SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7900 + Intel Arc B770

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

84 Score

Top 16% Ranking

84 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

74%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7900

49,228 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc B770

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900 and Intel Arc B770 form a desktop pairing that places in the 70th percentile of all CPU-GPU combinations in the benchmark database, with the CPU alone sitting in the 90th percentile of all processors. The Arc B770 has no measured game-frame data in the FACT PACK, so all FPS figures discussed below are estimates derived from its hardware specifications and the CPU’s benchmark results, not direct measurements. This combination targets high‑refresh 1080p and 1440p gaming, content creation, and professional multitasking, but the GPU’s mid‑range percentile means it will cap the system’s performance in graphics‑bound scenarios.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, and rendering implications

The Intel Arc B770 is built on the Xe2‑HPG architecture, the Battlemage generation, fabricated on TSMC’s 5 nm process. The die measures 368 mm² and the GPU is equipped with 4096 shading units, 256 texture mapping units, and 128 raster operations units. It has 32 dedicated ray‑tracing cores, though no tensor‑core count is listed. The base clock is 2100 MHz with a boost clock of 2400 MHz, and the memory runs at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective data rate.

Memory capacity is 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256‑bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s. That is a substantial amount of VRAM for 1440p and even 4K texture loading, and the bandwidth is high enough to feed the GPU’s compute units without stalling. The pixel rate is 307.2 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 614.4 GTexel/s, which together indicate strong fill‑rate headroom for rasterized scenes. The FP32 compute throughput is 19.66 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 39.32 TFLOPS (2:1), meaning the card can accelerate mixed‑precision workloads. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6, so it is compatible with the latest graphics APIs.

Because there are no benchmark scores for the B770 in this data set, its performance class must be inferred from its specifications. The GPU percentile against all GPUs is 50, placing it exactly at the median of the database. That is consistent with a mid‑range part. For rendering tasks, the 16 GB VRAM and 512 GB/s bandwidth are advantageous for large textures and scene data, while the 32 RT cores provide hardware acceleration for ray‑traced lighting and reflections. The lack of tensor cores in the specification list means that any AI‑assisted rendering features would rely on the shader units, which are plentiful at 4096. Overall, the GPU’s raw compute and memory resources suggest it can handle 1080p and 1440p gaming at high settings, and it can also serve as a capable accelerator for GPU‑based video encoding or 3D render workloads, though exact FPS figures are not available.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores and combined picture

The Ryzen 9 7900 delivers strong benchmark results across multiple suites. In Cinebench R23, it scores 24,776 in multi‑core and 1,966 in single‑core. In Geekbench, the multi‑core score is 17,726 and the single‑core is 2,495. The PassMark suite shows a multithreaded score of 48,347 and a single‑thread score of 4,130. Additional PassMark sub‑tests include integer math at 164,075, floating‑point math at 97,943, and extended instructions at 42,253. The 3DMark tests record 10,056 for 16 threads, 7,454 for 8 threads, 3,994 for 4 threads, 2,067 for 2 threads, 1,069 for a single thread, and 10,953 for max threads.

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 49,228, and its percentile versus all CPUs is 90, meaning it outperforms 90% of the processors in the database. The nearest rivals, based on average scores, are the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G (49,196, delta +0.1%), the Intel Core i5‑14600KF (49,394, delta −0.3%), the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 (48,995, delta +0.5%), and the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H (48,698, delta +1.1%). The 7900 is effectively tied with these parts, within a range of about one percent.

The GPU has no benchmark scores in the data; its percentile is 50 and its average score is 0. The combined percentile for the CPU‑GPU pairing is 70. This indicates that the CPU is significantly more powerful than the GPU relative to their respective pools. The CPU’s 90th percentile position drives the combined percentile upward, while the GPU’s 50th percentile pulls it down. In practical terms, the system’s overall performance is limited by the graphics card in most gaming and GPU‑accelerated tasks, but the CPU is more than capable of feeding it and will not be a bottleneck in typical games.

Gaming Performance — estimated FPS from the benchmark scores

No measured FPS data exists for this CPU‑GPU combination. The dataset contains no measuredFpsUltraByGame rows, and the flag dataIsMeasured is false. Therefore, the following frame‑rate expectations are estimates based on the GPU’s hardware specifications and the CPU’s benchmark scores, not direct measurements.

The Arc B770’s 16 GB of GDDR6 memory and 512 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for high‑resolution texture packs and modern game assets. The 19.66 TFLOPS FP32 compute is similar to that of other mid‑range cards that typically achieve 60+ FPS at 1080p ultra in many titles. At 1440p, the 512 GB/s bandwidth helps maintain steady frame times, though the 256‑bit bus is not the widest in the market. The CPU’s single‑thread scores (Geekbench 2,495, Cinebench R23 1,966) are strong enough to feed the GPU in most titles, meaning that the CPU will not be the limiting factor at 1080p or 1440p. At 4K, the GPU’s compute will become the primary constraint, and frame rates will drop accordingly.

For esports titles with high refresh‑rate monitors, the CPU’s high single‑thread performance and the GPU’s 512 GB/s bandwidth should deliver triple‑digit FPS at 1080p with lower settings. For AAA games at ultra settings, the GPU is expected to deliver 60–90 FPS at 1080p and 50–70 FPS at 1440p, with the CPU never becoming a bottleneck. These are estimates, not measurements, and actual results will vary by game and driver.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload

The CPU sits in the 90th percentile while the GPU is at the 50th percentile, a difference of 40 points. This is a clear indication that the GPU is the weaker component in the pairing. In gaming, the CPU’s 24 threads and high single‑core scores (Cinebench R23 single 1,966, Geekbench single 2,495) are sufficient for the vast majority of titles, and the GPU will be the limiting factor in almost every 3D application. The CPU’s PassMark multithread score of 48,347 shows that it can handle heavily threaded workloads without stress, so it is not a bottleneck in video editing, 3D rendering, or software compilation.

For CPU‑bound tasks such as physics simulation, data compression (PassMark data compression 577,847), or encryption (PassMark data encryption 34,708), the CPU will dominate. The GPU has no influence on these workloads. Conversely, for ray‑tracing or high‑resolution textures, the GPU’s 32 RT cores and 16 GB VRAM will be the decisive factor. The balance is therefore: the CPU is a high‑end part that can drive the system in productivity and multithreaded tasks, while the GPU is a mid‑range part that will limit the system in graphics‑heavy games and renderers. A user who upgrades the GPU later will see a large performance jump in gaming, while the CPU will not need replacement for many years.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, and real‑world performance

The Ryzen 9 7900 is a 12‑core, 24‑thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Raphael. It is fabricated on TSMC’s 5 nm process and has a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. The TDP is 65 W, which is notably low for a 12‑core part, and it supports an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. It uses the AMD Socket AM5 platform with dual‑channel DDR5 memory support, and it includes ECC memory support. The L3 cache is 64 MB shared, with 1 MB L2 and 64 KB L1 per core. The memory bandwidth is 83.2 GB/s, and the CPU has 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes available from the processor.

The benchmark scores paint a picture of a processor that excels in both multithreaded and single‑threaded work. The Cinebench R23 multi‑core score of 24,776 is very high for a 65 W chip, placing it in the same league as desktop parts with much higher power limits. The single‑core score of 1,966 is also strong, meaning that the CPU can handle latency‑sensitive tasks like gaming and general office work. In Geekbench, the multi‑core score of 17,726 and single‑core of 2,495 reinforce this. The PassMark multithread score of 48,347 is about 50% higher than a typical 8‑core, and the single‑thread score of 4,130 is close to the top of the consumer range.

The CPU’s 90th percentile rank means it is outperformed by only 10% of all processors, a category that includes high‑core‑count HEDT parts. For everyday use, the 7900 is a fast, energy‑efficient processor that will handle web browsing, office tasks, and content creation without breaking a sweat. Its 12 cores and 24 threads are well‑suited to video rendering, software compilation, and other parallel workloads, and the high boost clock of 5.4 GHz ensures snappy single‑thread responsiveness.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the benchmark scores

High‑refresh gaming: The CPU’s single‑thread performance (Cinebench R23 single 1,966, Geekbench single 2,495) is excellent, and the GPU’s 512 GB/s bandwidth and 16 GB VRAM are sufficient for 1080p and 1440p high‑refresh play. The CPU will not bottleneck the GPU in most games, so the system can drive high FPS in esports titles, though exact numbers are not measured.

Streaming: The CPU’s 12 cores and 24 threads provide ample headroom for simultaneous gaming and encoding. PassMark multithread score of 48,347 shows that the CPU can handle both the game and a software encoder without dropping frames. The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM also helps with texture streaming, but the GPU’s compute is limited, so streaming at 1080p with quality settings is realistic.

Video editing: The CPU’s multi‑core scores (Cinebench R23 24,776, Geekbench 17,726) indicate that it can handle 4K video timelines, and the GPU’s 512 GB/s bandwidth can accelerate effects and export. The 16 GB VRAM is ample for previews of high‑resolution footage. The system will be CPU‑limited during export, but the 65‑W TDP keeps thermals in check.

3D rendering: The CPU’s 24 threads and 64 MB L3 cache are ideal for CPU‑based renderers like Blender Cycles. The GPU’s 32 RT cores and 19.66 TFLOPS FP32 can be used for GPU‑accelerated rendering, and the 16 GB VRAM is sufficient for most scenes. The combination will handle both CPU and GPU rendering, with the CPU being the faster of the two for the final render.

Software development: The CPU’s high single‑thread performance (PassMark 4,130) speeds up compilation of single‑threaded build steps, while the multi‑thread scores accelerate parallel builds. The 24 threads and 64 MB cache reduce build times, and the DDR5 memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s supports large data sets.

Student and office work: The CPU’s low 65‑W TDP and integrated Radeon Graphics (from the CPU’s integrated GPU) make the system efficient for typical office tasks. The CPU’s high single‑core score ensures fast response in word processors, spreadsheets, and web browsers. The GPU is not needed for office tasks, but the system can handle light photo editing and video calls without issue.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries

This pairing is best suited for gamers who play at 1080p and 1440p with high settings, because the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM and 512 GB/s bandwidth are enough for modern titles, while the CPU’s 90th percentile ranking ensures that the CPU will not become obsolete for several years. Content creators, such as video editors and 3D artists, will benefit from the CPU’s strong multi‑threaded scores and the GPU’s large VRAM for texture and render workloads. Software developers who compile large projects will find the CPU’s 24 threads and high single‑core performance valuable. Students and small‑business users who need a reliable, energy‑efficient desktop that can handle occasional gaming or photo editing will also find this configuration suitable, as the 65‑W CPU keeps power consumption low and the system runs quietly. The system is not aimed at 4K gaming or high‑refresh 1440p gaming at maximum settings, where the GPU will be the bottleneck, but it is a solid mid‑range choice.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 7900 has 12 cores and 24 threads.

Q: What is the Intel Arc B770’s memory capacity and bandwidth?

A: The Arc B770 has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory with a 512.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Does the CPU support DDR5?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 9 7900 supports DDR5 memory with a dual‑channel bus and a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock?

A: The boost clock is 5.40 GHz, with a base clock of 3.70 GHz.

Q: What PCIe version does the CPU use?

A: The CPU has 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes (CPU only).

Q: Does the GPU have ray tracing hardware?

A: Yes, the Arc B770 has 32 ray‑tracing cores.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU‑GPU pair?

A: The combined percentile is 70, with the CPU at 90 and the GPU at 50.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 9 7900 is built for the AMD Socket AM5 platform. It supports DDR5 memory (dual‑channel) and has 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU, while the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. The system’s power supply requirement is 550 W for the GPU, and the CPU has a 65 W TDP, so a 550 W PSU is sufficient for the entire system. The AM5 socket is expected to support future Ryzen generations, so the CPU can be upgraded to a higher‑core part without changing the motherboard, provided that the board’s BIOS is updated. For the GPU, the Arc B770 is a mid‑range card, and a user who later wants more graphics performance can upgrade to a higher‑tier GPU that fits the PCIe 4.0 slot, such as a model with more shading units or higher memory bandwidth. The CPU’s strong scores (Cinebench R23 24,776, PassMark 48,347) mean it will remain a solid partner for future GPUs, so the platform has a clear upgrade path: first upgrade the GPU, then the CPU if needed. The motherboard also supports DDR5, so users can increase memory capacity or speed later. The system’s PSU headroom (550 W) is adequate for the current GPU, but a more powerful GPU would require a higher‑capacity PSU, as the suggested PSU for the Arc B770 is 550 W.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7900 + Intel Arc B770

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 7900

Intel Arc B770

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, and rendering implications

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores and combined picture

Gaming Performance — estimated FPS from the benchmark scores

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, and real‑world performance

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the benchmark scores

Who Should Build It — target users and industries

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds