SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7900 + Intel Arc A350

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

84 Score

Top 16% Ranking

84 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

74%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7900

49,228 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

AMD Ryzen 9 7900 and Intel Arc A350 is a desktop pairing that combines a high-end 12-core processor with an entry-level discrete GPU. The CPU sits in the 90th percentile of all tested processors, while the GPU sits exactly in the 50th percentile, and the combined configuration ranks in the 70th percentile. This is a lopsided match: the Ryzen 9 7900 is a productivity powerhouse, but the Arc A350 is a basic rendering device. The data shows a system that excels at multi-threaded workloads, but offers only modest graphics capability, which fundamentally shapes what this build can and cannot do.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900 is a 12-core, 24-thread processor built on the Zen 4 architecture (Raphael) using a 5 nm process at TSMC. It has a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, with a TDP of 65 W. The chip includes 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 64 MB of shared L3 cache. The transistor count is 13,140 million spread across a 2x 71 mm² die configuration.

Benchmark data confirms this is a top-tier desktop CPU. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 24,776, while the single-core score is 1,966. These figures place it at the 90th percentile of all CPUs. Comparing to nearest rivals, the Ryzen 9 7900 trades blows with the Intel Core i5-14600KF (deltaPct -0.3, meaning the 7900 is 0.3% behind), and it is 0.1% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G. It is also 0.5% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 and 1.1% ahead of the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H. The practical interpretation is that the 7900 sits in a performance tier where small percentage differences separate it from several strong competitors.

The Geekbench multi-core score of 17,726 and single-core score of 2,495 reinforce the picture. The 3DMark thread scaling tests show a progression from 1,069 (single thread) to 2,067 (2 threads), 3,994 (4 threads), 7,454 (8 threads), 10,056 (16 threads), and 10,953 (max threads). This scaling curve indicates the processor extracts meaningful performance from additional cores up to 16 threads, with diminishing returns beyond that point.

For real workloads, the PassMark results are revealing. Integer math scores 164,075, floating point math scores 97,943, and extended instructions score 42,253. Data encryption hits 34,708, data compression reaches 577,847, and random string sorting is 68,474. The physics score is 3,059, and prime number finding is 380. The multi-thread score is 48,347, and the single-thread score is 4,130. These numbers suggest the CPU is exceptionally strong in compression, encryption, and integer-heavy tasks, which are common in software compilation, database work, and scientific computing.

The 65 W TDP is notably low for a 12-core processor, and the fact that the multiplier is unlocked suggests overclocking headroom exists. The integrated Radeon Graphics provides a fallback display output, though the discrete GPU handles rendering. The data implies the CPU will not be the limiting factor in most workloads; instead, the GPU will constrain graphics performance.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 9 7900 uses AMD Socket AM5, which is the current desktop platform for the 7000 series. Memory support is DDR5 with a dual-channel bus, and the system provides 83.2 GB/s of memory bandwidth. ECC memory is supported, which matters for workstation reliability. PCIe connectivity is Gen 5 with 24 lanes available from the CPU, which is future-proof for fast NVMe storage and GPUs.

The GPU is a PCIe 4.0 x8 card, which is compatible with the CPU's PCIe 5.0 slots. The GPU TDP is 25 W, and the suggested PSU is 200 W. This is extremely low power consumption. The CPU TDP is 65 W. Combined, the system draws minimal power, meaning a modest power supply is sufficient. However, the suggested PSU figure of 200 W implies the entire system is designed for efficiency rather than high-end gaming performance.

The upgrade path is clear: the AM5 platform supports the latest Ryzen processors, so a user could later install a more powerful GPU without changing the motherboard. The PCIe Gen 5 lanes and DDR5 memory support mean the platform is not a bottleneck. The GPU has no display outputs, which is unusual; it is a compute-only card. The data shows the Arc A350 is end-of-life, with its predecessor being Xe Graphics and successor being Battlemage. This suggests it is a stopgap solution.

A sensible next upgrade would be replacing the GPU with a higher-tier model, as the CPU has ample headroom. The CPU's 90th percentile ranking means it will not bottleneck any current graphics card. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface of the current GPU is a limitation, but a newer GPU with PCIe 5.0 would fully utilize the CPU's lanes. The platform supports it, but the current GPU does not.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU is more than capable, with single-thread performance in the 90th percentile. However, the GPU is the limiting factor. The Arc A350 has only 4 GB of VRAM and 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, which is entry-level. At 1080p with high-refresh monitors, the GPU will likely struggle to maintain high frame rates in demanding titles. The data suggests this is not a high-refresh gaming build.

Streaming: The CPU's 12 cores and 24 threads handle encoding and multitasking well. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24,776 indicates the CPU can manage game capture and encoding simultaneously. However, the GPU lacks the horsepower for modern game rendering at high settings, so streaming would be limited to less demanding games. The PassMark multi-thread score of 48,347 supports the CPU's ability to handle concurrent workloads.

Video editing: The CPU excels here. The 64 MB of L3 cache and high multi-core scores (Cinebench R23 multi-core 24,776) accelerate rendering and export. The GPU can assist with effects, but its 4 GB VRAM and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth are insufficient for large 4K timelines. The data indicates the CPU does the heavy lifting, and the GPU provides minimal acceleration.

3D rendering: This is a strong CPU workload. The PassMark floating point math score of 97,943 and the 3DMark max threads score of 10,953 show the CPU handles complex calculations. The GPU's 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 is modest, so rendering will be CPU-bound. The 12 cores will render scenes efficiently, but the GPU will not accelerate ray tracing well, despite having 6 RT cores.

Software development: The CPU is ideal. The PassMark data compression score of 577,847 and integer math score of 164,075 speed up compilation and code analysis. The 24 threads allow parallel builds. The GPU is irrelevant for most development tasks. The system would handle IDEs, containers, and virtual machines without issue.

Student and office work: This is overkill. The CPU's 90th percentile performance is far beyond what office tasks require. The GPU is sufficient for basic 2D rendering and video playback, but the lack of display outputs means the integrated Radeon Graphics must handle display. This is a waste of CPU potential for typical student workloads.

Who Should Build It

The target user is a professional who needs massive CPU compute but has minimal GPU requirements. This includes software developers compiling large codebases, researchers running simulations, and data analysts processing large datasets. The CPU's 90th percentile ranking and high PassMark scores in encryption and compression make it suitable for database management and scientific computing.

Content creators who work primarily with CPU-based rendering (like Blender's Cycles CPU mode) would benefit, but the GPU limits real-time preview. The system is not for gamers, as the GPU's 50th percentile ranking and 4 GB VRAM are insufficient for modern titles at high settings. Small business workstations that run financial models or engineering simulations would find the CPU compelling, but they would need a different GPU for CAD work.

Students in engineering or computer science could use this for coursework, but the cost of the CPU is not justified by the GPU's low performance. The system is best described as a compute node with a basic display adapter. The combined percentile of 70 reflects this imbalance.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking?

A: The Ryzen 9 7900 is in the 90th percentile of all CPUs tested.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have?

A: The Intel Arc A350 has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the GPU?

A: The GPU has 124.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 9 7900 has ECC memory support.

Q: What is the TDP of the CPU?

A: The CPU TDP is 65 W.

Q: What is the suggested PSU for the GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the GPU is 200 W.

Q: Is the GPU still in production?

A: No, the production status is end-of-life.

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock?

A: The boost clock is 5.40 GHz.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A350 is a 6 nm chip (DG2-128) based on the Xe-HPG architecture, part of the Alchemist generation. It has 768 shading units, 48 TMUs, and 24 ROPs. The clock speed is a fixed 2000 MHz for both base and boost. Memory is 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, yielding 124.0 GB/s bandwidth. The memory clock is 1937 MHz, with 15.5 Gbps effective.

The GPU has 6 RT cores for ray tracing, and it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The FP32 performance is 3.072 TFLOPS, and FP16 is 6.144 TFLOPS (2:1). Pixel rate is 48.00 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 96.00 GTexel/s. The TDP is 25 W, and it has a single-slot design with no display outputs and no power connectors.

The GPU's benchmark scores are empty, and its percentile is exactly 50, which is the median. With no benchmark data, the ranking is based on specifications. The lack of display outputs is critical: this card cannot drive a monitor, so the system relies on the CPU's integrated Radeon Graphics for display. This makes the Arc A350 a compute-only accelerator.

The 4 GB VRAM is a major limitation for modern rendering. At 1080p, many games exceed 4 GB of VRAM at high textures. The 64-bit bus and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth are low compared to mainstream GPUs. The 6 RT cores are present, but the low shader count means ray tracing performance will be poor. The FP32 throughput of 3.072 TFLOPS is roughly half of what a mid-range card offers.

The GPU is end-of-life, with a successor in Battlemage. The data suggests this is a low-power accelerator for specific tasks, not a general-purpose gaming card. The 25 W TDP and 200 W suggested PSU indicate it is designed for systems where power efficiency is paramount.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU scores are extensive and strong. Cinebench R23 multi-core is 24,776, and single-core is 1,966. Geekbench multi-core is 17,726, and single-core is 2,495. 3DMark scores range from 1,069 (single thread) to 10,953 (max threads). PassMark multi-thread is 48,347, and single-thread is 4,130.

The CPU's average benchmark score is 49,228, placing it at the 90th percentile. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-14600KF, has an average score of 49,394, which is 0.3% higher. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G is 0.1% behind, and the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 is 0.5% behind. The Intel Xeon Gold 5318H is 1.1% behind. These small deltas mean the 7900 is effectively tied with the i5-14600KF in aggregate performance.

The GPU has no benchmark scores, so its percentile of 50 is based on its specification tier. The combined percentile of the CPU and GPU is 70. The data shows a stark contrast: the CPU is near the top of its class, while the GPU is exactly average. This means the system's overall performance is dragged down by the GPU.

For the combined picture, the system is a 70th percentile desktop. It will excel in CPU-bound tasks and lag in GPU-bound tasks. The lack of measured FPS data means no game-specific numbers exist, but the specifications suggest the GPU will be the bottleneck in any graphics-heavy workload.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build class system. The CPU is a 12-core, 24-thread Zen 4 processor with a 65 W TDP, and the GPU is a 25 W entry-level accelerator. The combined percentile is 70, which places it above average but below high-performance gaming rigs.

The pairing is unusual: a top-tier CPU with a bottom-tier GPU. The CPU is in the 90th percentile, and the GPU is in the 50th. This is a compute-first design, where the CPU does the heavy lifting and the GPU provides basic acceleration. The system is not balanced for gaming or graphics work.

The overall tier is mid-range, driven by the GPU's median position. The CPU alone would be high-end, but the GPU holds the system back. This is a workstation-style build for CPU-intensive tasks, not a gaming machine.

Balance and Bottleneck

The bottleneck is clearly the GPU. The CPU's 90th percentile performance far exceeds the GPU's 50th percentile. In gaming, the GPU will limit frame rates, as the CPU can easily feed it. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 3.072 TFLOPS will constrain resolution and settings.

In CPU-bound workloads like video encoding, software compilation, and 3D rendering in CPU mode, the CPU is the limiting factor only if the workload does not scale to 12 cores. The data shows the CPU scales well up to 16 threads, so most multi-threaded tasks will use it fully. The GPU is irrelevant in these cases.

The FPS scaling evidence is absent, as no measured FPS data exists. However, the specification gap implies that in any game, the GPU will be the constraint. The CPU will sit idle while the GPU works at full capacity. The system is imbalanced, and the GPU is the weak link.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. Therefore, all frame rate expectations are estimates based on benchmark scores.

The GPU has 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 4 GB of VRAM. This is entry-level. At 1080p, the GPU will likely achieve playable frame rates in esports titles like CS:GO or League of Legends, but AAA games at high settings will be challenging. The 4 GB VRAM will force lower textures in modern games.

At 1440p and 4K, the GPU is inadequate. The 64-bit memory bus and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth will severely limit performance. The CPU's high single-thread performance (PassMark single-thread 4,130) will not help if the GPU cannot render frames fast enough. The estimated frame rates are low, and the system is not recommended for gaming beyond casual titles.

The lack of display outputs on the GPU means the system must use the CPU's integrated Radeon Graphics for display. This complicates gaming, as the integrated graphics may handle the display while the Arc A350 computes. The data suggests this is not a gaming build, and users should expect significantly lower FPS than a dedicated gaming GPU would provide.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7900 + Intel Arc A350

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 7900

Intel Arc A350

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

FAQ

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds