SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7900X + AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
95%
VS
GPU
88%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X

53,288 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

13,745 Benchmark Score
Top 12% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X and AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT form a desktop pairing with a combined percentile of 73 against all hardware tested. The CPU holds a 91st percentile position across all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 55th percentile across all GPUs. The measured frame rate data indicates this is a high-performance desktop with a strong focus on CPU-driven workloads, with the GPU providing adequate but not class-leading raster performance. The following analysis uses the provided benchmark data to describe the balance, performance, and use cases of this specific hardware combination.

Balance and Bottleneck

The interaction between the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X and the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT is best described by their relative benchmark positions. The CPU scores at the 91st percentile compared to all CPUs, a strong result that places it well ahead of the average processor. In contrast, the GPU's 55th percentile rank against all GPUs is a modest midpoint. This disparity means that in most workloads, the CPU is not the limiting factor; the GPU will be the component that constrains overall frame rates in graphics-heavy tasks.

Looking at the measured frame rates, the average FPS across all games for this pair is 175. The pair ranks 663rd out of 3,732 total pairs by average FPS, placing it in the top 17.8% of all tested combinations. While the CPU's benchmark scores are exceptional, the GPU's lower percentile rank suggests that for many gaming workloads, the system will be limited by the graphics card's output, not the processor's speed.

The 3DMark CPU scores show a steep scaling pattern. The 2-thread score is 2,137, the 4-thread score is 4,151, and the 8-thread score is 7,798. This nearly doubles with each doubling of threads, which is a good sign for tasks that use up to eight threads. However, the scaling begins to flatten out at higher thread counts. The 16-thread score is 10,972, and the max-thread score is 12,536. This indicates that while the CPU has 24 threads, the performance gains from going beyond 16 threads are minimal in the 3DMark test. This is because the test cannot effectively use the full 24-thread capacity, or the workload becomes memory-bound.

This pattern of scaling suggests that in highly parallel workloads that can use all 24 threads, the CPU will still perform well, but the biggest gains are seen in the 8- to 16-thread range. For gaming, where the CPU can be used for physics, AI, and game logic, the CPU is generally more than enough to keep a GPU fed. The data shows that the CPU is rarely the bottleneck; the GPU's 55th percentile rank is a better indicator of overall frame rate. The bottleneck in this system is the GPU.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark results show a consistent position in the high-range. The average benchmark score for the CPU is 53,288. Its nearest rival is the AMD EPYC 7313P, which scores 53,206, a difference of only 0.2%, meaning the Ryzen 9 7900X is nearly identical in overall performance to that server chip. Another rival, the Intel Xeon Phi 7290, scores 53,469, which is 0.3% higher. The Intel Core i7-14700F scores 53,620, which is 0.6% higher. This cluster of results places the CPU in a tight group with those high-end server and desktop parts.

Single-threaded performance is also a strength. In Cinebench R23, the single-core score is 2,016.5. In Geekbench, the single-core score is 2,617. These are strong scores for a desktop processor, and the single-thread score will respond well to tasks that use only one core. The 3DMark single-thread score is 1,093, and the 2-thread score is 2,137, which is very close to ideal scaling. This strong single-thread performance is why the CPU ranks at the 91st percentile overall.

The GPU's benchmark data is separate and distinct. The average benchmark score for the GPU is 13,745. The nearest rival is the AMD Radeon 660M, which scores 13,812, a 0.5% difference. The NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile scores 13,821, also 0.5% ahead. The AMD Radeon RX 570X scores 13,871, 0.9% ahead. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT is 1.5% ahead with 13,543. This shows the GPU is performing at a level very similar to several very different cards, but the percentile rank is only 55th. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 5,623, which is a modern directX 12 test. The Geekbench Vulkan score is 71,068, which is a strong result. The Passmark G3D score is 29,009, and the GPU compute score is 16,828.

The combined picture is that the CPU is a high-tier, high-performance part, while the GPU is a solid mid-tier part. The CPU's benchmark scores are in the top tier of the database, while the GPU's scores are in the middle. The CPU will not limit the GPU in any workload, but the GPU will be the component that determines frame rates in graphically intense tasks.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data across the game list offers a clear view of the hardware's gaming capabilities. The data is measured, not estimated, and covers three resolutions at ultra settings.

At 1920x1080, the system produces very high frame rates for many games. Counter-Strike: Global Offensive reaches 602.1 FPS, and Valorant reaches 528.7 FPS. These are extremely high numbers, showing that the CPU is very strong in single-threaded, CPU-bound esports titles. Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege hits 325 FPS. Minecraft reaches 270 FPS. Counter-Strike 2 hits 274 FPS. These numbers show that for competitive, low-load games, the system can easily drive high refresh rate monitors.

At 2560x1440, the frame rates are still very high. Valorant is still at 500.5 FPS, and CS:GO is at 415.2 FPS. Counter-Strike 2 is 181 FPS. Call of Duty: Warzone is 145.6 FPS. For more demanding titles, the frame rates drop. Cyberpunk 2077 is 61 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 is 55.5 FPS. This is a good level of performance for 1440p gaming. Many games, like Assetto Corsa (110.4 FPS), Ready Or Not (137.9 FPS), and Doom (132 FPS), are well above 100 FPS.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is the limiting factor. Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 41.4 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 to 34.4 FPS. Call of Duty: Warzone is 124 FPS, but many titles are in the 40-60 FPS range. The heavy fidelity titles like Ark: Survival Ascended (11.9 FPS) and The Medium (36.1 FPS) are very demanding. The system is not a 4K performer for the most demanding games, but it is playable for many titles.

The average FPS across all games is 175, which is a high average, but it is skewed by the very high frame rates of the esports titles. The pair rank of 663 out of 3,732 pairs shows that the system is in the top 20% for overall gaming performance. In the most demanding titles, the GPU is the limiting factor, which is expected given its 55th percentile rank.

Who Should Build It

The data from the benchmarks shows a system that is well-suited for a specific type of user. The high CPU performance, particularly in single-threaded tasks, makes this an excellent choice for gamers at the 1080p and 1440p resolutions who want to take advantage of high refresh rate monitors.

For gamers at 1920x1080, the system provides the best results. Esports titles like Counter-Strike: Global Offensive and Valorant run at over 500 FPS, making high refresh rate monitors fully effective. The system can run these titles at over 500 FPS, and the CPU has the strong single-threaded performance to support them.

For content creators, the CPU is the main draw. The multi-threaded scores are high, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 29,300 and a Geekbench multi-core score of 19,267. The PassMark multi-thread score is 51,406. These scores show that the CPU can handle heavy multi-threaded tasks like video editing, 3D rendering, and software compilation.

The system is also a good choice for software developers. The CPU has a Passmark data compression score of 632,505, and a data encryption score of 37,263. These are high scores, which indicate that tasks like compiling, and data processing are not a problem. The CPU is a desktop part, so it can be used in a workstation.

Small business workstations that need a powerful CPU for tasks like data analysis, virtualization, or heavy multi-threaded applications will find the CPU very capable. The CPU's 91st percentile rank and high multi-thread scores make it a strong choice for these workloads.

The GPU is not the main reason to buy this system, but it can still handle gaming and rendering tasks. The GPU has 20 GB of VRAM, which can handle large textures and 3D scenes, but the data shows that it is not a top-tier GPU. The GPU is in the 55th percentile, so it is a mid-range part.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X is a 12-core, 24-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, with the codename Raphael. It is built on a 5 nm process by TSMC and uses 13,140 million transistors across a die size of 2x 71 mm². The base clock is 4.70 GHz and the boost clock is 5.60 GHz. The TDP is 170 W, and it uses the AMD Socket AM5. It supports DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus, and it has a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. It also has a Radeon integrated graphics processor, and it supports ECC memory. The L3 cache is 64 MB shared across the cores.

The benchmark scores are consistent with this hardware. The PassMark multi-thread score is 51,406, and the Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 29,300. The Geekbench multi-core score is 19,267. The single-thread scores are also strong, with a PassMark single-thread score of 4,238, a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,016.5, and a Geekbench single-core score of 2,617.

The CPU's 91.5 percentile rank places it above most CPUs. The nearest rivals are the AMD EPYC 7313P, which is a server processor, and the Intel Xeon Phi 7290, which is a many-core processor. The benchmark scores are close to those, with a 0.2% difference from the EPYC, and a -0.3% difference from the Xeon Phi.

The CPU's performance in different test types shows its strengths. The PassMark integer math score is 169,273, and the floating point math score is 103,952. The extended instructions score is 47,619. The data compression score is 632,505, and the data encryption score is 37,263. These scores show that the CPU is a strong all-rounder for both integer and floating point tasks.

The CPU's scaling is not perfectly linear. The 3DMark scores show that as the thread count increases from 2 to 4 to 8, the score increases from 2,137 to 4,151 to 7,798. But from 16 threads (10,972) to max threads (12,536), the scaling is only 14%. This indicates that the CPU's full potential is not fully used in that benchmark, but it's also because the workload does not have enough parallelism. For many real workloads, the CPU will handle 24 threads well.

The CPU is a strong part for a wide range of tasks, with a high single-thread performance and high multi-thread performance. The 91.5th percentile is a good indication of its overall ranking.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's percentile rank against all other CPUs?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X is at the 91st percentile against all CPUs, indicating it is a top-tier processor.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile rank against all other GPUs?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT is at the 55th percentile against all GPUs, placing it at the mid-range of the GPU performance spectrum.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the AMD EPYC 7313P?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score is 53,288, which is 0.2% higher than the AMD EPYC 7313P's average score of 53,206.

Q: What is the GPU's average benchmark score and its nearest rival?

A: The GPU's average benchmark score is 13,745. The nearest rival is the AMD Radeon 660M, which has an average score of 13,812, a 0.5% difference.

Q: What is the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score?

A: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 29,300.

Q: What is the GPU's memory size and type?

A: The GPU has 20 GB of GDDR6 memory with a 320-bit bus.

Q: What is the CPU's socket and memory support?

A: The CPU uses AMD Socket AM5 and supports DDR5 memory.

Q: What is the GPU's boost clock?

A: The GPU has a boost clock of 2394 MHz.

Q: What is the CPU's TDP?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 170 W.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core i7-14700F?

A: The CPU's average score is 53,288, which is 0.6% lower than the Intel Core i7-14700F's score of 53,620.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT is a GPU from the Radeon RX 7000 series, built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture. It uses the Navi 31 chip, manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC, with 57,700 million transistors on a 529 mm² die. The GPU has a base clock of 1387 MHz, a boost clock of 2394 MHz, and a game clock of 2025 MHz. The memory runs at 2500 MHz, which is 20 Gbps effective. The GPU has 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 320-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 800.0 GB/s.

The GPU has 5,376 shading units, 336 TMUs, and 192 ROPs. It has 84 ray tracing cores. The pixel rate is 459.6 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 804.4 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 51.48 TFLOPS, and the FP16 performance is 103.0 TFLOPS (2:1). The TDP is 300 W, and the suggested PSU is 700 W. The GPU uses a dual-slot design and has 2x 8-pin power connectors. It has a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. The display outputs are 1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, and 1x USB Type-C.

The GPU's benchmark scores are a mix. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 5,623. The Geekbench OpenCL score is 12,756, and the Geekbench Vulkan score is 71,068. The PassMark G3D score is 29,009, and the GPU compute score is 16,828. The average benchmark score is 13,745, and the percentile is 55th.

The nearest rival is the AMD Radeon 660M, which is an integrated GPU, showing that the RX 7900 XT is at a similar level to that iGPU in this benchmark. The NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile, a mobile GPU, is also close. This suggests that the benchmark suite provides a mixed picture for the GPU, but it is clear that the GPU is not in the top tier for performance.

The GPU is also listed as "End-of-life" production status, and its predecessor is Navi II, and successor is Navi IV. The GPU is a large, dual-slot card, with a length of 276 mm, a height of 110 mm, and a width of 51 mm.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU is based on the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which is a modern platform. It supports DDR5 memory, with a dual-channel bus, and has a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5, with 24 lanes for the CPU. The platform supports ECC memory, which is a feature for workstations.

The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is a standard interface. The GPU has a TDP of 300 W, and the suggested PSU is 700 W. The power connectors are 2x 8-pin, which is a common power configuration.

The upgrade path for this system is clear. The CPU is a very strong part, and its performance is still within the top 10% of all CPUs. The GPU is a more likely candidate for an upgrade, as it is in the 55th percentile. A user looking for more gaming performance would upgrade the GPU to a higher-tier model. The CPU can handle a more powerful GPU, as it is not the bottleneck.

The platform supports the AM5 socket, which is a recent socket. This means that the CPU is not a dead-end platform, and there will be future CPU releases for the AM5 socket. However, the CPU is already a high-end part, so a CPU upgrade would only be for a small gain, as the CPU is already in the top tier.

The memory and storage are also not a bottleneck. The system supports DDR5 memory, and the CPU has a high memory bandwidth. The PCIe 5.0 support means that fast SSDs can be used. The user could upgrade the memory to a higher capacity or speed, but the current support is adequate.

Build Overview

This build pairs two AMD components, but the performance is not equally matched. The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X is a high-performance desktop CPU, with a 91.5th percentile ranking against all CPUs. The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT is a mid-range GPU, with a 55.5th percentile ranking against all GPUs.

The combined percentile of the build is 73. This indicates that the overall performance of the system is above average, but it is dragged down by the GPU's mid-range position. The CPU is the star, and the GPU is the weak link. The build class is desktop, and the system is meant for a desktop.

The average FPS across all games is 175, and the pair rank is 663rd out of 3,732 pairs. This means the system is in the top 17.8% of all tested pairs. The CPU's performance is a major reason for this high ranking, as it provides the strong single-threaded and multi-threaded performance that the system needs. The GPU is a good mid-range card, but it is not a top-tier card.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: For competitive and high-refresh gaming, this build is excellent at 1080p. Counter-Strike: Global Offensive hits 602.1 FPS, Valorant hits 528.7 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 hits 274 FPS. At 1440p, those titles still reach 415.2 FPS and 500.5 FPS respectively. The CPU's strong single-threaded performance ensures these frame rates are stable.

Streaming: The CPU's multi-threaded performance is sufficient for streaming. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 29,300 and the Geekbench multi-core score of 19,267 show that the CPU can handle the encoding and game logic simultaneously. Software encoding is a possibility with 24 threads. The GPU also supports hardware encoding, but the CPU is strong enough for most streaming tasks.

Video Editing: The CPU's multi-threaded performance is ideal for video editing. The PassMark multi-thread score is 51,406, and the Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 29,300. These scores indicate that the CPU will handle video editing software well, including rendering and effects. The GPU can also help with GPU-accelerated tasks, but the CPU is the main performer.

3D Rendering: The CPU's multi-threaded performance is strong for 3D rendering. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 29,300 is high, and the Geekbench multi-core score is 19,267. The GPU's rendering performance is lower, but the CPU can handle most rendering tasks. The 20 GB of VRAM is helpful for large scenes.

Software Development: The CPU's performance is well-suited for software development. The PassMark data compression score is 632,505, and the data encryption score is 37,263. These scores show that the CPU can handle compilations, data processing, and other development tasks efficiently. The multi-threaded performance will also speed up builds.

Student and Office Work: For general office work, this build is overkill, but it will handle everything with ease. The CPU's single-threaded performance is high, and the multi-threaded performance is excellent. The GPU can handle any office tasks, and the system will not be limited by any workloads. The 20 GB of VRAM is not needed, but it will not hurt.