SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7900X + Intel Arc A350

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

85 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
GPU Bottleneck
CPU
95%
VS
GPU
74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X

53,288 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X is a 12-core, 24-thread desktop processor built on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Raphael. It operates on the AMD Socket AM5 platform and is manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC, containing 13,140 million transistors across a dual-die design with each die measuring 71 mm². The base clock is 4.70 GHz with a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, and the CPU has a TDP of 170 W. Cache configuration includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 64 MB L3 cache.

Benchmark results place this processor in the 91st percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 53,288. The nearest rivals show tight competition: the AMD EPYC 7313P scores 53,206 (0.2% lower), the Intel Xeon Phi 7290 scores 53,469 (0.3% higher), the Intel Xeon 634 scores 52,974 (0.6% lower), and the Intel Core i7-14700F scores 53,620 (0.6% higher). This clustering indicates the 7900X sits squarely in a competitive performance band, with no single rival holding a decisive edge.

In multi-threaded workloads, the 7900X delivers strong scaling. The 3DMark 16-thread test yields a score of 10,972, while the max-threads test reaches 12,536. Cinebench R23 multicore produces 29,300 points, and Geekbench multicore scores 19,267. These figures suggest that applications leveraging all 24 threads—such as video rendering, scientific computing, or code compilation—will see substantial throughput. The 3DMark 2-thread score of 2,137 and 4-thread score of 4,151 show that the processor also handles lightly threaded tasks efficiently, though the scaling from 8 threads (7,798) to 16 threads (10,972) demonstrates diminishing returns as core count increases.

Single-thread performance remains competitive. Cinebench R23 singlecore scores 2,016.5, Geekbench singlecore reaches 2,617, and 3DMark single-thread posts 1,093. PassMark single-thread registers 4,238. These numbers indicate that the 7900X can drive everyday productivity applications and games that rely on a few fast cores without becoming a bottleneck. The PassMark suite further reveals workload-specific strengths: integer math scores 169,273, floating-point math 103,952, extended instructions 47,619, and data compression 632,505. Prime number finding is notably lower at 388, suggesting that highly branch-dependent integer workloads may not be the processor’s strongest suit, but overall the data points to a balanced, high-end desktop part.

Balance and Bottleneck

The pairing of the Ryzen 9 7900X with the Intel Arc A350 creates an unusual balance profile. The CPU operates in the 91st percentile among all processors, while the GPU sits at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, and the combined percentile for this pairing is 71. This substantial gap indicates that the processor vastly outperforms the graphics card in relative terms; for most gaming scenarios, the GPU will be the limiting factor.

The CPU’s 12 cores and 24 threads provide far more compute capacity than the Arc A350’s 768 shading units can utilize in graphics-bound tasks. In CPU-heavy workloads like physics simulation, the PassMark physics score of 3,060 shows strong performance, but the GPU’s modest 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput means that frame generation will be constrained by the graphics pipeline. The Arc A350’s 4 GB VRAM and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth further cap resolution and texture detail, so at higher settings, the GPU will saturate before the CPU breaks a sweat.

Conversely, in productivity scenarios that rely on the CPU—such as data compression (632,505 in PassMark) or multithreaded rendering—the 7900X will dominate, and the GPU’s role becomes secondary. The data suggests that this is a CPU-first system: the processor provides headroom for future GPU upgrades, but the current graphics card limits gaming performance to entry-level territory. The FPS scaling, if measured, would show the GPU as the primary constraint across most modern titles, but no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, so those expectations remain qualitative.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X has 12 cores and 24 threads, enabling strong parallel performance in multi-threaded applications.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The 7900X’s average benchmark score of 53,288 is within 0.6% of the Intel Core i7-14700F (53,620) and 0.3% of the Intel Xeon Phi 7290 (53,469). It outperforms the AMD EPYC 7313P by 0.2% and the Intel Xeon 634 by 0.6%.

Q: What memory type does the platform support?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. ECC memory is also supported.

Q: Does the CPU include integrated graphics?

A: Yes, the 7900X includes Radeon Graphics as an integrated GPU, which can handle basic display output and light tasks without a discrete card.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory capacity and bandwidth?

A: The Intel Arc A350 has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 124.0 GB/s and a memory clock of 1937 MHz (15.5 Gbps effective).

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile ranking?

A: The Arc A350 sits at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, indicating mid-pack performance relative to the full range of graphics cards.

Q: Is the GPU suitable for modern gaming?

A: With 768 shading units and 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, the Arc A350 can handle esports and older titles at modest settings, but its 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit bus limit high-resolution or high-detail gaming.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination of AMD Ryzen 9 7900X and Intel Arc A350. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data, so all frame rate discussions are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of each component.

Based on the CPU’s strong single-thread score of 4,238 in PassMark and 2,016.5 in Cinebench R23 singlecore, the processor is more than capable of feeding frames in any modern game. However, the Arc A350’s 50th percentile GPU ranking and its 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 compute suggest that gaming performance will be entry-level. At 1080p with low-to-medium settings, esports titles such as competitive shooters or MOBAs should achieve playable frame rates, given the GPU’s 96.00 GTexel/s texture rate and 48.00 GPixel/s pixel rate. At 1440p or with ultra settings, the 4 GB VRAM and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth will likely cause stuttering or reduced texture quality, as the GPU becomes the bottleneck.

The CPU’s 3DMark 8-thread score of 7,798 and 16-thread score of 10,972 indicate that game logic, physics, and AI computations will not hinder performance. The limiting factor is clearly the graphics card. For users prioritizing gaming, this pairing delivers a CPU that will remain relevant for years, but the GPU must be upgraded to unlock higher resolutions and detail levels. The estimated FPS for demanding AAA titles at 1080p ultra would be modest, likely in the 30–50 FPS range, while competitive titles at low settings could approach 60–100 FPS, but these are approximations based on the benchmark scores rather than measured results.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who need exceptional CPU performance but have modest graphics requirements. The 91st percentile CPU ranking makes it ideal for content creators who work primarily with CPU-intensive tasks: video editors using multi-threaded rendering pipelines will benefit from the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 29,300, and 3D artists using CPU-based renderers will appreciate the 24 threads. Software developers compiling large codebases will see strong throughput, as the PassMark integer math score of 169,273 and data compression score of 632,505 indicate efficient handling of build tools and version control operations.

Students and small business workstations that run office applications, web development environments, or data analysis scripts will find the single-thread performance (4,238 in PassMark) more than sufficient. The integrated Radeon Graphics provides a fallback for display output without a discrete GPU, though the Arc A350 adds dedicated graphics capability for light GPU-accelerated tasks. Gamers at 1080p with low-to-medium settings on esports titles will find the system playable, but those seeking high-refresh-rate or high-detail gaming should look elsewhere or plan a GPU upgrade.

The 50th percentile GPU ranking means that users who occasionally dabble in photo editing or 2D design will see acceptable acceleration, but professional GPU workloads like machine learning training or high-end 3D rendering are not within this build’s reach. The combined 71st percentile ranking reflects a system that excels at CPU-bound tasks while lagging in GPU-bound ones.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X is built on the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with up to 83.2 GB/s bandwidth. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes, offering ample bandwidth for modern NVMe storage and expansion cards. The platform’s ECC memory support makes it suitable for workstation use where data integrity is critical.

The CPU has a TDP of 170 W, while the Intel Arc A350 has a much lower TDP of 25 W. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 200 W, which is modest, but the system’s total power draw will be dominated by the CPU. A power supply with sufficient headroom for the 170 W CPU plus the 25 W GPU, along with other components, is necessary; the data suggests a 200 W PSU is the minimum for the GPU alone, but the CPU will require additional capacity.

The most sensible next upgrade for this build is the graphics card. The CPU’s 91st percentile ranking provides substantial headroom—upgrading to a higher-tier GPU would shift the combined percentile upward and unlock the CPU’s full gaming potential. The AM5 platform supports future Ryzen processors, so a CPU upgrade path exists, but the 7900X is already a high-end part, so users should prioritize GPU improvements first. The Arc A350’s successor, Battlemage, is listed as the next generation, but no performance data is available. The GPU’s end-of-life production status means that replacements may be difficult to source over time, reinforcing the case for an early upgrade.

Benchmark Performance

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X delivers an average benchmark score of 53,288, placing it in the 91st percentile among all CPUs. The nearest rivals show a tight cluster: the AMD EPYC 7313P scores 53,206 (0.2% lower), the Intel Xeon Phi 7290 scores 53,469 (0.3% higher), the Intel Xeon 634 scores 52,974 (0.6% lower), and the Intel Core i7-14700F scores 53,620 (0.6% higher). This competition confirms that the 7900X is a top-tier desktop processor, with no rival gaining a meaningful advantage.

In specific benchmarks, the CPU excels in multi-threaded tests: Cinebench R23 multicore scores 29,300, Geekbench multicore reaches 19,267, and 3DMark max-threads hits 12,536. Single-thread performance is equally robust, with Cinebench R23 singlecore at 2,016.5 and Geekbench singlecore at 2,617. The PassMark multithread score of 51,406 and single-thread score of 4,238 further corroborate the CPU’s balanced capabilities.

The Intel Arc A350, by contrast, has no benchmark scores listed in the FACT PACK and an average benchmark score of 0. Its percentile ranking of 50 places it at the median of all GPUs. The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 71, reflecting a system where the CPU is the dominant performer and the GPU drags the overall score down. For users focused on CPU workloads, the 7900X is a standout; for gaming, the GPU holds the system back.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X, a 12-core, 24-thread processor based on Zen 4 architecture, with the Intel Arc A350, an entry-level graphics card based on the Xe-HPG architecture. The CPU ranks in the 91st percentile among all processors, while the GPU ranks at the 50th percentile. The combined percentile for this pairing is 71, indicating a system that is well above average overall but heavily skewed toward CPU performance.

The build class is desktop, and the production status of the CPU is active, while the GPU is end-of-life. The CPU’s launch MSRP is $549. The processor’s high core count and strong single-thread performance make it suitable for productivity, content creation, and development, while the GPU’s modest specifications limit gaming to entry-level scenarios. This is a system for users who prioritize CPU-bound tasks and are willing to accept (or later upgrade) the GPU’s limitations.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A350 is built on the Xe-HPG architecture, codenamed Alchemist, and uses the DG2-128 chip. It is manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC with 7,200 million transistors on a die size of 157 mm², yielding a transistor density of 45.9 million per mm². The GPU has 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 24 raster operation pipelines. It includes 6 ray tracing cores, though tensor core data is not available.

The GPU’s clocks are set at a base and boost frequency of 2000 MHz, with a memory clock of 1937 MHz (15.5 Gbps effective). Memory consists of 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 124.0 GB/s. The pixel rate is 48.00 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 96.00 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 3.072 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 6.144 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio). The GPU has a TDP of 25 W, is a single-slot design, and requires a suggested PSU of 200 W. It interfaces via PCIe 4.0 x8 and has no display outputs, meaning it relies on the CPU’s integrated Radeon Graphics for display connectivity.

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, indicating modern API compatibility. However, with no benchmark scores and a 50th percentile ranking, the data suggests mid-pack performance. The 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit bus are limiting for modern titles at high resolutions; the GPU is best suited for 1080p gaming at low-to-medium settings or as an accelerator for basic GPU tasks. The 6 RT cores provide some ray tracing capability, but the low compute throughput will constrain ray-traced performance.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s single-thread score of 4,238 in PassMark ensures that frame pacing is not CPU-bound, but the GPU’s 3.072 TFLOPS will cap FPS. Esports titles at 1080p low settings may approach high refresh rates, but demanding games will not. The 50th percentile GPU ranking places this below the threshold for consistent high-refresh gaming.

Streaming: The 24 threads of the 7900X can handle encoding workloads, with the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 29,300 indicating ample headroom for software x264 encoding. The GPU lacks dedicated tensor or encoder data, so streaming would rely on the CPU’s capabilities, which are strong.

Video editing: Multi-threaded rendering benefits from the 12 cores and 24 threads. The PassMark data compression score of 632,505 and floating-point math score of 103,952 support efficient timeline scrubbing and export. The GPU’s 4 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p editing but may limit 4K timelines.

3D rendering: CPU-based renderers will leverage the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 29,300, making this a capable workstation. GPU-based rendering in Blender or similar will be slow due to the Arc A350’s modest FP32 throughput, so users should stick to CPU rendering paths.

Software development: The PassMark integer math score of 169,273 and multithread score of 51,406 indicate fast compilation and test execution. The PCIe Gen 5 lanes support rapid NVMe storage, reducing build times.

Student and office work: The single-thread performance of 4,238 in PassMark handles spreadsheets, document editing, and web browsing with ease. The integrated Radeon Graphics or the Arc A350 can drive multiple monitors, though the GPU has no display outputs, so the iGPU must be used for display.