SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7900X + Intel Arc A380

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

90 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
95%
VS
GPU
86%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X

53,288 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A380

8,558 Benchmark Score
Top 14% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 9 7900X + Intel Arc A380: A High-End CPU Paired with an Entry-Level GPU

This pairing combines one of AMD's strongest 12-core desktop processors with Intel's most accessible discrete graphics card. The Ryzen 9 7900X delivers top-tier multi-threaded compute performance, while the Arc A380 provides modest 1080p gaming capability. The benchmark data reveals a stark imbalance: the CPU sits at the 91st percentile among all processors, while the GPU languishes at the 44th percentile. This is a workstation-first configuration where the CPU dominates every meaningful workload, and the GPU serves as a display adapter with light gaming potential rather than a performance partner.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming — The Arc A380's raw compute scores place it in direct competition with the NVIDIA GeForce MX330, which is a laptop-class GPU. With a PassMark G3D score of 6252 and a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 808, this GPU cannot sustain high refresh rates at demanding settings in modern titles. At 1080p with reduced settings, users can expect playable frame rates, but the 44th percentile ranking means most discrete GPUs outperform it. The CPU's single-thread score of 4238 in PassMark ensures no processing bottleneck for game logic, but the GPU will limit frame output.

Streaming — The Ryzen 9 7900X has 12 cores and 24 threads, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 29300. This provides ample headroom for simultaneous game capture, encoding, and streaming software. The Arc A380's 8 RT cores and 1024 shading units handle video decode and encode tasks, but its 6 GB VRAM and 186.0 GB/s bandwidth limit high-bitrate streaming scenarios. The CPU can handle x264 encoding at medium presets without impacting gameplay, but the GPU's modest compute performance means hardware encoding quality will be lower than what a stronger GPU could deliver.

Video editing — The CPU's multicore might shines here. The Geekbench multi-core score of 19267 and PassMark multi-thread score of 51406 indicate excellent timeline scrubbing, effect rendering, and export speeds in applications that leverage multi-threading. The GPU's 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 performance and PassMark GPU compute score of 2762 provide basic acceleration for effects and color grading, but timeline preview at full resolution may require proxy workflows. The 64 MB shared L3 cache and DDR5 memory support at 83.2 GB/s help keep large media files flowing.

3D rendering — This is the strongest scenario for this pairing. The CPU's Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 4820.5 and R23 multi-core score of 29300 make it a serious contender for CPU-based rendering in Blender, V-Ray, or similar software. The 12-core/24-thread configuration with a 5.60 GHz boost clock delivers near-workstation performance. The GPU's 8 RT cores support hardware-accelerated ray tracing, but the 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is roughly equivalent to integrated graphics on newer APUs. For GPU rendering, expect long wait times; for CPU rendering, expect excellent throughput.

Software development — The PassMark data compression score of 632505 and integer math score of 169273 indicate rapid code compilation and build times. The 12 cores handle parallel compilation jobs efficiently, and the single-thread score of 4238 ensures snappy IDE responsiveness. The 24 threads allow multiple containers or virtual machines to run concurrently. The Arc A380's 6 GB VRAM provides enough memory for multiple displays and UI rendering, but GPU compute for machine learning workloads will be limited by the 44th percentile GPU performance.

Student and office work — This configuration is massively over-specified for productivity tasks. The CPU's single-thread performance (Geekbench 2617, PassMark 4238) handles spreadsheets, word processing, and web browsing with negligible load. The GPU's 610 PassMark G2D score ensures smooth 2D desktop rendering and video playback. The 170 W TDP and 250 W suggested PSU mean this system draws more power than necessary for office tasks, but the responsiveness will be exceptional. The 5 nm process node and 13,140 million transistors deliver efficiency that older architectures cannot match.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 53288 places it at the 91st percentile of all CPUs, with nearest rivals including the AMD EPYC 7313P (53206, 0.2% behind) and Intel Xeon Phi 7290 (53469, 0.3% ahead). The Intel Core i7-14700F trails by 0.6% with a score of 53620, while the Intel Xeon 634 is 0.6% behind at 52974. This clustering shows the 7900X sits in a tightly contested performance band among high-end server and desktop parts.

In multi-threaded tests, the Cinebench R23 score of 29300 and Geekbench multi-core score of 19267 demonstrate strong scaling across the 12 cores. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 10972 and max-thread score of 12536 show consistent performance across thread counts. Single-thread performance is equally impressive: Cinebench R23 single-core 2016.5, Geekbench single-core 2617, and 3DMark single-thread 1093.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 8558 places it at the 44th percentile, with nearest rivals including the AMD FirePro W5170M (8595, 0.4% ahead), AMD Radeon HD 8870M (8462, 1.1% behind), NVIDIA GeForce MX330 (8458, 1.2% behind), and AMD Radeon 880M (8436, 1.4% behind). These are all mobile or entry-level parts, confirming the A380's positioning. The combined percentile for this pairing is 68, weighted heavily by the CPU's strength.

The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 808 and PassMark G3D score of 6252 indicate the GPU's DirectX 12 performance is relatively weak compared to its DirectX 9 score of 73 and DirectX 10 score of 37. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 38224 and Vulkan score of 36736 show better compute performance than the PassMark GPU compute score of 2762 suggests, but all figures point to entry-level territory.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A380 uses the DG2-128 chip built on TSMC's 6 nm process, containing 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. The GPU operates with a base clock of 2000 MHz and boost clock of 2050 MHz, with memory clocked at 1937 MHz (15.5 Gbps effective). The 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus delivers 186.0 GB/s of bandwidth — sufficient for 1080p gaming but limiting for higher resolutions or texture-heavy workloads.

The 1024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 render output units provide the compute foundation. The pixel rate of 65.60 GPixel/s and texture rate of 131.2 GTexel/s are modest figures. The FP32 performance of 4.198 TFLOPS and FP16 of 8.397 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio) place this GPU firmly in entry-level territory. The 8 RT cores support hardware ray tracing, but the overall compute throughput limits ray-traced scenes to low resolutions and settings.

The PassMark DirectX scores are telling: DirectX 9 at 73, DirectX 10 at 37, DirectX 11 at 38, and DirectX 12 at 35. The higher DirectX 9 score suggests older titles run relatively better, while modern API performance lags. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 808 confirms weak DX12 performance. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 36736 and OpenCL score of 38224 show the GPU performs better in compute-oriented workloads than in gaming-specific tests.

For rendering, the 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 throughput means GPU-accelerated rendering in Blender or similar applications will be slow. The 6 GB VRAM limits scene complexity, and the 186.0 GB/s bandwidth constrains texture streaming. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring API compatibility, but the hardware lacks the muscle for serious rendering tasks. The 75 W TDP and 250 W suggested PSU indicate low power draw, which is beneficial for system thermals but reflects the GPU's limited capability.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a severe imbalance. The CPU's 91st percentile ranking versus the GPU's 44th percentile means the GPU will be the limiting factor in virtually every graphics-intensive workload. In gaming, the CPU can feed frames far faster than the GPU can render them. The CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 4238 and 3DMark single-thread score of 1093 ensure game logic and physics calculations are never the bottleneck; the GPU's 6252 G3D score will cap frame rates well below what the CPU can support.

For productivity, the balance shifts. The CPU's multi-thread scores (Cinebench R23 29300, Geekbench 19267) dominate CPU-bound tasks like rendering, encoding, and compilation. The GPU's compute scores (OpenCL 38224, GPU compute 2762) are secondary. In video editing, the CPU handles most of the work, with the GPU providing minor acceleration. The 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth from the dual-channel DDR5 support feeds the CPU adequately, while the GPU's 186.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for its smaller workload share.

The FPS scaling picture is clear: no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, but the benchmark scores indicate the GPU will bottleneck at roughly the same frame rates regardless of CPU. The CPU's 12 cores and 24 threads provide headroom for background tasks while gaming, but the GPU's entry-level performance means users cannot leverage that headroom for higher frame rates. The combined percentile of 68 reflects this compromise — better than the GPU alone but far below the CPU's potential.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen 9 7900X is a 12-core, 24-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture (codenamed Raphael), manufactured on TSMC's 5 nm process. The die contains 13,140 million transistors across two 71 mm² chiplets. Base clock is 4.70 GHz with a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, and the multiplier is unlocked for overclocking. The 170 W TDP requires substantial cooling, but the architecture's efficiency at 5 nm helps manage thermals.

The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 64 MB shared L3. This large L3 cache benefits gaming and database workloads. The dual-channel DDR5 memory support with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth and ECC support makes this suitable for workstation use. The 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes provide high-bandwidth connectivity for storage and expansion.

Benchmark results show a processor that excels across all thread counts. The 3DMark scores scale from 2137 at 2 threads to 12536 at max threads, indicating excellent multi-threading efficiency. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 29300 is strong for a 12-core part, while the single-core score of 2016.5 demonstrates the Zen 4 architecture's IPC improvements. The PassMark suite shows diverse strengths: data compression at 632505, integer math at 169273, floating-point math at 103952, and extended instructions at 47619. The data encryption score of 37263 and find prime numbers score of 388 round out a balanced compute profile.

The 91st percentile ranking places this CPU among the top desktop processors available. The nearest rivals include server-class EPYC and Xeon parts, confirming its workstation-grade compute capabilities. The 5 nm process and 13,140 million transistors deliver efficiency that allows sustained multi-core loads without excessive power draw. The integrated Radeon Graphics provide a basic display output, which is useful for troubleshooting or office tasks without the discrete GPU.

Who Should Build It

Gamers at 1080p with low settings — The Arc A380 can handle esports titles and older games at playable frame rates, but the 44th percentile GPU performance means modern AAA games require significant settings reductions. The CPU ensures no stuttering from processing bottlenecks, but the GPU caps the experience.

Content creators focused on CPU rendering — Video editors, 3D artists, and animators who rely on CPU-based rendering will benefit from the 12-core/24-thread configuration and 29300 Cinebench R23 score. The GPU provides basic preview acceleration, but the CPU does the heavy lifting.

Software developers and data analysts — The 169273 integer math score and 632505 data compression score accelerate code compilation, data processing, and database operations. The 24 threads handle parallel builds and containerized workloads efficiently.

Students and researchers — The CPU's multi-thread performance supports scientific computing, simulation, and analysis tools. The GPU handles visualization and basic compute tasks. The 64 MB L3 cache benefits iterative workloads.

Small business workstations — For office productivity, financial modeling, and light content creation, this configuration delivers exceptional responsiveness. The CPU's single-thread score of 4238 ensures snappy application performance, while the GPU supports multiple displays.

Not recommended for high-end gaming — The GPU's 6252 G3D score and 808 Steel Nomad score cannot deliver high-refresh 1440p or 4K gaming. Users seeking competitive frame rates should pair this CPU with a stronger GPU.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 9 7900X uses the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which supports DDR5 memory and PCIe Gen 5. The dual-channel memory bus provides 83.2 GB/s bandwidth, and the 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes offer high-speed connectivity for NVMe storage and expansion cards. The platform supports ECC memory, which is valuable for workstation reliability.

The 170 W TDP and 250 W suggested PSU indicate the system has significant power headroom. The GPU's 75 W TDP is minimal, leaving ample PSU capacity for upgrades. The 1x 8-pin power connector on the GPU is standard, and the dual-slot design fits most cases.

A sensible next upgrade would be replacing the Arc A380 with a more powerful GPU. The CPU's 91st percentile performance means it can drive substantially faster graphics cards without becoming a bottleneck. The platform's PCIe Gen 5 support ensures future GPUs and storage devices will operate at full bandwidth. The DDR5 memory support allows capacity and speed upgrades as prices decline.

The AM5 socket has longevity, supporting multiple processor generations. Users can upgrade to higher-core-count Ryzen 9 parts or future Zen 5 processors without changing motherboards. The 5 nm process and 13,140 million transistors provide a strong foundation for years of service.

FAQ

Q: Is this configuration good for gaming?

A: The Arc A380's 6252 PassMark G3D score places it at the 44th percentile, roughly matching the NVIDIA GeForce MX330. It can handle 1080p gaming at low-to-medium settings, but the CPU's 91st percentile performance far exceeds the GPU's capability, making the GPU the limiting factor.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Ryzen 9 7900X's average score of 53288 is 0.2% ahead of the AMD EPYC 7313P and 0.6% ahead of the Intel Xeon 634. It trails the Intel Xeon Phi 7290 by 0.3% and the Intel Core i7-14700F by 0.6%.

Q: Can this system handle 3D rendering?

A: CPU-based rendering is excellent, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 29300. GPU rendering is limited by the Arc A380's 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 6 GB VRAM, which are entry-level figures.

Q: What is the GPU's ray tracing capability?

A: The Arc A380 has 8 RT cores supporting hardware-accelerated ray tracing, but the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 808 indicates low overall performance. Ray-traced scenes will run at low resolutions and settings.

Q: Is the CPU good for streaming?

A: The 12 cores and 24 threads provide ample encoding headroom, with a PassMark multi-thread score of 51406. The CPU can handle x264 encoding while gaming, though the GPU's modest performance may limit game quality settings.

Q: What memory does this platform support?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth and ECC capability. The 64 MB shared L3 cache helps mitigate memory latency in cache-sensitive workloads.

Q: What is the upgrade path?

A: The AM5 socket supports future processor generations, and the 250 W suggested PSU leaves headroom for a more powerful GPU. The PCIe Gen 5 interface ensures compatibility with next-generation components.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination — the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows. All frame rate expectations below are estimated from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than verified results.

Based on the GPU's 44th percentile ranking and 6252 PassMark G3D score, this system is best suited for 1080p gaming with adjusted settings. For esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 or Valorant, the CPU's single-thread score of 4238 and the GPU's 73 DirectX 9 score suggest frame rates above 60 FPS at low-to-medium settings. The 3DMark 2-thread score of 2137 indicates the CPU can handle game logic efficiently, but the GPU's 808 Steel Nomad DX12 score caps modern titles at lower frame rates.

For AAA games using DirectX 12, the GPU's 35 PassMark DirectX 12 score and 808 Steel Nomad score suggest 30-50 FPS at 1080p with low settings. Older DirectX 9 and DirectX 10 titles will perform relatively better, with the 73 and 37 scores respectively indicating playable frame rates. The 6 GB VRAM and 186.0 GB/s bandwidth handle 1080p textures but struggle with high-resolution texture packs.

At 1440p, the GPU's limited 44th percentile performance means frame rates will drop significantly, likely below 30 FPS in demanding titles. At 4K, the system is not viable for gaming without substantial settings reductions. The CPU's performance ensures no processing bottleneck, but the GPU's 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is the decisive constraint. Users should treat this as a light gaming system, with the expectation that competitive and older titles are playable while modern AAA games require significant compromises.