SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7900X + Intel Arc A310

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

95%

GPU

85%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X

53,288 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A310

7,550 Benchmark Score

Top 15% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 9 7900X + Intel Arc A310: A Desktop Analysis

This desktop pairing combines a 12-core, 24-thread AMD Ryzen 9 7900X from the Zen 4 Raphael family with Intel’s entry-level Arc A310 graphics card based on the Xe-HPG Alchemist architecture. The data shows a stark contrast: the CPU sits at the 91st percentile among all processors, while the GPU lands at the 40th percentile among all graphics cards. This is a configuration where compute capability far outstrips visual throughput, and every benchmark result in the FACT PACK reflects that fundamental imbalance.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The Intel Arc A310 is built on TSMC’s 6 nm process and packs 7,200 million transistors into a 157 mm² die. It features 768 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, and 16 raster output pipelines. The GPU runs at a fixed 1750 MHz for both base and boost clocks, with memory clocked at 1937 MHz (15.5 Gbps effective). The 4 GB GDDR6 memory sits on a 64-bit bus, yielding 124.0 GB/s of bandwidth — a modest figure that will constrain texture streaming and high-resolution workloads.

Ray tracing hardware is present in the form of 6 RT cores, marking this as a DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) capable part. The GPU supports Vulkan 1.4 and OpenGL 4.6. However, the FP32 throughput of 2.688 TFLOPS and pixel rate of 28.00 GPixel/s place it firmly in entry-level territory. The texture rate of 56.00 GTexel/s is similarly limited. There is no tensor core data in the FACT PACK, so any AI acceleration claims cannot be substantiated from this dataset.

Benchmark scores reinforce the hardware picture. The PassMark G3D score of 5433 sits at the 40th percentile among all GPUs, with the nearest rival being the AMD Radeon R7 250 at a delta of -0.1%. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 30607 and Vulkan score of 28964 indicate compute capability that is adequate for basic tasks but not for demanding rendering workloads. The PassMark GPU compute score of 2157 is particularly low, suggesting that compute-heavy applications will struggle. DirectX scores are uniformly weak: 31 for DirectX 10, 33 for DirectX 11, 29 for DirectX 12, and 69 for DirectX 9. The G2D score of 625 indicates acceptable 2D performance for desktop use.

For rendering, the combination of 4 GB VRAM, 124.0 GB/s bandwidth, and 2.688 TFLOPS means that real-time 3D rendering will be limited to low resolutions and modest settings. The RT cores exist but are unlikely to deliver playable ray-traced frame rates given the overall throughput. The GPU’s 30 W TDP and lack of power connectors make it a low-power solution, but that efficiency comes at the cost of raw capability.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The Ryzen 9 7900X delivers exceptional CPU benchmark results across the board. In Cinebench R23, it scores 29300 multi-core and 2016.5 single-core. Cinebench R15 results are 4820.5 multi-core and 323 single-core. Geekbench scores are 19267 multi-core and 2617 single-core. The 3DMark suite shows scaling from 1093 single-thread to 10972 at 16 threads, 7798 at 8 threads, 4151 at 4 threads, and 2137 at 2 threads, reaching 12536 at max threads. PassMark multithread score is 51406, with single-thread at 4238.

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 53288, placing it at the 91st percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals show tight competition: the AMD EPYC 7313P scores 53206 (delta 0.2%), the Intel Xeon Phi 7290 scores 53469 (delta -0.3%), the Intel Xeon 634 scores 52974 (delta 0.6%), and the Intel Core i7-14700F scores 53620 (delta -0.6%). This places the 7900X in a cluster where performance differences are within a single percentage point.

The Arc A310’s average benchmark score is 7550, with a PassMark G3D score of 5433 and a PassMark GPU compute score of 2157. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon R7 250 at 7557 (delta -0.1%), the AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 at 7580 (delta -0.4%), the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 at 7472 (delta 1%), and the AMD Radeon HD 8850M at 7447 (delta 1.4%). The GPU sits at the 40th percentile among all GPUs.

The combined percentile for this pairing is 66, reflecting the drag that the GPU imposes on the overall system capability. The CPU alone would place in the top 9% of all processors, but the GPU pulls the combined score down significantly. This is a CPU-dominant configuration where the processor outperforms the graphics card by a wide margin in their respective percentile rankings.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The balance here is heavily skewed toward the CPU. The 91st percentile CPU combined with a 40th percentile GPU means that the graphics card will be the limiting factor in any graphics-intensive task. The CPU has enough headroom to feed a much more powerful GPU, but the Arc A310 cannot translate that compute potential into frame rates.

In gaming workloads, the GPU’s 5433 PassMark G3D score and 29 DirectX 12 score indicate that the graphics card will bottleneck at lower resolutions and settings. The CPU’s 12536 3DMark max-thread score and 29300 Cinebench R23 multi-core score are far beyond what the GPU can utilize in most game scenarios. The FPS scaling evidence is absent from the FACT PACK — no measured FPS rows exist for this combination — but the percentile gap suggests that upgrading the GPU would yield substantial performance gains without requiring a CPU change.

For compute workloads, the situation reverses. The CPU’s PassMark integer math score of 169273, floating point math score of 103952, and data compression score of 632505 indicate that the processor will dominate tasks like video encoding, compilation, and data processing. The GPU’s compute score of 2157 means it contributes little to these workloads. The 12-core, 24-thread configuration with 64 MB of shared L3 cache provides ample parallel processing capability that the GPU cannot match.

Memory bandwidth is another factor. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 with 83.2 GB/s of memory bandwidth, while the GPU has 124.0 GB/s of dedicated GDDR6 bandwidth. This is unusual — the GPU has more bandwidth than the CPU’s memory subsystem, but the GPU’s small 4 GB capacity limits how much data it can hold locally.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work

High-refresh gaming: This configuration is not suited for high-refresh gaming. The Arc A310’s 5433 PassMark G3D score and 33 DirectX 11 score indicate that even 1080p gaming at high refresh rates is out of reach. The GPU’s 40th percentile ranking means most modern titles will run at low settings with modest frame rates. The CPU’s 4238 PassMark single-thread score provides enough processing power for game logic, but the GPU will bottleneck every frame.

Streaming: The CPU’s 12 cores and 24 threads, combined with a 29300 Cinebench R23 multi-core score, make this a capable streaming platform. The x264 encoder can leverage the CPU’s parallel resources, and the 64 MB L3 cache helps with real-time encoding tasks. The GPU’s low compute score of 2157 means hardware encoding via the Arc A310 is not a viable alternative — software encoding on the CPU is the better path.

Video editing: The CPU excels here with a 19267 Geekbench multi-core score and 103952 PassMark floating point math score. Timeline scrubbing, effects processing, and export encoding will all benefit from the 12-core processor. However, the GPU’s 4 GB VRAM and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth limit GPU-accelerated effects and 4K preview rendering. The CPU will carry the workload, and the GPU will only assist in basic tasks.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering is strong — the 29300 Cinebench R23 multi-core score translates to fast render times in applications that use CPU rays. GPU rendering is severely limited by the Arc A310’s 2.688 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 2157 PassMark compute score. The 6 RT cores exist but lack the throughput for meaningful ray-traced rendering. This is a CPU-rendering machine that happens to have a GPU.

Software development: The 7900X is excellent for compilation workloads. The 169273 PassMark integer math score and 51406 PassMark multithread score indicate fast build times for large codebases. The 24 threads handle parallel compilation well, and the 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth reduces bottlenecks. The GPU is irrelevant here, making this a solid development workstation.

Student and office work: This pairing is overkill for office tasks. The CPU’s 91st percentile ranking exceeds any office workload requirement, and the GPU’s 625 PassMark G2D score handles 2D desktop rendering adequately. The system will be responsive and fast, but the cost of the CPU is unjustified for basic productivity. The GPU’s 4 GB VRAM is sufficient for dual-monitor office setups.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 66, reflecting the GPU’s lower standing compared to the CPU’s 91st percentile.

Q: How does the Ryzen 9 7900X compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The 7900X scores 53288 on average, with the AMD EPYC 7313P at 53206 (0.2% higher), the Intel Xeon Phi 7290 at 53469 (0.3% lower), the Intel Xeon 634 at 52974 (0.6% higher), and the Intel Core i7-14700F at 53620 (0.6% lower).

Q: What is the Intel Arc A310’s memory configuration?

A: It has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, delivering 124.0 GB/s of bandwidth at 1937 MHz (15.5 Gbps effective).

Q: Does the Arc A310 support ray tracing?

A: Yes, it has 6 RT cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), but its overall 2.688 TFLOPS FP32 throughput limits practical ray-traced performance.

Q: What is the CPU’s power draw and socket?

A: The Ryzen 9 7900X has a TDP of 170 W, uses AMD Socket AM5, and supports DDR5 dual-channel memory with ECC.

Q: What is the suggested PSU for this system?

A: The GPU’s suggested PSU is 200 W, and the GPU itself has a 30 W TDP with no power connectors required.

Q: Does the GPU have any measured FPS data in the FACT PACK?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this combination, so all FPS figures on this page are estimates derived from benchmark scores.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this CPU and GPU combination. The measuredFpsUltraByGame field is empty, and dataIsMeasured is false. Therefore, all gaming performance figures presented here are estimates based on the benchmark scores.

The Arc A310’s 5433 PassMark G3D score and 29 PassMark DirectX 12 score suggest that at 1080p with ultra settings, most modern games will run at low frame rates — likely below 30 FPS in demanding titles. The GPU’s 4 GB VRAM will also limit texture quality, potentially causing stuttering when memory is exhausted. At 720p or with reduced settings, playable frame rates may be achievable in less demanding games, but the 40th percentile GPU ranking means this is not a gaming-focused configuration.

The CPU’s 4238 PassMark single-thread score ensures that game logic and physics will not be bottlenecks. The 12536 3DMark max-thread score provides ample headroom for background tasks while gaming. However, the GPU is the limiting factor at every resolution above 720p with medium settings. The 124.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 2.688 TFLOPS FP32 throughput are simply insufficient for modern AAA titles at high settings.

For esports titles with lighter graphics requirements, the A310 may deliver playable frame rates at 1080p with competitive settings. The 28.00 GPixel/s pixel rate can handle simple scenes, but frame rates will not approach high-refresh territory. The 16 ROPs limit fill-rate-bound scenarios.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries

This pairing suits users who prioritize CPU compute over GPU graphics. Software developers compiling large codebases will benefit from the 169273 PassMark integer math score and 29300 Cinebench R23 multi-core score. Data analysts and researchers running multithreaded workloads can leverage the 24 threads. Students in computer science or engineering fields who need fast compilation and simulation would find the CPU beneficial.

Content creators working with CPU-based rendering will appreciate the 103952 PassMark floating point math score. Video editors using software encoders can rely on the 12-core processor for export tasks. However, 3D artists who need GPU rendering should look elsewhere — the Arc A310’s 2157 compute score is inadequate for modern GPU renderers.

Small business workstations running virtualization or database workloads will see strong single-thread performance from the 4238 PassMark single-thread score and strong multi-thread performance from the 51406 multithread score. The 64 MB L3 cache helps with data-heavy tasks. The GPU’s low power draw (30 W TDP) keeps system heat down, which benefits office environments.

Gamers should avoid this configuration unless they exclusively play low-demand titles. The 40th percentile GPU ranking means high-refresh gaming is impossible. Users who need occasional gaming alongside heavy CPU workloads might find the A310 acceptable for 720p or low-setting 1080p play, but a more capable GPU would unlock the CPU’s full potential.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a desktop-class build combining the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X with the Intel Arc A310. The CPU is a 12-core, 24-thread processor from the Zen 4 Raphael generation, built on TSMC’s 5 nm process with 13,140 million transistors across a 2x 71 mm² die. It launched in September 2022 with a launch MSRP of $549. The GPU is an Intel Arc A310 from the Alchemist generation, built on TSMC’s 6 nm process with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. It launched in October 2022 and is now end-of-life.

The combined percentile of 66 places this system in the upper-middle tier overall. However, this ranking masks the extreme disparity between components. The CPU alone ranks in the 91st percentile, while the GPU sits in the 40th percentile. This is not a balanced build — it is a high-end CPU paired with an entry-level GPU. The system will excel at CPU-bound tasks and struggle with GPU-bound tasks.

The GPU’s production status is end-of-life, with Battlemage listed as its successor. The CPU remains active in production. This means the GPU is a legacy component with no future driver optimizations expected, while the CPU will continue to receive support. The combination is unusual, suggesting either a budget constraint or a specific workload requirement that favors CPU compute.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X features 12 cores and 24 threads based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Raphael. It operates at a 4.70 GHz base clock and boosts to 5.60 GHz. The 5 nm process from TSMC enables 13,140 million transistors across two 71 mm² chiplets. Each core has 64 KB of L1 cache and 1 MB of L2 cache, with 64 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with ECC at 83.2 GB/s bandwidth and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the CPU.

Benchmark results show exceptional real-world performance. The 29300 Cinebench R23 multi-core score indicates that heavily threaded workloads like video encoding, 3D rendering, and scientific simulations will complete quickly. The 2016.5 single-core score ensures responsive application behavior and fast single-threaded tasks. The 19267 Geekbench multicore and 2617 single-core scores corroborate this strength.

PassMark tests reveal specialized strengths. The 169273 integer math score accelerates compilation and cryptography. The 103952 floating point math score benefits scientific computing and financial modeling. The 632505 data compression score speeds up archiving and database operations. The 37263 data encryption score supports secure communications. The 47619 extended instructions score indicates strong SIMD performance for multimedia workloads.

The 74658 random string sorting score improves database and text processing. The 3060 physics score aids game physics simulations. The 388 find prime numbers score is a weaker point but rarely relevant in practical workloads. The 51406 multithread score places this CPU in the top tier for parallel workloads. The 4238 single-thread score ensures that even legacy single-threaded applications run well.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The Ryzen 9 7900X uses AMD Socket AM5, which supports the 7000 series and subsequent generations. The platform provides dual-channel DDR5 memory with ECC support, a key feature for workstation reliability. The CPU offers PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes, providing ample bandwidth for modern NVMe storage and graphics cards. The multiplier is unlocked, allowing overclocking for users who want to extract additional performance.

The CPU’s TDP is 170 W, while the GPU’s TDP is 30 W with a suggested PSU of 200 W. This means the system has significant PSU headroom. A 200 W PSU can handle the GPU alone, but the CPU requires additional power. The combined power draw suggests that a standard ATX power supply in the 550-650 W range (not specified in the FACT PACK, so this is qualitative) would provide ample headroom for both components plus peripherals.

The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8, which is compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 slots. The GPU’s single-slot design and lack of power connectors make installation simple. The 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 outputs support modern monitors.

A sensible next upgrade would be a more powerful GPU. The CPU’s 91st percentile ranking means it can drive much faster graphics cards without becoming a bottleneck. Replacing the Arc A310 with a GPU in the 70th percentile or higher would create a more balanced system. The CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 support ensures future GPUs will not be limited by interface bandwidth.

Alternatively, adding more DDR5 memory would benefit memory-intensive workloads. The CPU’s memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s is substantial, but dual-channel configurations can be expanded. The ECC support is valuable for data integrity in workstation scenarios.

The platform’s longevity is a key advantage. AM5 socket support for future Ryzen generations means the motherboard can be retained when upgrading the CPU. The 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes provide room for multiple NVMe drives or other expansion cards. The GPU’s end-of-life status suggests that replacing it sooner rather than later is prudent, as driver support will eventually cease.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7900X + Intel Arc A310

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X

Intel Arc A310

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work

FAQ

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame

Who Should Build It — target users and industries

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds