can handle heavily threaded rendering tasks with ease while also maintaining strong single-thread responsiveness. The CPU's 3DMark scores scale consistently with thread count: it scores 2,071 with 2 threads, 4,041 with 4 threads, 7,315 with 8 threads, 10,144 with 16 threads, and peaks at 11,480 with max threads. This scaling pattern shows efficient utilization of all 24 threads, though the incremental gains diminish slightly at the highest thread counts.

The data shows the CPU is extremely capable in synthetic productivity tests. Geekbench scores of 18,808 (multi-core) and 2,456 (single-core) reinforce its position as a high-end desktop processor. PassMark tests show a multi-thread score of 50,317 and a single-thread score of 4,126. The processor also excels in specialized tasks, with a data compression score of 593,838, an encryption score of 35,293, and a floating-point math score of 97,246. These figures suggest that the 7900X3D is not just a gaming CPU but a legitimate productivity powerhouse for content creation and scientific computing.

Relative to its nearest rivals, the 7900X3D is in a tight race. It holds a 0% delta against the AMD Ryzen 9 3900, which has an average score of 47,918 versus the 7900X3D's 47,908. It is 0.4% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265T, 0.5% behind the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380, and 0.6% behind the Intel Core Ultra 5 235A. This positions the processor at the very top of the performance tier, with its primary competition coming from newer, potentially more power-efficient designs. The 7900X3D's 90th percentile ranking among all CPUs confirms its status as a high-end part. Its average benchmark score of 47,908 places it in the upper echelon of available desktop processors, making it suitable for demanding professional applications.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A310 is built on the Xe-HPG architecture, part of the Alchemist generation (Arc 3). It uses the DG2-128 chip, manufactured on a 6 nm process by TSMC, with a die size of 157 mm² and 7,200 million transistors. The GPU has a base and boost clock of 1750 MHz, and its 4 GB of GDDR6 memory runs at 1937 MHz (15.5 Gbps effective), delivering a bandwidth of 124.0 GB/s over a 64-bit bus. The GPU includes 768 shading units, 32 TMUs, and 16 ROPs.

The A310 includes 6 RT cores, which provide hardware support for ray tracing, though the limited shader count (768) suggests that ray tracing performance will be constrained. The GPU lacks defined tensor cores, so any AI-accelerated features would rely on general-purpose compute. The FP32 performance is 2.688 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 5.376 TFLOPS (2:1). These numbers place it in the entry-level segment for graphics cards. The GPU's pixel rate is 28.00 GPixel/s and its texture rate is 56.00 GTexel/s.

Benchmark results confirm the A310's entry-level positioning. The PassMark G3D score is 5,433, which places it in the 40th percentile of all GPUs. DirectX 12 performance is particularly weak, with a score of 29, while DirectX 11 scores 33 and DirectX 10 scores 31. DirectX 9 performance is relatively better at 69. The G2D score of 625 indicates modest 2D desktop acceleration. Compute performance, as measured by PassMark GPU Compute, is 2,157. In Geekbench, the GPU scores 30,607 in OpenCL and 28,964 in Vulkan.

The nearest rivals for the A310 are all older or similarly entry-level parts. It shows a -0.1% delta against the AMD Radeon R7 250, a -0.4% delta against the Radeon Pro WX 3100, a 1% lead over the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650, and a 1.4% lead over the Radeon HD 8850M. This places the A310 in the same performance bracket as a GeForce GTX 1650, which is a capable 1080p gaming card from a previous generation. However, the A310's 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit bus are limiting factors for modern game textures and memory-intensive tasks. The GPU is marked as end-of-life, with Battlemage as its successor.

Benchmark Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the FACT PACK. All FPS discussion is therefore estimated from the individual benchmark scores of each component. The CPU's benchmark scores are excellent, with an average score of 47,908, while the GPU's average score is 7,550.

The CPU's performance is stellar. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42,767 places it in the top tier for rendering workloads. A Geekbench multi-core score of 18,808 supports this. The CPU's percentile rank of 90th among all CPUs confirms its high-end status. In contrast, the GPU's 40th percentile ranking shows it is an entry-level part. The PassMark G3D score of 5,433 is modest, and the DirectX 12 score of 29 is particularly low, indicating weak performance in modern graphics APIs.

The combined picture is one of severe imbalance. The CPU is capable of driving high-end gaming and professional workloads, but the GPU is not. The combined percentile for this build is 65, but this figure is heavily weighted by the CPU. In any gaming scenario, the GPU will be the limiting factor. The CPU's 3DMark 16-thread score of 10,144 shows it can handle physics and game logic, but the GPU's DirectX 12 score of 29 suggests that actual frame rendering will be bottlenecked. For productivity tasks that rely on CPU power, the build will perform exceptionally well, but for graphics-intensive tasks, it will underperform relative to the CPU's capabilities.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The motherboard platform is AMD Socket AM5, which is a current-generation desktop platform. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, and it supports ECC memory. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes, ensuring high bandwidth for future GPUs and NVMe drives. The CPU also includes integrated Radeon Graphics, which provides a fallback display output if the discrete GPU is removed.

The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is sufficient for its bandwidth needs. The GPU's TDP is just 30 W, and the suggested PSU is 200 W. This is incredibly low power draw, meaning the existing power supply has substantial headroom. The CPU's TDP is 120 W, so the total system power draw is modest. The GPU is single-slot and requires no power connectors, making it easy to install.

A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the Intel Arc A310 with a more powerful GPU. The CPU's PCIe Gen 5 support and high core count mean it can handle any modern graphics card without becoming a bottleneck. The 200 W suggested PSU for the GPU indicates that the power delivery system is designed for low-power operation, but the CPU's 120 W TDP suggests the platform can support a more robust power supply if needed. The platform's DDR5 support and ECC capability make it suitable for professional workstations. The integrated Radeon Graphics in the CPU also provides a backup if the discrete GPU fails or is removed.

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark data indicates that this build is profoundly bottlenecked by the GPU in graphics-intensive tasks. The CPU's 90th percentile rank versus the GPU's 40th percentile rank demonstrates a massive performance gap. In gaming, the GPU's DirectX 12 score of 29 suggests that frame rates will be low, even at 1080p. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth will also limit texture quality and resolution. The CPU, with its 128 MB of L3 cache and 24 threads, will have no trouble keeping up with the GPU's output.

In CPU-bound workloads, the balance is the opposite. For video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation, the CPU will perform exceptionally well, while the GPU will be underutilized. The CPU's Cinebench R23 score of 42,767 and Geekbench multi-core score of 18,808 indicate that these tasks will run at speeds comparable to high-end workstations. The GPU's compute score of 2,157 is low, so any GPU-accelerated rendering will be slow, but CPU-based rendering will be fast. The data shows that the CPU is the dominant component, and the GPU is a secondary, low-power output device.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This scenario is not viable. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 5,433 and DirectX 12 score of 29 indicate that frame rates will be too low for high-refresh monitors. The CPU would be able to handle the game logic, but the GPU would be the limiting factor. Estimated FPS in modern games would be low, even at 1080p with low settings.

Streaming: The CPU is well-suited for streaming. Its 24 threads and high Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42,767 allow for software encoding without dropping frames. The GPU can handle video output, but its encoding capabilities are limited by its low compute score. The CPU's integrated Radeon Graphics could also be used for additional display outputs.

Video editing: Video editing will be a mixed experience. The CPU's high multi-core performance (Geekbench 18,808) will make timeline scrubbing and effects processing smooth. However, the GPU's low compute score (2,157) will slow down GPU-accelerated effects and rendering. For simple cuts and titles, the build will be fine, but for heavy color grading and motion graphics, the GPU will be a bottleneck.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering will be excellent. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42,767 shows that the processor can handle complex scenes with high detail. GPU-based rendering will be slow due to the A310's low FP32 performance of 2.688 TFLOPS. For render engines that use the CPU, this build is a top performer.

Software development: This is a strong scenario. The CPU's high integer math score (160,779) and data compression score (593,838) indicate fast compilation and code processing. The GPU is irrelevant for most development tasks, so the CPU's power is fully utilized. The support for ECC memory (from the CPU's memory controller) is a bonus for long-running compilation jobs.

Student and office work: This build is overkill for basic tasks. The CPU's single-thread score of 4,126 (PassMark) ensures snappy application responsiveness. The GPU's G2D score of 625 is adequate for desktop rendering and 2D applications. However, the cost of the CPU makes this build impractical for typical student or office use, given that a lower-end processor would suffice.

Who Should Build It

This build is intended for users who need maximum CPU processing power for professional workloads and do not require discrete GPU performance. The target audience includes 3D artists who use CPU-based renderers, video editors who work with codecs that favor CPU encoding, and software developers who compile large codebases. The CPU's 90th percentile rank and Cinebench R23 score of 42,767 make it a top choice for these tasks.

Gamers at any resolution should avoid this build. The GPU's 40th percentile rank and low DirectX 12 score mean that gaming performance will be poor. Content creators who rely on GPU acceleration for effects or rendering will also be disappointed. However, small business workstations that run database queries, financial modeling, or scientific simulations will benefit from the CPU's 24 threads and high memory bandwidth.

For users who need a basic display output alongside a powerful CPU, the A310's low 30 W TDP and single-slot design are ideal. The build is also suitable for headless servers or compute nodes where a GPU is only needed for system administration. The CPU's integrated Radeon Graphics means the discrete GPU is not strictly necessary, but the A310 provides additional display outputs and hardware video decoding.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D CPU with the Intel Arc A310 GPU. The CPU is a 12-core, 24-thread processor with a 5.6 GHz boost clock and 128 MB of L3 cache, placing it in the 90th percentile of all CPUs. The GPU is an entry-level card with 4 GB of VRAM and a 64-bit memory bus, placing it in the 40th percentile of all GPUs. The combined percentile for this pair is 65, but this figure is heavily skewed by the CPU's high performance.

The overall tier of this build is a professional workstation CPU with a placeholder GPU. The CPU's benchmark scores (Cinebench R23 multi-core: 42,767) are comparable to the top processors available. The GPU's benchmark scores (PassMark G3D: 5,433) are comparable to a GeForce GTX 1650, which is an older entry-level card. This is not a balanced gaming system; it is a high-performance CPU platform that can be upgraded with a more powerful GPU later.

FAQ

Q: What is the performance gap between the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU is in the 90th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is in the 40th percentile of all GPUs. The CPU's average benchmark score is 47,908, while the GPU's is 7,550.

Q: Can this build play modern games?

A: Estimated FPS will be very low due to the GPU's weak DirectX 12 score of 29 and 4 GB VRAM. The CPU is powerful, but the GPU is the limiting factor.

Q: What is the CPU's single-thread performance?

A: The CPU scores 6,037 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 4,126 in PassMark single-thread, indicating strong responsiveness for everyday tasks.

Q: How much memory bandwidth does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. It also supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the power draw of the GPU?

A: The GPU has a TDP of 30 W, and the suggested PSU is 200 W. It requires no power connectors.

Q: Is the CPU good for video editing?

A: CPU-based video editing will be fast due to the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42,767. GPU-accelerated effects will be slow due to the GPU's low compute score of 2,157.

Q: What socket does the CPU use?

A: The CPU uses the AMD Socket AM5 platform and supports PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes.