SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7900 + Intel Arc A380

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

90 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
86%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7900

49,228 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A380

8,558 Benchmark Score
Top 14% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900 and Intel Arc A380 pairing is a study in extreme contrast: a top-tier 12-core desktop processor paired with an entry-level discrete GPU. The combined percentile of 67 reflects a system that is overwhelmingly CPU-bound, with the processor capable of handling far more demanding graphics hardware than the Arc A380 can deliver. This configuration is not balanced for high-end gaming; its strengths lie in productivity and multi-threaded workloads where the CPU dominates, while the GPU serves as a functional, basic display adapter.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data clearly indicates that the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 is the dominant component, while the Intel Arc A380 represents a significant bottleneck in graphics-intensive tasks. The CPU sits in the 90th percentile among all processors, while the GPU languishes in the 44th percentile. This stark difference in relative standing creates a system where the processor’s capabilities are largely untapped in gaming scenarios. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 49228 dwarfs the GPU’s 8558, showing a massive disparity in raw compute potential.

Benchmark results show that the CPU’s multi-threaded performance is exceptional. The 3dmark_max_threads score of 10953 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24776 indicate a processor that can rapidly complete complex, parallel tasks. Conversely, the GPU’s 3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12 score of 808 and Passmark G3D score of 6252 place it firmly in entry-level territory. In any gaming scenario, the GPU will reach its limits long before the CPU is stressed. The data suggests that for 1080p gaming, the Arc A380 will be the limiting factor, preventing the Ryzen 9 7900 from demonstrating its full potential.

The bottleneck is not a minor imbalance; it is a fundamental mismatch. The CPU is built for high-throughput workloads, while the GPU is designed for basic 1080p rendering. The FPS scaling in games will be dictated almost entirely by the GPU’s capabilities. The CPU’s single-threaded performance, with a 3dmark_single_thread score of 1069 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2495, is more than sufficient to feed even a much faster GPU. Therefore, any frame rate limitations will be directly attributable to the Arc A380, not the Ryzen 9 7900. This configuration is best understood as a workstation CPU with a basic display output, rather than a gaming-focused build.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this specific CPU and GPU combination. All frame rate discussions here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The data shows that the Arc A380 is an entry-level GPU, and its benchmark scores align with 1080p gaming at low-to-medium settings. The Passmark DirectX 12 score of 35 and Passmark DirectX 11 score of 38 are indicative of a card that can run modern titles but not at high fidelity. The GPU’s FP32 performance of 4.198 TFLOPS and memory bandwidth of 186.0 GB/s are modest, limiting its ability to handle high-resolution textures and complex shaders.

At 1080p, the Arc A380 should be capable of delivering playable frame rates in less demanding esports titles. However, for AAA games, the user should expect to significantly lower graphical settings to achieve a smooth experience. The CPU’s high single-threaded score of 4130 in Passmark ensures that it will not introduce stuttering or frame-pacing issues, but it cannot compensate for the GPU’s raw pixel-pushing limitations. At 1440p or 4K, the GPU would be severely overburdened, and performance would likely be sub-30 FPS in most modern games. The 6 GB VRAM capacity may also become a limiting factor at higher resolutions or with high-resolution texture packs.

The data suggests a gaming experience that is strictly entry-level. Users should not expect high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p in demanding titles. The GPU’s 3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12 score of 808 is a low-end result, and the Passmark G2D score of 610 indicates modest 2D performance as well. For a gaming-focused build, this GPU is the clear weak point, and the CPU’s potential is wasted in this context. The estimated FPS figures would be acceptable for casual gaming but would frustrate enthusiasts seeking high detail settings.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: This is the weakest scenario for this pairing. The Arc A380’s low benchmark scores, including a Passmark G3D score of 6252, will not sustain high frame rates in modern titles. The CPU is capable of high FPS, but the GPU bottleneck will cap performance well below what a 144Hz monitor requires. Users would need to play esports titles on low settings to approach high refresh rates.

Streaming: The CPU is exceptionally well-suited for streaming. The 12 cores and 24 threads, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24776, provide ample headroom for encoding video while gaming. The Ryzen 9 7900 can handle the software encoding workload without significantly impacting gaming performance, which is a major advantage. The GPU’s role in this scenario is minimal, as the CPU can handle the heavy lifting.

Video Editing: This scenario is a strong point for the build. The CPU’s multi-threaded performance, with a Passmark multithread score of 48347, is ideal for rendering and exporting video. The GPU can assist with some effects and playback, but the CPU is the primary workhorse. The data shows a system that can handle complex editing timelines and render times that are significantly shorter than on lower-core-count systems.

3D Rendering: The Ryzen 9 7900 excels here. The Cinebench R15 multicore score of 4020 and the high 3dmark_max_threads score of 10953 indicate a processor that can crunch through 3D rendering tasks efficiently. The Arc A380, with its 8 RT cores, offers some ray-tracing acceleration, but its low FP32 performance of 4.198 TFLOPS means it is not a primary rendering device. This is a CPU-centric workflow where the processor’s 12 cores shine.

Software Development: The CPU is a compiler’s best friend. The high multi-threaded scores, such as a Passmark integer math score of 164075, mean faster code compilation times. The single-threaded performance, with a Passmark single-thread score of 4130, ensures snappy responsiveness in IDEs. The GPU is adequate for basic GUI rendering but offers no specific advantages for development work.

Student and Office Work: This scenario is overkill. The CPU’s immense power, with a Geekbench multicore score of 17726, is far beyond what office applications require. The GPU is more than sufficient for document editing, web browsing, and video playback. The system will be incredibly responsive, but the hardware is underutilized. The low TDP of 65W for the CPU is a benefit for energy-conscious users.

Who Should Build It

This build is for a user who prioritizes CPU-intensive productivity tasks and needs a functional GPU for basic display output. The Ryzen 9 7900 is a desktop-class processor in the 90th percentile of all CPUs, making it an excellent choice for professionals in content creation, software development, and data analysis. The 12 cores and 24 threads, combined with a 64 MB L3 cache, provide a powerful foundation for multi-threaded applications.

The Intel Arc A380 is suited for users who do not play demanding 3D games. It is capable of driving multiple displays, with outputs including HDMI 2.1 and DisplayPort 2.0, making it suitable for office workstations and general productivity. The GPU’s 6 GB of VRAM is enough for 2D applications and basic video playback. Users who are building a small business workstation for accounting, document management, or software that is not graphically intensive will find this pairing to be effective.

This is not a system for gamers. The GPU’s 44th percentile ranking and low benchmark scores preclude a satisfying gaming experience at high settings. Content creators who rely on CPU rendering, such as video editors and 3D modelers, will benefit from the CPU’s power. Software developers will appreciate the fast compile times. Students in engineering or computer science will find the CPU useful for simulations and coding, while the GPU handles standard desktop tasks. The system is a workhorse for compute-heavy tasks, with the GPU serving as a secondary component.

FAQ

Q: Is the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 a good processor for gaming?

A: The CPU itself is excellent for gaming, with a 3dmark_single_thread score of 1069 and a Passmark single-thread score of 4130. However, in this specific build, the Intel Arc A380 GPU will be the limiting factor, preventing the CPU from delivering high frame rates in demanding games.

Q: Can the Intel Arc A380 handle 4K video playback?

A: Yes, the GPU is capable of handling video playback. It has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory and supports modern display outputs like HDMI 2.1 and DisplayPort 2.0. Its 2D performance, with a Passmark G2D score of 610, is adequate for this purpose.

Q: What is the main advantage of the Ryzen 9 7900 in this build?

A: The main advantage is its exceptional multi-threaded performance. The 12 cores and 24 threads, reflected in a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24776, make it ideal for video editing, 3D rendering, and software compilation.

Q: Is this a balanced system for playing modern AAA games?

A: No. The data shows the GPU is in the 44th percentile while the CPU is in the 90th. This imbalance means the GPU will bottleneck performance, and users will have to play games at low-to-medium settings at 1080p to get playable frame rates.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the Intel Arc A380?

A: The Intel Arc A380 has a memory bandwidth of 186.0 GB/s, using a 96-bit memory bus with 6 GB of GDDR6 memory running at an effective speed of 15.5 Gbps.

Q: Does the Ryzen 9 7900 support DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports DDR5 memory with a dual-channel memory bus and a maximum bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. It also supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the process node for the Intel Arc A380?

A: The Intel Arc A380 is built on a 6 nm process at TSMC. It has 7,200 million transistors and a die size of 157 mm².

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A380 is an entry-level desktop GPU based on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the Alchemist generation. It is built on a 6 nm process at TSMC and features the DG2-128 chip with 7,200 million transistors. The GPU has 1024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 raster output pipelines. Its memory subsystem consists of 6 GB of GDDR6 on a 96-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 186.0 GB/s. The memory clock runs at an effective 15.5 Gbps.

The GPU’s compute capabilities are modest, with an FP32 performance of 4.198 TFLOPS. It includes 8 ray tracing cores, enabling some hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though its low overall performance limits its usefulness in this area. The benchmark scores confirm its entry-level positioning. The 3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12 score of 808 is low, and the Passmark G3D score of 6252 places it in the 44th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon 880M and the NVIDIA GeForce MX330, which are integrated or low-end mobile parts, indicating its performance class.

The GPU’s texture rate is 131.2 GTexel/s and its pixel rate is 65.60 GPixel/s. These figures suggest it is capable of handling basic 1080p rendering. The 75W TDP and 250W suggested PSU make it an efficient, low-power card. It uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface and has a dual-slot design with a 1x 8-pin power connector. Its display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 2.0, making it suitable for multi-monitor setups. For rendering, the GPU’s low FP32 performance and 8 RT cores mean it is not a primary renderer; the CPU is the main compute engine.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900 is a high-end desktop processor from the 7000 series, based on the Zen 4 architecture with the Raphael codename. It is manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC, with 13,140 million transistors across a dual-die design of 2x 71 mm². The CPU features 12 cores and 24 threads, with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. It has a 65W TDP and supports DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus, with a maximum bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. It also supports ECC memory and has 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes.

The cache hierarchy is substantial: 64 KB of L1 and 1 MB of L2 per core, plus a shared 64 MB of L3 cache. This large L3 cache is beneficial for gaming and productivity applications. The benchmark scores are exceptional. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24776 and the Geekbench multicore score of 17726 highlight its multi-threaded prowess. The 3dmark_max_threads score of 10953 and Passmark multithread score of 48347 further confirm its ability to handle heavily parallel workloads. Its single-threaded performance is also strong, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1966 and a Passmark single-thread score of 4130.

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 49228 places it in the 90th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i5-14600KF, with a score of 49394, and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G, with a score of 49196. The data shows that the Ryzen 9 7900 is competitive with these parts, with performance deltas of -0.3% and 0.1% respectively. For real workloads, this means excellent performance in video encoding, 3D rendering, software compilation, and scientific computing. The unlocked multiplier allows for overclocking, and it is compatible with the AMD Socket AM5 platform. It was released on 2023-01-13 with a launch MSRP of $429.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build that combines a top-tier productivity CPU with an entry-level discrete GPU. The AMD Ryzen 9 7900 is a 12-core, 24-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, representing the high end of AMD’s 7000 series. The Intel Arc A380 is a low-power, entry-level GPU based on the Alchemist architecture, designed for basic gaming and general display tasks. Together, they form a system with a combined percentile of 67.

The build’s overall tier is defined by its CPU, which is in the 90th percentile. The GPU, in the 44th percentile, drags down the combined score. This is a configuration that is best described as a CPU-centric workstation. It is not a balanced gaming system, but rather a machine where the processor is the star, and the GPU is a supporting player for display output and light acceleration. The CPU’s 65W TDP is remarkably low for its performance class, making it an efficient choice for a desktop workstation. The GPU’s 75W TDP also contributes to the system’s overall low power draw.

The pairing is unusual, but it serves a clear purpose. For users who need massive multi-threaded compute power for productivity but do not play demanding games, this build offers a logical combination. The CPU’s performance in Cinebench and Geekbench is stellar, while the GPU provides a modern, feature-complete display output with support for HDMI 2.1 and DisplayPort 2.0. This is a system for work, not for high-end gaming, and its component choices reflect that priority.

Benchmark Performance

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900 delivers top-tier benchmark results across the board. In 3DMark, it scores 10953 in the max threads test and 1069 in the single-thread test. Cinebench R23 results are strong, with a multicore score of 24776 and a single-core score of 1966. Geekbench scores are also high, with a multicore score of 17726 and a single-core score of 2495. Passmark results show a multithread score of 48347 and a single-thread score of 4130. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 49228, placing it in the 90th percentile of all CPUs. It is closely matched with the Intel Core i5-14600KF, which has an average score of 49394, a delta of -0.3%.

The Intel Arc A380 shows entry-level performance in its benchmarks. Its 3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12 score is 808. Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores are 38224 and 36736, respectively. Passmark results are modest, with a G3D score of 6252 and a GPU compute score of 2762. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 8558, placing it in the 44th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the AMD FirePro W5170M, which has an average score of 8595, a delta of -0.4%. The combined picture is of a system with immense CPU power and limited GPU capability.

The combined percentile for this build is 67, reflecting the massive disparity between the two components. In productivity tasks that use the CPU, this system will perform in the top 10% of all systems. In gaming tasks that use the GPU, it will perform in the bottom half. The data shows that benchmarks for the CPU are world-class, while those for the GPU are firmly in the entry-level segment. Users should rely on the CPU scores for performance expectations in rendering and compilation, and the GPU scores for expectations in light gaming and 2D acceleration.