SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7900X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

96 Score

Top 4% Ranking

96 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

95%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X

53,288 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080

56,083 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 pairing represents a high-end desktop configuration built around a 12-core Zen 4 processor and a Blackwell 2.0 flagship GPU. The CPU, part of the 7000 series, uses the Raphael architecture on a 5 nm TSMC process, housing 13,140 million transistors across a 2x 71 mm² die. It operates with a base clock of 4.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, with a 170 W TDP. The 12 cores and 24 threads are supported by a cache hierarchy of 64 KB L1 and 1 MB L2 per core, plus a shared 64 MB L3 cache. Memory support is limited to DDR5, running on a dual-channel bus with 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth, and ECC memory is supported. The CPU connects via PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes and includes integrated Radeon Graphics, making it a versatile desktop part. The GPU, meanwhile, is built on the GB203 chip with 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die, featuring 10,752 shading units, 336 TMUs, and 112 ROPs. It has 84 RT cores and 336 tensor cores, with a boost clock of 2617 MHz and memory clock of 1875 MHz (30 Gbps effective). The 16 GB of GDDR7 memory runs on a 256-bit bus, delivering 960.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU’s FP32 performance is 56.28 TFLOPS, with a pixel rate of 293.1 GPixel/s and texture rate of 879.3 GTexel/s. This is a dual-slot card requiring a 750 W suggested PSU and a single 16-pin power connector, with display outputs including 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen 9 7900X is a 12-core, 24-thread processor built on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Raphael, and fabricated on a 5 nm process by TSMC. Its base clock of 4.70 GHz and boost clock of 5.60 GHz are high for a multi-core part, and the 64 MB shared L3 cache is substantial for gaming and productivity workloads. The CPU’s benchmark results show a strong balance between single-thread and multi-thread performance. In Cinebench R23, it scores 2016.5 in single-core and 29300 in multi-core, indicating that the high boost clock translates to excellent per-thread responsiveness while the 12 cores scale well under full load. The Geekbench scores of 2617 single-core and 19267 multi-core reinforce this pattern, with the multi-core result being roughly 7.4 times the single-core figure, showing good scaling across the 24 threads. The 3DMark results further illustrate this: the single-thread score is 1093, while the max-thread score is 12536, a ratio of about 11.5, which is expected for a 12-core/24-thread part. The Passmark suite shows a multithread score of 51406 and a single-thread score of 4238, with specific workloads like integer math at 169273 and floating-point math at 103952, indicating strong arithmetic capability. The data compression score of 632505 and encryption score of 37263 suggest the CPU handles data-heavy tasks efficiently, which is relevant for file archiving and secure communications. The CPU’s percentile rank of 91 against all CPUs places it in the top tier, and its average benchmark score of 53288 is nearly identical to the AMD EPYC 7313P (53206, deltaPct 0.2) and Intel Xeon Phi 7290 (53469, deltaPct -0.3). It is also within 0.6% of the Intel Xeon 634 (52974) and 0.6% behind the Intel Core i7-14700F (53620). This means the 7900X sits in a competitive zone where its multi-threaded performance rivals server-class parts, while its single-thread scores are more typical of a high-end desktop CPU. For real workloads, this translates to snappy application launches, fast code compilation, and smooth multitasking, with the 12 cores providing ample headroom for heavily threaded tasks like video encoding or 3D rendering.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 53288, placing it at the 91st percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD EPYC 7313P, scores 53206, a delta of 0.2%, meaning the 7900X is essentially tied with a server processor in overall CPU performance. The Intel Xeon Phi 7290 is 0.3% ahead, and the Intel Core i7-14700F is 0.6% ahead, while the Intel Xeon 634 is 0.6% behind. This clustering shows that the 7900X is at the top of the desktop CPU hierarchy, with performance comparable to enterprise silicon. The GPU, the RTX 5080, has an average benchmark score of 56083 and sits at the 87th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon 8060S (55757, deltaPct 0.6%), AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB (55698, deltaPct 0.7%), and AMD Radeon Pro W5700X (54828, deltaPct 2.3%), while the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE is 2.2% ahead (57367). This indicates the RTX 5080 is a high-end GPU, though not the absolute fastest, with performance slightly above some Radeon options but below the RX 9070 GRE. In specific GPU benchmarks, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 8637, and the Geekbench OpenCL score is 235901 with Vulkan at 255450. The Passmark G3D score is 36565, with a GPU compute score of 21789. The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pair is 89, reflecting a very strong overall system. The pair’s average FPS across games is 215.4, ranking 123rd out of 3732 pairs, which puts it in the top 3.3% of all tested combinations. This combined picture shows a system that excels in both CPU-bound and GPU-bound tasks, with the CPU’s high single-thread performance complementing the GPU’s raw rasterization power.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data, which is based on actual testing (dataIsMeasured is true), shows this pairing delivers high frame rates across a wide range of titles. At 1920x1080, the system is exceptionally fast in esports and lighter games: Counter-Strike 2 hits 345 FPS, Valorant reaches 530 FPS, and Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege X achieves 410.7 FPS. Even at 2560x1440, these titles remain well above 200 FPS, with Valorant at 503 FPS and CS2 at 227.7 FPS. At 3840x2160, Valorant still manages 467 FPS, showing that CPU-bound esports titles are not a bottleneck. For AAA games, the results are strong but more resolution-dependent. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 103 FPS at 1080p, 76 FPS at 1440p, and 49.5 FPS at 4K. Red Dead Redemption 2 achieves 94.6 FPS at 1080p, 70 FPS at 1440p, and 47.8 FPS at 4K. Call of Duty: Warzone is more consistent, with 165 FPS at 1080p, 146 FPS at 1440p, and 124 FPS at 4K. Heavier titles like Ark: Survival Ascended are demanding, with 49 FPS at 1080p, 31 FPS at 1440p, and 16 FPS at 4K, indicating that some games will require settings adjustments for smooth 4K play. Microsoft Flight Simulator runs at 122.8 FPS at 1080p, 101.9 FPS at 1440p, and 71.2 FPS at 4K, which is respectable for a simulation. The data shows a clear pattern: at 1080p and 1440p, the system is capable of high-refresh gaming in most titles, while 4K performance varies from playable (Warzone at 124 FPS) to marginal (Ark at 16 FPS). The average FPS across all tested games is 215.4, which is inflated by esports titles but still indicates a very capable gaming machine.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the system exceeds 200 FPS in most esports titles, with Valorant at 530 FPS and CS2 at 345 FPS, making it ideal for 240 Hz or 360 Hz monitors. At 1440p, it still delivers over 200 FPS in Valorant (503) and 227.7 in CS2, so high-refresh 1440p is achievable in competitive games. For AAA titles, 1440p results like 76 FPS in Cyberpunk 2077 and 70 FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2 are suitable for 144 Hz displays with some settings tweaks.

Streaming: The 12-core CPU with a multithread score of 51406 provides ample headroom for encoding while gaming. The Passmark data compression score of 632505 and encryption score of 37263 indicate the CPU can handle the background workload of streaming software without significantly impacting game FPS. The GPU’s 336 tensor cores also support hardware encoding, though the CPU alone is powerful enough for x264 encoding at reasonable presets.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 29300 and Geekbench multicore score of 19267 show strong multi-threaded performance for rendering timelines and exporting video. The 64 MB L3 cache helps with large media files, and the 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth supports 4K footage editing. The GPU’s 16 GB GDDR7 memory and 960.0 GB/s bandwidth accelerate effects and color grading.

3D rendering: The CPU’s max-thread 3DMark score of 12536 and Passmark floating-point math score of 103952 indicate solid performance for CPU-based rendering. The GPU’s FP32 of 56.28 TFLOPS and 84 RT cores make it excellent for GPU-accelerated rendering and ray tracing. The combined percentile of 89 suggests this is a top-tier workstation for 3D artists.

Software development: The single-thread score of 4238 in Passmark and 2617 in Geekbench ensure fast compilation of single-threaded build steps, while the 24 threads handle parallel builds efficiently. The data encryption score of 37263 is useful for secure development environments. The 170 W TDP CPU with 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes supports fast NVMe storage for large codebases.

Student and office work: This is overkill for basic tasks, but the integrated Radeon Graphics provide a fallback if the GPU is not needed. The single-thread performance ensures snappy spreadsheet and browser use, while the 12 cores handle multitasking with many open applications. The ECC memory support adds stability for long-running academic computations.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a well-balanced system, but the bottleneck shifts depending on resolution and workload. At 1080p, the CPU’s single-thread performance (Passmark 4238) is sufficient to drive high FPS, but the GPU’s percentile of 87 is lower than the CPU’s 91, suggesting the GPU is the limiting factor in some games. For example, in Cyberpunk 2077 at 1080p, the 103 FPS is likely GPU-bound, as the CPU could push higher. At 4K, the GPU is clearly the bottleneck, as seen in Ark: Survival Ascended dropping to 16 FPS, where the GPU’s raw throughput is insufficient. Conversely, in esports titles like Valorant at 4K (467 FPS), the CPU is the limiting factor, as the GPU is not fully utilized at such high frame rates. The FPS scaling from 1080p to 1440p to 4K shows this: in Warzone, FPS drops from 165 to 146 to 124, a relatively small decline, indicating the CPU is keeping up. In contrast, in Fortnite, FPS drops from 161 to 103 to 54, a steeper decline, showing the GPU becomes the constraint at higher resolutions. The pair’s rank of 123 out of 3732 pairs (top 3.3%) indicates that this combination is well-matched, with neither component severely limiting the other in most scenarios. The CPU’s 91st percentile and GPU’s 87th percentile are close, meaning the system is balanced, but for 4K gaming, a more powerful GPU would be the next upgrade to improve frame rates in the most demanding titles.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket AM5, which is the current desktop platform, and supports DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus. The 170 W TDP CPU is paired with a GPU that has a 360 W TDP, and the suggested PSU is 750 W, which provides headroom for the entire system. The motherboard should support PCIe Gen 5, as the CPU provides 24 lanes and the GPU uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface. The memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s is a potential upgrade point, as faster DDR5 kits could improve performance in memory-sensitive workloads. The CPU has an unlocked multiplier, allowing overclocking, and the 5 nm process with a 170 W TDP suggests there is thermal headroom for a capable air cooler or liquid cooler. The GPU is a dual-slot card with a 16-pin power connector, so the PSU must have that connector. A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-tier GPU, as the CPU’s 91st percentile has more headroom than the GPU’s 87th percentile. The platform supports future Ryzen 9000-series CPUs on AM5, so a CPU upgrade is possible without changing the motherboard. The 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on the GPU is ample for current games, but future titles may benefit from more VRAM, though that would require a GPU replacement. The PCIe Gen 5 support ensures that fast NVMe SSDs are not bottlenecked, and the 24 CPU lanes allow for multiple expansion cards.

Who Should Build It

This build targets gamers who play at 1440p or 4K and want high frame rates in both esports and AAA titles. The data shows 1440p is the sweet spot, with over 200 FPS in Valorant and CS2, and over 70 FPS in most AAA games. 4K gamers will need to accept lower settings in the most demanding titles, as Ark: Survival Ascended only hits 16 FPS at 4K. Content creators, particularly video editors and 3D renderers, will benefit from the CPU’s 29300 Cinebench R23 multicore score and the GPU’s 56.28 TFLOPS FP32 performance. Software developers will appreciate the fast compilation times from the 12 cores and high single-thread speed. Students and office workers would find this system overkill, but the ECC memory support and integrated graphics make it a stable workstation for academic research. Small business workstations that run virtual machines or data analysis will use the 24 threads effectively, with the Passmark multithread score of 51406 indicating strong throughput. The system is not ideal for budget-conscious builders, but for those who need top-tier performance in both CPU and GPU tasks, this pairing delivers.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080. The CPU is a 12-core, 24-thread Zen 4 part with a 91st percentile ranking, while the GPU is a Blackwell 2.0 flagship with an 87th percentile ranking. The combined percentile is 89, placing this system in the top tier of desktop configurations. The average FPS across games is 215.4, ranking 123rd out of 3732 pairs, which is in the top 3.3% of all tested combinations. This is a high-end pairing suitable for demanding gaming and productivity workloads, with the CPU providing excellent single-thread and multi-thread performance and the GPU delivering strong rasterization and ray tracing capabilities. The system is well-balanced, with the CPU and GPU percentiles within 4 points of each other, ensuring that neither component is a significant bottleneck in most scenarios. The 16 GB of GDDR7 memory and 960.0 GB/s bandwidth make the GPU future-proof for several years, while the AM5 platform offers a clear upgrade path for the CPU.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s multi-core performance compared to its nearest rival?

A: The Ryzen 9 7900X has an average benchmark score of 53288, which is 0.2% higher than the AMD EPYC 7313P (53206) and 0.6% higher than the Intel Xeon 634 (52974). It is 0.3% behind the Intel Xeon Phi 7290 (53469) and 0.6% behind the Intel Core i7-14700F (53620).

Q: How does the RTX 5080 compare to the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE?

A: The RTX 5080 has an average benchmark score of 56083, which is 2.2% lower than the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE (57367). It is 0.6% higher than the AMD Radeon 8060S (55757) and 0.7% higher than the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB (55698).

Q: What is the best resolution for gaming with this build?

A: The data shows 1440p is the sweet spot, with over 200 FPS in esports titles like Valorant (503 FPS) and CS2 (227.7 FPS), and over 70 FPS in AAA games like Cyberpunk 2077 (76 FPS) and Red Dead Redemption 2 (70 FPS). At 4K, performance drops significantly in demanding titles, with Ark: Survival Ascended at 16 FPS.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X supports ECC memory, which is useful for workstation stability. It supports DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration?

A: The RTX 5080 has 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 960.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 1875 MHz (30 Gbps effective).

Q: What is the system’s overall performance ranking?

A: The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pair is 89. The average FPS across games is 215.4, ranking 123rd out of 3732 pairs, which is in the top 3.3% of all tested combinations.

Q: What is the suggested power supply for this build?

A: The suggested PSU is 750 W, based on the GPU’s 360 W TDP and the CPU’s 170 W TDP. The GPU requires a single 16-pin power connector.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7900X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Minecraft: Java Edition

Minecraft

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Gaming Performance

Usage Scenarios

Balance and Bottleneck

Upgrade Path and Platform

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

FAQ

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds