SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7900 + Intel Arc A310E

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

84 Score

Top 16% Ranking

84 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

74%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7900

49,228 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A310E

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900 paired with the Intel Arc A310E is a desktop combination defined by an extreme imbalance: a 12-core, 24-thread Zen 4 processor sitting in the 90th percentile of all CPUs, driving a compact single-slot GPU that occupies only the 50th percentile of all graphics cards. The result is a build that behaves like a capable workstation with a display adapter, not a gaming rig. Note that no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the database — all frame-rate discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A310E is a small chip by any standard. It is built on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the DG2-128 die, fabricated by TSMC on a 6 nm process with 7,200 million transistors packed into a 157 mm² die at a density of 45.9M transistors per mm². The specifications read like an entry-level product: 768 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, 16 render output units, and 6 ray tracing cores. Raw compute tops out at 3.072 TFLOPS FP32, with FP16 running at a 2:1 ratio for 6.144 TFLOPS. There are no tensor cores listed in the data.

Memory is the defining constraint. The A310E carries 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, yielding just 124.0 GB/s of bandwidth, with memory clocked at 1937 MHz (15.5 Gbps effective). That is a fraction of what modern game engines expect, and it caps both texture quality and resolution headroom regardless of compute. Pixel rate is 32.00 GPixel/s and texture rate is 64.00 GTexel/s — figures that place hard ceilings on fill-rate-heavy rendering.

Clock behavior is unusual: base and boost are both listed at 2000 MHz, so there is effectively a single flat clock target. The card draws 75 W, fits a single slot with no power connectors required, and measures 168 mm long, 69 mm tall, and 20 mm wide — genuinely tiny. A 250 W power supply is the suggested pairing, which tells you how light this GPU's load really is. It connects over PCIe 4.0 x8 and offers four mini-DisplayPort 2.0 outputs, which is generous for multi-monitor setups. API support is modern: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6, and the ray tracing hardware exists even if the 6 RT cores and the 4 GB buffer make serious path-traced rendering impractical. Production status is end-of-life, with Battlemage listed as the successor line.

For rendering work specifically, the data shows a card meant for display output, light 2D acceleration, and modest media tasks — not GPU compute or real-time 3D rendering at scale.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU side of this pairing is thoroughly documented. The Ryzen 9 7900 scores 24776 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 1966 in single-core, 17726 in Geekbench multi-core and 2495 in single-core, and 48347 in PassMark multithread with 4130 in single-thread. Older suites corroborate: Cinebench R15 shows 4020 multi-core and 315 single-core. The 3DMark CPU scaling profile runs from 1069 single-thread and 2067 at 2 threads, through 3994 at 4 threads and 7454 at 8 threads, up to 10953 at maximum threads and 10056 in the 16-thread test.

The average benchmark score across the suite is 49228, placing the 7900 in the 90th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals sit almost exactly on top of it: the Intel Core i5-14600KF scores an average of 49394 (a -0.3% delta, meaning the Intel chip is marginally ahead), the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G averages 49196 (0.1% behind), the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 averages 48995 (0.5% behind), and the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H averages 48698 (1.1% behind). In aggregate terms this is a statistical dead heat with those rivals — a strong upper-mainstream CPU performance envelope.

The GPU side has no benchmark entries in the database at all: an empty benchmark list, an average score of 0, and no nearest-rival data. Its 50th percentile position versus all GPUs is the only ranking figure available, and it situates the A310E at the median of the graphics landscape — respectable for an entry card, but nowhere near what the CPU alongside it deserves.

The combined picture is stark. The build's combined percentile is 70, pulled down from the CPU's 90th by a mid-pack GPU. In any workload that touches graphics, the A310E is the story.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen 9 7900 is a Socket AM5 desktop processor built on AMD's Zen 4 architecture under the Raphael codename. It offers 12 cores and 24 threads, a 3.70 GHz base clock, and a 5.40 GHz boost clock, all within a 65 W TDP — an unusually low thermal envelope for this core count. The chip is manufactured by TSMC on a 5 nm process, contains 13,140 million transistors across a 2x 71 mm² die configuration, and supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel with 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth. ECC memory is supported, which matters for workstation and small-business reliability builds.

Cache is generous: 64 KB of L1 and 1 MB of L2 per core, plus 64 MB of shared L3. There is no 3D V-Cache variant data listed. The multiplier is unlocked, so overclocking headroom exists for builders who want it, and the platform provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the CPU. Integrated Radeon Graphics are present — a useful fallback if the discrete card is ever removed. The part sits in the 90th percentile of all CPUs.

What the scores mean in practice: the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24776 combined with the R15 multi-core of 4020 shows sustained throughput that handles heavily threaded rendering and compilation comfortably. The single-core figures — 1966 in R23, 2495 in Geekbench, 4130 in PassMark — indicate snappy per-thread responsiveness. The 3DMark thread scaling (7454 at 8 threads versus 10953 at max threads) shows the chip keeps gaining well past 8 threads, which benefits games and applications that can spread load. PassMark subsystem scores reinforce the all-rounder profile: 164075 integer math, 97943 floating point, 42253 extended instructions, 577847 data compression, 34708 encryption, 68474 string sorting, 380 on prime finding, and 3059 physics. Against rivals, the aggregate data puts it level with the Core i5-14600KF and ahead of the Xeon Gold 5318H by 1.1% on average — a server-class part — which frames the 7900 as workstation-adjacent performance in a desktop socket.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This is where the pairing fails. With the GPU at the 50th percentile and only 4 GB of VRAM on a 64-bit bus, estimated frame rates in modern AAA titles at high settings will be limited by the A310E long before the 90th-percentile CPU breaks a sweat. Esports titles at reduced settings are the realistic ceiling.

Streaming: The CPU alone could encode and multitask without issue given 24 threads and the 48347 PassMark multithread score. But streaming gameplay means gaming first, and the GPU becomes the wall. A streamer would need a different graphics card.

Video editing: Timeline scrubbing and effects previews lean on the GPU and its 124.0 GB/s of bandwidth — a bottleneck for high-resolution footage. Exports and codecs, however, run on the CPU, where the 24776 R23 multi-core score and 577847 data compression result deliver genuinely fast throughput.

3D rendering: CPU rendering is a strength — 12 cores, 24 threads, and a Cinebench profile that keeps scaling to maximum threads. GPU rendering is not viable at scale: 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 and 4 GB of memory rule out serious GPU-accelerated path tracing.

Software development: The strongest scenario for this build. Compilation benefits directly from the multi-core scores, string sorting at 68474 and encryption at 34708 support toolchain-heavy work, and the A310E comfortably drives the four mini-DisplayPort outputs for a multi-monitor coding setup.

Student and office work: Excellent fit. The 65 W TDP keeps the system quiet and cool, ECC support adds reliability, single-thread scores of 1966 (R23) and 2495 (Geekbench) guarantee responsiveness in office suites and browsers, and the tiny single-slot GPU fits compact cases.

Balance and Bottleneck

This is one of the most lopsided pairings the database is likely to show. The CPU sits at the 90th percentile; the GPU sits at the 50th. A 40-point gap in percentile terms means that in every graphics-bound workload — games at any modern resolution, GPU rendering, video preview — the A310E is the hard limit. Estimated FPS scaling will flatline as resolution and settings rise because the 64-bit bus and 124.0 GB/s of bandwidth saturate, while the 7900's cores idle.

Flip the workload CPU-ward and the picture inverts. Compilation, compression, physics, and multi-threaded rendering all run at the 7900's level — statistically tied with the Core i5-14600KF (avgScore 49394, deltaPct -0.3) and ahead of the Xeon Gold 5318H. The combined percentile of 70 quantifies the mismatch: a top-decile CPU dragged twenty points down by a median GPU. The correct upgrade path is obvious and singular — replace the A310E, and the combined figure rises immediately. Replace the 7900 instead, and nothing changes in graphics workloads.

Who Should Build It

The target user is not a gamer. This configuration suits developers, students, and small-business workstation builders who need the 12-core, 24-thread throughput for compilation, data processing, or virtualization and who need only display output plus light GPU acceleration. The four mini-DisplayPort 2.0 outputs make it a natural multi-monitor office or trading machine. ECC support on the AM5 platform strengthens the case for small-business reliability builds. Content creators doing CPU-bound exports (the 577847 compression score and 24776 R23 multi-core result) but not GPU-bound previews can also use it. Gamers at 1080p, 1440p, or 4K should not build this — the 50th-percentile GPU with 4 GB of VRAM will not deliver those experiences at high settings regardless of the CPU's 90th-percentile pedigree. The Ryzen 9 7900 carries a launch MSRP of $429, positioning it as a serious processor; the A310E, now end-of-life, is fundamentally an accessory to it.

Gaming Performance

As noted, no measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU and GPU combination in the database, so the figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores rather than measurements. Based on the A310E's 50th-percentile GPU ranking, 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, 4 GB of GDDR6, and 124.0 GB/s of bandwidth, expectations should be modest. At 1080p with settings reduced below ultra, older and lighter titles should remain playable; at ultra settings in modern games, estimated frame rates fall into ranges unsuitable for smooth play, with VRAM capacity likely the first wall hit when texture quality rises. At 1440p and 4K the estimates worsen considerably given the fill-rate limits of 32.00 GPixel/s. Ray tracing, despite the 6 RT cores, is not realistically enabled in demanding titles. In every gaming scenario, the 7900's CPU scores — including 3DMark results up to 10953 at max threads — indicate the processor would support far higher frame rates than the GPU can feed, confirming the A310E as the sole limiter.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build (buildClass: desktop) pairing AMD's Ryzen 9 7900 — a Zen 4 (Raphael) 7000-series processor released on January 13, 2023, with 12 cores, 24 threads, a 5.40 GHz boost clock, and a 65 W TDP on Socket AM5 — with Intel's Arc A310E, an Alchemist (Arc 3) generation card on the Xe-HPG architecture released March 31, 2024 and now end-of-life. Overall tier, judged by the numbers: upper-tier processing power (CPU percentile 90) matched to mid-tier graphics (GPU percentile 50), producing a combined percentile of 70. The platform itself is forward-looking — PCIe Gen 5 with 24 CPU lanes, DDR5 support, and an AM5 socket — which makes the weak GPU the only dead end in the configuration. Swap that one component and the build's standing changes immediately.

FAQ

Q: Is this build good for gaming?

A: No. The GPU sits at the 50th percentile with 4 GB of VRAM and 124.0 GB/s of bandwidth, while the CPU sits at the 90th percentile. Every graphics-bound workload is limited by the Arc A310E.

Q: How does the Ryzen 9 7900 compare to its rivals?

A: Its average benchmark score of 49228 puts it within a fraction of a percent of the Intel Core i5-14600KF (avgScore 49394, deltaPct -0.3), slightly ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G (49196, 0.1%) and Intel Core Ultra 5 245 (48995, 0.5%), and 1.1% ahead of the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H.

Q: Can this build handle video editing?

A: Partially. CPU-side exports benefit from the 24776 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and 24 threads, but preview and playback lean on the A310E's limited compute and bandwidth, which caps performance with high-resolution footage.

Q: Does the Arc A310E need a power connector?

A: No. It draws 75 W, requires no power connectors, occupies a single slot, and Intel suggests a 250 W power supply for the card.

Q: Does the build support ECC memory?

A: Yes. The Ryzen 9 7900 supports ECC on its Socket AM5 platform with DDR5 memory, which suits reliability-focused workstation use.

Q: Are the FPS numbers for games measured?

A: No. No measured FPS data exists for this combination; all frame-rate expectations are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and percentile positions.

Q: What is the main upgrade path?

A: Replace the GPU. The CPU's 90th percentile ranking means it can drive far stronger graphics cards, and the PCIe Gen 5 platform with 24 CPU lanes provides the connectivity to do so.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7900 + Intel Arc A310E

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 7900

Intel Arc A310E

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

CPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

Gaming Performance

Build Overview

FAQ

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds